現階段我國國防戰略目標為「預防戰爭、國土防衛、應變制變、防範衝突、區域穩定」，以「防衛固守、有效嚇阻」為軍事戰略構想，並透過建構固若磐石的國防武力，使任何想侵犯台灣的軍事行為不敢輕舉妄動，然而，當戰事不可避免時，國防及戰爭並非單純的軍事行動與軍人的責任，全國軍民無人能置身事外。 後備軍人輔導組織自民國55年成立至今，所屬輔導幹部均秉持著犧牲、奉獻的精神經營各地方，協助政府推動全民國防政策及整合全民防衛動員力量，期達全民參與、全民信賴及總體防衛的全民防衛動員體系，具體實踐全民國防政策。此外，後備軍人輔導組織所推展的「組織、宣傳、安全、服務」之後備軍人四大工作，均在實際參與各項工作中累積相當的經驗。因此，後備軍人輔導組織如何有效整合全民總體力量，支援全民防衛動員，達成全民國防的最終目標，成為為本研究的重點。 我國全民國防制度是一個能凝聚全民共識、保衛國土安全的機制，後備軍人輔導組亦是機制中的一環，是國軍整體戰力的樞紐，更是國家生存發展的關鍵，所以對於後備軍人輔導組織與全民國防的研究，有其絕對的重要性。

當前我國國防政策的基本目標為「預防戰爭、國土防衛、反恐制變」，為確保目標之達成，現階段之各項國防整備措施及建軍備戰作為，須仰賴國軍推動必要的轉型，建立一支彈性快速、高作戰性能，以及能夠滿足多元國防任務的現代化軍隊，以期能「以革新提升實力，以實力確保和平」，有效保障國家安全與國民福祉。自國軍推行「精實案」、「精進案」後，兵力結構改變，台澎防衛作戰仍以三軍聯合作戰為主要型態，但最後成敗關鍵，動員整備工作的落實與否成了很重要的因素；現行組織之編組與做法，仍有若干問題存在，亟應朝法制化、常軌化發展，建立全民防衛動員工作之正常體制與良好運作環境，方能切合時代潮流，有效發揮全民防衛戰力。 全民防衛動員成功關鍵，必須以「全民國防」的意識及作為支撐，才能夠將「有效嚇阻、防衛固守」的戰略構想賦予具體內容。其所追求的目標是：「全民關注、全民支持、全民參與」，平時透過「全民國防教育法」的各項積極作為教育民眾，支持政府從事各項國防建設，喚起民眾憂患意識，落實全民心防，端正社會風氣；進入戰時狀態即依據「全民防衛動員準備法」，整合軍民之力量，建構生命共同體，擴展愛鄉、愛國之心胸，消弭統獨族群爭議，建立正確敵情觀念，以因應威脅國家安全的各種狀況。這些重點工作，個人期望能在全民防衛動員戰略規劃中，具體將國家整體資源及社會民物力運用，做深入探討，以試圖提出今後對建軍備戰的具體建議。 / At this time point, the fundamental goal of our policies of National Defense is “Prevent the war from, the national territory defends, anti- perhaps system changes”. In order to accompolish this goal,two transitions need take place: The national defense reorganizes and outfits the measure and sets up the armament war conduct and actions.To meet the expecfation of " Promote the strength with the innovation, insure the peace with the strength" a modern troop with high flexibility and high performance,which cancomplete National Defensive mission is requined. Although the army Structure has slightly changed after the national army started “Solid case, aggressive case of the main form of Taiwan Pon Hoo Denfensive war is The armed forces consociation battles.The key to success still depends on the execution of Mobilize to reorganize and outfit the work in order to demonstrate National Defensive Force. The key to the success of All the people defends to mobilize must be supported by the concept of Civil national defense in order to materialize the strategy of Deter, defend to keep without change effectively.The aim is All the people pays attention to, all the people support, all the people participates,the Bureau of National Defense edvcates the citizens to support National Dofease and rectify social trend. Arouse the people the disaster realizes, carrying out the civil mental defence.When at war, All the people defends to mobilize to prepare the method will be activated to integrate forces of soldiers and people,construct Common body of life,demonstrate patriotism,solve the dispute of The is only the ethnicity controversy,and develop the cornect Condition of the enemy idea,in order to cope with any condition that could thneateu national security.These issues will be discussed in my All the people mobilizes the strategy programming and I will also discuss about how to fully utilize National Resources and social Force Social people's material resources in order to give specifiz suggestions on Set up the soldier general quarter .

政府存在的目的，在維持人民基本的生活水準，在促使民眾能在自由、安和、樂利的平等的社會環境，並透過與運用法律、道德所允許的公權力手段，以促進社會的繁榮為最高之宗旨；但在目前政府處理危機緊急應變機制計有國土安全會報、災害防救會報及全民防衛動員準備業務會報(此即政府三大緊急應變體系)等，並自2005年起推動合併運作迄今，在中央政府之作法，似已達實際聯合運作與資源整合之效益，然在實際運作情形因需涉及中央與地方間權責分工關係？各公民營事業機構等體系能否協同運作之勾聯？等問題，現有運作並非如此順暢，究其原因係政府在面對新型態的危機發生時，三大應變體系聯合運作所能回應與處理的緊急應變處置作為，不僅未能有效的解決危機與事件所引發的問題，甚者更成為危機處置的亂源與礙手礙腳始作俑者；實有再予檢視與探討空間，以期建立一個權責相符且明確的緊急應變機制。 本文試圖以運用跨域治理為出發點，謹就政府目前積極推動之國土安全、災害防救及全民防衛動員準備業務(此即政府三大緊急應變體系)上聯合運作既存的困境，究其緣由乃此三應變體系皆屬危機管理範疇，各體系內所包含之工作項目與所涉單位甚多，任務屬性與編組成員重疊度極高，甚者尚可包含公(私)營事業機構，故亦應屬跨域治理之特徵，此三者之間關係應緊密運作且具關聯性。然從自2005年起政府積極推動情形下，縱然掌握最大的緊急應變資源與能量，但從歷次處理各項災後或危機應變等工作，卻往往是成為社會與民眾所責難焦點，何以如此呢？實因在於政府的緊急應變處置的機制紛亂不一所致，況且今日台灣面臨全球化所造成的衝擊，環境的變遷導致複合式災害所形成的危機出現層出不窮、社會科技上多元技術的需求以及民眾普遍要求全面的危機管理與跨域治理，故本文主要乃是以「跨域治理」與「危機管理理論」作為基礎論點，藉由文獻探討、焦點座談及問卷調查等方式，檢視三大應變體系聯合運作政府與民間的豐沛資源，運用網際網絡之功能與跨域治理的模式，才能達到凝聚總體資源，群策群力共同處理危機。 / The primary purpose of the government existence is maintaining the integrity of the people's basic living standard, encouraging people to have freedom, peace, and equality. Furthermore, under the law and morality, by means of public power to promote social prosperity. Since 2005, the Taiwan government has amalgamated and promoted the joint operation of three urgent strain response systems which includes homeland security council, disaster council, and national defense mobilization council (these three are the urgent strain response systems of Taiwan Government). The government's approach seems to have reached the joint operation of resources integration of benefits. However, in the actual operation, the problems were emerged from the conflict involved between Central and local authorities, the responsibilities between the public and private utilities, and how to implement the operation of the system of cooperative association. To trace the causes, the joint operation of three major urgent strain response systems is incapable to respond and handle emergency disposal when facing a new state crisis. Moreover, it might cause the crisis of the source of chaos and drag initiator. Definitely, there is a need for further review and assessment to establish a consistent and clear responsibilities among these three urgent strain response systems. This article attempts to use cross-domain governance as a starting point to assess the system. The government impetus the urgent strain of government presently, the three urgent strain response systems are the part of crisis management which includes lots of work and connections with other majority organizations. Because the association constitutes various members base on the different tasks, some members may belong to different divisions. Even the enterprises which run by the local people are the members of the “cross-boundary governance” which should be closely related each other. Since 2005, the government has actively promoting circumstances, even the government has enough information and resources of handling emergency situation, this government (administration) still censured by the public. The reason is that the emergency structure of our government is out of frame and inconsistence. In addition, Taiwan is facing the high pressure of becoming globalization. The impact of changes of the environment resulted in the formation of compound disaster crises emerged, the needs of diverse technologies and social science and people generally demand comprehensive crisis management along with cross-domain administration, so this paper is based on “cross-boundary governance” and “crisis management”, by using the literature reviews, seminars and workshops, questionnaires and surveys to assess the joint operation of three urgent strain systems of Taiwan Government, and the public use of the vast resources, to apply the internet functions and cross-domain governance model, will be able to reach the overall resources and effectively integrating the common crisis management of Taiwan Government.