本研究旨在瞭解新北市國民中小學校長評鑑之實施現況，並探討已參與「新北市國民中小學校長評鑑規劃及試辦計畫第一階段至第三階段」之受評校長，對校長評鑑實施現況之看法，進而檢核該評鑑符合人事評鑑後設評鑑四大標準-「適切性」、「效用性」、「可行性」及「精確性」之程度，最後歸納分析作成結論，並提出具體建議。 本研究採問卷調查法，以「新北市國民中小學校長評鑑之後設評鑑研究調查問卷」為研究工具，針對已參與「新北市國民中小學校長評鑑規劃及試辦計畫第一階段至第三階段」之68位學校校長為問卷調查對象，共寄出36份正式施測問卷，回收有效問卷共31份，以獨立樣本t考驗及單因子變異數分析進行統計。此外，本研究亦採取個案訪談法，以「新北市國民中小學校長評鑑之後設評鑑研究訪談大綱」為研究工具，針對已參與「新北市國民中小學校長評鑑規劃及試辦計畫第一階段至第三階段」之受評校長及評鑑規劃小組成員進行訪談，共計3人，以期深入瞭解新北市實施國民中小學校長評鑑之現況。 依據研究目的、綜合文獻探討、問卷調查分析及個案訪談結果，整理歸納本研究結果如下： 一、北市實施國民中小學校長評鑑在各層面均獲得認同，以適切性層面表現最佳，其次依序為精確性、可行性及效用性層面。 二、「學歷」變項在「適切性」層面具有顯著差異，碩士學歷之受評校長認同程度較高。 三、「學歷」變項在「效用性」層面具有顯著差異，碩士學歷之受評校長認同程度較高。 四、「學歷」變項在「可行性」層面具有顯著差異，碩士學歷之受評校長認同程度較高。 五、「學歷」及「學校規模」變項在「精確性」層面具有顯著差異，碩士學歷之受評校長認同程度較高。 六、新北市實施國民中小學校長評鑑尚屬可行，惟在評鑑計畫反映社會大眾期待、評鑑結果運用、回饋建議符合學校個殊性、評鑑過程兼顧量化及質性資料蒐集等方面可再加強。 七、新北市實施國民中小學校長評鑑能真實反應校長辦學情形，最有幫助之處在於協助校長檢視個人辦學優劣。 最後，本研究針對教育行政機關及未來研究提出具體建議。 關鍵字：校長評鑑、後設評鑑、後設評鑑標準 / The purpose of this research is to realize the implement status of elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City, and to explore the elementary school and junior high school principals’ opinions on this evaluation. By examining the degree of the propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy dimension this evaluation gets, suggestions in accordance with the result of the research are made for improvements. The study adopted questionnaire survey, and the tool was “Questionnaire of meta-evaluation of elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City”. The research subjects were elementary school and junior high school principals who participated the first stage to the third stage elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City were surveyed. A total of 36 questionnaires were distributed; 31 valid returned ones were analyzed. Statistical techniques used include t-tests and one-way ANOVA. An interview research was also adopted in this study. 2 principals and 1 faculty who participated the first stage to the third stage elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City were selected in order to get more information about the evaluation. According to the findings of the research, conclusions were summarized as followings: 1.The principal evaluation of elementary school and junior high school is approved in the propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy dimension. The propriety dimension gets the highest scores, followed by accuracy, feasibility, and utility dimension. 2.In the propriety dimension, there is 1 significant difference in the educational background. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 3.In the utility dimension, there is 1 significant difference in the educational background. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 4.In the feasibility dimension, there is 1 significant difference in the educational background. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 5.In the accuracy dimension, there are 2 significant differences in the educational background and the number of school classes. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 6.It’s feasible to implement the principal evaluation of elementary school and junior high school in New Taipei City, but it should be strengthened in the evaluation plan reflects community expectation, evaluation finding uses, the proposal of evaluation reporting is consistent with the different schools’ characteristics. Evaluation process taking into account the qualitative and quantitative data collection. 7.The principal evaluation of elementary school and junior high school in New Taipei City can truly reflects principals’ managing performance. The most helpful thing is to assist principals who examine their merits and shortcomings. Finally, the study provides suggestions to the administrative department and future researchers as reference resources. Key words：principal evaluation；meta-evaluation；meta-evaluation standards

本研究旨在建構大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標－以JCSEE方案評鑑標準為基礎，並提出結論與建議，以供大學實施系所自我評鑑之參考。 研究方法上，先以文獻分析初擬出大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標，接著以專家問卷進行指標的刪修和確定，再利用模糊德菲術問卷整合專家學者對指標重要性之看法，最後以歸一化方式求得各指標的權重，完成我國大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論如下： 一、本研究建構之大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標，計有五大類，三十個標準，六十項指標。 二、參考「JCSEE方案評鑑標準」建構大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標，其方法可行。 三、本研究建構之大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑五大類標準中，以「適切性標準」較為重要。 四、大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑各類別標準中，分別以「有意義的過程和結果」、「脈絡的可行性」、「回應與包容導向」、「可靠的資訊」、「評鑑檔案化」較重要。 最後，本研究根據研究結果，提出相關建議，俾供教育主管機關、大學系所以及後續研究之參考。 / The purpose of the study is to construct of meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation - based on the JCSEE program evaluation standards, in order to provide conclusions and suggestions for the university to implement the departmental self-evaluation. According to the research methods, first, through the analysis of literature review, it preliminarily develops the meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation. Second, the expert’s questionnaires modified the preliminary indicators. Third, by using the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire about important indicators evaluated by experts are integrated. Final, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each indicator, establishing the meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation. The main conclusions follow: 1. The meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation consist with five major categories, 30 standards, 60 indicators in total. 2. The method is feasible that constructing the meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation based on the JCSEE program evaluation standards. 3. The meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation consist of five major categories, the ‘propriety standards’ is the most important. 4. The meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation consists with 30 standards, ‘meaningful processes and products’ in utility standards, ‘contextual viability’ in feasibility standards, ‘responsive and inclusive orientation’ in propriety standards, ‘valid information’ in accuracy standards, and ‘evaluation documentation’ in evaluation accountability standards are the most important. In conclusion, the findings and results in the hope of providing suggestions for educational administrative institutions, university departments, and future studies.

本研究旨在瞭解臺中市國民小學校長辦學績效評鑑之實施現況，並探討國民小學教育人員對校長辦學績效評鑑的看法，進而檢核該評鑑符合後設評鑑標準「適當性」、「效用性」、「可行性」與「精確性」之程度，最後最後依結論提出具體建議。 本研究採問卷調查法，以「臺中市國民小學校長辦學績效評鑑之後設評鑑調查問卷」為研究工具，針對參與臺中市九十七學年度至九十九學年度第一學期「臺中市高級中等以下學校校長辦學績效評鑑實施計畫」之學校教育人員為問卷調查對象，共寄發180份問卷，回收有效問卷共159份，以t考驗與單因子變異數分析進行統計分析。此外，亦採取專家訪談法，以「臺中市國民小學校長辦學績效評鑑之後設評鑑訪談大綱」為研究工具，針對參與臺中市九十七學年度至九十九學年度第一學期「臺中市高級中等以下學校校長辦學績效評鑑實施計畫」之校長為研究對象進行訪談工作，共計3位校長，以期深入瞭解臺中市實施校長辦學績效評鑑之現況。 綜合文獻探討與研究結果之發現，歸納可得研究結論如下： 一、 臺中市校長辦學績效評鑑在各層面均獲得認同，以適當性層面表現最佳，其次依序為可行性、精確性與效用性層面。 二、 性別、年齡與職務在適當性層面具有顯著差異，男性、資深教育人員與非校長職之教育人員認同度較高。 三、 性別、年齡與職務在效用性層面具有顯著差異，男性、資深教育人員與非校長職之教育人員認同度較高。 四、 年齡與職務在可行性層面具有顯著差異，資深教育人員與主任認同度較高。 五、 性別、年齡與職務在精確性層面具有顯著差異，男性、資深教育人員與主任認同度較高。 六、 校長辦學績效評鑑之作法可行，惟在評鑑之人員可信度、報告功能性、結果運用、客觀性、資訊辯護性、追蹤輔導等方面可加以改進。 七、 校長辦學績效評鑑能真實反應校長辦學情形，最有幫助之處在於藉由檢視歷年辦學成果有助提升辦學績效。 最後，本研究針對教育行政主管機關、學校與後續研究提出具體建議。 / entary school faculties’ opinions on this evaluation. By examining the degree of the propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy dimension this evaluation gets, suggestions in accordance with the result of the research are made for improvements. Elementary school faculties whose schools participated in the evaluation of elementary school principals’ managing performance in Taichung City in the academic years of 2008 to 2010 were surveyed. A total of 180 questionnaires were distributed; 159 valid returned ones were analyzed. Statistical techniques used include t-tests and one-way ANOVA. An interview research was also adopted in this study. 3 principals participating in the evaluation of elementary school principals’ managing performance in Taichung City in the academic years of 2008 to 2010 were selected in order to get more information about the evaluation. According to the findings of the research, conclusions were summarized as followings: 1. The evaluation of elementary school principals’ managing performance is approved in the propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy dimension. The propriety dimension gets the highest scores, followed by feasibility, accuracy and utility dimension. 2. In the propriety dimension, there are significant differences in the gender, age and current position. Male, senior, and non-principal school faculties have higher agreement. 3. In the utility dimension, there are significant differences in the gender, age and current position. Male, senior, and non-principal school faculties have higher agreement. 4. In the feasibility dimension, there are significant differences in the age and current position. Senior school faculties and school directors have higher agreement. 5. In the accuracy dimension, there are significant differences in the gender, age and current position. Male, senior school faculties and school directors have higher agreement. 6. It’s feasible to implement the evaluation of elementary school principals’ managing performance, but it should be strengthened in the evaluators’ reliability, functional reporting, finding uses, objectivity, defensible information, and track and assistance. 7. The evaluation of elementary school principals’ managing performance can truly reflect principals’ managing performance. The most helpful thing is to enhance the managing performance by reviewing the school achievement every year. Finally, the study provides suggestions to the administrative department and future researchers as reference resources.

本研究之目的主要在探討國民中小學校長評鑑系統的建構及有關研究。所採用的研究方法包括：文獻分析、問卷調查與訪談法。在文獻分析方面：分別就校長評鑑系統建構的基本理念、可能的探究取向與模式、英美兩國與國內國中小校長評鑑系統的發展情形、校長評鑑系統的後設評鑑標準與可能存在的問題等加以探討。在實證研究方面：以自編調查工具，對各縣市教育行政人員、國中小校長、主任、教師、家長與教育學者，就規劃實施國中小校長評鑑系統的三階段歷程要素、後設評鑑標準與可能存在的問題等，進行問卷調查與訪談。綜合本研究的結論發現：國中小校長評鑑系統的建構有其重要性，落實校長評鑑可協助校長提升辦學效能。而校長評鑑系統建構的理論與實務已日趨完善，在規劃過程中可參考不同的探究取向與英美兩國的實務經驗，讓校長評鑑系統的規劃能更為完備。此外，「教育評鑑標準聯合委員會」所發展的「教育人員評鑑標準」，不僅可用來協助規劃設計國中小校長評鑑系統，亦可以之進行現有校長評鑑系統的後設評鑑，妥當的應用可確保校長評鑑系統符合正當性（prophey）、效益性（utility）、可行性 （feasibility）與正確性（accuracy）標準。完整的國中小校長評鑑系統可分成三個階段，各階段均有應遵循的原則。做好規劃設計階段的工作是成功的第一步；資料蒐集階段應能正確而完整的蒐集資訊並遵循評鑑倫理；評鑑結果與處理階段，亦應配合評鑑目的，務實的做好各項後續工作，並作必要的決定。而評鑑歷程中務必遵守正當程序與保密原則，妥善保管資料並規範查閱程序，以保障受評校長的權益。最後本研究依上述研究結論，分別針對教育行政機關、國中小校長及其他利害關係人，綜合提出規劃實施國中小校長評鑑系統的建議。 關鍵字：校長評鑑、評鑑系統、評鑑模式、後設評鑑、評鑑標準 / The aim of this study is mainly to investigate the construction of the principal evaluation system of elementary and junior high schools and its related issues. The research methods included document analysis, questionnaires and interviews. The analysis of documents covered the basic concepts of the construction of principal evaluation systems, possible research approaches and models, the development of school principal evaluation in Taiwan as well as in the United States and Britain, meta-evaluation standards, and potential problems. A field study was conducted to explore the factors of the three phases of the design and implementation of a principal evaluation system, the meta-evaluation standards, and potential problems. It has employed questionnaire surveys and interviews to gather information from local government education administrators, school principals, deans, teachers, parents, and education academics. It has been found that the construction of school principal evaluation systems is more important than ever, and it could help raising school effectiveness. The construction of principal evaluation systems has been maturing in both theory and practice. Consulting different theoretical approaches and the practice of the United States and Britain makes the planning of principal evaluation systems comprehensive. Furthermore, the Personnel Evaluation Standards, developed by the Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation in the United States, not only can serve as criteria for designing systems for school principal evaluation, they can be used to meta-evaluate ongoing principal evaluation systems as well. Applied appropriately, they should ensure that the standards of propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy are maintained in the principal evaluation system. A comprehensive system for school principal evaluation consists of three phases and each has its own rules to follow. The first phase is to plan and design it deliberately. Information should be gathered accurately and completely in the phase while the evaluation ethics is abided by. The consequent works should be taken care of in line with the purpose of the evaluation in the third phase of the processing of evaluation results. Necessary decisions should be made accordingly. Due process and confidentiality should be observed when implementing the evaluation. There should be an appropriate set of rules governing procedures of access to evaluation reports and data to protect the rights of the principals evaluated. According to the conclusions above, this research has offered some propositions regarding the planning and implementation of school principal evaluation systems. These propositions are aimed at education administrations, school principals, and other stakeholders. Keywords: principal evaluation, principal appraisal, evaluation system, evaluation model, meta-evaluation, evaluation standard,

基於教育指標客觀而精簡的特性，本研究嘗試建立一套適合當前教育環境的「我國高級中學後設評鑑指標權重體系」。其方法首先經由文獻探討，分析國內外關於教育指標及後設評鑑的相關研究，並以此建立我國高級中學後設評鑑指標調查問卷初稿。再利用得懷術，結合專家學者智慧修正指標。最後則以臺灣區公、私立高級中學校長為對象寄發問卷，有效樣本123位，並以因素分析法計算後設評鑑指標權重。據此，本研究建構完成之「我國高級中學後設評鑑指標之權重體系」，其結果顯示： 一、「我國高級中學後設評鑑指標之權重體系」中，一級指標包括「評鑑規劃階段」，權重值.204、「評鑑設計階段」，權重值.226、「評鑑實施階段」，權重值.233、「評鑑結果階段」，權重值.220、「結果利用與檢討階段」，權重值.228。 二、一級指標中之「評鑑規劃階段」，下轄「評鑑目的」、「評鑑計畫」、「規劃人員」等三個二級指標，其權重值依序為.391、.402、.379，二級指標下共有11個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。 三、一級指標中之「評鑑設計階段」，下轄「評鑑方式」、「評鑑表與評鑑標準」、「評鑑組織及人員」等三個二級指標，其權重值依序為.373、.378、.371，二級指標下共有12個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。 四、一級指標中之「評鑑實施階段」，下轄「溝通與協調」、「評鑑資料蒐集方法」、「學校自評過程」、「訪視評鑑過程」等四個二級指標，其權重值依序為.286、.298、.280、.296，二級指標下共有17個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。 五、一級指標中之「評鑑結果階段」，下轄「評鑑資料分析」、「評鑑報告」、「評鑑結果公佈」等三個二級指標，其權重值依序為.358、.362、.359，二級指標下共有13個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。 六、一級指標中之「結果利用與檢討階段」，下轄「評鑑結果的利用」、「評鑑結果的檢討」等二個二級指標，其權重值皆為.523，二級指標下共有10個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。 此外，本研究也針對得懷術及因素分析方法的運用進行分析與檢討，最後並針對實務應用及未來後續研究方向等提出具體的建議。 / The purpose of this study is to establish the meta-evaluation indicators and the weight system of senior-high school in Taiwan.First,we used document analysis to establish the primary scales of meta-evaluation indicators of senior-high school in Taiwan(M.E.I.S.T.).Then,we used the delphi technique to improve the primary scales.Finally, 123 principles of senior-high school in Taiwan were investigated, and we used factor analysis to calculate the weights of M.E.I.S.T.. The main conclusion of this study are as follows: (1)The first-order indicators of M.E.I.S.T. include “the stage of evaluation formulation”,” the stage of evaluation design”, “the stage of evaluation implementation”, “the stage of evaluation results”,“the stage of use and discussion of results”. The weights for each indicator is .204,.226,.233,.220,and.228. (2)There are 3 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation formulation”.They are “The evaluation purpose”, “The evaluation plan”, “The staff of planning”. The weights for each indicator is .391, .402, .379.There are 11 third-order indicators under them. (3) There are 3 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation design ”.They are “The evaluation ways”, “The evaluation scales and criterias ”, “The organizations and staff”. The weights for each indicator is .373, .378, .371. There are 12 third-order indicators under them. (4) There are 4 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation implementation”.They are “The communication and negotiation”,“The data collection”,“The self-evaluation process”, “ The external evaluation process”.The weights for each indicator is .286, . 298, .280, .296. There are 17 third-order indicators under them. (5) There are 3 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation results”.They are “The data analysis”, “The evaluation report ”,“The disclosure of results”. The weights for each indicator is .358, .362, .359. There are 13 third-order indicators under them. (6) There are 2 second-order indicators under“The stage of use and discussion of results.”.They are “The use of results ”, “The discussion of results ”. Both of the weights are .523. There are 10 third-order indicators under them. Besides,this study also discusses the implementation of delphi technique and factor analysis. At the end of the study also proposes some concrete suggestions for practical and further study.