Orientador: Lídia Almeida Barros / Banca: Maurizio Babini / Banca: Nelson Luis Ramos / Banca: Ricardo Baptista Madeira / Resumo: A presente dissertação resulta do desenvolvimento de um projeto sobre o léxico, mais especificamente sobre a terminologia especializada predominante em atas de assembléias de associados submetidas à tradução juramentada. A língua de partida é a espanhola, nas variantes nacionais da Venezuela e do Uruguai, e a de chegada é a portuguesa do Brasil. Procedemos a investigações científicas no campo da Terminologia, utilizando também o arcabouço teórico e metodológico da Lingüística de Corpus e dos Estudos da Tradução Baseada em Corpus. Os termos foram identificados e contrastados aos corpora comparáveis em busca das aproximações e distanciamentos existentes entre os termos utilizados pelos tradutores juramentados e os termos encontrados em documentos de mesma natureza originalmente escritos em português. Buscamos ainda equivalentes em espanhol dos termos em português levantados em nossa pesquisa. Diante dos resultados, observamos questões de equivalência terminológica bilíngüe (total, parcial e ausência de equivalência). As análises foram feitas visando observar o quanto as diferentes realidades dos sistemas organizacionais do país de origem dos textos traduzidos e do país a que tais termos se destinam são relevantes para a compreensão do texto e de sua tradução. As diferenças encontradas não se situam apenas entre as duas línguas em questão (o português e o espanhol), mas também entre as variantes nacionais venezuelana, uruguaia e espanhola. / Abstract: The present work results from the development of a project about the lexicon, more specifically about the terminology that can be found in minutes of member's meetings submitted to sworn translation. The source language is Spanish, from Venezuela and Uruguay and the target language is Brazilian Portuguese. Our study was performed based on Terminology; we also drawn on some theoretical and methodological principles of Corpus Linguistics and of Corpus-Based Translation Studies. The terms were identified and contrasted with two comparable corpora to find approximations and distances from the terminologies that were used by the sworn translators and the terms found dealing with the same subject. We also searched for the equivalents in Spanish to the terms in Portuguese that were found in our corpus of study. We observed bilingual terminological equivalencies related to total, partial or even absence of equivalence. The analysis was carried out in order to show how different realities of the organizational systems of the countries in which the texts are produced, and the country to which the texts are destined, are relevant for the understanding and the translation, mainly the sworn translation. The differences found were not only between Spanish and Portuguese, but also between the language spoken in Venezuela, Uruguay and Spain. / Mestre

Doctor of Philosophy / Department of History / Michael Krysko / David Stone / Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who was a nationalist leader and founder and first president of the republic of Turkey, still remains an important figure in the Turkish political and social landscape. Kemalist historiography, which is based on Mustafa Kemal’s six-day speech (Nutuk) in October 1927, emphasizes the foundation of the Republic as central to Turkish history. While this historiography emphasizes that Mustafa Kemal had an explicit plan during his modernization efforts, this dissertation will cover how Mustafa Kemal was incoherent in his actions and changed his discourses over and over again during the change of the political structure of Turkey. Beyond that, this study will suggest that Mustafa Kemal was an opportunist and pragmatist who utilized every single event to establish a Jacobin style autocracy. This research will discuss how Mustafa Kemal succeeded in using every opportunity, such as the Law of Supreme Commander Act in August 1921, the abolition of Sultanate in 1922, the establishment of Republic in 1923, the abolition of Caliphate in 1924, and the elimination of opposition in 1925, to establish his personal autocracy. In particular, the records of Assembly debates, not sufficiently used by Turkish historians, will be helpful to understand the creation of this personal autocracy. While Kemalist historiography credits Mustafa Kemal Ataturk with the original and unique conception of the social, legal, and educational reforms of the early Republican period, this dissertation argues that this approach is not balanced. Although the Kemalist historiography asserts that Mustafa Kemal and his legacy represent carrying out Enlightenment ideals in an obsolete society almost totally ignorant of these principles, the Kemalist modernization got a great inheritance from its predecessors, the Young Turks. Therefore, the Kemalist overstatement of an idealist figure of Mustafa Kemal is wrong in some degree. This dissertation aims to scrutinize the contribution of the Ottoman reformers and contradictions, mistakes, and overstatements of the Kemalist modernization project in social, legal, and educational areas by the help of wide primary sources which include official reports of the Grand National Assembly, the Republican Era archives and a mass of periodicals which were published in 1920s in Turkey.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:22:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2009-06-01Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:28:35Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 costa_lr_me_sjrp.pdf: 516889 bytes, checksum: 36d1aac51c9fc1b9b626da124ab023e7 (MD5) / A presente dissertação resulta do desenvolvimento de um projeto sobre o léxico, mais especificamente sobre a terminologia especializada predominante em atas de assembléias de associados submetidas à tradução juramentada. A língua de partida é a espanhola, nas variantes nacionais da Venezuela e do Uruguai, e a de chegada é a portuguesa do Brasil. Procedemos a investigações científicas no campo da Terminologia, utilizando também o arcabouço teórico e metodológico da Lingüística de Corpus e dos Estudos da Tradução Baseada em Corpus. Os termos foram identificados e contrastados aos corpora comparáveis em busca das aproximações e distanciamentos existentes entre os termos utilizados pelos tradutores juramentados e os termos encontrados em documentos de mesma natureza originalmente escritos em português. Buscamos ainda equivalentes em espanhol dos termos em português levantados em nossa pesquisa. Diante dos resultados, observamos questões de equivalência terminológica bilíngüe (total, parcial e ausência de equivalência). As análises foram feitas visando observar o quanto as diferentes realidades dos sistemas organizacionais do país de origem dos textos traduzidos e do país a que tais termos se destinam são relevantes para a compreensão do texto e de sua tradução. As diferenças encontradas não se situam apenas entre as duas línguas em questão (o português e o espanhol), mas também entre as variantes nacionais venezuelana, uruguaia e espanhola. / The present work results from the development of a project about the lexicon, more specifically about the terminology that can be found in minutes of member’s meetings submitted to sworn translation. The source language is Spanish, from Venezuela and Uruguay and the target language is Brazilian Portuguese. Our study was performed based on Terminology; we also drawn on some theoretical and methodological principles of Corpus Linguistics and of Corpus-Based Translation Studies. The terms were identified and contrasted with two comparable corpora to find approximations and distances from the terminologies that were used by the sworn translators and the terms found dealing with the same subject. We also searched for the equivalents in Spanish to the terms in Portuguese that were found in our corpus of study. We observed bilingual terminological equivalencies related to total, partial or even absence of equivalence. The analysis was carried out in order to show how different realities of the organizational systems of the countries in which the texts are produced, and the country to which the texts are destined, are relevant for the understanding and the translation, mainly the sworn translation. The differences found were not only between Spanish and Portuguese, but also between the language spoken in Venezuela, Uruguay and Spain.