1 |
The influence of FAIS and FICA on a medium sized life insurance company – Assupol LifeLaidlaw, Cristiaan Johannes 11 1900 (has links)
As a medium-sized life insurance company Assupol Life provide life insurance products to clients within government departments, although the company entered the broader private market. The enactment of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002 and the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 2001 impacted financial service providers and the research analysed the influence of regulation on managerial decision making, marketing and sales, finance, human resources, training and the structures within the organisation to comply with the legislation.
The study endeavoured to determine the influence of regulation on the company and the measures implemented by the management of Assupol Life. The research results confirmed that the primary challenge faced by the company is to find a balance between compliance, managing human capital and creating value for shareholders. The major impact of the legislation involves the human resource- and training functions and the study illustrated that other influences was less severe. / Business Administration / M. Tech. (Business Administration)
|
2 |
The influence of FAIS and FICA on a medium sized life insurance company – Assupol LifeLaidlaw, Cristiaan Johannes 11 1900 (has links)
As a medium-sized life insurance company Assupol Life provide life insurance products to clients within government departments, although the company entered the broader private market. The enactment of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002 and the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 2001 impacted financial service providers and the research analysed the influence of regulation on managerial decision making, marketing and sales, finance, human resources, training and the structures within the organisation to comply with the legislation.
The study endeavoured to determine the influence of regulation on the company and the measures implemented by the management of Assupol Life. The research results confirmed that the primary challenge faced by the company is to find a balance between compliance, managing human capital and creating value for shareholders. The major impact of the legislation involves the human resource- and training functions and the study illustrated that other influences was less severe. / Business Administration / M. Tech. (Business Administration)
|
3 |
Enkele opmerkings oor die wesenlikheidsvereiste in die lig van Qilingele v South African Mutual Life Assurance Society 1993(1) SA 69(A)Strydom, Johan Joost 06 1900 (has links)
Summaries in English and Afrikaans / Wanvoorstelling van wesenlike feite deur omiss/o aan 'n versekeraar kan tot gevolg he
dat die versekeringskontrak ongeldig verklaar word ingevolge die gemene reg. In Mutual
and Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Oudtshoorn Municipality 1985 (1) SA 419 (A) is beslis
dat wesenlikheid bepaal moet word vanuit die oogpunt van die redelike man.
In 'n paging om bewys van die wesenlikheid van feite te vermy, het versekeraars vereis
dat aansoekers die voorstellings in die kontrak moat waarborg. Dit het tot gevolg gehad
dat voorstellings wat in die kontrak gewaarborg is outomaties wesenlik was.
Sedert die invoering van artikel 63(3) van die Versekeringswet 27 van 1943 deur die
wetgewer gedurende 1969, is die wesenlikheid van voorstellings egter 'n vereiste, selfs
waar dit in die kontrak gewaarborg is. Versekeraars sou dus in die toekoms nie agter
kontraktuele wanvoorstellings kon skuil nie. Hierdie maatreel het meer beskerming aan
die versekerde gebied.
In Qilingele v South African Mutual Life Assurance Society 1993 (1) SA 69 (A) is die toets
vir wesenlikheid, soos vereis deur artikel 63{3), aangespreek. Dit het die vraag laat
ontstaan of daar twee aparte toetse vir wesenlikheid bestaan, naamlik gemeenregtelik en
statuter, en of daar een algemene toets bestaan. / Misrepresentation by omissio of material facts to an insurer may lead to an insurance
contract being declared invalid in terms of the common law. In Mutual and Federal
Insurance v Oudtshoorn Municipality 1985 (1) SA 419 (A) it was decided to determine
materiality in the eyes of the reasonable man.
To avoid proving materiality of facts, the insurers required proposers to warrant the
representations in the contract. This resulted in the facts automatically being material.
In 1969 parliament, .however, enacted section 63(3) of the Insurance Act 27 of 1943
whereby materiality of presentations, even where it was warranted in the contract,
became a requirement. Therefore insurers could in future not hide behind contractual
misrepresentations. This provided more protection to the insured.
Qilingele v SA Mutual Life Assurance Society 1993 (1) SA 69 (A) addresses the test for
materiality as required by section 63(3). This resulted in the question whether two
separate tests for materiality in terms of common law and statute, or only one exists. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M.
|
4 |
Enkele opmerkings oor die wesenlikheidsvereiste in die lig van Qilingele v South African Mutual Life Assurance Society 1993(1) SA 69(A)Strydom, Johan Joost 06 1900 (has links)
Summaries in English and Afrikaans / Wanvoorstelling van wesenlike feite deur omiss/o aan 'n versekeraar kan tot gevolg he
dat die versekeringskontrak ongeldig verklaar word ingevolge die gemene reg. In Mutual
and Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Oudtshoorn Municipality 1985 (1) SA 419 (A) is beslis
dat wesenlikheid bepaal moet word vanuit die oogpunt van die redelike man.
In 'n paging om bewys van die wesenlikheid van feite te vermy, het versekeraars vereis
dat aansoekers die voorstellings in die kontrak moat waarborg. Dit het tot gevolg gehad
dat voorstellings wat in die kontrak gewaarborg is outomaties wesenlik was.
Sedert die invoering van artikel 63(3) van die Versekeringswet 27 van 1943 deur die
wetgewer gedurende 1969, is die wesenlikheid van voorstellings egter 'n vereiste, selfs
waar dit in die kontrak gewaarborg is. Versekeraars sou dus in die toekoms nie agter
kontraktuele wanvoorstellings kon skuil nie. Hierdie maatreel het meer beskerming aan
die versekerde gebied.
In Qilingele v South African Mutual Life Assurance Society 1993 (1) SA 69 (A) is die toets
vir wesenlikheid, soos vereis deur artikel 63{3), aangespreek. Dit het die vraag laat
ontstaan of daar twee aparte toetse vir wesenlikheid bestaan, naamlik gemeenregtelik en
statuter, en of daar een algemene toets bestaan. / Misrepresentation by omissio of material facts to an insurer may lead to an insurance
contract being declared invalid in terms of the common law. In Mutual and Federal
Insurance v Oudtshoorn Municipality 1985 (1) SA 419 (A) it was decided to determine
materiality in the eyes of the reasonable man.
To avoid proving materiality of facts, the insurers required proposers to warrant the
representations in the contract. This resulted in the facts automatically being material.
In 1969 parliament, .however, enacted section 63(3) of the Insurance Act 27 of 1943
whereby materiality of presentations, even where it was warranted in the contract,
became a requirement. Therefore insurers could in future not hide behind contractual
misrepresentations. This provided more protection to the insured.
Qilingele v SA Mutual Life Assurance Society 1993 (1) SA 69 (A) addresses the test for
materiality as required by section 63(3). This resulted in the question whether two
separate tests for materiality in terms of common law and statute, or only one exists. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M.
|
Page generated in 0.0213 seconds