No description available.

<p dir="ltr">In the dynamic realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this study explores the multifaceted landscape of Trustworthy AI with a dedicated focus on achieving both explainability and acceptance. The research addresses the evolving dynamics of AI, emphasizing the essential role of human involvement in shaping its trajectory.</p><p dir="ltr">A primary contribution of this work is the introduction of a novel "Trustworthy Explainability Acceptance Metric", tailored for the evaluation of AI-based systems by field experts. Grounded in a versatile distance acceptance approach, this metric provides a reliable measure of acceptance value. Practical applications of this metric are illustrated, particularly in a critical domain like medical diagnostics. Another significant contribution is the proposal of a trust-based security framework for 5G social networks. This framework enhances security and reliability by incorporating community insights and leveraging trust mechanisms, presenting a valuable advancement in social network security.</p><p dir="ltr">The study also introduces an artificial conscience-control module model, innovating with the concept of "Artificial Feeling." This model is designed to enhance AI system adaptability based on user preferences, ensuring controllability, safety, reliability, and trustworthiness in AI decision-making. This innovation contributes to fostering increased societal acceptance of AI technologies. Additionally, the research conducts a comprehensive survey of foundational requirements for establishing trustworthiness in AI. Emphasizing fairness, accountability, privacy, acceptance, and verification/validation, this survey lays the groundwork for understanding and addressing ethical considerations in AI applications. The study concludes with exploring quantum alternatives, offering fresh perspectives on algorithmic approaches in trustworthy AI systems. This exploration broadens the horizons of AI research, pushing the boundaries of traditional algorithms.</p><p dir="ltr">In summary, this work significantly contributes to the discourse on Trustworthy AI, ensuring both explainability and acceptance in the intricate interplay between humans and AI systems. Through its diverse contributions, the research offers valuable insights and practical frameworks for the responsible and ethical deployment of AI in various applications.</p>

<p dir="ltr">The research delves into the intricate challenge of quantifying data protection, a concept that has evolved from ancient ethical codes to the complex landscape of modern cybersecurity. The research underscores the pressing need for a scientific approach to cybersecurity, emphasizing the importance of measurable security properties and a robust theoretical foundation. It highlights the historical evolution of confidentiality, tracing its roots from ancient civilizations to the contemporary digital era, where the proliferation of technology has amplified both the important ortance and complexity of safeguarding sensitive information. The research identifies key challenges in measuring data protection, including the dynamic nature of threats, the gap between theoretical models and real-world implementations, and the difficulty of accurately modeling risks. It also explores societal challenges related to data protection, such as data breaches, surveillance, social media privacy erosion, and the lack of adequate regulations and enforcement.</p><p dir="ltr">The core of the research lies in developing a causal model that examines the interplay of security controls, vulnerabilities,and threats, providing a deeper understanding of the factors influencing data exposure. The model is built upon a comprehensive literature review, synthesizing key findings and establishing a taxonomy of security protections. The research outlines a structured approach to building and utilizing causality models, incorporating essential elements such as identifying key variables, visualizing causal relationships using Directed (A)cyclic Graphs (DAGs), and determining appropriate research methodologies. The model is rigorously validated through various techniques, including assessing model fit, examining confounding factors. The research also explores a general set of experiments for both interventions and counterfactual studies.</p><p dir="ltr">The research concludes by highlighting potential future research directions, particularly emphasizing the need for standardized data protection metrics and the development of adaptive security systems. It underscores the importance of consistent measurements that enable organizations to compare their security performance effectively and adapt to the evolving threat landscape. The development of adaptive security systems, capable of dynamically modifying defense mechanisms in response to new threats, is also identified as a crucial research avenue. The research's contribution lies in providing a systematic approach to studying data protection, from problem identification to model development, validation, and future directions, ultimately aiming to enhance the protection of sensitive information.</p>