除了日本以外的亞洲四小龍國家，歷經了第二次世界大戰以來的高度經濟成長，這樣的經濟成就，被喻為「東亞經濟奇蹟」。觀察這些東亞國家的經濟發展軌跡，大致上可以得到一個共通的現象，即國家在經濟發展方面所扮演的重要角色，和作為後發工業化國家為了追趕上已工業化國家所採取的「發展型國家模式」。這套模式在東亞不同經濟體的運作上，展現出不同的細微樣貌，但真正對此經濟發展模式提出挑戰的，則是一九九七年東亞金融危機的爆發。 金融危機的爆發，標誌著冷戰以來的國際政治經濟環境已經起了很大的變化，這套發展模式的持續性、頑強性與適用性在全球化的時代也因此受到關注。在亞洲四小龍中，韓國一度受到金融危機的創傷頗深，然而韓國卻又在金融危機發生後的十年過後，重新成為世界經濟發展舞台上一個表現亮眼的角色，這其中的轉折令人相當的好奇也引發筆者的研究興趣。 本文的研究目的，在試圖釐清曾經受金融危機重創的韓國，於此一事件發生前後的國內政治經濟結構和環境的變化，以求探究「發展型國家模式」在後金融危機、受到國際貨幣基金援助，和接受全球化的韓國，所發生的轉變與變遷的方向，並藉此尋求韓國在後金融危機經濟重新復甦的解釋，和全球化、「發展型國家模式」，以及國家角色，彼此之間理論調和的可能性。 <a href=http://www.gospelaudio.com/ >free music download sites</a> <a href=http://www.musicfrost.com/ >musica mp3</a> / The Asian Tigers, followed by flying geese model of Japan, enjoyed high economic growth since the World War II. These East Asian countries, commonly shared an economic development , which was “developmental state”, further labeled and highlighted the role of state in the economic development stage for the late comers in the process of industrialization. Not until the outbreak of 1997 financial crisis in the East Asia, did this model face challenge and arouse severe academical discussion. The outbreak of 1997 East Asia financial crisis marked the huge change in the world political and economical environment, hence the robust effect of the developmental state model has also been questioned. The purpose of this paper aims doing the case study of South Korea, explaining the factors how and why South Korea can return to its high economic development even faced such impact as financial crisis. How much did the developmental state model contribute in this period? Or how much did this model evolve in the globalization era, especially when South Korea received the bailout of IMF? The author also tries to study the possibility for the reconciliation of different point such as: globalization, developmental state model, role of state in the economic development, and etc. <a href=http://www.gospelaudio.com/ >free music download sites</a> <a href=http://www.musicfrost.com/ >musica mp3</a>