• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Avalia????o da capacidade dos processos de governan??a corporativa de TI baseda no COBIT 5 / Avalia????o da percep????o da conformidade de processos de contrata????o de solu????es de tecnologia da informa????o com a instru????o normativa 04/2010 da SLTI

Santos, Diana Leite Nunes dos 05 August 2013 (has links)
Submitted by Kelson (kelson@ucb.br) on 2016-07-18T12:07:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DianaLeiteNunesdosSantosDissertacao2013.pdf: 2232490 bytes, checksum: d0f04d5a5aa136b8228c17afb63807e4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-18T12:07:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DianaLeiteNunesdosSantosDissertacao2013.pdf: 2232490 bytes, checksum: d0f04d5a5aa136b8228c17afb63807e4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-05 / COBIT 5 provides a separation of governance and management processes along with a new assessment approach that focus on process capability. This paper describes such assessment performed at a Brazilian government institution that resulted in 40% of the governance processes at level 0 ??? incomplete process and 60% at level 1 ??? performed process. Given the role of governance, fragilities in its processes may reflect negatively in management and additional research should include a closer look at this relationship. For this particular institution, it is expected that all governance processes are performed (level 1) by the next two years, which is a goal towards an efficient and effective governance system. The following barriers to the application of this self-assessment were found: lack of knowledge on COBIT 5 processes from the assessed institution and the extension of the questionnaire which had 33 questions in its final version. When compared to COBIT 4.1 assessment model, the results were lower, as the same organization was classified in level 2 - repeatable but intuitive. The previous model is also easier and faster to apply. This comparison should be done carefully for the models are very different in its design and use. Finally, the proposed objectives were met: the mechanism is repeatable and can be used in the future to create a historic base; it can be performed as a selfassessment and is expected to be completed, in a medium size IT department, in a four hour time limit. / O COBIT 5 traz a separa????o dos processos de governan??a e gerenciamento e uma nova abordagem de avalia????o com foco na capacidade dos processos. Esse artigo descreve a aplica????o deste tipo de avalia????o em uma institui????o governamental brasileira, que resultou em 40% dos processos de governan??a no n??vel 0 ??? processo incompleto, e 60% no n??vel 1 - processo executado. Dado o papel da governan??a, fragilidades em seus processos podem refletir negativamente no gerenciamento da TI da institui????o e pesquisas adicionais devem incluir um aprofundamento neste relacionamento. Para esta institui????o, em particular, ?? esperado que todos os processos de governan??a passem a ser executados (n??vel 1) nos pr??ximos dois anos, que ?? um objetivo no rumo de um sistema de governan??a eficiente e eficaz. As seguintes barreiras na aplica????o desta autoavalia????o foram encontradas: falta de conhecimento dos processos do COBIT 5 por parte da institui????o avaliada e extens??o do question??rio, que chegou a 33 perguntas em sua vers??o final. Quando comparado com o modelo de avalia????o do COBIT 4.1, os resultados foram inferiores, com a mesma organiza????o sendo classificada no n??vel 2 ??? repet??vel mas intuitivo. O modelo anterior ?? tamb??m mais r??pido e f??cil de aplicar. Essa compara????o deve ser feita com cuidado j?? que os modelos s??o muito diferentes em seu desenho e uso. Finalmente, os objetivos propostos foram alcan??ados: o mecanismo ?? repet??vel e pode ser usado futuramente para criar uma base hist??rica; ele pode ser aplicado como uma autoavalia????o e ?? esperado que seja completado, numa institui????o com uma ??rea de TI de m??dio porte, em at?? quatro horas.

Page generated in 0.1279 seconds