Spelling suggestions: "subject:"beneficiaries -- south africa -- limpopo"" "subject:"beneficiaries -- south africa -- ḽimpopo""
1 |
An analysis of the impact of land redistribution projects in Modimolle Municipality,Limpopo ProvinceBuys, Michael January 2012 (has links)
Thesis (M.Dev.) --University of Limpopo, 2012
|
2 |
Examination of socio-economic benefits of land restitution in the Makuleke community of Limpopo ProvinceMkhombo, Vusiwana Veronica 11 February 2016 (has links)
Institute for Rural Development / MRDV
|
3 |
Intervention strategy for improving livelihoods of restituted farm beneficiaries in Waterberg District of Limpopo Province, South AfricaTjale, Malose Moses 17 May 2019 (has links)
PhDRDV / Institute for Rural Development / Land reform programmes have been implemented to address challenges of inequality in land
ownership and poverty in many countries worldwide. They provide the poor people with
important livelihood opportunities, such as livestock rearing, crop production and game farming
in many rural areas. The government of South Africa, through the Department of Rural
Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) allocated various farms through the restitution
programme to deal with unemployment, poverty, unsustainable livelihoods, shortage of skills
and inequality challenges. This study focused on the restituted farm beneficiaries in Waterberg
District. This was informed by the fact that since these farms were restituted, the majority of the
farm beneficiary’s livelihoods have not significantly changed.
A transformative sequential mixed method design was applied in this study in order to enable
beneficiaries define their own issues and seek solutions. This involved concurrent collection of
both quantitative and qualitative data; a stratified random sampling method was used to select
474 respondents. Qualitative data was collected using Interview guides, photo-voice and focus
group discussions mainly from key informants- traditional leaders and the Ward Councillors.
Two focus group discussion were held with the key informants and an observation was also
used to collect qualitative data from the farmers. The data were analysed using ATLAS. ti
version 7.5.7 and Thematic Content Analysis. The quantitative data was collected using a
survey questionnaire and the Geographical Information System (GIS) approach to provide
trends of the farm production. Remote sensing analysis was used to determine farm production
performance of these restituted farms while the Statistical Package for the Social Science
(SPSS version 25) was used for computing descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation.
The data indicated that farm production has declined since occupation of farms by the farm
beneficiaries from 1995 to 2015. The decline has negatively affected the livelihoods of farm
beneficiaries since more than half (61.6 %) indicated difficulties in effective operation of the farm
due to lack of markets. About 64% of the farm beneficiaries have not been trained in farming.
From 1995 to 2015, most of the restituted farms have lacked markets for their produce due to
poor production arising from lack of funds to manage the farms. This has impeded beneficiaries
from receiving any benefits, in terms of income or employment. Generally, the study concluded
that there were no changes in the socio-economic status of the farm beneficiaries in the
Waterberg District because most of the farms are not being utilised. The study recommends that
the sector Department and private organizations should work together in ways, such as
assisting the farm beneficiaries with capacity building, developing marketing strategy for the
farm produce, with funds and infrastructure to improve production.
With respect to farm performance satisfaction, the majority (77.2 %) of the farm beneficiaries
were not satisfied with the restituted farms. Their benefits in terms of human development,
financial, social and physical capitals had not changed as the majority (83.3 %) said there are
no improvements in terms of salaries or wages. They claim that their livelihoods have remained
the same because the farms are not operational due to lack of basic farming skills and conflicts.
Agricultural Extension Advisors, Councillors, Traditional leaders and officials from DRDLR
confirmed that production levels have declined because the land was transferred to people with
no basic training in farming; most (54 %) of the respondents confirmed that the beneficiaries,
therefore utilise only a portion of the farms. It is imperative, thus, to ensure that production on
the restituted farms is enhanced to improve the areas, such as social, financial, human and
physical capital.
A three-pronged intervention strategy was, therefore, developed to help restituted farm
beneficiaries in Waterberg District to improve their livelihoods, emancipate themselves from
poverty and ultimately contribute to the National Development Plan of South Africa. The
developed strategy is anchored on three key factors: the need for thorough assessment by the
government on the farm beneficiary’s level of commitment to the farm prior to farm allocation
and funding, need to incorporate new experts in agricultural economics and agricultural
engineers into the restituted farms personnel and the need to decentralize the services of
mentors and agricultural extension advisors at District and local Municipalities. / NRF
|
4 |
An assessment of post settlement support programme for restitution beneficiaries: experiences from Capricorn District, South AfricaKekana, Ephenia Mosadi 01 October 2013 (has links)
Institute for Rural Development / MRDV
|
5 |
An Evaluation of Land Reform Implementation in the Vhembe District, South Africa ; A quest for Sustainable LivelihoodsRatombo, Mutshinyalo 05 1900 (has links)
PhDGEO / Department of Geography and Geo-Information Sciences / See the attached abstract below
|
Page generated in 0.0838 seconds