The world has seen gradual evolution of regional human rights arrangements. The adoption by the UN General Assembly of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on December 10, 1948, was followed by the creation of numerous regional instruments that address concerns of particular importance in the regional context. Three world regions, Africa, the Americas and Europe, have established their respective regional instruments together with the supervisory mechanism, such as commissions and courts. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, with its emphasis on group rights and individual duties challenges the Western liberal account of rights, as expressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The cultural differences brought to the fore not only the tension between individual and group rights but also the question as to whether of the universalism of human rights is possible. The study advocates for a moderate universalism of human rights, which can only be achieved through a dialogue among different cultural approaches to the notion of human rights. This study examines the content and substance of human rights norms of the African system with a view to recommending the possible strategies for their reform. Its central thesis is, the system is rather weak and therefore needs to be reformed. Toward this end, the study analyses the provisions of the African Charter. Thereafter, it explores its weaknesses and proposes strategies for their reform. The African human rights mechanisms face a number of common and particular challenges. Prospectively, Africa is going through a tremendous and interesting phase. These challenges are not insurmountable. / Constitutional, International and Indigenous Law / LL.D.

This study is entitled ‘investigating the challenges in enforcing international human rights law in Africa: Towards an effective regional system’. It centres around a critical research problem namely: what challenges beset regional enforcement of human rights law in Africa and how can they be addressed to ensure the effective promotion and protection of human rights in the continent? It critically reviews and revisits the discourses and scholarly arguments on the crucial issue of regional enforcement of human rights law in Africa. It traverses through historical epochs in order to explain the origins, scope and evolution of human rights law in Africa. This is done in the quest for answers to questions such as: When and how did Africa’s regional human rights system originate? What factors led to its emergence? Was the concept of human rights recognised in Africa prior to European colonial rule? What is the present status of international human rights in Africa? It therefore lays the foundations for a better understanding of the historical and philosophical origins and evolution of Africa’s regional human rights system. The study then proceeds to review the normative and institutional mechanisms established in Africa to enforce human rights at the regional level. Particularly, it highlights the roles of the African Commission and Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in the light of their contribution to, and challenges in, the enforcement of human rights in the region. The study concludes with recommendations on the possible ways to invigorate the African human rights system. One of the key findings is that, with appropriate reforms, the system can be more effective. / Constitutional, International and Indigenous Law / LL.D. (Public, Constitutional and International Law)

The world has seen gradual evolution of regional human rights arrangements. The adoption by the UN General Assembly of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on December 10, 1948, was followed by the creation of numerous regional instruments that address concerns of particular importance in the regional context. Three world regions, Africa, the Americas and Europe, have established their respective regional instruments together with the supervisory mechanism, such as commissions and courts. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, with its emphasis on group rights and individual duties challenges the Western liberal account of rights, as expressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The cultural differences brought to the fore not only the tension between individual and group rights but also the question as to whether of the universalism of human rights is possible. The study advocates for a moderate universalism of human rights, which can only be achieved through a dialogue among different cultural approaches to the notion of human rights. This study examines the content and substance of human rights norms of the African system with a view to recommending the possible strategies for their reform. Its central thesis is, the system is rather weak and therefore needs to be reformed. Toward this end, the study analyses the provisions of the African Charter. Thereafter, it explores its weaknesses and proposes strategies for their reform. The African human rights mechanisms face a number of common and particular challenges. Prospectively, Africa is going through a tremendous and interesting phase. These challenges are not insurmountable. / Constitutional, International and Indigenous Law / LL.D.

Si l’idée de la création d’une cour régionale de protection des droits de l’Homme remonte à 1961, elle ne s’est concrétisée qu’en 1998 avec l’adoption du protocole de Ouagadougou créant la Cour africaine des droits de l’Homme et des peuples. Cette juridiction vient compléter le mandat de la Commission africaine des droits de l’Homme et des peuples. Elle s’inscrit dans la lignée de ses homologues européenne et américaine et joue un rôle essentiel dans l’effectivité de la protection régionale des droits de l’Homme. De ce fait, l’étude de cette juridiction à la lumière de l’expérience européenne a pour but de mettre en exergue les particularités de cette cour tout en démontrant qu’elle a su adapter les standards internationaux en la matière, particulièrement les normes découlant du procès équitable. Il reste toutefois que sa compétence demeure ainsi singulière à bien des égards. Les États africains ont fait preuve de pragmatisme dans l’établissement de cette cour et n’ont pas opéré un mimétisme aveugle avec le modèle de la CEDH. Depuis son premier arrêt en 2009, la cour africaine a rendu des arrêts au fond qui apportent des précisions utiles tant sur les questions d’ordre procédural que sur le contenu des droits protégés. Cependant, elle reste confrontée à des défis qui menacent son avenir. La cristallisation des relations avec la CPI et l’incertitude de la création d’une cour africaine de justice et des droits de l’homme sont manifestement problématiques. La multiplicité des juridictions régionales ayant pour objectif l'intégration économique, mais pouvant statuer sur des questions relatives aux droits de l'Homme, soulève également un certain nombre d’interrogations / If the idea of creating a regional human rights court dates back to 1961, it became a reality in 1998, when the Ouagadougou Protocol establishing the African Court of Human and Peoples' rights (African Court) was adopted.This court complements the mandate of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ rights. It is fully in line with its European and American counterparts and has undoubtedly a role to play in the effectiveness of the regional protection of human rights.Therefore, the study of this court, in the light of the European experience, aims to highlight the features of this court while demonstrating that it meets international standards in this area, particularly the standards derived under fair trial. His extended competence, whether contentious or advisory is unique in many ways.African states have demonstrated pragmatism in the establishment of this regional court and have not made a blind imitation with the model of the European Court of Human Rights. Since its first judgment in 2009, the African Court delivered judgment on the merits which provide information on both procedural issues and the content of the protected rights. Of course, challenges remain to be addressed. The crystallization of the relations with the International Criminal Court and the subsequent uncertainty about the creation of an African Court of Justice and Human Rights are clearly problematic. The multiplicity of regional courts whose main objective is economic integration, but who can also rule on questions relating to human rights, also raises a number of questions

"It is submitted that South Africa presents the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Commission) and the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Court) with inspiration to draw from on how social-economic rights can be protected. Issues of locus, defining the state's obligations, effective remedies and their enforcement can be drawn from. However, it is impossible to transpose a domestic system directly into the regional system. It is also submitted that South Africa's Constitution and jurisprudence is not without criticisms as assessed against the backdrop of international human rights law. In this respect the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the Committee) offers immense inspiration. Through its practice of giving normative content to the rights in the ICESCR the Committee has given extensive definition to some of the rights in the ICESCR and the obligations that attach to them. The obligation of the states to take steps to the maximum of the available resources to achieve progressively the full realisation of the rights in the Covenant has been the subject of extensive elaboration by the Committee. In addition to this the Committee has read into the ICESCR a very important concept, the principle of 'core minimum obligations'. This concept sets the benchmark in determining whether the state has discharged it obligations at the minimum level. The Commission and Court should take advantage of the provisions of the Charter which allow for inspiration from other instruments. The Charter obliges the Commission and the Court to draw inspiration from international law and human and peoples' rights, including the UDHR and other instruments adopted by the United Nations and African countries in the area of human rights. This is in addition to taking into consideration other instruments laying down rules expressly recognized by the states. This paper sets out to show that the African system can draw inspiration from South Africa and the Committee in order to surmount the challenges affecting the realisation of the rights. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part outlines the normative framework of protection of economic, social and cultural rights within the ICESCR, the African Charter and South African Constitution. The second part explores the challenges hampering the effective realisation of these rights followed by an analysis of the African Court and the lessons it may draw not only from the Committee and South Africa's Constitution but from the African Commission as well. The fourth part looks at the forth-coming African Court and its challenges, pointing to aspects on which it may seek inspiration. This will be followed by a conclusion and recommendations." -- Introduction. / Prepared under the supervision of Professor Sandra Liebenberg at the Faculty of Law, University of the Western Cape, South Africa / http://www.chr.up.ac.za/academic_pro/llm1/dissertations.html / Centre for Human Rights / LLM

This thesis uses the Critical theory to explore the history and functioning of African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. This judicial institution was established in 1998. However, it did not rule any decision on the merits until 2013. All cases had been refused because it lacked the jurisdiction. Finally in 2013, two judgments were issued that solved the factual situation of applicants. Nevertheless, the danger still exists that the Court will function only if the states will allow it to do so. Such inactivity of the Court is firmly inconsistent with the intensity of human rights violations on the African continent. In the same way, it falsifies the presuppositions of liberal institutionalism that the international institutions should strengthen cooperation between states and contribute to the development of mutually interconnected areas: economic development, democracy and human rights protection. The thesis is an empirical case study which opposes the liberal-institutional ideas. It uses the Critical theory in narrow sense to show that those ideas played certain role in the establishment of the Court. Nonetheless, the real willingness of the states to empower the Court with authority and limit their sovereignty was absent. The Court, as a procedural enlargement of substantive human rights...

La régionalisation des droits de l'homme a permis l'adoption de plusieurs instruments juridiques visant à assurer la protection des droits de l'homme. Dans cette optique, l'Afrique s'est dotée en 1981 d'une Charte africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples. Les rédacteurs de la Charte africaine ont voulu adopter un texte qui tienne compte des spécificités et diversités culturelles du continent. Ainsi à côté des droits de première, deuxième et troisième génération, la Charte africaine consacre les droits des peuples et proclame des devoirs. Le volet institutionnel de la protection des droits de l'homme en Afrique a pris tout son sens avec la création de la Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples. Toutefois, il faut souligner le rôle important qu’a joué et continue à jouer la Commission africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples, organe non juridictionnel, certes, mais qui œuvre pour la promotion des droits de l’homme en Afrique. La place accordée aux droits de l’homme dans les constitutions des États africains est révélatrice de l’intérêt particulier accordé à ces droits. / The decentralization of human rights has favoured the setting up of a number of legal instruments more properly equipped to insure the protection of human rights. With this in view, in 1981 Africa drafted the African Charter of Human and People’s Rights. The authors of the African Charter were anxious to provide a legislation that would take into account the specificities and cultural diversity of their continent. In this way, alongside the rights of first, second and third generations, the African Charter enshrines the rights of her peoples and proclaims their duties. The institutional side of the protection of human rights in African has taken on its full significance with the creation of the African Court of Human and People’s Rights. However, even if the organization has no legal power, we should not underestimate the importance of the role played in its defence of Human rights in Africa by the African Commission of Human and People’s rights. The pride of place given to human rights in the constitutions of African States shows how they prioritize these rights.

No description available.

Magister Legum - LLM

La réparation des dommages causés aux particuliers est une thématique ancienne en droit international. Toutefois, elle a été longuement appréhendée au seul prisme des relations interétatiques, l’individu n’étant perçu que comme un objet du droit international. Le bouleversement introduit par la protection internationale des droits de l’homme quant au statut de l’individu dans cet ordre juridique invite donc à une relecture de cette question. Les obligations substantielles contractées par les Etats en matière de protection internationale des droits de l’homme devraient logiquement trouver un prolongement dans l’existence d’une obligation de ces derniers de réparer les dommages causés aux particuliers. Or, l’identification d’une telle obligation s’avère délicate, tant au regard de ses créanciers que de son étendue. Sa réalisation est quant à elle laissée en grande partie aux mains du juge. Il s’avère donc malaisé de dégager un véritable régime juridique de la réparation des dommages causés par la violation des droits de l’homme. / The reparation of damage caused to individuals is a former thematic issue of international law. However, its development has been studied only from the point of view of interstate relations as soon as the individual was conceived and treated as an object, not as a subject of international law. The change, brought by the international protection of human rights relating to the status of individual, in this legal order, suggests to re-open the debate on this matter. As a result, the compelling obligations undertaken by member states regarding international protection of human rights, should logically lead to the existence of an obligation for the latter to repair the damage caused to the private individuals. But identifying such an obligation remains delicate both with regard to his creditors and with regard to its scope. Its implementation is left largely with the hands of the judge. It is therefore difficult to find a genuine legal regime for the reparation of damages caused by the violation of human rights.