Spelling suggestions: "subject:"betweenecology."" "subject:"coralsecology.""
1 |
Community assembly and spatial ecology of saproxylic coleoptera /Victorsson, Jonas, January 2009 (has links)
Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Univ., 2009. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.
|
2 |
The ecology of small predatory beetles, with special reference to their competitive relationsDavies, Michael January 1955 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
The endocoprid dung beetles of southern Africa (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)Davis, Adrian L V (Adrian Louis Victor) January 1978 (has links)
The biology and ecology of the endocoprid dung beetles of the Aethiopian zoogeographic region has been studied in the field and laboratory. Work has centred mainly on Oniticellus planatus and O. formoaus although infomation has also been supplied on O. egregius, O. pictus and Tragiscus dimidiatus. The taxonomy of Onticellus (s.str.) and Tragiscus has been discussed with the recommendation that O. planattus and O. pseudaplanatus be synonymised. It has been suggested that endocoprid distribution is chiefly controlled by temperature, rainfall and the density of suitable large dung masses. On the basis of distribution it has been suggested that the taxonomic status of the subspecies of O. pictus should be reviewed. Endocoprids (genus Oniticellus (s.str.) are found throughout the warmer regions of Africa and Asia. Tragiscus is found only in Africa. Methods are described for monitoring endocoprids in the field, for distinguishing freshly emerged from older specimens, and for breeding endocoprids under laboratory conditions. It has been shown that endocoprids breed within or just beneath large dung masses unlike most other members of the Scarabaeinae which actively bury dung and construct the their broods at depth in the soil. It has been shown that there is a restriction of breeding sites available to endocoprids due to the removal of dung by the Scarabaeinae beetles and the limited space available within dung pads. This has resulted in low endocoprid population numbers, a disadvantage, which has been countered by highly specialised but opportunistic breeding habits. The requirements of dung plasticity have limited the time available for breeding activity by most endocoprids (excluding O. egresius) so that both the reproductive system and the reproductive behaviour (cf. O. planatus) are geared to rapid egg and brood production. Large numbers of follicles are able to be produced over a short period. In the probable absence of feeding, this has possibly been allowed by the involvement of a well developed fat body. The broods are tended by the parent female during larval development and the follicles are gradually resorbed, probably to prevent starvation. Ovarian recovery is rapid once feeding recommences. Behavioural mechanisms have developed which boost the number of broods constructed and the rapidity with which they are produced. The duration of endocoprid colonisation and the timing of arrival at dung is shown to be related to the rate of pad desiccation which is chiefly controlled by temperature and degree of dung removal by other dung beetles. Precipitation may also play a part. Predation by vertebrates and other insects has been noted and a number of mechanisms are described which are probably protective. Two insect parasitoids of O. formosus larvae have been recorded. The potential use of endocoprids in the Australian dung and fly control project has been discussed and it is recommended that their introduction be considered of low priority. It is suggested that the endocoprids evolved from Euoniticellus type ancestors and that their behaviour complex nidification developed in response to harsh environmental factors, chiefly the danger of desiccation and competition for dung with other dung beetles. From a consideration of brood and brood chamber construction it is suggested that O. egresius is a relatively unspecialised endocoprid which may retain dry season aestivation and has not evolved much further than its probable Euoniticellus type ancestor. The broods are coated in clay and abandoned soon after construction. Greater specialisation is shown by O. planatus and O. formosus which exhibit brooding behaviour, increasing longevity, more specialised brood protection, increased potential fecundity and continuous activity throughout the year. O. formosus shows greater specialisation in brood production than O. planatus. Greatest specialisation is found in T. dimidiatus which exhibits a precise brooding period and low egg production. Brood construction is of a similar degree of specialisation to that of O. formosus. Activity is also continuous throughout the year. The comparative biology of the five southern African endocoprids is summarised in Table 35. Summary, p. 129-131.
|
4 |
The population ecology of certain carabid beetles living in marshes and near fresh waterMurdoch, William January 1963 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Habitat associations of riparian beetles (Coleoptera) at Big Beaver Creek Research Natural Area, North Cascades National Park, WashingtonLaBonte, James R. 18 March 2002 (has links)
Beetle diversity and habitat associations of five
prevalent riparian plant communities were examined along
the lower reaches of Big Beaver Creek Research Natural
Area, North Cascades National Park, Washington. These
communities were defined by dominant tree species, and
included Alder Swamps, Cedar-Hemlock Forests, Douglas-fir
Forests, Gravel Bars, and Willow-Sedge Swamps. Monthly
samples were taken with pitfall traps from 10 randomly
selected patches per habitat during the snow-free periods
(mid-June through mid-October) of 1995 and 1996.
A total of 8,179 non-necrophagous beetles was
collected, comprising 4 families and 290 species. Four
families - Staphylinidae (43%), Carabidae (31%),
Elateridae (12%), and Anthicidae (6%) accounted for 92%
of all individuals. Four families encompassed 65% of all
species Staphylinidae (31%), Carabidae (19%),
Elateridae (8%), arid Leiodidae (7%)
A few species accounted for the majority of
individuals. Almost 51% of individuals were found among
just 20 species. The five most abundant species in each
habitat accounted for 33% (Alder Swamps) to 71% (Gravel
Bars) of individuals.
Beetle abundance and species composition differed
among habitats. Abundance ranged from 1,530 (Cedar-Hemlock Forests) to 2,071 (Alder Swamps) . Abundance per
trap per month varied from 16 (Willow-sedge Swamps) to 27
(Alder Swamps). Species richness was lowest in Douglas-fir
Forests (76) and highest in Alder Swamps (119)
Simpson's 1-D index ranged from 0.74 (Douglas-fir
Forests) to 0.96 (Alder Swamps).
Species were categorized as detritivores,
fungivores, herbivores, omnivores, predators, and
unknowns. Individuals and species of predators and
fungivores were generally numerically dominant.
Herbivores and omnivores contributed few species and
individuals. Gravel Bars virtually lacked fungivores and
were the only community with many (more than 30%)
detrivorous individuals.
Two patterns of seasonal abundance were evident.
Abundance was highest in June in the two open habitats,
Gravel Bars and Willow-Sedge Swamps, thereafter sharply
and continuously declining into October. Abundance
peaked during September in the forested habitats.
Baseline data was acquired about the North Cascades
National Park beetle faunas, furthering Park goals to
perpetuate habitat and community assemblage integrity.
In a larger context, this information has also enriched
the understanding of the arthropod faunas of the Pacific
Northwest. / Graduation date: 2002
|
6 |
Effects of forest site preparation methods on carabid beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) diversityBeaudry, Suzanne January 1995 (has links)
The objective was to analyze the effects of logging and prescribed burning on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at a jack pine stand and white spruce plantations in order to assess short-term impacts of these forestry practices on the diversity of this beetle group. In addition, soil scarification was also included at the jack pine stand. Based on previous reports on forest disturbance influences on carabids, it is hypothesized that short-term effects of studied forestry practices do not reduce carabids' diversity. Four carabid assemblage characteristics were compared: (a) number of catches; (b) dry mass; (c) species richness; and, (d) diversity index. Species responses and dry mass distributions were also investigated. Treatments either increased or maintained studied variables compared with control sites. Diversity indices were highest in burnt-over areas. Similar response patterns of species or groups of species were observed in both forest types. The presence of regenerating sites among the natural landscape increased carabid diversity.
|
7 |
Ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities along a successional gradient in southwestern Quebec and notes on the range expansion of introduced speciesMercado, Alida. January 2005 (has links)
Species diversity is influenced by disturbance in the environment. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) were used as a model taxon to study the effects of disturbance (i.e., time since disturbance) in different habitats along a successional gradient (agricultural fields, old fields, young forests and old forests). Seventy-three species (5139 individuals) were collected during both years of sampling, of which 9 species are introduced species and compose 64.8% of the total catch. In contrast to the predictions of the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, diversity of ground beetles was higher in the agricultural fields and lowest in the old forests. The community composition, as seen with Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination, in the agricultural fields was the most distinct, while the difference between and among other habitats was less clear, possibly influenced by the introduced species present in the area. The introduced species collected had a significant influence in the total catch as they represented more than half of the total individuals collected and in the ground beetle community composition. The distribution of seven introduced species in Quebec was studied and compared to what was reported in 1975. Five species have a similar distribution, while the distribution range of Harpalus rufipes DeGeer has expanded south and Bembidion obtusum Audinet-Serville might have been dispersing northeast since its introduction.
|
8 |
Response of carabid and cicindelid beetles to various types of landscape disturbances.Jaganyi, Joan N. U. 23 December 2013 (has links)
A study of carabids and cicindelids was carried out in eastern South Africa using the same
methodology as has been used in the northern hemisphere to obtain a southern hemisphere
perspective. The study used the macroecology approach to compare patterns and responses of
these animals to anthropogenic disturbances in visually similar habitats (forests, grasslands).
Although this is essentially a local component of a larger macroecological study, it is shown that
even though species and identities differ between the north and southern hemispheres, the
general patterns of community response to anthropogenic disturbances are surprisingly similar.
Changes in carabid assemblages were assessed across eight sites or landscape elements
experiencing a range of disturbance types, both regular and irregular (such as mowing, fire,
irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides, forestry). Direct comparisons were made with similar studies
in the Palaearctic. Species diversity, seasonal population variations, population phenology,
spatial patterns and mean body size of species assemblages relative to the landscape elements
are described. As in the north, intensively disturbed biotopes were impoverished, and natural
patches of moist forest acted as habitat sources for these disturbed sinks. Roadside verges were
species-rich analogues of natural habitats. The mean body size of carabid assemblages in forest
and grassland sites decreased with increasing intensity of disturbance. One contrary comparison
with the north was that a plantation, in this case macadamia, was exceptionally rich in carabid
species and individuals.
Classification and ordination methods identified and characterised the eight sites to six
ecological meaningful biotopes for carabids and cicindelids. This also allowed inferences as to
how the various landscape disturbances in natural forests, planted pine forests, macadamia
plantation, recreational park, road verge grasslands and hayfields affect carabid and cicindelid
species richness and abundance. Species assemblages that responded to these anthropogenic
impacts were potential indicator groups that can assist in the planning and management of forest
and grassland landscapes for conservation of biodiversity. Some management recommendations
for these landscapes are given.
Individual species-environment relations were investigated using both univariate and
multivariate analyses. The solutions to these analyses were then used to describe how species are distributed along major environmental gradients. It was shown that soil characteristics (pH,
moisture, twig and/or leaf litter) determine carabid and cicindelid assemblages. Land-use and
management regimes influence these patterns. The effect of altitude is masked by the presence
of soil characteristics in a multivariate analysis, and more so in the presence of pH and moist
soil-sand gradients with changing altitude. In the absence of soil characteristics and in univariate
analysis, altitude becomes very important. Altitude has therefore an indirect effect in that it
determines climate, which, in turn, determines soil and vegetation type which then determines
species presence and abundance.
It is concluded that the macroecological approach has great potential for teasing apart local
effects from global ones, and can contribute to the conservation of biodiversity at both small and
large scales. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 1998.
|
9 |
The ecology and control of small hive beetles (Aethina tumida Murray)Ellis, James Douglas January 2004 (has links)
The small hive beetle (Aethina tumida Murray) is an endemic scavenger in colonies of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) subspecies inhabiting sub-Saharan Africa. The beetle only occasionally damages host colonies in its native range and such damage is usually restricted to weakened/diseased colonies or is associated with after absconding events due to behavioral resistance mechanisms of its host. The beetle has recently been introduced into North America and Australia where populations of managed subspecies of European honey bees have proven highly susceptible to beetle depredation. Beetles are able to reproduce in large numbers in European colonies and their larvae weaken colonies by eating honey, pollen, and bee brood. Further, adult and larval defecation is thought to promote the fermentation of honey and large populations of beetles can cause European colonies to abscond, both resulting in additional colony damage. The economic losses attributed to the beetle since its introduction into the United States have been estimated in millions of US dollars. Although beetles feed on foodstuffs found within colonies, experiments in vitro show that they can also complete entire life cycles on fruit. Regardless, they reproduce best on diets of honey, pollen, and bee brood. After feeding, beetle larvae exit the colony and burrow into the ground where they pupate. Neither soil type nor density affects a beetle’s ability to successfully pupate. Instead, successful pupation appears to be closely tied to soil moisture. African subspecies of honey bees employ a complicated scheme of confinement (aggressive behavior toward and guarding of beetles) to limit beetle reproduction in a colony. Despite being confined away from food, adult beetles are able to solicit food and feed from the mouths of their honey bee guards. Remarkably, beetle-naïve European honey bees also confine beetles and this behavior is quantitatively similar to that in African bees. If confinement efforts fail, beetles access the combs where they feed and reproduce. Two modes of beetle oviposition in sealed bee brood have been identified. In the first mode, beetles bite holes in the cappings of cells and oviposit on the pupa contained within. In the second mode, beetles enter empty cells, bite a hole in the wall of the cell, and oviposit on the brood in the adjacent cell. Despite this, African bees detect and remove all of the infected brood (hygienic behavior). Similarly, European bees can detect and remove brood that has been oviposited on by beetles. Enhancing the removal rate of infected brood in European colonies through selective breeding may achieve genetic control of beetles. Additional avenues of control were tested for efficacy against beetles. Reducing colony entrances slowed beetle ingress but the efficacy of this method probably depends on other factors. Further, the mortality of beetle pupae was higher when contacting species of the fungus Aspergillus than when not, making biological control an option. Regardless, no control tested to date proved efficacious at the level needed by beekeepers so an integrated approach to controlling beetles remains preferred. The amalgamation of the data presented in this dissertation contributed to a discussion on the beetle’s ecological niche, ability to impact honey bee colonies in ways never considered, and the ability to predict the beetle’s spread and impact globally.
|
10 |
Ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities along a successional gradient in southwestern Quebec and notes on the range expansion of introduced speciesMercado, Alida. January 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0462 seconds