Spelling suggestions: "subject:"bible. O.T. -- anguage, style"" "subject:"bible. O.T. -- 1anguage, style""
1 |
Towards a discourse-pragmatic description of left-dislocation in biblical HebrewWestbury, Joshua Ryan 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA (Biblical Languages))--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This is an exploratory investigation into the discourse-pragmatic function(s) of the so-called
Left-Dislocation construction in Biblical Hebrew. This inquiry is a part of a larger investigation
into the nature and function of word order variation in Biblical Hebrew. In light of past research
on Biblical Hebrew word-order variation, specifically concerning Left-Dislocation constructions,
it is concluded that a re-analysis of Left-Dislocation constructions in Biblical Hebrew is called
for. Advancements within the fields of cognitive-functional linguistics and discourse-pragmatics
(information-structure) have afforded numerous avenues towards a more comprehensive
cognitive-oriented frame of reference for ascertaining the functions of Biblical Hebrew word order variation.
The discourse-pragmatic and cognitive-functional notion of information-structure serves as the
basis for the theoretical framework employed in the present investigation. Information-structure
is principally concerned with the question as to why grammars of natural language offer speakers
a variety of morphosyntactic and prosodic options for expressing the same propositional content.
Since the Left-Dislocation construction is a universal syntactic phenomenon, typological
information regarding the form and function of Left-Dislocation constructions across languages
served as a critical source of insight into the prototypical formal features and functional domains
of the construction within Biblical Hebrew. The insights garnered from cross-linguistic data
informed the parameters employed in the construction and construal of a random data-set of one
hundred cases of Left-Dislocation drawn from the narrative portions of the Hebrew Bible
stretching from Genesis to 2 Chronicles.
The investigation of our data-set, within the confines of a discourse-pragmatic framework,
reveals that Left-Dislocation constructions in Biblical Hebrew are principally employed to
facilitate the topic-promotion of identifiable but inactive discourse-referents. These referents
could be the primary or secondary topics of the sentences in which they are used. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie is 'n verkennende ondersoek na die diskoerspragmatiese funksie(s) van
sogenaamde linksverskuiwing ('Left-Dislocation') konstruksies in Bybelse Hebreeus. Hierdie
vraagstelling vorm deel van 'n meer omvattende ondersoek na die aard en funksie van
woordorde-variasies in Bybelse Hebreeus. Na aanleiding van 'n uitvoerige literatuurstudie oor
die funksie(s) van woordorde-variasies in Bybelse Hebreeus, veral met betrekking tot
linksverskuiwingskonstruksies, is tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat 'n heranalise van
linksverskuiwingskonstruksies in Bybelse Hebreeus nodig is. Vooruitgang op die gebiede van
kognitiewe-funksionele taalkunde, en tekspragmatiek (informasiestruktuur) het dit moontlik
gemaak om 'n meer omvattende kognitief-georiënteerde verwysingsraamwerk vir die bepaling
van die funksie(s) van Bybels-Hebreeuse woordorde-variasies te formuleer.
Die diskoerspragmatiese en kognitiewe-funksionele opvatting van informasiestruktuur dien as
die basis vir die teoretiese raamwerk wat in die huidige ondersoek gebruik is.
Informasiestruktuur is hoofsaaklik gemoeid met die vraag waarom die grammatika van
natuurlike taal aan sprekers 'n verskeidenheid van morfosintaktiese en prosodiese opsies bied vir
die uitdrukking van dieselfde proposisionele inhoud.
Aangesien die linksverskuiwingskonstruksie 'n universele sintaktiese verskynsel is, is
taaltipologiese inligting oor die vorm en funksie van die linksverskuiwingskonstruksie gebruik
om insig te kry in die prototipiese formele eienskappe en funksies van die konstruksie in Bybelse
Hebreeus.
Aan die hand van bg. taaltipologiese insigte is parameters geformuleer aan die hand waarvan 'n
ewekansige monster voorbeelde van linksverskuiwing uit verhalende tekste uit Genesis tot 2
Kronieke ondersoek is. Daar is bevind dat linksverskuiwing in Bybelse Hebreeus hoofsaaklik
aangewend word om identifiseerbare, maar onaktiewe diskoersreferente te promoveer as topieks.
Hierdie referente mag primêre of sekondêre topieks wees.
|
2 |
Final sentences in biblical Hebrew narrative prose form Genesis to 2 KingsPayle, Kenneth David 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (PhD)--Stellenbosch University, 2000. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Final sentences are a neglected area of research in Biblical Hebrew. Apart from an
investigation by Mitchell (1879) in the previous century, and a more recent article by
Muraoka (1997), this is certainly an area of Biblical Hebrew grammar in need of research.
Biblical Hebrew grammars propound a variety of ways final constructions can supposedly
be expressed. The main thesis of this study is that the diversity of final constructions in
Biblical Hebrew is not merely different syntactic realizations of the same semantic
meaning, but that each syntactic construction carries definite semantic nuances.
Traditional grammars, because they are sentence-based, present some shortcomings in the
description of final sentences. I will briefly expose some of the linguistic presuppositions
of traditional grammars, and their inherent limitations with respect to the study of final
constructions.
Recent developments in general linguistics, especially the variety of approaches subsumed
under the broad classification textlinguistics, create new opportunities to address Biblical
Hebrew grammar. I will explore this relatively recent developments to the study of
language, in order to determine whether insights from studies conducted in terms of this
paradigm can be used to describe final constructions more adequately.
A number of theses are presented in Chapters 2 and 3, which are evaluated in Chapters 4
to 6. The findings are presented in a summary of at the end of each chapter. The final
results of this investigation are summarized in Chapter 7. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Finaalsinne het tot dusver min aandag geniet in Bybelse Hebreeuse navorsing. Afgesien van 'n
ondersoek deur Mitchell (1879) in die vorige eeu, en 'n onlangse artikel deur Muraoka (1997), is
hierdie 'n navorsingsgebied wat vra om nadere ondersoek.
Volgens Bybelse Hebreeuse grammatikas kan finaalsinne op verskeie wyses uitgedruk word. Die
hooftese van hierdie studie is dat die verskeidenheid van finaalkonstruksies in Bybelse Hebreeus
nie bloot verskillende sintaktiese opsies is om dieselfde semantiese betekenis te realiseer nie, maar
dat elke onderskeie sintaktiese konstruksie 'n besondere semantiese nuanse weergee.
Omdat hulle eng op die beskrywing van die sin gebaseer is, hou traditionele grammatikas
tekortkominge in vir die beskrywing van finaalsinne. In hierdie studie wys ek kortliks op die
linguistiese voorveronderstellings van die tradisionele benadering, en op die inherente
tekortkominge van so 'n benadering ten opsigte van die ondersoek van finaalsinne.
Onlangse ontwikkelinge in die algemene linguistiek, veral die verskeidenheid benaderings
saamgevat onder die begrip tekslinguistiek, bied nuwe moontlikhede vir die beskrywing van
Bybelse Hebreeus. Ek sal hierdie nuwe benadering tot taalstudie ondersoek om vas te stel of dit
aangewend kan word om finaalsinne beter te beskryf.
Verskeie tesisse word in Hoofstukke 2 en 3 geformuleer en dan in Hoofstukke 4 tot 6 geëvalueer.
Die resultate word aan die einde van elke hoofstuk saamgevat. Die uiteindelike konklusies van
hierdie studie word in Hoofstuk 7 saamgevat.
|
3 |
The meaning of the biblical Hebrew verbal conjugation from a crosslinguistic perspectiveMoomo, David O. 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (DLitt)--Stellenbosch University, 2004. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: One of the questions that have challenged scholars of BH for many years is whether the
language should be regarded as a tense, aspectual or modal language. In this thesis, I argue
that the lack and application of a metacategory for describing any language in general, and
BH in particular, has been the main problem of the debate. A sound methodology is needed in
order to be able to make an argument that can be tested empirically.
The present study presents such a viable methodological approach. Using Bhatian
parameters for tense, aspect and modal prominent languages, crosslinguistic metacategories
of tense, aspect and mood were developed. These were applied to BH and the outcome was
the hypothesis that BH is an aspect-prominent language.
After formulating the above-mentioned hypothesis for BH, a corpus had been selected
in the light of which the hypothesis was tested. The result demonstrates that BH consistently
maintains perfective and imperfective aspectual distinctions. It was found that even where
aspectual distinctions are extended to modal categories, the distinction in meanings between
the perfective and the imperfective forms of the BH verb are not neutralised.
From these observations, it has been concluded that there is the need to revisit the
semantics of Proto Semitic. A model like the one used in this study could be replicated in
the study of Proto Semitic. Such a revisit, it is hypothesised, may give fresh insights into the
verbal system of Proto Semitic in general and BH in particular / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Een van die vrae wat reeds vir baie jare vir kenners van Byblese Hebreeus (=BH) In uitdaging
is, is of die taal 'n tempustaal, 'n aspektuele taal of 'n modale taal is. In hierdie tesis voer ek
aan dat die gebrek aan die toepassing van 'n metakategorie vir die beskrywing van tale in die
algemeen, en BH in die besonder, die hoof probleem in die debat is. 'n Deeglike begronde
metodologie is nodig om 'n hipotese daar te stel wat empiries getoets kan word.
Hierdie studie wil so 'n metodologie formuleer. Deur gebruik te maak van Bhat se
parameters vir tale waarvan die tempus, aspek en modaliteit prominent is, is kruislinguistiese
metakategorieë vir tempus, aspek en modaliteit ontwikkel. Hierdie metakategorieë is op BH
toegepas en die resultaat daarvan was die hipotese dat BH 'n aspek-prominente taal is.
Nadat die bogenoemde hipotese vir BH geformuleer is, is 'n korpus geselekteer in die
lig waarvan hierdie hipotese getoets kon word. Die resultaat demonstreer dat BH konsekwent
die perfektiewe en imperfektiewe aspektuele onderskeid handhaaf. Daar is gevind dat selfs
wanneer aspektuele onderskeidings uitgebrei is na modale kategorieë, die onderskeid tussen
die perfektiewe en die imperfektiewe vorme van die BH werkwoord nie geneutraliseer word
me.
Vanuit hierdie waarnemings is tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat dit nodig is om weer
te gaan kyk na die semantiek van Proto-Semities. 'n Model soos die een wat in hierdie studie
gebruik is, kan ook in die studie van Proto-Semities bebruik word. Die hipotese is dat so 'n
hernude ondersoek nuwe insigte kan gee in die werkwoordsisteem van Proto-Semities in die
algemeen en BH in die besonder.
|
4 |
From information structure, topic and focus, to theme in Biblical HebrewFloor, Sebastiaan Jonathan 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (DLitt (Ancient Studies)) -- University of Stellenbosch, 2004. / The purpose of this study is to investigate the information structure of Biblical Hebrew
narrative, and develop accounts of topic and focus in Biblical Hebrew, respectively. Both
topic and focus categories have been determined for Biblical Hebrew (cf. chapters 3 and 5), as
well as the information structure strategies that these categories can fulfill in discourse.
For topic categories, four different categories of information structure topics in Biblical
Hebrew have been distinguished. These are
1. Primary topics
2. Secondary topics
3. Tail topics
4. Topic frames
In addition, associated with topics are topic contrastiveness as well as deictic orientations or
text-world frames. All these categories, when present, are part of the topical framework of a
discourse.
For focus structure categories, three different types of focus structure in Biblical Hebrew have
been distinguished. These are:
1. Predicate focus
2. Sentence focus
3. Argument focus
Again, like in the case of topics, contrastiveness is associated with focus structures.
The strategies of information structure topics and focus structures in theme developments
were distinguished. For topics, the following information structure strategies or functions
stand out:
1. Topic continuity
2. Topic promotion
3. Topic shift
4. Topic deictic text-world framing
5. Topic contrasting
For focus structures, the following information structure strategies or functions stand out:
1. Commenting on topics
2. Presenting unidentifiable or inactive participants
3. Reporting, that is, event-reporting and state-reporting of out-of-the-blue,
unexpected, discourse new events or states. Some reporting re-directs the
theme, other reporting, especially that of states, supports the theme. 4. Identifying referents, either as identifying contrastive, unexpected referents or
deictic text-world frames, or by announcing theme macrowords.
Contrastiveness is a pragmatic overlay in the case of many focus constituents, especially
presupposed information that is focused on.
In other words, the three focus structures are used in certain strategies:
1. Predicate focus structures are used for commenting in topic-comment
articulations.
2. Sentence focus structures are used for presentational sentences, and for themeredirecting
and theme-supporting, event-reporting and state-reporting
sentences. The word-order is generally marked.
3. Argument focus is used for unexpected, contrastive identification, and for the
announcement of theme macrowords. The word-order is marked, similar to
sentence focus structures.
All the topic and focus categories and their respective information structure strategies have a
link with the theme of a discourse. Theme has been defined in this study as the developing
and coherent core or thread of a discourse in the mind of the speaker-author and hearerreader,
functioning as the prominent macrostructure of the discourse (chapter 7 (7.4.4)).
The information structure with its topics and focus structures and its strategies, can be used as
a tool to identify and analyse themes. These categories and strategies together are called
theme traces when they occur in marked syntactic constructions or in other prominence
configurations like relexicalisation, end-weight, and repetition of macrowords. Theme traces
are defined with the following wording: A theme trace is a clue in the surface form of a
discourse, viewed from the perspective of information structure, that points to the cognitive
macrostructure or theme of a text. This clue is in the form of (1) a marked syntactical
configuration, be it marked word-order or marked in the sense of explicit and seemingly
“redundant”, all signaling some thematic sequencing strategy, or (2) some recurring
concept(s) signaling some prominence and coherence (chapter 7 (7.5.4)).
By investigating these theme traces, the analyst will have a tool to study themes in discourse.
This theme traces tool will assist in the demarcation of the sections in the developing theme of
a text by means of a variety of boundary features, and once these thematic units have been
established, the study of the topic framework together with the focus content will yield a
verifiable understanding of the macrostructure of a text in Biblical Hebrew. Global themes are
contrasted with local themes. Global themes occur in the higher-level thematic groupings, like
whole narratives and smaller episodes within the narratives. Within the episodes are sub-units
like scenes and thematic paragraphs, the smallest thematic unit. In scenes and thematic
paragraphs, local themes occur.
Between the different thematic units, a variety of theme sequential strategies occur. Theme
shifting is a wider information structure strategy that is in operation in discourse. For instance,
topic promotion, topic shift, and topic text-world framing are all cases of theme shifting. To
study the theme of a narrative discourse from the perspective of the information structure,
four steps of a theme-tracing model have been suggested, and applied to Genesis 17.
|
Page generated in 0.0665 seconds