1 |
O dom?nio de si mesmo (?????????) como condi??o ?tico-existencial na filosofia de Plat?oRocha, Gabriel Rodrigues 04 September 2015 (has links)
Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-10-27T10:39:35Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
475907 - Texto Completo.pdf: 3482518 bytes, checksum: ab8078a121a46cd9dd2fc8b477ef09cb (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-10-27T10:39:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
475907 - Texto Completo.pdf: 3482518 bytes, checksum: ab8078a121a46cd9dd2fc8b477ef09cb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-09-04 / From the understanding of two particular sentences VII of the Charter (331 d): "Live each day so that was master of himself (???????? ????? ?????) as much as possible; "And (c 324):" When I was young, I felt the same as many: I thought, soon I became lord (??????) of myself, go straight to the policy; "The thesis intended to propose how the concept of ????????? (self-control) is of exceptional importance throughout the Platonic philosophy, at different stages in the production-written dialogue of the Athenian philosopher. It suggests that Plato shows a real philosophical intentionality, not only with the formation of self-control to those who intend "to go" policy, but also extending this training to the interior individuality of each participant in the political community; likewise, it was proposed that the other domain ultimately present as a corollary of knowledge and self care, taking them to these as essentially members of Platonism concepts. It concludes that self-control is a power higher college ????, and so it is a virtue and a purification of themselves capable of being trained / configured on each psychic individuality, constituting as well as spiritual exercise par excellence. The purpose of this practice himself never appears as pure theoretical training, but is also always an activity, a continuous movement that prepared the ethical, political and existential conduct humanly possible. / A partir da compreens?o de duas particulares senten?as da Carta VII (331 d): ?Viver cada dia de modo a que fosse senhor de si mesmo (???????? ????? ?????), o mais poss?vel; ? e (324 c): ?Quando eu era jovem, senti o mesmo que muitos: pensei, logo me tornasse senhor (??????) de mim mesmo, ir direto ? pol?tica; ? a tese pretendera propor o quanto o conceito de ????????? (dom?nio de si) ? de excepcional import?ncia no conjunto da filosofia plat?nica, em distintas etapas, na produ??o escrita-dial?gica do fil?sofo ateniense. Sugestiona-se que Plat?o evidencia uma real intencionalidade filos?fica, n?o somente com a forma??o do dom?nio de si aos que intencionam ?ir? a pol?tica, mas, tamb?m estendendo esta forma??o ao interior de cada individualidade part?cipe na comunidade pol?tica; da mesma forma, prop?s-se que o dom?nio de si acaba por se apresentar como o corol?rio do conhecimento e do cuidado de si, tomando-os a estes, como conceitos essencialmente integrantes do platonismo. Conclui-se que o dom?nio de si mesmo ? uma pot?ncia da faculdade superior da ????, e por isso ? uma virtude e uma purifica??o de si pass?veis de serem formados/configurados em cada individualidade ps?quica, constituindo-se assim como exerc?cio espiritual por excel?ncia. O objetivo desta pr?tica de si nunca se apresenta como pura forma??o te?rica, mas tamb?m ? sempre uma atividade, um movimento cont?nuo que prepara a melhor conduta ?tico-pol?tico-existencial humanamente poss?vel.
|
2 |
?tica na pesquisa em Administra??oLeite, Ana Patr?cia Rodrigues 17 September 2012 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T13:51:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
AnaPRL_TESE.pdf: 1398783 bytes, checksum: a39a285b2b65a0e25d04622cb65d8880 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-09-17 / Ethics on scientific research is approached and often discussed in several areas of knowledge
connected to health. In the Administration area there are very few studies which approach the
topic of ethics on research. The present paper tried to fill in this gap in the production of
knowledge about the topic, investigating how the ethical principles found in the literature and
in the codes of conduct are noticed and taken into account in Administration research
activities developed by acting researchers in Administration Post Graduation Programs.
Theoretically speaking, the study was based mainly on the approaches by Creswell (2007) and
Bell and Bryman (2007), which discuss the research ethical principles. Methodologically
speaking it was all about an exploratory kind of study, with qualitative research approach.
Upon data collection, personal interviews were made aiming at its depth and focus groups
were formed. The first stage had interviews with four experienced researchers who took part
on a teaching and researching event and on the second stage we used the focus group
technique. The focus groups were done in four college institutions along with the post
graduation programs in Administration in the states of Rio Grande do Norte, Para?ba and
Pernambuco, in Brazil. The results suggest the existence of general principles and parameters
for the scientific research recommended in the literature and on official resolution. However,
in the Administration area, there are only a few recommendations of good practices when it
comes to submitting articles for scientific publications but we found no guidance with ethical
principles and parameters which cover all the activities in the scientific research and which
specifically meet the research particularities in Administration. The main ethical dilemma
pointed by the researchers refers to ethical questions which arise at the time of data collection
and on disclosing the results. Most researchers do not know the guidelines and the ethical
norms on ethics about research that we have in our country neither do they send in their
projects to the research ethics committee. When dilemma arises, they decide the ethical
question based on their values and common sense. These elements confirm the thesis that the
researcher s procedure in the research activities in Administration is predominantly signed by
personal values or by common sense and less by ethical principles, whether by not knowing
the normative instruments related to ethics or by disagreeing with any disciplining rules on
ethical behavior in the research / A ?tica na pesquisa cient?fica ? um tema abordado e muito discutido em diversas ?reas do
conhecimento ligadas ? sa?de. Na ?rea da Administra??o, s?o raros os estudos que abordam o
tema da ?tica na pesquisa. O presente estudo buscou preencher esta lacuna na produ??o do
conhecimento sobre o tema, investigando como os princ?pios ?ticos encontrados na literatura
e nos c?digos de conduta s?o percebidos e considerados nas atividades de pesquisa em
Administra??o, desenvolvidas por pesquisadores atuantes em Programas de P?s-Gradua??o
em Administra??o. Teoricamente, o estudo apoiou-se principalmente nas abordagens de
Creswell (2007) e Bell e Bryman (2007), que discutem os princ?pios ?ticos na pesquisa.
Metodologicamente, tratou-se de um estudo de car?ter explorat?rio, com abordagem de
pesquisa qualitativa. Na coleta de dados foram feitas entrevistas pessoais e em profundidade e
formados grupos focais. Na primeira etapa, foram realizadas entrevistas com quatro
pesquisadores experientes, participantes de um evento de ensino e pesquisa e na segunda
etapa, foi adotada a t?cnica de grupo focal. Os grupos focais foram realizados em quatro
institui??es de ensino superior junto aos Programas de P?s-Gradua??o em Administra??o nos
Estados do Rio Grande do Norte, Para?ba e Pernambuco. Os resultados apontam para a
exist?ncia de princ?pios gerais para a pesquisa cient?fica propostos na literatura e em
resolu??o oficial. Por?m, na ?rea da Administra??o existem apenas recomenda??es de boas
pr?ticas no tocante ? submiss?o de artigos para publica??es cient?ficas, mas n?o foram
encontradas orienta??es com princ?pios ?ticos que englobem todas as atividades da pesquisa
cient?fica e que atendam especificamente ?s particularidades das pesquisas em Administra??o.
Os principais dilemas ?ticos, apontados pelos pesquisados se referem ?s quest?es ?ticas que
surgem nas fases da coleta dos dados e na divulga??o dos resultados. A maioria dos
pesquisados n?o conhecem as diretrizes e as normas sobre ?tica na pesquisa existentes no pa?s
e nem enviam seus projetos aos comit?s de ?tica na pesquisa. Em caso de dilemas, decidem a
quest?o ?tica com base nos seus valores e senso comum. Estes elementos confirmam a tese de
que a conduta do pesquisador nas atividades de pesquisa em Administra??o ?
predominantemente balizada por valores pessoais ou pelo senso comum e menos por
princ?pios ?ticos, seja pelo desconhecimento de instrumentos normativos relacionados ? ?tica,
como tamb?m pela discord?ncia com quaisquer regras de disciplinamento sobre conduta ?tica
na pesquisa
|
Page generated in 0.0133 seconds