1 |
公部門危機之跨域治理:德翔臺北貨櫃輪擱淺事件個案分析 / Cross-boundary governance on crisis management in the public sector:a case study of the grounded謝楊永 Unknown Date (has links)
當公部門遇到突發的災害事件時,會依據災害防救體系進行危機管理,然而各部門會有各自專業領域,需要摒除本位主義進行跨部門協力合作。因此在跨域治理時,機關間常常因權責劃分不清而導致管轄權緊張,如何去化解緊張關係為本研究重要的課題。本次以德翔臺北貨櫃輪擱淺事件進行探討,原本以為是單純的船舶擱淺事件,後續卻延伸海洋油汙染的重大問題,屬於海難導致油汙染的複合性災害,在事件處理過程中,如何讓各機關及私部門進行公私協力合作並且減少衝突發生,考驗者主政者如何進行溝通協調及建立信賴夥伴關係。而本次研究目的為瞭解發生海難事故的緊急應變及分工機制外,進一步探討過程中遭遇困難時如何跨域協調,並藉由學者Kettl所提到的跨域治理需突破五項疆界圍籬,分別為任務、資源、能力、責任及課責等五大原因進行分析,找出各部門間產生的關係緊張原因,再利用跨部門協力的管理策略,找出處理過程產生的跨域問題。本研究利用文獻分析、個案研究及深度訪談法,找出跨域問題的癥結點後,回頭檢視事件後修訂之重大海洋油汙染緊急應變計畫,其中最主要變革為海難導致油汙染事件將由交通部主政,在法規面向可將事權統一,然而修法並非萬靈丹,如何藉由管理策略達成跨部門協力才是主要目標。
|
2 |
我國政府三大緊急應變體系功能整合之研究-跨域治理理論之應用 / The study on functional intergration of three emergency response systems in taiwan govenmance-the application of cross-bountary theory張念華, Chang, Nien Hua Unknown Date (has links)
政府存在的目的,在維持人民基本的生活水準,在促使民眾能在自由、安和、樂利的平等的社會環境,並透過與運用法律、道德所允許的公權力手段,以促進社會的繁榮為最高之宗旨;但在目前政府處理危機緊急應變機制計有國土安全會報、災害防救會報及全民防衛動員準備業務會報(此即政府三大緊急應變體系)等,並自2005年起推動合併運作迄今,在中央政府之作法,似已達實際聯合運作與資源整合之效益,然在實際運作情形因需涉及中央與地方間權責分工關係?各公民營事業機構等體系能否協同運作之勾聯?等問題,現有運作並非如此順暢,究其原因係政府在面對新型態的危機發生時,三大應變體系聯合運作所能回應與處理的緊急應變處置作為,不僅未能有效的解決危機與事件所引發的問題,甚者更成為危機處置的亂源與礙手礙腳始作俑者;實有再予檢視與探討空間,以期建立一個權責相符且明確的緊急應變機制。
本文試圖以運用跨域治理為出發點,謹就政府目前積極推動之國土安全、災害防救及全民防衛動員準備業務(此即政府三大緊急應變體系)上聯合運作既存的困境,究其緣由乃此三應變體系皆屬危機管理範疇,各體系內所包含之工作項目與所涉單位甚多,任務屬性與編組成員重疊度極高,甚者尚可包含公(私)營事業機構,故亦應屬跨域治理之特徵,此三者之間關係應緊密運作且具關聯性。然從自2005年起政府積極推動情形下,縱然掌握最大的緊急應變資源與能量,但從歷次處理各項災後或危機應變等工作,卻往往是成為社會與民眾所責難焦點,何以如此呢?實因在於政府的緊急應變處置的機制紛亂不一所致,況且今日台灣面臨全球化所造成的衝擊,環境的變遷導致複合式災害所形成的危機出現層出不窮、社會科技上多元技術的需求以及民眾普遍要求全面的危機管理與跨域治理,故本文主要乃是以「跨域治理」與「危機管理理論」作為基礎論點,藉由文獻探討、焦點座談及問卷調查等方式,檢視三大應變體系聯合運作政府與民間的豐沛資源,運用網際網絡之功能與跨域治理的模式,才能達到凝聚總體資源,群策群力共同處理危機。 / The primary purpose of the government existence is maintaining the integrity of the people's basic living standard, encouraging people to have freedom, peace, and equality. Furthermore, under the law and morality, by means of public power to promote social prosperity. Since 2005, the Taiwan government has amalgamated and promoted the joint operation of three urgent strain response systems which includes homeland security council, disaster council, and national defense mobilization council (these three are the urgent strain response systems of Taiwan Government). The government's approach seems to have reached the joint operation of resources integration of benefits. However, in the actual operation, the problems were emerged from the conflict involved between Central and local authorities, the responsibilities between the public and private utilities, and how to implement the operation of the system of cooperative association. To trace the causes, the joint operation of three major urgent strain response systems is incapable to respond and handle emergency disposal when facing a new state crisis. Moreover, it might cause the crisis of the source of chaos and drag initiator. Definitely, there is a need for further review and assessment to establish a consistent and clear responsibilities among these three urgent strain response systems.
This article attempts to use cross-domain governance as a starting point to assess the system. The government impetus the urgent strain of government presently, the three urgent strain response systems are the part of crisis management which includes lots of work and connections with other majority organizations. Because the association constitutes various members base on the different tasks, some members may belong to different divisions. Even the enterprises which run by the local people are the members of the “cross-boundary governance” which should be closely related each other. Since 2005, the government has actively promoting circumstances, even the government has enough information and resources of handling emergency situation, this government (administration) still censured by the public. The reason is that the emergency structure of our government is out of frame and inconsistence. In addition, Taiwan is facing the high pressure of becoming globalization. The impact of changes of the environment resulted in the formation of compound disaster crises emerged, the needs of diverse technologies and social science and people generally demand comprehensive crisis management along with cross-domain administration, so this paper is based on “cross-boundary governance” and “crisis management”, by using the literature reviews, seminars and workshops, questionnaires and surveys to assess the joint operation of three urgent strain systems of Taiwan Government, and the public use of the vast resources, to apply the internet functions and cross-domain governance model, will be able to reach the overall resources and effectively integrating the common crisis management of Taiwan Government.
|
Page generated in 0.1197 seconds