Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-10-27T10:39:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 475907 - Texto Completo.pdf: 3482518 bytes, checksum: ab8078a121a46cd9dd2fc8b477ef09cb (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-10-27T10:39:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 475907 - Texto Completo.pdf: 3482518 bytes, checksum: ab8078a121a46cd9dd2fc8b477ef09cb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-09-04 / From the understanding of two particular sentences VII of the Charter (331 d): "Live each day so that was master of himself (???????? ????? ?????) as much as possible; "And (c 324):" When I was young, I felt the same as many: I thought, soon I became lord (??????) of myself, go straight to the policy; "The thesis intended to propose how the concept of ????????? (self-control) is of exceptional importance throughout the Platonic philosophy, at different stages in the production-written dialogue of the Athenian philosopher. It suggests that Plato shows a real philosophical intentionality, not only with the formation of self-control to those who intend "to go" policy, but also extending this training to the interior individuality of each participant in the political community; likewise, it was proposed that the other domain ultimately present as a corollary of knowledge and self care, taking them to these as essentially members of Platonism concepts. It concludes that self-control is a power higher college ????, and so it is a virtue and a purification of themselves capable of being trained / configured on each psychic individuality, constituting as well as spiritual exercise par excellence. The purpose of this practice himself never appears as pure theoretical training, but is also always an activity, a continuous movement that prepared the ethical, political and existential conduct humanly possible. / A partir da compreens?o de duas particulares senten?as da Carta VII (331 d): ?Viver cada dia de modo a que fosse senhor de si mesmo (???????? ????? ?????), o mais poss?vel; ? e (324 c): ?Quando eu era jovem, senti o mesmo que muitos: pensei, logo me tornasse senhor (??????) de mim mesmo, ir direto ? pol?tica; ? a tese pretendera propor o quanto o conceito de ????????? (dom?nio de si) ? de excepcional import?ncia no conjunto da filosofia plat?nica, em distintas etapas, na produ??o escrita-dial?gica do fil?sofo ateniense. Sugestiona-se que Plat?o evidencia uma real intencionalidade filos?fica, n?o somente com a forma??o do dom?nio de si aos que intencionam ?ir? a pol?tica, mas, tamb?m estendendo esta forma??o ao interior de cada individualidade part?cipe na comunidade pol?tica; da mesma forma, prop?s-se que o dom?nio de si acaba por se apresentar como o corol?rio do conhecimento e do cuidado de si, tomando-os a estes, como conceitos essencialmente integrantes do platonismo. Conclui-se que o dom?nio de si mesmo ? uma pot?ncia da faculdade superior da ????, e por isso ? uma virtude e uma purifica??o de si pass?veis de serem formados/configurados em cada individualidade ps?quica, constituindo-se assim como exerc?cio espiritual por excel?ncia. O objetivo desta pr?tica de si nunca se apresenta como pura forma??o te?rica, mas tamb?m ? sempre uma atividade, um movimento cont?nuo que prepara a melhor conduta ?tico-pol?tico-existencial humanamente poss?vel.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T13:51:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AnaPRL_TESE.pdf: 1398783 bytes, checksum: a39a285b2b65a0e25d04622cb65d8880 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-09-17 / Ethics on scientific research is approached and often discussed in several areas of knowledge connected to health. In the Administration area there are very few studies which approach the topic of ethics on research. The present paper tried to fill in this gap in the production of knowledge about the topic, investigating how the ethical principles found in the literature and in the codes of conduct are noticed and taken into account in Administration research activities developed by acting researchers in Administration Post Graduation Programs. Theoretically speaking, the study was based mainly on the approaches by Creswell (2007) and Bell and Bryman (2007), which discuss the research ethical principles. Methodologically speaking it was all about an exploratory kind of study, with qualitative research approach. Upon data collection, personal interviews were made aiming at its depth and focus groups were formed. The first stage had interviews with four experienced researchers who took part on a teaching and researching event and on the second stage we used the focus group technique. The focus groups were done in four college institutions along with the post graduation programs in Administration in the states of Rio Grande do Norte, Para?ba and Pernambuco, in Brazil. The results suggest the existence of general principles and parameters for the scientific research recommended in the literature and on official resolution. However, in the Administration area, there are only a few recommendations of good practices when it comes to submitting articles for scientific publications but we found no guidance with ethical principles and parameters which cover all the activities in the scientific research and which specifically meet the research particularities in Administration. The main ethical dilemma pointed by the researchers refers to ethical questions which arise at the time of data collection and on disclosing the results. Most researchers do not know the guidelines and the ethical norms on ethics about research that we have in our country neither do they send in their projects to the research ethics committee. When dilemma arises, they decide the ethical question based on their values and common sense. These elements confirm the thesis that the researcher s procedure in the research activities in Administration is predominantly signed by personal values or by common sense and less by ethical principles, whether by not knowing the normative instruments related to ethics or by disagreeing with any disciplining rules on ethical behavior in the research / A ?tica na pesquisa cient?fica ? um tema abordado e muito discutido em diversas ?reas do conhecimento ligadas ? sa?de. Na ?rea da Administra??o, s?o raros os estudos que abordam o tema da ?tica na pesquisa. O presente estudo buscou preencher esta lacuna na produ??o do conhecimento sobre o tema, investigando como os princ?pios ?ticos encontrados na literatura e nos c?digos de conduta s?o percebidos e considerados nas atividades de pesquisa em Administra??o, desenvolvidas por pesquisadores atuantes em Programas de P?s-Gradua??o em Administra??o. Teoricamente, o estudo apoiou-se principalmente nas abordagens de Creswell (2007) e Bell e Bryman (2007), que discutem os princ?pios ?ticos na pesquisa. Metodologicamente, tratou-se de um estudo de car?ter explorat?rio, com abordagem de pesquisa qualitativa. Na coleta de dados foram feitas entrevistas pessoais e em profundidade e formados grupos focais. Na primeira etapa, foram realizadas entrevistas com quatro pesquisadores experientes, participantes de um evento de ensino e pesquisa e na segunda etapa, foi adotada a t?cnica de grupo focal. Os grupos focais foram realizados em quatro institui??es de ensino superior junto aos Programas de P?s-Gradua??o em Administra??o nos Estados do Rio Grande do Norte, Para?ba e Pernambuco. Os resultados apontam para a exist?ncia de princ?pios gerais para a pesquisa cient?fica propostos na literatura e em resolu??o oficial. Por?m, na ?rea da Administra??o existem apenas recomenda??es de boas pr?ticas no tocante ? submiss?o de artigos para publica??es cient?ficas, mas n?o foram encontradas orienta??es com princ?pios ?ticos que englobem todas as atividades da pesquisa cient?fica e que atendam especificamente ?s particularidades das pesquisas em Administra??o. Os principais dilemas ?ticos, apontados pelos pesquisados se referem ?s quest?es ?ticas que surgem nas fases da coleta dos dados e na divulga??o dos resultados. A maioria dos pesquisados n?o conhecem as diretrizes e as normas sobre ?tica na pesquisa existentes no pa?s e nem enviam seus projetos aos comit?s de ?tica na pesquisa. Em caso de dilemas, decidem a quest?o ?tica com base nos seus valores e senso comum. Estes elementos confirmam a tese de que a conduta do pesquisador nas atividades de pesquisa em Administra??o ? predominantemente balizada por valores pessoais ou pelo senso comum e menos por princ?pios ?ticos, seja pelo desconhecimento de instrumentos normativos relacionados ? ?tica, como tamb?m pela discord?ncia com quaisquer regras de disciplinamento sobre conduta ?tica na pesquisa