Hier wird über den objektiven Vergleich der Kurz- und Langzeitergebnisse, die mit der laparoskopischen Heller-Myotomie plus Dor-Fundoplikatio (LHM + Dor) und der per-oralen endoskopischen Myotomie (POEM) an einer einzigen Institution erzielt wurden und über die Entwicklung eines "maßgeschneiderten Ansatzes" berichtet. Die laparosko-pischen Heller Myotomie (LHM) gilt aktuell als das Standardverfahren zur Therapie der Achalasie. Die perorale endoskopische Myotomie (POEM) bietet eine neue Alternative zur Durchführung der Heller-Myotomie auf endoskopischem und natural orifice translu-minal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) Wege. Wir berichten über unsere unselektierte konsekutive Patientenserien (n = 238), die zwi-schen 2009 und 2017 entweder einer LHM + Dor Prozedur (n = 100) oder einer POEM Operation (n = 138) unterzogen wurden. Es gab keine Unterschiede hinsichtlich des Behandlungserfolgs (Eckardt-Score ≤ 3) nach 3 - 6 Monaten (LHM: 90,1% vs. POEM: 90,5%; p = 0,735), 12 Monate (LHM 84,4% vs. POEM 84,0%; p = 0,766 und> 2 Jahre (LHM 81,1% vs. POEM 79,2%; p = 0,432). Die Verbesserung der Lebensqualität (GIQLI-Score) und die Patientenzufriedenheit waren in beiden Gruppen ebenfalls ver-gleichbar gut (~ 90%) und zu jedem Zeitpunkt der Nachbeobachtung. Refluxraten sind ebenfalls ähnlich (Sodbrennen LHM: 32,9% vs. POEM: 30,1%; Ösophagitis LHM: 16,3% vs. POEM: 14,6%; PPI-Aufnahme 21,2% vs. 32,5%, pathologischer pH-Wert -Meter-LHM: 8,8% vs. POEM: 23,3%) ohne Signifikanz der Unterschiede. Die „maßgeschneiderte Verfahrenswahl POEM vs. LHM“ könnte geeignet sein und sollte in weiteren Studien weiter untersucht werden. / This article reports on the objective comparison of the short and long-term results obtained with the laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication (LHM + Dor) and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) at a single institution and on the development of a " tailored approach". The laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) is currently considered the standard procedure for the treatment of achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) offers a new alternative to Heller myotomy by endoscopic and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). We report on our unselected consecutive patient series (n = 238) who underwent either an LHM + Dor procedure (n = 100) or POEM surgery (n = 138) between 2009 and 2017. There were no differences in treatment success (Eckardt-Score ≤ 3) after 3 - 6 months (LHM: 90.1% vs. POEM: 90.5%; p = 0.735), 12 months (LHM 84.4% vs.POEM 84.0%; p = 0.766 and> 2 years (LHM 81.1% vs. POEM 79.2%; p = 0.432). The improvement of quality of life (GIQLI-Score) and patient satisfaction were also comparably good (~ 90%) in both groups and at all times of follow-up. Reflux rates are also similar (heartburn LHM: 32.9% vs. POEM: 30.1%; esophagitis LHM: 16.3% vs. POEM: 14.6%; PPI uptake 21.2% vs. 32.5%, pathological pH meter-LHM: 8.8% vs. POEM: 23.3%) without significance of the differences. The "tailored approach for choosing the procedure POEM vs. LHM" might be appropriate and should be further investigated in further studies.

Triple A syndrome, formerly known as Allgrove syndrome, is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized clinically by adrenal insufficiency, alacrima, achalasia, and neurological abnormalities. We report a 17-year-old boy presented to the endocrine clinic with delayed puberty and a 4-year’s history of fatigue and muscle weakness. He had achalasia, alacrima, and skin and mucosal hyperpigmentation. Hormonal assessment revealed isolated glucocorticoid deficiency. Clinical diagnosis of triple A syndrome was confirmed by sequencing the entire coding region including exon-intron boundaries of the AAAS gene. Analysis revealed a homozygous novel indel mutation encompassing intron 7 to intron 10 of the gene (g.16166_17813delinsTGAGGCCTGCTG; NG_016775). This is the first report of triple A syndrome in Jordan with a novel indel mutation and presenting with delayed puberty.

No description available.