No description available.

Στόχος της εργασίας είναι η παραμετρική μελέτη μεταλλικών τρισδιάστατων πλαισίων με συνδέσμους δυσκαμψίας, ανθεκτικούς σε λυγισμό (BRB: Buckling Restrained Braces). Τα πρώτα κεφάλαια της εργασίας αποτελούν το θεωρητικό υπόβαθρο της διατριβής και αναφέρονται στα ζητήματα που αφορούν τον αντισεισμικό σχεδιασμό των μεταλλικών κατασκευών. Στο υπόβαθρο αυτό βασίστηκε τόσο ο σχεδιασμός του δείγματος των κατασκευών όσο και η επιλογή των υπό διερεύνηση παραμέτρων. Το αντικείμενο της εργασίας καθαυτό παρουσιάζεται στα τρία τελευταία κεφάλαια όπου γίνεται η περιγραφή του σχεδιασμού των τελικών κτιρίων ώστε να επιτευχθεί φυσική μονοαξονική εκκεντρότητα και στη συνέχεια η ανάλυση των κατασκευών αυτών με μη γραμμικές αναλύσεις. Από αυτές δημιουργείται μια βάση δεδομένων από την οποία εξάγονται συμπεράσματα που αφορούν τη συσχέτιση της εκκεντρότητας με τα μεγέθη απόκρισης των κατασκευών. / The subject of this thesis is the non linear analysis of 3D steel frames with buckling restrained braces (BRB).

Most structural optimization procedures focus on minimizing the total volume of steel in an attempt to reduce overall costs. However, many other factors can have an effect on the overall cost of a structure. Base column demands in particular, can affect base plate sizes, anchorage, and foundation design. Researchers have found that present methods for estimating column demands are too conservative. Nonlinear time history analyzes were conducted on buckling-restrained braced frames of six heights. Optimized results were found considering three ductility constraints and two optimization objectives. The two optimization objectives were minimized total brace area and minimized base column demands. The results show that designs created by using a minimized column demand objective led to column demands that ranged from 2 to 6% lower than column demands in designs generated by a total brace area minimizing objective. The average brace areas of the designs produced by the total brace area minimizing objective were 25 to 80% less than the designs produced by the column demand minimizing objective. Results showed that large braces in the top stories did not have an effect on column demands in the ground level story. The results indicate that base column demands can be minimized by minimizing braces areas. However, braces areas cannot be minimized by minimizing base column demands.

Severe earthquakes cause damage to buildings. One measure of damage is the residual drift. Large residual drifts suggest expensive repairs and could lead to complete loss of the building. As such, research has been conducted on how to reduce the residual drift. Recent research has focused on self-centering frames and dual systems, both of which increase the post-yield stiffness of the building during and after an earthquake. Self-centering systems have yet to be adopted into standard practice but dual systems are used regularly. Dual systems in steel buildings typically combine two types of traditional lateral force resisting systems such as bucking restrained braced frames (BRBFs) and moment resisting frames (MRFs). However, the cost of making the moment connections for the MRFs can make dual systems costly. An alternative to MRFs is to use gravity columns as the secondary system in a dual system. The gravity columns can be used to help resist the lateral loads and limit the residual drifts if the lateral stiffness of the gravity columns can be activated. By restraining the displacement of the gravity columns, the stiffness of the columns adds to the stiffness of the brace frame, thus engaging the lateral stiffness of the gravity columns. Three methods of engaging the stiffness of the gravity columns are investigated in this thesis; one, fixed ground connections, two, a heavy elastic brace in the top story, and three, a heavy elastic brace in the middle bay. Single and multiple degree of freedom models were analyzed to determine if gravity columns can be effective in reducing residual drift. In the single degree of freedom system (SDOF) models, the brace size was varied to get a range of periods. The column size was varied based on a predetermined range of post-yield stiffness to determine if the residual drift decreased with higher post-yield stiffness. Three and five story models were analyzed with a variety of brace and column sizes and with three different configurations to activate the gravity columns. Using gravity columns as part of a dual system decreases the residual drift in buildings. The results from the SDOF system show that the residual drift decreased with increased post-yield stiffness. The three and five story models showed similar results with less residual drift when larger columns were used. Further, the models with a heavy gravity column in the top story had the best results.

Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames (CRSBFs) have been developed as a high-performance structural solution to resist seismic forces, due to their ability to minimize structural damage and self-centre the structure back to its original position after an earthquake. A CRSBF is intentionally allowed to uplift and rock on its foundation, which acts as the nonlinear mechanism for the system rather than member yielding and buckling. While the CRSBF is in the rocking phase, the response of the system is controlled by prestressing which anchors the frame to the foundation and energy dissipation devices which are engaged by uplift. Although CRSBFs have shown promising structural performance, an assessment of the overall effectiveness of this system must also consider the performance of nonstructural components which have a significant impact on the safety and economic performance of the system. The purpose of this thesis is to compare the performance of nonstructural components in buildings with CRSBFs to their performance in a conventional codified system such as a buckling restrained braced frame (BRBF), while also investigating which design parameters influence nonstructural component demands in CRSBFs. The responses of various types of nonstructural components, including anchored components, stocky unanchored components that slide, and slender unanchored components that rock, are determined using a cascading analysis approach where absolute floor accelerations generated from nonlinear time-history analyses of each structural system are used as input for computing the responses of nonstructural components. The results show that the trade-off of maintaining elastic behaviour of the CRSBF members is, in general, larger demands on nonstructural components compared to the BRBF system. The results also show that the stiffness of the frame and vibration of the frame in its elastic higher modes are the main influencers for nonstructural component demands in buildings with CRSBFs, while energy dissipation has a minimal impact. / Thesis / Master of Applied Science (MASc) / Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames (CRSBFs) have been proposed as a high-performance structural system that resists earthquake forces on buildings. This system has the ability to minimize damage to structural members and self-centre the building back to its original position after an earthquake, two characteristics that are typically not achieved by current conventional systems. However, an assessment of the CRSBF’s overall effectiveness cannot be limited to the consideration of only the structural skeleton, as the performance of nonstructural components (e.g. architectural elements, mechanical and electrical equipment, furnishings, and building contents) that are not part of the structural skeleton can have a significant impact on the safety and economic performance of earthquake resisting systems. This thesis compares the demands on nonstructural components in buildings with CRSBFs to their demands in a more conventional system during earthquake motions. The results show that the trade-off for avoiding damage to structural members in the CRSBFs is often higher demands on the nonstructural components.

The Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) is a region that is characterized by low frequency-high consequence seismic events such as the New Madrid sequence of 18111812. The infrequent nature of earthquakes in the region has led to a perception that the seismic risk in the area is low, and the current building stock reflects this perception. The majority of steel-framed buildings in the CEUS were designed without regard to seismic loads. Such frames possess limited seismic resistance, and may pose an unacceptable risk if a large earthquake were to occur in the region. A key ingredient of building performance and seismic risk assessment is the fragility, a term that describes the probability of failure to meet a performance objective as a function of demand on the system. The effects of uncertainties on building seismic performance can be displayed by a seismic fragility relationship. This fragility can be used in a conditional scenario-based seismic risk assessment or can be integrated with seismic hazard to obtain an estimate of annual or lifetime risk. The seismic fragility analyses in this study focus on steel frames that are typical of building construction in regions of infrequent seismicity; such frames have received little attention to date in building seismic risk assessment. Current steel building stock in Shelby Co., TN has been represented by five code-compliant model frames with different lateral force-resisting systems, i.e., braced-frames, partially-restrained moment frames and a rigid moment frame. The performance of model frames under certain hazard levels was assessed using fragility curves. Different rehabilitation methods were discussed and applied. Results indicate that PR frames behave better than expected and rehabilitated frames perform quite well even under severe earthquakes.

Hospitals are regarded as some of the most important structures in society due to the service that they provide. Knowing this, governments spend large amounts of money on these facilities. Also, codes of design require to provide them more reserve capacity than that for conventional structures. However, large damages (such as collapses and permanent or temporary interruptions of their functionality) have still been observed in hospitals during strong earthquakes. Unfortunately, it is precisely after this type of event that their service is in high demand and failure in providing that service could lead to further disastrous or fatal consequences. Therefore, the use of protective technologies, combined with rational procedures of design, would help to reduce damage and probable losses of functionality in hospital structures. In this thesis, a procedure for seismic design of structures equipped with a type of protective technology, namely, buckling-restrained braces (BRBs), is proposed. Then, the results of experimental and numerical studies are presented to understand the benefits of using BRBs in structures. This study highlights that BRBs are very effective to dissipate seismic energy and can act as structural fuses, i.e. disposable devices that may be replaced after an earthquake without interruptions in the functionality of the structure. One of the advantages of the proposed procedure is that it takes into account explicitly the characteristics and contributions of both, the main structure and the BRBs. It is based on the assumption that a structure protected with BRBs can rationally be represented by a dual SDOF system whose parts yield at different displacement levels. Other advantages include: 1) better control of the displacement demands on the structure; 2) achievement of the fuse concept beforehand; and 3) rapid assessment of the probabilistic performance of the structure. The experimental studies consisted of testing steel and concrete models, with and without BRBs, on a shaking table. In addition to calibrate and validate the proposed method of design, the tests have helped to find that, due to BRBs: 1) the damping ratio is increased significantly; and 2) the dynamic response, to ground motions characteristic of the lakebed zone of Mexico City, is reduced in terms of lateral displacements, inter-storey drifts, floor velocities and floor accelerations. The numerical studies are: 1) a study of the response of typical hospitals improved with BRBs; 2) a study of residual displacements in conventional and dual systems; and 3) evaluation of the economic benefits of using BRBs in structures. On these studies, hypothetical hospitals located in the lakebed zone of Mexico City were considered. The results show that the use of BRBs is very beneficial in medium- and low-rise buildings, while adverse effects may be observed in high-rise structures.

No description available.