Spelling suggestions: "subject:"administrative procedure."" "subject:"dministrative procedure.""
61 |
Aplicabilidade da lei federal 9.784/99 / Federal law 9.784/99 applicability.Cunha, Bruno Santos 30 April 2014 (has links)
O presente trabalho tem por escopo analisar a aplicabilidade da Lei Federal n. 9.784/99 (Lei de Processo Administrativo Federal LPAF). A partir do exame das expressões doutrinárias do direito e do processo administrativo no Brasil, busca-se investigar a extensão de sua incidência, tendo-se como premissa inicial o fato de a referida Lei representar um verdadeiro quadro ou fonte normativa primordial de ordenação da atuação administrativa, pautando requisitos mínimos para instauração, instrução e decisão relativos à formação e posterior execução da vontade funcional da Administração Pública. Nesse sentido, busca-se discutir a fórmula ou regime geral de incidência da LPAF, tendo como fundamento sua estipulação baseada em normas básicas e sua subsidiariedade em relação às espécies processuais administrativas reguladas por leis específicas. Os critérios legais de aplicabilidade da lei são evidenciados para que se chegue a um escalonamento (ordem de preferência) entre os mesmos, sobretudo a fim de melhor trilhar a extensão da lei entre os entes, entidades e órgãos submetidos a seu quadro normativo. Em vistas disso, o estudo toma como base os caracteres estruturais Administração Pública, alinhando a atividade administrativa e a consequente incidência da LPAF ao quadro de organização administrativa disposto no Anteprojeto de Lei Orgânica da Administração Pública Federal e Entes de Colaboração. Por derradeiro, estuda-se a o alcance federativo da lei, de forma a investigar a possibilidade de sua aplicação e extensão aos entes subnacionais, com a instauração de um patamar de tratamento e atuação unificados perante as diversas facetas e expressões de atividade administrativa em todas as entidades políticas (União, Distrito Federal, Estados e Municípios) / The present work aims to analyze the Federal Law n. 9.784/99 applicability (Federal Administrative Procedure Act, also known, in Brazil, as LPAF). From the examination of brazilian experts expressions about administrative law and administrative procedure law, the study seeks to investigate the extension of the LPAF impact, taking into consideration that this Act represents a primary source of normative ordering of the administrative functions and all the acts and decisions taken and made by the Public Administration. In such scope, the aim is thus to discuss a general formula for the impact of the LPAF, mainly based on its basic rules and principles and its subsidiarity in relation to administrative procedural species regulated by specific Acts. Furthermore, the legal criteria for the applicability of the LPAF are highlighted in order to reach an order of preference between them. From this point, the study sets its focus on the structural character of the Public Administration to investigate the impact of the LPAF aligned to regular administrative activity. For the last, the federal state issue is raised in order to discuss its applicability and the possibility of establishing an unified level of administrative procedures and activities through all the political entities in the Federation (Union, Federal District, States and Municipalities).
|
62 |
Aplicabilidade da lei federal 9.784/99 / Federal law 9.784/99 applicability.Bruno Santos Cunha 30 April 2014 (has links)
O presente trabalho tem por escopo analisar a aplicabilidade da Lei Federal n. 9.784/99 (Lei de Processo Administrativo Federal LPAF). A partir do exame das expressões doutrinárias do direito e do processo administrativo no Brasil, busca-se investigar a extensão de sua incidência, tendo-se como premissa inicial o fato de a referida Lei representar um verdadeiro quadro ou fonte normativa primordial de ordenação da atuação administrativa, pautando requisitos mínimos para instauração, instrução e decisão relativos à formação e posterior execução da vontade funcional da Administração Pública. Nesse sentido, busca-se discutir a fórmula ou regime geral de incidência da LPAF, tendo como fundamento sua estipulação baseada em normas básicas e sua subsidiariedade em relação às espécies processuais administrativas reguladas por leis específicas. Os critérios legais de aplicabilidade da lei são evidenciados para que se chegue a um escalonamento (ordem de preferência) entre os mesmos, sobretudo a fim de melhor trilhar a extensão da lei entre os entes, entidades e órgãos submetidos a seu quadro normativo. Em vistas disso, o estudo toma como base os caracteres estruturais Administração Pública, alinhando a atividade administrativa e a consequente incidência da LPAF ao quadro de organização administrativa disposto no Anteprojeto de Lei Orgânica da Administração Pública Federal e Entes de Colaboração. Por derradeiro, estuda-se a o alcance federativo da lei, de forma a investigar a possibilidade de sua aplicação e extensão aos entes subnacionais, com a instauração de um patamar de tratamento e atuação unificados perante as diversas facetas e expressões de atividade administrativa em todas as entidades políticas (União, Distrito Federal, Estados e Municípios) / The present work aims to analyze the Federal Law n. 9.784/99 applicability (Federal Administrative Procedure Act, also known, in Brazil, as LPAF). From the examination of brazilian experts expressions about administrative law and administrative procedure law, the study seeks to investigate the extension of the LPAF impact, taking into consideration that this Act represents a primary source of normative ordering of the administrative functions and all the acts and decisions taken and made by the Public Administration. In such scope, the aim is thus to discuss a general formula for the impact of the LPAF, mainly based on its basic rules and principles and its subsidiarity in relation to administrative procedural species regulated by specific Acts. Furthermore, the legal criteria for the applicability of the LPAF are highlighted in order to reach an order of preference between them. From this point, the study sets its focus on the structural character of the Public Administration to investigate the impact of the LPAF aligned to regular administrative activity. For the last, the federal state issue is raised in order to discuss its applicability and the possibility of establishing an unified level of administrative procedures and activities through all the political entities in the Federation (Union, Federal District, States and Municipalities).
|
63 |
Government-nonprofits collaborations a study of linking arrangements in third-party government /Yuen, Yiu-kai, Terence. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Title proper from title frame. Also available in printed format.
|
64 |
Bevisbördans placering i taxeringsprocessenGranlund, Gustav January 2010 (has links)
<p><strong><p>Sammanfattning.</p></strong></p><p>I uppsatsen berörs ämnet bevisbördans placering i taxeringsprocessen. Detta görs</p><p>genom användning av en rättsdogmatisk metod. Av frågestelningen utgörs syftet att</p><p>utreda vart bevisbördan är placerad på kostnadssidan när det gäller inkomstslaget</p><p>näringsverksamhet. Som framgår av uppsatsen är bevisbördan generellt placerad på</p><p>den skattskyldige när det gäller kostnadsavdrag. Att så är fallet framgår av den i</p><p>doktrinen förda diskussion att placeringen har blivit vedertagen. Vissa undantag</p><p>finns, ett är då lag stadgar att bevisbördan är placerad på annat vis. Andra fall är vid</p><p>eftertaxering och påförande av skattetillägg, i båda dessa fall anses det så</p><p>betungande för den enskilde att bära bevisbördan att den istället placerats på</p><p>myndigheten. En bevisbördepunkt placeras även ut på sannolikhetsskalan, denna</p><p>placering utgör det beviskrav som skall vara uppnått för att den bevisskyldige skall få</p><p>bifall för sitt yrkande. Beviskravet fastställs i de flesta fall av domstolarna då lagen</p><p>oftast inte ger utryck för vilket krav som ställs. Om bifall kan medges är beroende av</p><p>den bevisning som läggs fram inför rätten samt vilket värde bevisningen ges. En fri</p><p>bevisvärdering skall tillämpas där varje enskilt bevis skall bedömas utifrån sitt</p><p>specifika värde.</p>
|
65 |
Government-nonprofits collaborations : a study of linking arrangements in third-party government /Yuen, Yiu-kai, Terence. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Also available online.
|
66 |
The Kavango Legislative Council 1970-1979: a critical analysis.Nambadi, Aaron Haufiku. January 2007 (has links)
<p>Namibia was under South African rule until March 1990. On 11 September 1962, the Odendaal Commission was set up by the State President of South Africa to enquire into the welfare and progress of all the inhabitants of South West Africa, particularly the African people. The Commission was required to make recommendations for the development of the various African people inside and outside their designated areas. The outcome of the Commission was the division of South West Africa into ten designated areas for the various native nations. These areas later became the homelands for the Africans in South West Africa. This thesis was concerned with examining the Kavango Legislative Council, its constitution, its powers, the role of the traditional authorities within the body, and the legislation passed by the Council.</p>
|
67 |
Bevisbördans placering i taxeringsprocessenGranlund, Gustav January 2010 (has links)
Sammanfattning. I uppsatsen berörs ämnet bevisbördans placering i taxeringsprocessen. Detta görs genom användning av en rättsdogmatisk metod. Av frågestelningen utgörs syftet att utreda vart bevisbördan är placerad på kostnadssidan när det gäller inkomstslaget näringsverksamhet. Som framgår av uppsatsen är bevisbördan generellt placerad på den skattskyldige när det gäller kostnadsavdrag. Att så är fallet framgår av den i doktrinen förda diskussion att placeringen har blivit vedertagen. Vissa undantag finns, ett är då lag stadgar att bevisbördan är placerad på annat vis. Andra fall är vid eftertaxering och påförande av skattetillägg, i båda dessa fall anses det så betungande för den enskilde att bära bevisbördan att den istället placerats på myndigheten. En bevisbördepunkt placeras även ut på sannolikhetsskalan, denna placering utgör det beviskrav som skall vara uppnått för att den bevisskyldige skall få bifall för sitt yrkande. Beviskravet fastställs i de flesta fall av domstolarna då lagen oftast inte ger utryck för vilket krav som ställs. Om bifall kan medges är beroende av den bevisning som läggs fram inför rätten samt vilket värde bevisningen ges. En fri bevisvärdering skall tillämpas där varje enskilt bevis skall bedömas utifrån sitt specifika värde.
|
68 |
An appraisal of the channels for the redress of grievances and the processing of public complaint information: the case of Hong KongWong, Kit-lin, Rebecca., 黃潔蓮. January 1982 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Public Administration / Master / Master of Social Sciences
|
69 |
Corruption and its complainants: reasons for complaining to the ICAC - a theoretical modelHo, Chi-hang., 何志恆. January 1992 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Sociology / Master / Master of Social Sciences
|
70 |
Procesas pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme / Procedure at Administrative Court of First InstanceRaižys, Dainius 12 June 2008 (has links)
Asmens konstitucinės teisės į teisminę gynybą pirminis realizavimo etapas yra kreipimasis būtent į pirmosios instancijos administracinį teismą, t.y. apygardos administracinį teismą. Šiame teisme nustatomos bylai reikšmingos aplinkybės, renkami, tiriami ir vertinami įrodymai bei paprastai priimamas teismo sprendimas, kuriuo ginčas išsprendžiamas iš esmės. Tai lemia išskirtinę proceso pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme vietą asmens konstitucinės teisės į teisminę gynybą realizavimo sistemoje. Todėl šį procesą reguliuojančiuose įstatymuose neturėtų būti prieštaravimų bei spragų, taip pat proceso pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme teisinis reguliavimas turėtų atitikti Konstitucijoje įtvirtintiems teisės į teisminę gynybą imperatyvams. Tyrimo objektas – administracinių bylų procesas pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme: teorinės ir teisinės praktikos problemos. Darbo tikslas – nustatyti administracinių bylų proceso pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme veiksmingumą. Darbe pirmą kartą Lietuvoje sistemiškai analizuojamas proceso pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme teisinio reguliavimo modelis. Darbe atskleistos proceso pirmosios instancijos administraciniame teisme teisinio reglamentavimo problemos bei pasiūlyti galimi jų sprendimo būdai, taip pat užsienio valstybių administracinės justicijos analizė būti panaudota siekiant sukurti optimalų administracinių bylų proceso teisinio reguliavimo modelį. / Initial stage of implementation of the constitutional right of a person to judicial protection is an application to the administrative court of first instance, i. e. to regional administrative court. At the administrative court of first instance circumstances relevant to the case are determined, evidence is collected, investigated and evaluated and usually court decision resolving the case in essence is adopted. This determines an exceptional place of the procedure at the administrative court of first instance in the system of implementation of the constitutional right of a person to judicial protection. Therefore, legislation regulating the procedure should be clear and bear no contradictions or gaps, moreover, legal regulation of the procedure at the administrative court of first instance should be in compliance with imperatives of the right to judicial protection conferred by the Constitution.
The object of the research is the procedure of administrative cases at the administrative courts of first instance: theoretical and legal issues in the jurisprudence.
The objective of the thesis is to determine the efficiency of the procedure of administrative cases at the administrative courts of first instance. The thesis in a systematical manner examines the model of legal regulation for the procedure at the administrative court of first instance in Lithuania the first time. Furthermore, the thesis reveals problematic aspects of legal regulation for the procedure at the... [to full text]
|
Page generated in 0.1183 seconds