1 |
跨國智財交易租稅效益之研究 / The Tax Benefits Derived from Enterprise’s Intellectual Property in Doing Cross-boarding Transitions邱國晉 Unknown Date (has links)
過去許多企業,將企業原本擁有的智慧財產(例如:專利、商標、營業祕密…)與企業的其他資產、負債,分離出來,成立智慧財產控股公司,並透過智慧財產供股公司的經營管理,獲取大量的租稅利益。此一租稅規劃工具雖然已引起稽徵機關的注意,但運用得當,仍可為企業創造可觀的利潤。
智慧財產控股公司的設立架構,母公司通常會在低稅率的國家或州,設立一完全控股的子公司,由智慧財產控股公司自行創設、或自母公司繼受智慧財產。智慧財產控股公司授權的對象,可能是母公司、亦可能為不相干的第三人。
智慧財產控股公司的租稅效益,來自智慧財產控股公司通常選在低公司稅率(甚至零稅率)的地區設立,對於權利金收入予以免稅的地區。母公司付給子公司的權利金費用,母公司可作為費用扣除,藉以降低母公司的所得稅。智慧財產控股公司可透過發放股利,或對母公司融資等方式,解決母公司的資金需求。
透過智慧財產控股公司進行租稅規劃,最重要面臨『移轉定價』與『避免濫用租稅協定』,因此智慧財產控股公司進行的關係人交易,不能是純為獲取租稅利益的假交易,必須有商業實質。 / Over the last decade or so, many businesses generating significant revenue from intellectual property such as patents, copyrights, trade names and marks, software and know-how (the IP Assets) have organized intellectual property holding companies (IPHCs) to reduce federal and state taxes while separating valuable IP Assets from other corporate liabilities. Recently, states have started to aggressively challenge this tactic. However, substantial state and federal tax savings can still be realized if IPHCs are organized and operated correctly.
The structure of an IPHC is fairly simple. The parent corporation typically creates a corporate subsidiary in a state or in a foreign country where little or no taxes are imposed . IP Assets are created by or transferred to the subsidiary. The subsidiary enters into license agreements under which the parent corporation and non-related corporations agree to pay the IPHC royalties in exchange for an exclusive or non-exclusive right to use the IP Assets.
Since most IPHCs are organized in jurisdictions with no income tax, the royalties received by the IPHC are generally tax-free. In addition, the parent corporation that paid the royalty typically can deduct the payment as a deductible expense, thereby reducing the parent's income or franchise tax liability. In some circumstances, IPHCs can make tax-free dividend distributions or loans to the parent corporation.
The key issue IPHC should consider is “Transfer Price Issue” and “Anti Treaty Shopping Issue”. Transactions between related parties can’t be shame transaction, business substance is required.
|
Page generated in 0.0201 seconds