Spelling suggestions: "subject:"botswana stock exchange"" "subject:"botswana stock cxchange""
1 |
Development of a database for listed companies on the Botswana Stock ExchangeMasole, Mothusi 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MBA)--Stellenbosch University, 2001. / A database on South African industrial companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange called FIN01 was created by the Graduate School of Business (USB),
University of Stellenbosch, to capture the various companies' financial data from 1970 to
date. FIN01 database is being updated to capture financial data of listed companies
from other African countries. Against the background, the purpose of the study project
was to update the University database (FIN01) by creating a database for listed
Botswana Stock Exchange companies. The creation of the database required gathering
and analysis of information of the various Botswana companies. Before the information
from the Annual Reports could be captured into the main database, it was captured into
Excel created spreadsheets. This information was captured under the respective
workbooks as created for the cash flow statements, income statements and balance
sheet items.
To conform to the requirements of the FIN 01 database, the Botswana companies were
allocated codes. The summarised data was then transferred to the main USB database
(FIN01). A thorough analysis on performance of the various companies was then carried
out. This was done through trend analysis, common size analysis and ratio analysis.
Problems were encountered during the process of data capturing and analysis. These
included unavailability of Annual Reports, various different reporting formats and the
standard Excel spreadsheets provided. The various companies' inconsistency in
reporting was further reflected in the non-reporting of turnover and share prices by most
of the listed companies.
However, the creation and incorporation of the listed Botswana companies was a
success. It is recommended that the project be continued as an ongoing process. The
information should be updated on a yearly basis. Companies should be encouraged to
continue sending the Annual Reports to the University. The companies should in return
get regular feedback on key performance indicators as reflected in the database.
|
2 |
Corporate disclosure quality - a comparative study of Botswana and South AfricaKiyanga, Bendriba Patrick Lutimbanya 07 1900 (has links)
Corporate reporting has changed from the traditional form of reporting which covered financial information only to the modern form of reporting called integrated reporting which covers, financial, corporate governance and sustainability information. The levels of corporate disclosure among corporate entities within any country and between countries are thus likely to have been affected by this change.
Motivated by the IMF/World Bank (2006) that observed that corporate reporting improved in Botswana during the previous five years, without indicating what the actual level was or how it compares with that of other countries; this study sought to determine the actual level of corporate disclosure of two samples of companies: 23 companies listed on the Botswana Stock Exchange (BSE) and the top 40 companies (by market capitalisation) that are listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). The study also shows how the two levels of corporate disclosure compare.
This study is qualitative and descriptive by design; and involves analysing the content of the corporate annual report of each company in a sample using a corporate disclosure checklist; and determining the level of corporate disclosure for each sample of companies. The process ends with a comparative analysis of the levels of corporate disclosure of the companies from the two samples.
Consistent with the IMF/World Bank report, the study revealed that the level of corporate disclosure in the BSE sample was low but increasing. However, the increase in the level of corporate disclosure varied from sector to sector and the specific information items. The study also showed that integrated reporting was not practised at all by the companies in the BSE sample.
Comparatively, companies in the JSE sample had a higher level of corporate disclosure than that of companies in the BSE sample; and the rate of increase was much higher than that in the BSE sample. The study further found integrated reporting practiced in the entire JSE sample, although at different levels.
xi
This study also noted that although in principle it is sensible to benchmark from the best, other fundamental factors need to be considered before carrying out the exercise. Furthermore, the study indicated that the prevalent low level of corporate disclosure in the BSE sample was evidence that the corporate reporting environment in which the BSE lies was not conducive for the theories of corporate disclosure to fully explain corporate disclosure.
A number of recommendations were made including establishing corporate disclosure indices and creation of a corporate environment in which all the theories discussed in the study can explain corporate disclosure.
This study contributes to the literature on cross-country corporate disclosure and cautions companies with low levels of corporate disclosure not to embark on benchmarking without creating an environment conducive for corporate reporting. The study also offers useful insights to policymakers in Botswana and South Africa; and stimulates further research on cross-country corporate disclosure. The academia too will be able to identify areas for further research from this study. / Business Management / M. Com. (Accounting)
|
3 |
Corporate disclosure quality : a comparative study of Botswana and South AfricaKiyanga, Bendriba Patrick Lutimbanya 07 1900 (has links)
Corporate reporting has changed from the traditional form of reporting which covered financial information only to the modern form of reporting called integrated reporting which covers, financial, corporate governance and sustainability information. The levels of corporate disclosure among corporate entities within any country and between countries are thus likely to have been affected by this change.
Motivated by the IMF/World Bank (2006) that observed that corporate reporting improved in Botswana during the previous five years, without indicating what the actual level was or how it compares with that of other countries; this study sought to determine the actual level of corporate disclosure of two samples of companies: 23 companies listed on the Botswana Stock Exchange (BSE) and the top 40 companies (by market capitalisation) that are listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). The study also shows how the two levels of corporate disclosure compare.
This study is qualitative and descriptive by design; and involves analysing the content of the corporate annual report of each company in a sample using a corporate disclosure checklist; and determining the level of corporate disclosure for each sample of companies. The process ends with a comparative analysis of the levels of corporate disclosure of the companies from the two samples.
Consistent with the IMF/World Bank report, the study revealed that the level of corporate disclosure in the BSE sample was low but increasing. However, the increase in the level of corporate disclosure varied from sector to sector and the specific information items. The study also showed that integrated reporting was not practised at all by the companies in the BSE sample.
Comparatively, companies in the JSE sample had a higher level of corporate disclosure than that of companies in the BSE sample; and the rate of increase was much higher than that in the BSE sample. The study further found integrated reporting practiced in the entire JSE sample, although at different levels.
xi
This study also noted that although in principle it is sensible to benchmark from the best, other fundamental factors need to be considered before carrying out the exercise. Furthermore, the study indicated that the prevalent low level of corporate disclosure in the BSE sample was evidence that the corporate reporting environment in which the BSE lies was not conducive for the theories of corporate disclosure to fully explain corporate disclosure.
A number of recommendations were made including establishing corporate disclosure indices and creation of a corporate environment in which all the theories discussed in the study can explain corporate disclosure.
This study contributes to the literature on cross-country corporate disclosure and cautions companies with low levels of corporate disclosure not to embark on benchmarking without creating an environment conducive for corporate reporting. The study also offers useful insights to policymakers in Botswana and South Africa; and stimulates further research on cross-country corporate disclosure. The academia too will be able to identify areas for further research from this study. / Business Management / M. Com. (Accounting)
|
Page generated in 0.0415 seconds