Preventative care services allow patients to be fully equipped with the knowledge, tools, and other resources to help them discover and treat many diseases and illnesses so that the burden of costs will not fall on patients and their families. Since the passage of the Affordable Care of Act (ACA) by President Barack Obama, the requirement for health insurance coverage has not translated to utilization of preventative care services. The purpose of this study is to determine the motivation for African Americans who have insurance coverage and access to care who are not taking advantage of opportunities for screenings and health education. The health belief model was used to determine how belief and modifying factors influence health decisions. The quantitative study required use of a secondary dataset to determine utilization of preventative care services, insurance affordability, future access to care and understanding of the health care law. The study included testing the statistical significance of these factors among African Americans, White Americans, and Hispanic Americans who participated in the Healthy Americas Survey. Using the program SPSS to process data analyzation and organize output, results reveal that African American participants are concerned about the future ability to access and afford care. With a history of distrust amongst African Americans and the health industry, social implications are for administrators and providers to bridge the gap by offering health education to those in their immediate communities and requesting and implementing feedback from those same individuals.

No description available.

Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed and implemented to expand insurance coverage, reduce health care cost, and improve the quality of care. The purpose of this dissertation study was to investigate whether the ACA insurance expansion correlates with the number of visits made to emergency departments (EDs). The quasi-experimental design interrupted time series was utilized in the analysis. The ED visits were compared using MANOVA to determine the relationship between ED visits and ACA and canonical correlation analysis to assess the strength of the relationship and the extent to which independent variables could predict the dependent variable. The hypothesis was that the ACA will reduce the uninsured, increase the insured, and reduce the ED visits. The relationship between number of ED visits and the ACA will present whether the uninsured patients contributed significantly to the ED overcrowding. Analysis of secondary data from four EDs (H1, H2, H3, and H4) in the Chicago area showed that 484,742 visits were made, and 2,801 were excluded due to unknown payer type. Medicaid patients recorded the largest number of visits (181,226) while the uninsured patients recorded the least number of visits (56,572). The ED visits decreased by 6% from 2012 to 2013 (pre-ACA) and increased by 4% from 2013 to 2105 (post-ACA). The ACA implementation increased the people with insurance who visited the EDs by 11%. The results demonstrated a strong relationship between ACA and ED visits. The correlation of the variables (hospital and year) and ED visits demonstrated that the hospital could explain 97% of the Medicaid visits and 87% of uninsured while the year could predict 82.6% of the uninsured visits and 52.5% of Medicaid visits.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has declared the misuse of opioid prescription drugs as a public health emergency. The Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion expanded the number of people with insurance and increased the demand for services related to substance abuse treatment. In the first part of this study, the researcher examines whether the Medicaid expansion reduced the likelihood of treatment delay. The second part of this study explores whether the length of stay for opioid use disorder treatment is significantly different in states that adopted Medicaid expansion versus states that did not. In both studies, the researcher analyzes administrative data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to discover any treatment delays associated with the opioid treatments for the states that adopted the expansion versus the states that did not, and to determine whether there was a difference in the length of stay in the states that adopted the Medicaid versus the states that did not. A difference-in-difference approach is used in both studies to compare the states which adopted an optional Medicaid expansion to those non-adoption states. The evidence suggests that demand for opioid treatment services increased in expansion states as there is a decreased probability of obtaining treatment on the first day for initial requests for outpatient treatment. In addition, evidence suggests that Medicaid expansion increased the likelihood of staying longer in outpatient facilities, but not inpatient facilities. / Business Administration/Risk Management and Insurance

Objectives: Few research studies have analyzed college students' attitudes of health reform caused by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Specifically, no studies exist looking at undergraduate and graduate social work students' views on current health reform. The study will ask two questions: (1) What do Social Work students know about the components and potential impacts of the ACA, and (2) Are there any characteristics of students associated with their level of knowledge or attitudes about the Act? Methods: A 53-item survey questionnaire inquiring knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions related to health reform and the Affordable Care Act was dispersed to a convenience sample of 105 undergraduate and graduate social work students from the University of Central Florida School of Social Work in January-February 2014. Results: Students had favorable views on how the health reform will be funded and how health reform could support specific social issues such as acknowledging the need for reform and believing health care should be a basic right. There were fewer clear trends in students' attitudes about reform implementation and knowledge of specific ACA provisions. There were no significant associations between student's knowledge of the ACA and their insurance status or political affiliation. Conclusions: Students' beliefs on health reform are inconsistent. Ethnicity was the only demographic characteristic that affected students' views. This study advocates the need for more in-depth health policy education within the social work program curriculum.

Community engagement in health assessment enables researchers to better understand and prioritize community needs. The value of community engagement is increasingly documented; however, few studies engage youth. Research and assessments are often done for youth, but not with youth. Youth bring a unique contextual lens to community issues; without engagement, the likelihood that resultant efforts would be accepted by or appropriate for youth decreases. This dissertation explores opportunities and methodological approaches for, and contributions and feasibility of engaging youth in non-profit hospital community health needs assessments (CHNAs) mandated through the Affordable Care Act. This study has three specific aims, utilizing multiple methodological approaches: • Aim 1: Assess the current level of youth engagement, and prevalence of youth-focused priority areas in Massachusetts CHNAs. CHNAs were reviewed and analyzed using the Community Health Improvement Data Sharing System’s community engagement template. • Aim 2: Compare assessment results of focus groups and participatory photo mapping (PPM) in documenting youth observations of Boston community conditions. Three focus groups and PPM processes engaged 46 high-school age youth. Data were qualitatively compared, with attention to youth-identified community assets, concerns, and recommendations. • Aim 3: Compare youth results with existing CHNAs and identify potential contributions of youth engagement. Using the social determinants of health framework, youth recommendations were compared to Boston hospital community health improvement (CHI) publications to observe the convergence and divergence of priorities. While all MA hospitals minimally complied with required CHNA community engagement criteria, there was no standard practice or approach. 20% of CHNAs engaged youth, primarily through focus groups; yet, 80% of CHNAs that identified priorities included youth-focused priorities. Youth-driven results focused upon social determinants of health factors; furthermore, PPM results provided more detailed and granular CHI recommendations. Youth-identified CHI recommendations complemented those identified by hospitals, indicating that youth engagement can potentially strengthen CHI priorities and identify salient strategies for addressing youth health, specifically. Findings can be extrapolated to the many institutions conducting assessments, including health departments and Community Action Agencies. Findings will be disseminated through a series of practice briefs that make recommendations to hospitals, assessment practitioners, and youth organizations to consider for future efforts.

In 2001, The Institute of Medicine published its recommendations for bringing high quality care to all people of the United Sates. That solution involved fulfilling criteria expressed in the acronym, STEEEP. Care must be: Safe, Timely, Effective, Efficient, Equitable and Patient Centered (Institute of Medicine 2001). While improvements were made in terms of infant mortality, longevity, and deaths amenable to quality care, healthcare in the United States has remained fragmented with much work yet to be done. This leaves many uninsured individuals without access to affordable healthcare. Despite the implementation of policies such as the Affordable Care Act and the American Rescue Plan, which have expanded Medicaid and given access to many, it still falls short. Approximately 24.9 million people remain uninsured. The rising costs of healthcare in the U.S. have led to both insured and uninsured patients being exposed to medical debt, lower health status, and limited access to care. Safety net clinics, such as free clinics, have become essential for many uninsured individuals who rely on them to receive medical care. Free clinics are an example of safety nets that give medical access to the uninsured. These clinics have positive results on health outcomes and help to lower healthcare expenditures, particularly in emergency room visits. Studies have shown that uninsured individuals are more likely to use emergency services, which results in higher healthcare costs. Free clinics provide preventative care and early interventions that can help prevent costly emergency visits and hospitalizations. Moreover, free clinics serve as a place for volunteers to grow their skills and become better providers of medicine. Volunteers include physicians, nurses, medical students, and other healthcare professionals who dedicate their time and expertise to help those in need. Volunteers at free clinics are provided with a unique opportunity to enhance their skills by working with a diverse patient population that often has complex medical conditions. Free clinics are essential safety nets that provide medical access to the uninsured and underserved communities. Without these clinics, many uninsured individuals would be left without access to care, leading to poor health outcomes and higher healthcare costs. The importance of free clinics cannot be overstated, and unless there is a change in the current healthcare system, free clinics should be given the place they deserve, including more volunteer and funding support. As the U.S. healthcare system continues to evolve, it is critical to recognize the value of free clinics and the role they play in ensuring access to care for all individuals, regardless of their insurance status.

The purpose of this thesis is to examine the Affordable Care Act through an analysis of the United States Supreme Court's holding in The National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. In order to better understand the Supreme Court's reasoning in that case, this paper will first examine the history and the function of the Supreme Court, which will demonstrate the Court's power to either augment or diminish the power of the states in relation to the federal government. This paper will then discuss the background of the Affordable Care Act, the procedural history of the case, and the majority's analysis supporting its decision. The concurring and dissenting opinions of the other justices will be discussed to present the various viewpoints regarding the proper role of the federal government and the implications this case may have on federal/state conflict. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services. The 5-4 decision was extremely close and the opinions given by each Justice highlighted the various flaws and benefits of the Act it was looking to uphold. Further research of Supreme Court cases in our country's history reveal the trend of augmenting and diminishing state's rights. This thesis will examine the constitutionality of the aforementioned decision, the effects it will have on each of the states within the United States, and the impact the citizens will experience.

No description available.

No description available.