Yes / This study aims to provide a better understanding of oversight the audit profession in Egypt, including its motivations, objectives and its working approach. Further, it reaches a better understanding of the Egyptian Big 4 partners’ perceptions of the new Audit Oversight Board (AOB). Previous studies have frequently examined the audit oversight system in developed countries (US and UK in particular), but little is known on how the system works on developing countries. We believe that facing different problems and challenges demands that audit regulators in developing countries follow different approaches in order to improve the quality of their audit markets. Lack of skilled auditors, lack of transparency and public accountability, and a high level of corruption are the main problems facing the audit profession in Egypt (Awadallah, 2006, Wahdan et. al., 2005: a). Our findings suggest that establishing an audit oversight board in Egypt has been motivated by the need to attract foreign investments and follow the global trend of auditing in developed countries. A number of legal changes are needed in order to improve the AOB’s efficiency.

Yes / This study aims to provide a better understanding of the role of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in restoring public trust in audit profession in the UK. It analyses the views of partners in the Big 4 audit firms on this role. This study identifies three main strategies to promote trust and enhance the choice of auditors in the UK audit market. These strategies are improving audit quality, increasing the transparency of the big audit firms and reducing the barriers to competition in the audit market. The findings suggest that partners of the Big 4 believe that the FRC's projects effectively participate in improving audit quality as well as providing wider information about the audit firms to the public. However, different actions need to be taken to enhance the choice in the market.

Bakgrund och problem: Hållbarhetsredovisning är central för företag i dagens samhälle, med ökat fokus på ansvarstagande och ökad efterfrågan på transparens. EU-direktivet Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ställer högre krav på företag att rapportera och granskas av revisorer. Ökad efterfrågan på hållbarhetsrevision öppnar nya marknader för revisionsbyråer, särskilt för Big 4-byråerna. Men övergången till att granska hållbarhetsrapporter är inte enkel. Det finns idag inga klara riktlinjer för hur det ska göras, vilket skapar osäkerhet och dilemman för revisorer. EU:s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ökar kraven på oberoende granskning, vilket förväntas leda till betydande förändringar inom revisionsbranschen. Dock saknas forskning på byrånivå, vilket är av intresse för att förstå hur dessa organisationer hanterar omställningen. Syfte: Syftet med denna uppsats är att skapa en djupare förståelse gällande hur revisionsbyråerna som ingår i Big 4 hanterar den förändring som medföljer de ökade kraven på hållbarhetsrevision.  Metod: Detta är en kvalitativ studie med en deduktiv forskningsansats. Det empiriska materialet har samlats in genom semistrukturerade intervjuer. Studiens empiri baseras på 8 respondenter med god insikt i byråernas förändringsarbete. Metoden för att analysera det empiriska materialet är av tematisk karaktär.   Slutsats: Studien påvisar att omställningen som Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive medför innebär både stora möjligheter och utmaningar för Big 4-byråerna. Den insamlade empirin påvisar att införandet av Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive skapar en stor marknadspotential, men att framförallt bristen på resurser är ett stort orosmoment. För att möta denna oro förespråkar respondenterna rekrytering och utbildning. Big 4-byråerna, med sina resurser, förväntas bättre klara denna omställning än mindre byråer. Slutligen pekar resultaten på en enhetlig strategi mellan Big 4-byråerna för att möta kraven på hållbarhetsrevision och på deras inflytande över branschnormer genom branschorganisationen FAR. / Background and Problem: Sustainability reporting is central for companies in today's society, with increased focus on accountability and growing demand for transparency. The EU directive Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive imposes higher requirements on companies to report and be audited by auditors. Increased demand for sustainability auditing opens up new markets for auditing firms, especially the Big 4-firms. However, the transition to auditing sustainability reports is not straightforward. There are no clear guidelines on how to do it, which creates uncertainty and dilemmas for auditors. The EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive directive increases the requirements for independent auditing, which is expected to lead to significant changes in the auditing industry. However, research at the firm level is lacking, which is of interest to understand how these organizations handle the transition.  Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to gain a deeper understanding of how the auditing firms within the Big 4 handle the changes accompanying the increased requirements for sustainability auditing.  Method: This is a qualitative study with a deductive research approach. The empirical material has been collected through semi-structured interviews. The study's empirical basis consists of 8 respondents with good insight into the firms' change efforts. The method for analyzing the empirical material is thematic.  Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the transition brought about by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive entails both great opportunities and challenges for Big 4 firms. The collected empirical data shows that the introduction of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive creates significant market potential, but the lack of resources is a major concern. To address this concern, respondents advocate for recruitment and training. Big 4 firms, with their resources, are expected to better cope with this transition than smaller firms. Finally, the results point to a unified strategy among Big 4 firms to meet the requirements of sustainability auditing and their influence on industry norms through the industry organization FAR.