Spelling suggestions: "subject:"board off trustees"" "subject:"board off bustees""
61 |
Perspective vol. 23 no. 2 (Apr 1989)Seerveld, Calvin, Haan, Pearl den 30 April 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
62 |
Perspective vol. 21 no. 3 (Jun 1987)Veenkamp, Carol-Ann, Adams, Charles 30 June 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
63 |
Perspective vol. 21 no. 2 (Apr 1987)Douglas, Nigel Charles 30 April 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
64 |
Perspective vol. 23 no. 2 (Apr 1989) / Perspective (Institute for Christian Studies)Seerveld, Calvin, Haan, Pearl den 26 March 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
65 |
Perspective vol. 21 no. 3 (Jun 1987) / Perspective (Institute for Christian Studies)Veenkamp, Carol-Ann, Adams, Charles 26 March 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
66 |
Perspective vol. 21 no. 2 (Apr 1987) / Perspective (Institute for Christian Studies)Douglas, Nigel 26 March 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
67 |
Turning Around Small, Private, Tuition Dependent Colleges: How Boards of Trustees Impact Decline and TurnaroundBills, Michael 19 June 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
68 |
The legal obligations of retirement fund trustees in respect of section 37c of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956David, Vanashree 08 February 2013 (has links)
Prior to the introduction of section 37C into the Pension Funds Act. 24 of 1956, the benefit payable as a result of the death of a member would devolve in accordance with his last will and testament or the provisions of intestate succession. The advent of section 37C brought a statutory regime which expressly excludes freedom of testation and rather looks to the board of a fund to distribute the death benefit. The board may only pay the dependants of a deceased (either factual or legal) or the persons he has recorded on his nomination form. The section relies on the board to exercise its discretion in a manner which results in an equitable distribution of the death benefit notwithstanding that it does not provide any guidelines as to how this is to be achieved. Accordingly, numerous decisions are challenged by the identified beneficiaries because they are unhappy with the manner in which the board exercised its discretion. This results in complaints being lodged with the Pension Funds Adjudicator. Many such complaints should never have arisen or could have been easily solved by a proper exercise of discretion on the part of the board. The problem is that these complaints are adding to an already burdened office. Adequate training and understanding of the obligations of section 37C would probably result in fewer complaints to the Adjudicator. This dissertation examines whether the determinations which have been issued by the Adjudicator in respect of section 37C indicate a need for such training and understanding and, if they do, what possible remedies there might be to cure such a problem. Recommendations arising from this are that trustees must receive training focused on section 37C and proposed practical protocols to assist a board when exercising its duty to make an equitable distribution. / Jurisprudence / LL.M.
|
69 |
Perspective vol. 22 no. 4 (Aug 1988)Veenkamp, Carol-Ann, Williams, Stuart, Pitt, Clifford C., Ansell, Nicholas John, Van Arragon, Leo 31 August 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
70 |
Perspective vol. 22 no. 3 (Jun 1988)Pitt, Clifford C., Veenkamp, Carol-Ann, Kits, Harry J. 30 June 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0674 seconds