It has been demonstrated in past studies that drainage area (Ada) and mean annual precipitation depth (Pmean) are significant independent variables for predicting bankfull channel geometry. Bankfull width (Wbf), a particularly useful measure of bankfull channel geometry, is used in hydrology, fluvial geomorphology and stream ecology applications. Since precipitation depth does not generally have a normal distribution over a basin it is reasonable to question whether or not Pmean is the best measure of precipitation across a basin. That is, perhaps the median precipitation depth (P50) or the mean annual precipitation depth at the basin outlet (Poutlet) is more representative of precipitation in a basin. The objective of the study is to see if Pmean, P50, or Poutlet is a significantly better measure of precipitation in a watershed. Along with Ada, each of these precipitation measures was used to develop relationships for predicting Wbf for basins located across the continental U.S. Using several goodness-of-fit statistics i.e., coefficient of determination(R2), Standard error of estimates(SEE) and Akaike Information Criterion(∆AIC), the relationships were compared to determine which one had the greatest predictive strength. Estimates of Pmean, P50, and Poutlet were derived from a precipitation model developed by PRISM. Results from this study tentatively indicate that all three measures of precipitation depth yield models for predicting Wbf that have comparable goodness-of-fit statistics.

Headwater streams drain the majority of the landscape, yet little is known about their form and function in comparison to lowland rivers. Better understanding of their morphology and sediment transport processes will improve understanding of landscape evolution and promote a more complete view of fluvial systems. Therefore, the goal of my project was to determine controls on headwater channel form and function in the humid, moderate-relief drainage basins of the Valley and Ridge and Blue Ridge provinces in the southern Appalachian Mountains. I surveyed nine headwater (0.33 - 2 km2 drainage area) streams in a variety of bedrock, climate, base level, and land use conditions and produced a high-resolution dataset on their longitudinal and cross sectional form. This data was analyzed empirically to determine controls on channel form, and used in hydrologic modeling to determine the ability of the channels to erode their beds during regularly recurring flows as well as the recurrence interval of bankfull flows. Field survey results demonstrate that the channels are dominantly alluvial and vary greatly between and within channels in their overall longitudinal form, channel slope values, and grain size. These variations are due to differences in bedrock resistance at the formation level as well as at short wavelengths. Bedrock also controls channel form through its influence on local and regional base level, channel initiation processes, and log jam abundance. Hydraulic geometry, steam competence and bankfull flow recurrence also vary greatly between and within channels. This variation is due to the high sensitivity of the streams to hillslope influences such as bedrock resistance, boulder influx, and soil profile development. Increases in bedrock resistance within a channel create knickpoints that lower stream competence and slow hilllslope erosion. Stream competence is generally higher in channels with erodable bedrock and lower in channels with resistant bedrock, but most channels could entrain the majority of the grains on their bed at 2-year stormflows. Bankfull is a larger, less frequent flow than the 2-year storm at very small drainage areas (<0.4 km2), but is approximately a 2-year recurrence flow at larger drainage areas. Bankfull occurs less frequently in North Carolina Blue Ridge streams, due to deep soils that form on metamorphic bedrock under an more intense precipitation regime and have high rainfall storage capacity. Results indicate that variability is a fundamental feature of headwater streams and that they do not follow channel slope, hydraulic geometry, and bankfull relations developed in lowland river systems. / Master of Science

This study is concerned with the effect that mean annual precipitation (P) has on the relationship between bankfull channel width (Wbf) and drainage area (Ada). Several other studies have been conducted in which relationships were developed for predicting Wbf as a function of Ada and P. In most cases, however, the relationships were developed for specific regions, e.g., physiographic regions. This study is unusual in that it evaluates the relationship between Wbf, Ada, and P over a broad area (i.e., across a range of geologic, terrestrial, and climatic environments). In one study, where a broad area was considered, the relationship between Wbf, Ada, and P was found to be linear. The dataset for this study was compiled from data in U.S. Geological Survey flood-flow-frequency reports, regional curve studies (i.e., studies in which Wbf vs. Ada relationships are developed) and other sources. A total of 435 sites that span across 12 states of the continental U.S. are represented in the dataset. Streams represented in the dataset are alluvial and have widths from 1 to 110 m, drainage areas from 0.50 to 22,000 km2, and mean annual precipitation depths ranging from 22 to 277 cm/yr. Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Wadeable Streams Assessment study were employed in validating the results of this study. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was developed and it was determined that the intercept coefficient for the relationship between Wbf and Ada varies as follows: for P < 50 cm/yr the intercept coefficient (α) is constant; for 50 cm/yr ¡Ü P ¡Ü 100 cm/yr, α increases with P, and for P ¡Ý100 cm/yr, α is again constant. Across all values of P, the slope coefficient is constant (90% Confidence level). Changes in the relationship between Wbfand Ada are attributed to vegetation by noting that biome types changes from shrubland to forest as P increases from 50 to 100 cm/yr. These findings can be incorporated in regional curve studies and landscape evolution models (i.e., models which aim to integrate hydrology, land use history, geomorphology and climate change with models of vegetation succession).

No description available.

No description available.

It is well documented that urbanization changes the hydrology of watersheds (Hammer 1972; Booth 1991; Rose and Peters 2001). Increases in runoff volume and velocity from urbanization result in stream channel degradation (Hammer 1972; Henshaw and Booth 2000; Walsh et al. 2005; Leopold et al. 2005a; Poff et al. 2006). While stormwater management measures may be implemented to reduce the impact of stormwater runoff on streams, these practices do not reverse stream channel degradation that has already occurred. Stream restoration utilizing Natural Channel Stream Design (NCD) techniques is an effective way to reverse the effects of urbanization and return natural function to a stream. The design (bankfull) discharge for an NCD stream restoration project is the cornerstone of a restoration design. Existing methodologies for determining design discharges, such as hydrologic modeling and bankfull identification, have not worked well for NCD stream restoration projects in urban watersheds. The use of hydraulic geometry relationships serves as an alternative method for determining design discharge, but the required information is not generally available for urban Northern Virginia streams. However, rural regional curves developed for the Maryland piedmont, adjusted for watershed impervious area, provide a means to determine design discharges for urban stream restoration projects in Northern Virginia. / Master of Science

Hydraulic geometry relationships and regional curves are used in natural channel design to assist engineers, biologists, and fluvial geomorphologists in the efforts undertaken to ameliorate previous activities that have diminished, impaired or destroyed the structure and function of stream systems. Bankfull channel characteristics were assessed for 14 United States Geological Survey (USGS) gaged sites in the Inner Bluegrass and 15 USGS gaged sites in the Outer Bluegrass Regions of Kentucky. Hydraulic geometry relationships and regional curves were developed for the aforementioned regions. Analysis of the regression relationships showed that bankfull discharge is a good explanatory variable for bankfull parameters such as area, width and depth. The hydraulic geometry relationships developed produced high R2 values up to 0.95. The relationships were also compared to other studies and show strong relationships to both theoretical and empirical data. Regional curves, relating drainage area to bankfull parameters, were developed and show that drainage area is a good explanatory variable for bankfull parameters. R2 values for the regional curves were as high as 0.98.

No description available.

This report was sponsored by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to determine if stream restoration structures could be used as scour countermeasures near state highways and bridges. Scour countermeasures that are effective in preventing erosion exist but that are not so friendly for aquatic organisms. UDOT is interested in finding a countermeasure that is both effective in preventing erosion while not harming aquatic organisms. Stream restoration structures are friendly for aquatic organisms but are prone to failure when flows exceed the design levels. David Rosgen has developed restoration structures that are friendly for aquatic organisms and that have provided streambank protection. These structures are the J-Hook vane, Cross-Vane and W-Weir. Based research done in this report, Cross-Vanes and W-Weirs are best suited to protect bridges because they will protect both sides of a stream bank. For these restoration structures to be reliable at higher flows and shear stresses experienced at bridges, they must follow the design criteria specified in this report. One of the most important design requirements is that the structures designed by David Rosgen have an attached floodplain where the structure meets the streambank. The floodplain disperses the energy of the flow, reducing shear stress. In the vicinity of some bridges, a floodplain cannot be implemented. In such cases, culverts can be installed at the floodplain level, that pass under the bridge to help reduce shear stresses, mimicking a floodplain. Cross-Vanes and W-Weirs can be used to protect bridges and other infrastructure. Based on modeling and comparing restoration structures to a labyrinth weir, they still have an impact on higher flows. At higher than design flows, such as experienced at bridges, the structures help to reduce shear stresses. To further investigate their use as a scour countermeasure near bridges, it is recommended that a structure be installed near a bridge following this report's design criteria. This will be determined depending on available funding.

No description available.