The study focus on how customer satisfaction influence capital structure . Among lots of the theory of capital structure , if we reconsider the customer satisfaction ,we would explain the theory of capital structure deeply . We select the customer satisfaction index as our observable variable . In brief , our study have two main purposes ¡G 1.Does customer satisfaction influence capital structure ? 2.If customer satisfaction influence capital structure by cash f low , how would it influence capital structure . This paper employs a database containing the market and accounting data (from 1996 to 2005) from more than 40 NYSE-listed companies(212 samples) to document our empirical study . We find that customer satisfaction has significant impact on capital structure by cash flow and the capital structure is nearly the same as the pecking order theory ¡Awhich suggest that firms are said to prefer retained earnings as their main source of funds for investment .

None

This paper studies the relation between the optimal capital structure and industry dynamic. First,we formulate a dynamic adjustment model. We specify and estimate the unobservable optimal capital structure using observable determinants Secondly,we apply dynamic factor demand model that assumes each firm derives an optimal plan such that the expected present value of current and future cost streams is minimized. In variables setting, capital inputs are divided into debt capital and equity capital. The empirical work is based on firm level data of Taiwan high-technology industries during 2003 ~2007. The empirical results show that (1) The capital structure of high- technology is adjusted dynamaic.(2) The contribution of debt on high-technology industries is negative.

This paper aims to realize that the capital structure decisions will be affected by the credit rating of a firm. According to the argument made by Kisgen(2006), a firm will incur discrete costs and benefits as a result of the level changes of its credit rating situation, and then causes jumps on firm¡¥s value. In order to maximize firm value, firms near a credit rating downgrade or upgrade will issue less debt relative to equity (as a portion of assets) than firms not near the change in credit raring, attempting to gain the advantage of an upgrade and avoid the disadvantage of a downgrade. The firms near a rating change are defined in different ways, and four hypotheses are tested empirically, using pooled OLS, fixed effect model and random effect model, to know how the concerns of firms¡¥ credit rating changes directly affect its financing decisions on debt and equity structure. Plus or Minus test(POM test), High or Low test(HOL test), Investment Grade or Speculation Grade test(IG/SG test) and Watch list test(Wlist test) are used to examine the influences of credit rating on firms¡¥ financing decisions. The firm which has a credit rating at the beginning of the year in all industries in Taiwan is included in our sample, and the sample period is from 2000 to 2007. As a result, although control variables such as leverage, profitability and firm size have significant impacts on financing decision, we observe that the impacts of credit ratings on net debt issuance are negative but not statistically significant in all models except in HOL test, in which credit rating variables are negative and significant at 5% confidence level. For this reason, the effect of credit ratings on firms¡¥ financing decision can not be concluded and should be examined further.

Observing the deficiencies of traditional methods in meeting the demands of today&rsquo / s infrastructure development has been motivating countries towards privatization of these sectors. However, due to the differences in these sectors as compared to other businesses, privatization can not be performed without strict regulations. Today, concession agreements like BOT models seem the best way for solving the problems. Financing of concession agreements plays a key role. In Turkey, most BOT projects are financed by capital structure that has a maximum debt ratio, which is allowed by the law. The objective of this study is to examine whether the maximum amount of debt ratio is the optimum amount of debt ratio. Optimization is carried out by analyzing the trade off between benefits of tax shield and the loss due to financial failure as a result of change in leverage, assuming other things are the same. A theoretical framework is developed for the analysis by selecting Adjusted Present Value Method as a financial tool. Energy generation sector in Turkey is analyzed, stock market data in Turkey is used for the analysis, and a bankruptcy prediction model is proposed for BOT projects in Turkey. Finally, by using the theoretical framework, an actual BOT model hydro electric power plant proposal is analyzed for optimization of capital structure.

No description available.

This research is about financing practices of Pakistani-immigrant and indigenous-owned small travel agents. The study provides an understanding of the capital structures of businesses owned by both groups and compares these to draw similarities and differences between both groups. The research integrates the 'ethnic enclave' immigrant theory, the capital structure theory in particular the Pecking Order Hypothesis, the role of 'networks' in business financing, and the business life-cycle theories. The research question and the research hypotheses emerged from the literature reviewed. Ten case studies, five Pakistani businesses and five indigenous businesses, confirmed the hypotheses which formed the basis of a survey of a large sample of sixty businesses, thirty in each group. The case study data is considered invaluable since it provided the real evidence of the sensitive nature of financial information in these businesses. The methodology adopted was a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. The findings of the study show that there are more similarities than differences among the capital structures of both groups of businesses. The nuclear family plays a crucial role throughout the life-cycle of the business in both groups. The role of family labour is not as prominent as among other industries such as Confectionery, Tobacconists, and Newsagents (CTN's). Informal sources of finance are preferred over formal sources by both groups of businesses due to their availability and lower cost. The Pecking Order Hypothesis theory applies to both groups of businesses. The main sources of formal finance were high street banks, bank overdrafts and loans. Pakistani businesses were not disadvantaged in any way by the formal providers of finance. This research is the first to report on the comparative capital structures among both groups of businesses. However, although considerable contribution has been made by this research to the small business finance literature further research should be conducted into the area.

abstract: I study the relation between firm debt structure and future external financing and investment. I find that greater reliance on long-term debt is associated with increased access to external financing and ability to undertake profitable investments. This contrasts with previous empirical results and theoretical predictions from the agency cost literature, but it is consistent with predictions regarding rollover risk. Furthermore, I find that firms with lower total debt (high debt capacity) have greater access to new financing and investment. Lower leverage increases future debt issues and capital expenditures, and firms do not fully rebalance by reducing the use of external financing sources such as equity. Finally, my results support the view that greater reliance on unsecured debt can increase future debt financing. Overall, my paper offers new insights into how aspects of debt structure, in particular maturity, are related ex-post to firms' ability to raise new financing and invest. / Dissertation/Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation Business Administration 2017

In the wake of the recent global financial crisis, the banking industry has come under heavy criticism for the negative externalities imposed on the economy and society. The distress of the financial system during the financial crisis has triggered public discussions about the role of bank capital structures in the stability of banking institutions. While it was previously thought that regulatory capital requirements are the sole determinant of bank capital structure, recent empirical studies suggest that, instead, the standard cross-sectional determinants that explain the capital structures of non-financial firms also apply to banks. The findings from these studies prompt further investigation into what other factors determine the capital structure of banks. More recently, engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities has emerged as a vital dimension through which firms develop sustainable strategies that affect overall firm performance. In addition, the subsequent reporting of CSR performance has become increasingly important as more investors incorporate information about the social behaviour of firms in their investment decisions. This suggests that CSR has implications for the financing policies of firms. In light of the development of CSR as a relevant concept in the current corporate environment and especially in the banking industry, the goal of this study is to investigate whether CSR is a determinant of the capital structure of banks through a multiple regression analysis of panel data from 2009 to 2018 for a sample of 28 Global Systemically Important Banks. Using DataStream Refinitv ESG scores to proxy for CSR, the first hypothesis proposes that socially responsible banks tend to be less leveraged than those that are socially irresponsible due to the positive influence on equity financing from the lower costs of capital, informational asymmetries and risk associated with good CSR performance. The second hypothesis examines the effect of bank size on the proposed relationship. Initial results indicate no significant relation between aggregate CSR and bank leverage, however, further analysis shows a significant negative relationship between the governance dimension of CSR and bank capital structure, suggesting that the governance structures of banks are more relevant for bank capital structure decisions. Bank size is found to have no effect on the relationship. The findings from this study have important implications that are particularly relevant in today's financial environment as calls for the restoration of public trust in banking institutions accelerate.

This dissertation comprises of three related essays in regard of puzzling negative book equity phenomenon among U.S. public firms. In essay 1, I present the evidence that there is an increasing trend of negative book equity firms over the past 50 years, from 0.3% up to over 5% among publicly traded firms in US. In contrast to previous research which generally classify these firms as distressed firms with highly likelihood of bankruptcy, I propose a new method to separate Healthy Negative Book Equity Firms (HNBEF) from relatively more distressed negative book equity firms. The results show that HNBEF have much higher net income and interest coverage ratio, they survive longer, and pay more dividends. More interestingly, these firms are often actively increase share repurchases and debt issuance. These facts, combined with their strong profitability, indicate that managers of these firms are actively increasing their leverage and choose to be negative book equity firms. To explain the existence of HNBEF, in essay 2, I investigate several possible reasons that may contribute to the extreme leverage of these firms. I find that HNBEF are substantially undervalued by their book assets as stated on the balance sheet. In addition, the value of intangible assets, especially those off-balance sheet intangible assets, is positively related to the probability of becoming HNBEF. Moreover, I find that characteristics of intangible assets and firms also play important role on existence of HNBEF. Specifically, I find that both liquidity and redeployability of intangible assets are positively related with the probability of becoming HNBEF. Also, firms associated with closer borrower-lender relationship are more likely to become HNBEF. To investigate if the aggressive capital structure adopted by HNBEF is optimal, in essay 3, I performed several tests to analyze how these firms differ from other firms in terms of operating performance, corporate governance and firm value. My research finds that compared to firms from same industry and with similar size, managers of HNBEF invest more heavily in their own firms, and HNBEF have better corporate governance. In addition, HNBEF are associated with better operating performance and higher value.