Spelling suggestions: "subject:"iir abrasion dental"" "subject:"rair abrasion dental""
1 |
Effect of surface conditioning methods on repair bond strength of microhybrid resin matrix compositeRajitrangson, Phitakphong, January 2010 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.D.)--Indiana University School of Dentistry, 2010 / Title from PDF t. p. (viewed May 12, 2010) Advisor(s): Michael A. Cochran, Chair of the Research Committee, Jeffrey A. Platt, Bruce A. Matis, Carlos Gonzalez-Cabezas, Sopanis D. Cho. Curriculum vitae. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 64-69).
|
2 |
Efeito do tratamento da superfície, ciclagem térmica e fadiga mecânica na resitência de união entre uma cerâmica reforçada por dissilicato de lítio e em cimento resinoso / Effect of surface treatments, thermocycling and loading on the bond between a ceramic and a resin cementGuarda, Guilherme Bottene, 1987- 18 August 2018 (has links)
Orientadores: Lourenço Correr Sobrinho, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-18T00:18:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Guarda_GuilhermeBottene_M.pdf: 2504078 bytes, checksum: 72f1d754db2ac04524c40271b35d7366 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011 / Resumo: O objetivo neste estudo foi investigar o efeito de diferentes tratamentos de superfície, fadiga mecânica e termociclagem na resistência da união à microtração da cerâmica IPS e.max (Ivoclar) e do cimento resinoso de ativação dupla. Métodos: 18 blocos de cerâmica (10 mm de comprimento x 7 mm de largura x 3 mm de espessura) foram confeccionados e divididos em 6 grupos (n=3): Grupos 1, 2 e 3 - jateamento por 5 segundos com partículas de óxido de alumínio de 50?m; Grupos 4, 5 e 6 - condicionamento com acido hidrofluorídrico à 10% por 20 segundos. O silano Rely X Ceramic Primer foi aplicado sobre todos os espécimes e seco por 5 minutos. Após, os blocos de cerâmica foram unidos à blocos de compósito restaurador Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar-Vivadent) com cimento resinoso RelyX ARC (3M ESPE), sob carga estática de 500 gf por 2 minutos. O excesso de cimento foi removido com micropincel e fotoativado por 160 segundos (40 s cada face) com um aparelho de LED (UltraLume 5, Ultradent). Os espécimes dos grupos 1 e 4 foram armazenados em água destilada a 37°C por 24 h. Nos grupos 2 e 5, os espécimes foram submetidos a 3.000 ciclos térmicos entre 5°C e 55°C. Para os grupos 3 e 6, os espécimes foram submetidos ao ensaio de fadiga mecânica por 100.000 ciclos com 2 Hz. Os espécimes foram seccionados perpendiculares a área de união para obtenção de palitos com área seccional de 1mm2 (25 palitos por grupo) e submetidos ao ensaio de resistência de união à microtração em máquina de teste universal (EZ Test - Shimadzu) com velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Foi utilizado para verificar o padrão de fratura uma lupa estereoscópica (Olympus) com aumento de 40x. Os dados foram submetidos à Análise de Variância de 2 fatores e ao teste de Tukey (p<0,05). Os valores de resistência de união à microtração (MPa) foram: 26,9 ± 6,9, 22,2 ± 7,8 e 21,2 ± 9,1 para os Grupos 1 a 3 e 35,0 ± 9,6, 24,3 ± 8,9 e 23,9 ± 6,3 para os Grupos 4 a 6. O grupo controle submetido ao teste de fadiga e termociclado mostrou predominância de padrão de fratura adesiva para o tratamento de superfície com acido hidrofluorídrico a 10% e padrões adesiva e mista para tratamento de superfície com 50um de oxido de alumínio. Concluindo a fadiga e a termociclagem diminuíram significantemente a resistência de união à microtração para ambos os tratamentos de superfície das cerâmicas comparada ao grupo controle. Condicionamento com acido hidrofluorídrico a 10% aumentou a resistência de união à microtração para o grupo controle / Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of surface treatments, mechanic fatigue and thermocycling tested on the microtensile bond strength of the ceramic IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent) luted with dual-cured resin cement. Eighteen ceramic bars (10mm length x 7mm width x 3.0mm thickness) were fabricated, and divided into 6 groups (n=3): Groups 1, 2 and 3 - air particle abraded for 5 s with 50?m aluminum oxide particles; Groups 4, 5 and 6 - acid etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s. Coupling agent silane was applied on to all bond surface specimens and allowed to dry for 5 s and the ceramic bars were bonded to a block of composite resin Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar-Vivadent) with Rely X ARC (3M ESPE) resin cement and placed under a 500 g static load for 2 min. The cement excess was removed with a disposable microbrush and 40 s light-activation (four activations) were performed using a LED curing unit (UltraLume LED 5, Ultradent). The specimens of the groups 1 and 4 were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, groups 2 and 5 were submitted to 3,000 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C and groups 3 and 6 submitted to a fatigue test for 100,000 cycles with 2 HZ. Specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the bonding area to obtain 1mm2 sectional area beams (25 beams per group) and submitted to a microtensile bond strength test in a universal testing machine (EZ Test - Shimadzu), at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. The fracture specimens were observed under optical microscopy (Olympus) at a 40x magnification. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (p?0.05). Results: The microtensile bond strength values (MPa) were: 26.9 ± 6.9, 22.2 ± 7.8 and 21.2 ± 9.1 for G1-G3 and 35.0 ± 9.6, 24.3 ± 8.9 and 23.9 ± 6.3 for G4-G6. The control group, fatigue tested and thermocycled groups showed a predominance of failure adhesive for surface treatment with 10% hydrofluoric acid and adhesive and mixed for surface treatment with 50 ?m Al2O3. In conclusion the fatigue and thermocycling decreased significantly the microtensile bond strength for both ceramic surface treatments compared to control groups. Etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid increased the microtensile bond strength for the control group / Mestrado / Materiais Dentarios / Mestre em Materiais Dentários
|
3 |
Effect of surface conditioning methods on repair bond strength of microhybrid resin matrix compositeRajitrangson, Phitakphong, 1982- January 2010 (has links)
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Repair is an alternative treatment option in many cases to replacement of resin matrix composite restoration. However, aged resin matrix composites have a limited number of carbon-carbon double bonds to adhere to a new layer of rein. Therefore, surface treatments of the aged resin matrix composite surface prior to repairing could improve the repair bond strength.
The objectives of this study were to: 1) To evaluate various surface treatments on
shear bond strength of repair between aged and new microhybrid resin matrix composite, and 2) To assess the influence of applying a silane coupling agent after surface
treatments.
Eighty disk-shaped resin matrix composite specimens were fabricated and
thermocycled 5000 times prior to surface treatment. Specimens were randomly assigned to one of the three surface treatments (n = 20): 1) Airborne abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide, 2) Tribochemical silica coating (CoJet), or 3) Er,Cr:YSGG laser and control group (n = 20). Specimens were cleaned with 35-percent phosphoric acid, rinsed, and dried. Each group was assigned into two subgroups (n =10): a) no silanization, and b) with silanization. Adhesive agent was applied and new resin matrix composite was bonded to each conditioned surface. Bond strength was evaluated by shear test. Data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA model. The interaction between conditioning and silanization was significant(p = 0.0163), indicating that comparisons of silanization must be evaluated for each conditioning method, and that comparisons of conditioning methods must be evaluated separately with and without silanization. Airborne particle abrasion showed significantly
higher repair bond strength than Er,Cr:YSGG laser without silanization (p < 0.0001) and with silanization(p = 0.0002), and higher repair bond strength than the control without silanization (p < 0.00001) and with silanization (p < 0.00001). Airborne particle abrasion
did not have significantly different in repair bond strength than Tribosilica coating without silanization (p = 0.70) or with silanization (p = 0.33). Tribosilica coating had significantly higher repair bond strength than Er,CR:YSGG laser without silanization
(p < 0.0001) and with silanization (p < 0.0001), and significantly higher repair bond strength than control without silanization (p < 0.0001), but not with silanization (p =0.16). Er,CR:YSGG laser and control did not have significantly different repair bond strength without silanization (p = 1.00) or with silanization (p = 0.11). There was no
effect of silanization on repair bond strength overall (p = 0.34) for any of the surface conditioning methods (p = 0.76 for airborne particle abrasion; p = 0.39 for tribosilica coating; p = 1.00 for Er,Cr:YSGG laser, or p = 0.39 for control). Airborne particle abrasion with 50-μm aluminum oxide particle and tribochemical silica coating followed by the application of bonding agent provided the highest shear bond strength values, suggesting that they might be adequate methods to improve the quality of the repairs of resin-matrix composites.
|
Page generated in 0.0694 seconds