Spelling suggestions: "subject:"aristotle"" "subject:"aristotles""
101 |
Addiction and action: Aristotle and Aquinas in dialogue with addiction studiesDunnington, Kent J. 15 May 2009 (has links)
The phenomenon of addiction has been a subject of investigation for a number of
academic disciplines, but little has been written about addiction from a philosophical
perspective. This dissertation inserts philosophy into the conversations taking place
within the multi-disciplinary field of “Addiction Studies.” It contends that the
philosophical accounts of human action given by Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas
provide means for an analysis of many of the conceptual confusions in the field of
Addiction Studies, including those surrounding the concepts of choice, compulsion, and
habit. It argues that the category of habit in these two thinkers is richer and more
complex than contemporary conceptions of habit and that the category of habit in its
Aristotelian and Thomistic guises is indispensable for charting an intelligible path
between the muddled polarities that construe addiction as either a disease or a type of
willful misconduct. Furthermore, it suggests that recognizing the distance between
Aristotle’s social context and the modern social context affords powerful insight into the
character of modern addiction, and that an exploration of the parallels between the habit
of addiction and Aquinas’s development of the habit of charity offers suggestive inroads
for thinking about addiction as a moral strategy for integrated and purposive action.
|
102 |
Aristotle on deformitiesGiulietti, Stephen. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. L.)--Catholic University of America, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 80-81).
|
103 |
Opinions in context Reconsidering endoxa in Aristotle's "On Rhetoric" /Simpler, Kyle. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.) -- University of Texas at Arlington, 2008.
|
104 |
Platos Ideenlehre in der Darstellung und in der Kritik des AristotelesWilbrandt, Robert, January 1899 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin. / "Die ganze Abhandlung beabsichtige ich später unter dem Titel "Platos Ideenlehre in der Kritik des Aristotels zu veröffentlichen": t.p. verso. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
105 |
Ontwikkelingsmomenteu in de xielkunde van Aristoteles een historisch philosophische studie ...Nuyens, Franciscus Johannes Christiaan Jozef. January 1939 (has links)
Academisch proefschrift--Amsterdam. / Summaries in French and German. "Literatuur": p. [321]-328.
|
106 |
Aristoteles und der aristotelische Essentialismus Individuum, Art, Gattung /Liske, Michael-Thomas January 1900 (has links)
Edition commerciale de : Dissertation : Philosophie : Freiburg : 1982-1983. / Bibliogr. p. 440-448. Index.
|
107 |
Aristotle's teleology and modern mechanicsMirus, Christopher V. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Notre Dame, 2004. / Thesis directed by Phillip R. Sloan and Michael J. Loux for the Program in History and Philosophy of Science. "January 2004." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 278-285).
|
108 |
De Aristotelis dicendi ratione : Pars prima, Observationes de particularum usu ... /Eucken, Rudolf, January 1866 (has links)
Dissertatio inauguralis--Academia Georgia Augusta (Göttingen?).
|
109 |
Should Aristotle pass the buck? : on choosing a virtuous act for itself / On choosing a virtuous act for itselfSmith, Kevin Wayne 27 February 2012 (has links)
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle identifies three conditions that are necessary in order for a virtuous act to have been done as a virtuous agent: the act must be done (1) knowingly, (2) for itself, and (3) from a steady disposition. I examine previous interpretations of the second item, and then offer my own: a virtuous act is chosen for itself if it is chosen for its virtue-making features that are also reasons to do the act, and these features motivate the agent to such an extent that the agent would do the act even if there were no other reason to do it. / text
|
110 |
The role of actuality in Aristotle's first philosophyBattiste, Brian 01 July 2014 (has links)
I show how Aristotle’s theory of the priority of actuality and his theory of non-correlative actuality help prepare the way for his own positive account of the separate, non-sensible substances. Aristotle argues that actuality is prior to potentiality in Metaphysics [Theta]8, and in particular that actuality is prior in substance and in a more authoritative kind of way. I show how both of these arguments are to be understood, and how the more authoritative kind of priority (which is not substantial priority, as usually thought) is again appealed to in Metaphysics [Lamda]6 in order to draw important inferences about the primary principles. I also show how the theory of non-correlative actuality used in [Theta]8 is, just like the more authoritative kind of priority, again applied in [Lamda]6 in parallel kinds of ways. It turns out that the traditional interpretation which ascribes the notion of “pure actuality” to Aristotle is mistaken, and this comes to light once Aristotle’s theory of non-correlative actuality is properly understood and the texts are properly interpreted. / text
|
Page generated in 0.0356 seconds