No description available.

Background: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a non-steroid, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor indicated for atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1%-based treatment versus conventional therapy in adults with moderate AD. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 62) or vehicle (n = 68) at the first signs/symptoms of AD, for 24 weeks as required. A moderately potent topical corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was allowed in both groups to treat flares. Results: Corticosteroids were required on fewer days in the pimecrolimus group, compared with the vehicle group (9.7 vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 59.7% of pimecrolimus-treated patients experienced no flares during the study period, compared with 22.1% of vehicle-treated patients (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was well tolerated throughout the study. Conclusion: For adults with moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of flares, reduces/eliminates corticosteroid use, improves long-term disease control and enhances the patients’ quality of life. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Allergic manifestations are increasingly common in infants and children. Accumulating evidence suggests that the ‘epidemic’ increase of childhood allergy may be associated with environmental factors such as stress. Although the impact of stress on the manifestation and exacerbation of allergy has been demonstrated, the underlying mechanisms of stress-induced exacerbation are still obscure. A growing number of studies have suggested an altered hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function to stress in allergic children. It is speculated that a dysfunctional HPA axis in response to stress may facilitate and/or consolidate immunological aberrations and thus, may increase the risk for allergic sensitization and exacerbation especially under stressful conditions. In the present review the potential impact of a hyporesponsive as well as a hyperresponsive HPA axis on the onset and chronification of childhood allergy is summarized. Moreover, potential factors that may contribute to the development of an aberrant HPA axis responsiveness in allergy are discussed. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Erhöhte Hautoberflächen-pH-Werte werden bei atopischer Dermatitis beobachtet.Störungen der pH-Regulation, insbesondere eine unzureichende Azidifizierug des Stratum corneum, werden mit der Störung der epidermalen Barrierefunktion bei atopischer Dermatitis als pathogenetischer Faktor diskutiert.Zielsetzung der vorliegenden Arbeit war die Klärung der Frage, ob Störungen der pH-Regulation schon unmittelbar im Verlauf der postpartalen Phase bei Neugeborenen nachweisbar sind. Ferner sollte geklärt werden, ob der Hautoberflächen-pH-Wert als Prädiktor der atopischen Dermatitis herangezogen werden kann.Es wurden 108 Säuglinge der Entbindungsstation des Städtischen Klinikums Gütersloh im postpartalen Verlauf (4 bis 7 Tage,sowie 6, 12 und 24 Wochen nach der Geburt) mittels Hautoberflächen-pH-Messung und Corneometrie (24 Woche postpartum) untersucht. Es wird gezeigt, dass der Hautoberflächen-pH-Wert atopisch disponierter Säuglinge und von Säuglingen ohne atopische Disposition keinen signifikanten Unterschied im postpartalen Verlauf aufweist.Dagegen zeigten atopisch disponierte Säuglinge einen deutlich niedrigeren Wert der Stratum-corneum-Hydratation (Corneometrie). Die Ergebnise lassen den Schluß zu, dass der Barrierefunktionsstörung der atopischen Dermatitis keine primäre pH-Regulationsstörung zugrunde liegt. Die Messung der Hautoberflächen-pH eignet sich nicht zur Früherkennung der atopischen Dermatitis.

Ziel der hier vorgelegten Untersuchung war es, die Bedeutung von S. aureus-Exotoxinen/Superantigenen als Pathogenitätsfaktor bei der AD zu analysieren, da kausalpathogenetisch ausgerichtete Experimentalansätze sowie systematische klinische Untersuchungen zu dieser Thematik bei Patienten mit AD ausstanden. In einer Querschnittsstudie war eine Assoziation zwischen dem Grad der S. aureus-Besiedlung und dem Schweregrad der AD nachzuweisen. Von 74 Kindern mit AD waren 60 (81%) mit S. aureus kolonisiert. S. aureus Exotoxin-sezernie-rende Stämme wurden bei 40 Patienten (53%) von der Haut isoliert. Am häufigsten wurden SEA- und SEC-sezernierende Stämme nachgewiesen, gefolgt von SEB, TSST-1 und SED. Der ausgeprägteste Schweregrad der AD wurde in der mit Exotoxin-sezernierenden S. aureus-kolonisierten Gruppe beobachtet. Für die Schwere der Erkrankung, gemessen am SCORAD-Score wurde eine Varianzaufklärung von 30% für die Exotoxine und 50% für die S. aureus-Infektion errechnet. In einer Subgruppe von Patienten wurde der Einfluß von S. aureus-Exotoxinen auf intradermale T-Zell-Rezeptor-Vß-Repertoir-Veränderungen untersucht. Bei den Patienten mit chronischer AD, die mit SEB-sezernierendem S. aureus besiedelt waren, war mittels immunhistologischer Untersuchung in der Haut nachzuweisen, dass zwischen 25% und 65% der intradermalen T-Zellen das zugehörige Superantigen-reaktive Vß-T-Zell-Repertoire gegenüber 5% bis 17% der T-Zellen im Blut exprimieren. Weder in der Haut noch im Blut war eine Akkumulation nicht-superantigenreaktiver T-Zell-Subpopulationen nachzuweisen. Auch fand sich keine selektive Akkumulation von Vß-T-Zell-Subpopulationen bei Kindern mit S. aureus-Kolonisierung ohne Exotoxinnachweis. Die Ergebnisse belegen, dass bei Kindern mit AD und positivem S. aureus-Exotoxinnachweis auf ekzematöser Haut ein Grossteil der dermal akkumulierten T-Zellen auf diese S. aureus-Exotoxine/Superantigene reagieren können und wesentlich an der Pathogenese der AD beteiligt sind. In einer Teilpopulation bei 58 Kindern mit AD wurden Prävalenz und Rolle von Serum-IgE-Antikörpern gegen die S. aureus-Exotoxine SEA und SEB untersucht. Bei 34% der Kinder mit AD (20/58) konnten wir spezifische IgE-Antikörper gegen SEA und/oder SEB nachweisen (45% zu SEB, 10% zu SEA und 45% zu SEA und SEB). Alle gegen SEA und SEB sensibilisierten Kindern waren mit S. aureus kolonisiert gegenüber 71% (27/38) der nicht-sensibilisierten Kinder. Der Grad der S. aureus-Besiedlung, die Prävalenz von SEB-sezernierendem S. aureus auf der Haut, sowie die Prävalenz von S. aureus-Hautinfektionen war in der sensibilisierten Gruppe höher. Die höchste Varianzaufklärung von 37% wurde zwischen dem Vorliegen von S. aureus-Hautinfektionen und dem Nachweis spezifischer SEA/SEB-IgE-Antikörper ermittelt; diese stellen somit einen Risikofaktor für eine Sensibilisierung gegen S. aureus-Exotoxine dar. Die SEA/SEB-sensibilisierte Gruppe zeigte einen höheren Schweregrad der AD, höhere Serum-Gesamt-Spiegel und eine polyvalente Sensibilisierung gegen Inhalations- und Nahrungsmittelallergene. Insgesamt belegen unsere klinischen, immunologischen und statistischen Ergebnisse, dass die S. aureus-Exotoxine einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die Immunpathogenese der AD haben. Eine orale Therapie mit CyA kann bei S. aureus-kolonisierten Kindern die S. aureus-Besiedlungsdichte reduzieren. In der S. aureus-infizierten Gruppe war die Prävalenz von Exotoxin-produzierendem S. aureus und die Krankheitsaktivität höher, wobei eine Verminderung der Besiedlung nicht beobachtet wurde. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit erlauben den Schluss, dass S. aureus-Exotoxine als Triggerfaktor die Exazerbation der AD im Kindesalter wesentlich unterstützen. Deswegen sollte in ein therapeutisches Konzept eine konsequente Prävention bzw. eine Behandlung von S. aureus-Infektionen einbezogen werden. Kinder mit bereits schwerer AD profitieren von einer immunmodulatorischen Therapie. / Background: The skin of patients suffering from atopic dermatitis (AD) exhibits a striking susceptibility to colonization with S. aureus. Some strains of S. aureus secrete exotoxins with T cell superantigen activity (toxigenic strains) and abnormal T cell functions are known to play a critical role in AD. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of exotoxin production by skin-colonizing S. aureus on disease severity and the presence of T-cell subsets in lesional skin. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of oral cyclosporin A in severe pediatric atopic dermatitis on disease severity and S. aureus colonization density. Methods: In a cross sectional study of 74 children with atopic dermatitis, the presence and density of toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of S. aureus was correlated with disease severity. In a subgroup of patients the T cell receptor (TCR) Vß repertoire of peripheral blood and lesional T cells was investigated and correlated with individual superantigen activity of skin colonizing S. aureus. Furthermore, in a subgroup of patients, the presence of IgE antibodies to SEA and SEB was correlated with severity of the disease and the total and other unrelated allergen-specific IgE titers and density of colonization with S. aureus strains on atopic skin and episodes of superficial S. aureus skin infections. Eleven children with severe AD (SCORAD score > 50) were treated for eight weeks with 2.5 to 5 mg/kg CyA. In five children the skin was only colonized with S. aureus whereas the remaining six patients had clinically relevant skin infections with requirement for systemic antibiotic therapy. The isolates from the latter patients were sensitive for the selected antibiotics. Clinical and microbiological investigations were performed before and after CyA therapy. Results: 53% of children with AD were colonized with toxigenic strains of S. aureus producing SEC, SEA, TSST-1, SEB and SED in decreasing frequency. Children colonized with toxigenic S. aureus strains presented with higher disease severity as compared to the non-toxigenic and S. aureus negative groups. The influence of exotoxin production on the SCORAD score was determined as R2 = 0.3 (ie, 30% of the SCORAD score is explained by exotoxin production), whereas infection with S. aureus revealed R2 = 0.5. Patients colonized with toxigenic S. aureus exhibited shifts in the intradermal TCR Vß repertoire which correspond to the respective superantigen-responsive T cell subsets. In a subgroup of patients, twenty of 58 children (34%) were sensitized to superantigens (45% to SEB, 10% to SEA, 45% to SEA and SEB). In this group, severity of AD and levels of specific IgE to food and air allergens were higher. The degree of disease severity correlated to a higher extent with the presence of SEA/SEB-specific antibodies than with total serum IgE levels. Density of colonization with superantigen-secreting S. aureus strains was higher in the superantigen IgE-positive group. Sixty-three of these children experienced repeated episodes of superficial S aureus skin infections. The influence of S. aureus skin infection on the presence of SEA/SEB-specific antibodies was determined as R2 = 0.37 (ie, 37% of the the presence of SEA/SEB-specific antibodies is explained by S. aureus superficial skin infection). In the group of patients, who were treated with CyA, clinical signs and symptoms of AD improved in all patients (mean SCORAD score reduction from 74 to 29). However, disease severity was more supressed by CyA in the "colonized" patients compared with the patients with clinical S. aureus infections. Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in S. aureus density on atopic skin after CyA treatment in "colonized" patients but not in "infected" patients. The prevalence of exotoxin producing strains was higher in the "infected" group. Conclusion: The data demonstrate that S. aureus released exotoxins can modulate disease severity and dermal T cell infiltration. Patients, suffering from AD may take profit from both consequent prevention or treatment of S. aureus skin infection as well as immunmodulating approaches.

Background: Evidence-based treatment algorithms, successfully established for asthma, are missing for atopic eczema (AE). Objectives: To investigate whether treatment according to an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE. Methods: Based on a systematic literature review, we developed an evidence-based severity-score-oriented treatment algorithm for AE and compared its effectiveness to that of an individualised symptom-oriented treatment (individual therapy) in a randomised controlled trial. Sixty-three participants were randomised to algorithm (n = 32) or individual therapy (n = 31) and treated accordingly for 12 months. Study end points included difference between baseline SCORAD and mean SCORAD under treatment (primary end point), quality of life and treatment utilisation. Analysis was by intention to treat (registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00148746). Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical or subjective response were observed between groups. Treatment following the algorithm and individual treatment both effectively controlled AE. Mean SCORAD reductions were 47% (95% confidence interval, CI = 38–55; algorithm) and 42% (95% CI = 29–54; individual). Clinical response was paralleled by improved quality of life in both groups. Physicians adhered to the algorithm option in 93% of their treatment decisions. Conclusion: Treatment following an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE but does not show clear advantages compared to individualised treatment in a dermatological setting. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Financial constraints challenge evidence of the effectiveness of dermatological inpatient management. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of hospitalization in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis regarding initial and sustained benefits. Methods: Prospective study on adults with psoriasis vulgaris (n = 22) and atopic dermatitis (n = 14). At admission, discharge, and 3 months after discharge, validated outcomes of objective and subjective disease severity were assessed by trained investigators. Results: Hospitalization resulted in substantial benefit in quality of life and clinical disease severity. Looking at mean scores, the observed benefit appeared stable until 3-month follow-up. The analysis of individual patient data revealed significant changes in disease severity between discharge and 3-month follow-up with some patients relapsing, others further improving. Reasons for hospitalization and treatment performed were not related to sustained benefit. Conclusions: In psoriasis vulgaris and atopic dermatitis, hospitalization effectively improved quality of life and clinical disease severity. Further research should focus on prognostic factors for sustained improvement. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Pimecrolimus cream (Elidel®, SDZ ASM 981), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). We assessed whether early treatment of AD signs/symptoms reduces the need for topical corticosteroids. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the long-term management of adult AD. Methods: 192 adults with moderate to severe AD were randomised (1:1) for twice daily (b.i.d.) treatment of early signs or symptoms of AD with either pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle cream (control group) to prevent progression to flares. Treatment was given as needed for 24 weeks. In the event of flares, a moderately potent corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was permitted as rescue medication in both groups. The percentage of days on which a topical corticosteroid was used to treat disease flares was the main outcome measure. Results: Corticosteroid medication was used on 14.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 8.3–21.1) of the days of the 24-week treatment period in the pimecrolimus group and on 37.2% (95% CI: 30.4–44.0) of the days in the control group (p < 0.001). In total, 44.8% (43/96) of patients in the pimecrolimus group did not experience a flare compared with 18.8% (18/96) of patients in the control group. The median time to first flare was 144 days in the pimecrolimus group and 26 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus treatment was also associated with improvement in signs and symptoms of AD, pruritus, patients’ self-assessment and quality of life. Conclusions: Pimecrolimus cream 1% b.i.d. is an effective, well-tolerated, long-term treatment for AD in adults, substantially reducing the number of flares compared to a conventional therapy and consequently reducing or eliminating the need for corticosteroid treatment. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Evidence-based treatment algorithms, successfully established for asthma, are missing for atopic eczema (AE). Objectives: To investigate whether treatment according to an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE. Methods: Based on a systematic literature review, we developed an evidence-based severity-score-oriented treatment algorithm for AE and compared its effectiveness to that of an individualised symptom-oriented treatment (individual therapy) in a randomised controlled trial. Sixty-three participants were randomised to algorithm (n = 32) or individual therapy (n = 31) and treated accordingly for 12 months. Study end points included difference between baseline SCORAD and mean SCORAD under treatment (primary end point), quality of life and treatment utilisation. Analysis was by intention to treat (registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00148746). Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical or subjective response were observed between groups. Treatment following the algorithm and individual treatment both effectively controlled AE. Mean SCORAD reductions were 47% (95% confidence interval, CI = 38–55; algorithm) and 42% (95% CI = 29–54; individual). Clinical response was paralleled by improved quality of life in both groups. Physicians adhered to the algorithm option in 93% of their treatment decisions. Conclusion: Treatment following an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE but does not show clear advantages compared to individualised treatment in a dermatological setting. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.