本文主要評價與分析兩種結構型債券：一為目標贖回雪球型利率連動債、一為雙匯率連動債。 第一個商品利率連動債券為十年期、每季付息債券，其指標利率為三個月期LIBOR利率。本文以BGM市場模型進行評價，同時考慮40個遠期三個月期LIBOR利率的動態過程，而每個動態過程之間的相關係數為一40維度的方陣，為了加速計算速度採用Weigel(2004)運用線性代數降秩的方法，使原本相關係數矩陣由「秩40」降為「秩11」後，不僅可以加快運算速度又不會使原本相關係數矩陣失真。以蒙地卡羅模擬利率路徑評價後並進行敏感性分析。 第二個商品雙匯率連動債券連結到兩個匯率指標：歐元兌日圓及美元兌新台幣。其中連結歐元兌日圓匯率的報酬型態為雙界限出局二元選擇權，而連結美元兌新台幣匯率的報酬型態為下出界選擇權。本文利用Ritchken(1995)三元樹分別建構兩個匯率界限選擇權的評價，並發現歐元兌日圓匯率界限選擇權的價值佔債券面額的比例極小，故之後只針對美元兌新台幣匯率界限選擇權進行敏感性分析。

2008年初，正值美國籠罩次級房貸風暴影響、全球經濟景氣趨緩、產油國地緣政治因素造成能源價格創新高…等險峻經濟狀況之際，投資銀行設計一包含 :搭配出局條款之CMS Spread雪球型利率結構商品及結合附加WTI上限、USD/JPY匯率上下限之異型選擇權的混合結構性商品提案。本文依據標的資產屬性，參考相關文獻及近期在頂級期刊發表之利率資產評價模型研究中，選用Extended BGM模型(Ting-Pin Wu, and Son-Nan Chen(2007))、遠期曲線模型及匯率評價模型為個案之基礎評價模型；以無套利觀念依取得之市場各資產相關公開報價資料估算各模型所需之參數；由於屬於雪球利率結構型商品及路徑相關特性，在目前相關文獻無封閉解的條件下，使用蒙地卡羅模擬獲得未來各資產之現金流折現值，進而計算預期理論價值。依據上述方法論評價所獲得之預期理論價格顯示，個案並非具公平價值之交易，依此結論強烈建議客戶不應該承做本交易。 個案相當於投資銀行以買入一個5年期附帶出局條件，隱含看空經濟景氣循環之CMS Spread選擇權及買入一個1年期看空WTI價格選擇權建構此混合結構性商品。為強化客戶承做意願，設立一似乎觸及機會很大，但從交易後至今從未觸及的出局條件，又透過每日數位選擇權計息方式將WTI波動度資產化，提供大於10%之相對LIBOR rate 很高，但實際是被低估之半年收息固定費率。由於雪球型利率結構型商品特性，收益不僅取決於是否達成交易付款條件，更重要因素是達成時間點之速度。 在蒙地卡羅模擬資產價格路徑中，觸及頭一次CMS Spread付款條件天數之眾數區間為125至135，貼近實際136天。從評價結果，交易之付款條件內已隱含透過兩個不同標的資產選擇權之高預期獲利相互達到避險、套利及強化收益等效益;投資銀行可以不用額外對受眾多複雜不確定因數影響之WTI價格採取避險策略，而將所有避險成本轉嫁於選擇權賣方的客戶。在資本計提規範下及確保未來預期收益之考量下，投資銀行唯一要做是以低成本尋求中介銀行進行背對背交易以強化因市場風險所衍生之信用風險。 從研究過程，不禁讚嘆個案是投資銀行設計建構在財務工程科學上的卓越藝術及策略，從它一旦出現世界上之瞬間，個人預估其價值將達34,211,458.09美元! / Early 2008 was a steep economic era when U.S. was enveloped by subprimemortgage crisis, world's economy was slowing down, and energy prices were pushed to a historical record high by oil geopolitical factors. Under this situation, an investmentbank designed a hybrid structure product, which includes a CMS Spread Snowball interest rate structured product with USD/JPY FX rate Knock out condition, a WTIoption of an additional upper limit, a USD/JPY exchange rate combined exotic option of upper and lower limits. After considering assets attributes and reviewing the relevant literature and recent research published in top journals related to the interest rate assetpricing model, Extended BGM model (Ting-Pin Wu, and Son-Nan Chen (2007)), forward curve model, and FX Rate model are selected as the basic pricing models. Tocalculate the expected theoretical value of this structured product, the unavailable model parameters of assets are estimated through the public market data based on thearbitrage-free concept, and the discounted values of the assets future cash flows are obtained by Monte Carlo simulation because of snowball interest rate structured product and path dependency characteristic and no close form solution in current relevant literature. The results of the pricing models shows that the net present value(NPV) received by customers is lower than that received by the investment bank, theconclusion is : Strongly recommend customers should not to do this trade ! In this case, the investment bank used a long position of one 5-year period CMSSpread Option with knock out condition, which implies Bearish on the economic cycle, and a short position of a 1-year period WTI option with up and low limits condition to construct this hybrid structure product. To draw customers’ attention to this proposal, the investment bank designed a knock out condition that seemed to be met very easily,but the price never touched by the article finished date. Additionally, a daily accrued digital option is used to transfer WTI volatility to a semi-annual fixed yield over 10% that, compared to LIBOR Rate, is very high but actually is underestimated. For theSnowball structure product, the total profit depends on not only when but also, more importantly, how soon to meet the payment condition. According to the asset pricing path generated by Monte Carlo simulation, the mode range which CMS Spread payment condition first met is 125 to 135 days after the contract’s value date, very close to the actually history data of 136 days. From pricing results, terms of contract implied that two different options combined to hedge risk and gain profit from each other. Hence, the investment bank does not need to make extrahedge strategy to WTI price which is impacted by more complicated risk factors.However, customer must spend hedge cost because of taking much risk as a sell option role. Under the Capital Charge regulation, to lock up the expected profit, what the investment bank needs to do is only to pay a very low cost fee, which like insurancepremium, to look for an intermediary bank to offer a back to back trade to manage thecredit risk caused by market risk! During the research of this paper, I am amazed what an excellent art and strategy that designed by the investment bank based on financial engineering science! As this structure product appeared in this world, I estimated that it would worth 34,211,458.09 USD.

近年來由於金融自由化的發展，台灣已陸續開放新金融商品，除了股權相關的新金融商品之外，也陸續開放利率相關的新金融商品，如新台幣利率交換、新台幣利率選擇權、債券遠期交易、債券選擇權等。在信用衍生性商品市場方面，我國銀行從2002年底開放承做信用衍生性商品，目前正準備開放證券商承做。隨著金融國際化及自由化，未來將會從國外引進更新穎的金融商品，使金融市場更為完備。 本文以Hull – White利率模型及LIBOR市場模型為架構，藉由數值方法評價分析兩個衍生性商品──信用連結票券及利率交換。首先在信用連結票券方面，運用Li（1998）建立信用價差曲線（Credit Curve），將之應用至Hull – White三元樹，評價信用連結票券之價值，並作敏感度分析與避險參數分析。其次在利率交換方面，由於投資人端連結「雪球型」的支付型態，為路徑相依商品，故使用LIBOR市場模型以蒙地卡羅模擬法（Monte Carlo）進行評價與分析，再進行發行者損益兩平分析及情境分析。最後針對兩個商品的評價結果作結論，分析發行者及投資人的利潤及避險，並給予後續研究者模型改進之建議與方向。