Breast cancer, which in advanced stages often leads to bone metastasis, is the most frequent malignant tumor and the second deadliest form of cancer among women in the U.S. Skeletal metastasis is associated with imbalanced bone remodeling and eventual bone fracture that contributes to incapacitating pain and loss of mobility. Bone cancer pain remains a significant health problem due to the limited repertoire of analgesics available to treat this pain without negatively influencing the quality of life and "bone health" of the patient. Bone cancer results in a marked influx of pro- and anti- inflammatory hematological cells into the medullary cavity resulting in activation of nociceptors that express cytokine and chemokine receptors. Thus, blockade of these factors may result in a significant attenuation in bone cancer pain. The sustained release of cytokines by both primary tumor cells and invading leukocytes into the tumor microenvironment shapes the immune response to tumor invasion and ultimately mediates the shift in immune balance to the predominantly immunosuppressive state seen with late stage disease. Activation of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2), found on immune cells but not neuronal cells, has been shown to inhibit the release of cytokines from leukocytes; this inhibition plays an important role in CB2 agonist's ability to inhibit pain without producing the CNS side effects commonly associated with CB1. Cannabinoids have also been demonstrated in a number of cancer models to modulate the tumor microenvironment via effects specific to the tumor cells as well as regulation of invading leukocytes. Here, we show that the CB2 specific agonist JWH-015 mediates inflammatory factors in vitro and in vivo in the femoral intramedullary cavity in a murine model of bone cancer while simultaneously attenuating breast cancer induced bone pain and promoting overall health of the bone microenvironment. Further, we demonstrate JWH-015's ability to positively modify the systemic balance of regulatory to effector lymphocytes as well as modulate the suppressive function of regulatory T lymphocytes. We also show that JWH-015 attenuates breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro in a concentration dependent manner. Finally, utilizing a murine in vivo bioluminescence model, we demonstrate that JWH-015 treatment not only attenuates primary tumor growth, but also rate of metastasis. Taken together, these data establish CB2 as an innovative therapeutic target across multiple stages of breast cancer.

Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of solid tumors. However, the drug accumulates in the cochlea, and damages inner ear structures, resulting in bilateral andpermanent hearing loss. Previous data from our laboratory indicate that activation of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptor (by capsaicin) increases the NOX3 isoform of NADPH oxidase, leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cochlea, transient cochlear inflammation and transient hearing loss. We also demonstrated that the transient inflammation was produced by ROS-mediated activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1). Surprisingly, over time, this response desensitizes and capsaicin was subsequently able to protect against cisplatin ototoxicity. The goal of this study was to determine the mechanism of otoprotection against cisplatin ototoxicity following the administration of capsaicin. For this study we utilize both an immortalized organ of Corti outer hair cells and rat cochlea. Capsaicin (2.5 µM) increased both Ser727 p-STAT1 and Tyr705 p-STAT3 implicating its role in inflammation. Expression of cannabinoid receptors were observed in UB/OC-1 cells as well as rat outer hair cells (OHCs). However, inhibition of CB2 receptors (by AM630) reduced capsaicin-mediated Tyr705 p-STAT3, but had little effect on Ser727 STAT1. Capsaicin protected UB/OC-1 cells against cisplatin-induced apoptosis. This protection was reversed by CB2 antagonist but potentiated by TRPV1 inhibition. Significant cell death was observed following treatment of UB/OC-1 cells with AM630 alone, underscoring the importance of CB2 receptors in survival of these cells. CB2 agonist, JWH, significantly increased the protective signal, STAT3. Furthermore, capsaicin-mediated protection was reversed by the inhibition of STAT3, implicating STAT3 in otoprotection. In animal studies, oral administration of capsaicin (0.5% solution) induced transient inflammation but led to a long term recovery. Animals pre-treated with oral capsaicin were protected against cisplatin-induced hearing loss as compared to vehicle-treated animals, suggesting protection against hearing loss. Capsaicin increased the expression of both CB1 and CB2 receptors in the organ of Corti, which might confer the long term protective actions of this agent against hearing loss. In rats pretreated with AM630, the protective action of capsaicin was abolished. We conclude that otoprotection mediated by capsaicin is produced by activation of CB receptors in the cochlea which are coupled to both STAT1 and STAT3 activation. However, our data support the conclusion that activation of STAT3 confers the otoprotective action of capsaicin. In contrast, activation of STAT1 by capsaicin could contribute to the transient inflammatory response previously observed in vivo. The net protective action of capsaicin could result from an increase in the STAT3/STAT1 ratio of cells in the cochlea, which antagonizes the ability of cisplatin lower this ratio and promote cell death.

Endocannabinoid (eCB) system is composed of endogenous CB ligands including anandamide (AEA) and 2-Arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), enzymes involved in their biosynthesis and degradation such as diacylglycerol lipase-α (DAGL- α), and CB receptors. Primarily, there are three types of CB receptors - CB receptor 1(CB1), CB receptor 2 (CB2) and non CB1 non CB2 types of CB receptor (e.g. GPR, TRPV1) and they belong to G-protein (Gi/o) coupled receptors (GPCR) family.CB1 receptors are abundant in the brain where they modulate neuronal activities. On the other hand, CB2 receptors are predominantly expressed in the immune cells and regulate the growth and proliferation of different immune cells and modulate the activities of cytokines network and anti-oxidant machinery in stress conditions. Inflammation plays a central role in hearing loss (HL) caused by different ototoxic insults including anti-neoplastic agents such as cisplatin, aminoglycosides and acoustic trauma. These insults can trigger chronic production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in regions of cochlea such as organ of Corti, stria vascularis (SVA), spiral ligament (SL) and spiral ganglion neurons (SG). This leads to increased synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, disruption of mitochondrial membrane integrity, activation of DNA damage/repair pathways and activation of pro-apoptotic enzymes. Jeong et al. (2007) have shown that CB2 receptor specific agonist (JWH-015) protects the HEI-OC1 hair cell cultures against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in-vitro. The goal of the current study was to examine the distribution and function of CB receptors (mainly CB2) in the cochlea and determine whether activation of these receptors could protect the cochlea by altering the expression of ROS generating proteins, along with pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic proteins. This study also investigated whether inhibition of eCB synthesis can causes HL. Aim 1 of the current study investigated the expression of CB receptors in the cochlea using different in-vivo models such as male Wistar rat and knock-in mice with GFP-tagged CB2 receptors, in-vitro models such as organotypic culture of neonatal mouse (C57BL/6) cochlea and University of Bristol organ of Corti (UB/OC1) cells. We show that both CB1 and CB2 receptors are expressed in the outer and the inner hair cells (OHCs and IHCs), SV, SG and supporting cells (SCs) included outer and inner pillar cells. The distribution of DAGL- α was also examined in the male Wistar rats and we found the similar distribution pattern of this enzymes as CB2. DAGL- α catalyzes the hydrolysis of DAG to synthesize 2-AG, which acts as a chief endogenous CB2 ligand. Our initial studies suggested a role of CB2 and not CB1 in protection, leading us to focus on CB2 receptors for subsequent studies. Aim 2 examined the otoprotective role of trans-tympanic application of CB2 specific agonist (JWH-015) against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in male Wistar rats. Activation of CB2 receptors restored cisplatin-induced elevations in ABR thresholds which was significantly reversed by CB2 antagonist AM-630. Pre-treatment with JWH-015 protected against cisplatin-induced loss of hair cell and synaptic ribbons. In-vitro studies in UB/OC-1 cells demonstrated that pre-treatment of JWH-015 modulates the activities of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and 3 (STAT1 and STAT3), increases the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL, indicating its role in regulating the apoptosis Activation of CB2 also abrogated cisplatin-induced decrease in Na+/K+ATPase- α in the SV and SL fibrocytes and ameliorated the expression of different pro-inflammatory genes including TRPV1, COX2, NOX3, KIM1, iNOS and TNF- α. We also found that blocking of CB2 by AM630 itself resulted in hearing loss and loss in CB2 receptors, indicating eCB system is tonically active and could be important for physiological function of the cochlea. Indeed, we observed that inhibition of DAGL- α by RHC80267 results in HL. Aim 3 of this current study investigated whether pre-treatment of CB2 agonist will interfere with anti-cancer efficacy of cisplatin against various cancer cell lines head and neck cancer cells (UMSCC10B), and colon cancer cells (HCT116). Our data indicate that JWH-015 did not interfere with cisplatin-induced apoptosis in these cells. Overall, this study provides novel insights into the essential role eCBs plays in protection the cochlea under non-stressed conditions and following exposure to ototoxic agents. It also demonstrates that application of exogenous CB2 agonist (JWH-015) could serve as an effective protective agent against cisplatin ototoxicity These data suggest that localized delivery of CB2 agonists should be studied in human for protection against hearing loss.

Inflammation is a multifactorial response towards noxious stimuli, however appropriate regulation and resolution of inflammation is crucial for the prevention of chronic inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis. The endocannabinoid (eCB) system is an endogenous immunomodulatory system which consists of a series of lipophilic ligands that signal via two G-protein-coupled receptors. Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) is mainly expressed in the central nervous system and its activation has psychoactive effects. Cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R) is mainly expressed on leukocytes and receptor activation has anti-inflammatory actions in mouse models of atherosclerosis and chronic inflammatory pain. It is considered that CB2R activation is involved in modulation of the recruitment of inflammatory cells, especially monocytes/macrophages; however the exact mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesised that activation of CB2R modulates monocyte/ macrophage recruitment and signalling, thus providing a homeostatic mechanism to limit macrophage activation in inflammatory responses. The high lipophilicity of cannabinoid ligands and their lack of selectivity for CB2R over CB1R limits CB2R drug development. In collaboration with Dr Angela Russell, we used virtual screening and a CB2R cAMP assay that we validated to discover a novel CB2R agonist, 3-((2’-Cyanobenzyl)thio)-5H-[1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b]indole, (DIAS2). In collaboration with Dr Russell’s group who did chemical synthesis, we extended this novel scaffold to include over 80 compounds. Using the same hCB2R cAMP screening assay we demonstrated that 16 compounds with the same scaffold are at active at CB2R in the nanomolar range. At least 3 compounds, including DIAS2, were found to be ≥ 300-fold selective for CB2R over CB1R in cAMP assays and radioligand binding studies. In the inflammatory model of zymosan-induced peritonitis, DIAS2 dose-dependently inhibited inflammatory monocyte recruitment by 50% at highest dose of 5 mg/kg with no effect on neutrophils. In further zymosan-induced peritonitis experiments 5 mg/kg of DIAS2 and a structurally-similar CB2R agonist from the same family of triazino-indoles inhibited monocyte recruitment while a different CB2R agonist (JWH-133) at 5 mg/kg did not inhibit monocyte recruitment. Analysis of peritoneal exudates showed that the inhibition of monocyte recruitment was not associated with changes in the levels of JE, MIP-1α and nitric oxide but was associated with increased levels of the chemokine KC. Using in vitro cell biology approaches, we demonstrated that 10μΜ dose of both DIAS2 and JWH-133 reduced forskolin-induced cAMP production in primary murine macrophages. Also 2.5 to 10 μΜ οf JWH-133 and HU-308 dose-dependently induced primary murine macrophage chemotaxis which could be blocked a CB2R antagonist (SR 144528, 1 μΜ) while DIAS2 at doses up to 10 μΜ was not a chemoattractant. Accordingly HU-308 and JWH-133 were at least 3-fold more efficacious than DIAS2 at recruiting β-arrestin to the murine CB2R. Moreover in studies with primary murine macrophages 10 μΜ dose of JWH-133 and HU-308 induced ERK1/2 and Akt phosphorylation within 30 minutes, while 2-AG (an endogenous eCB ligand) and DIAS2 at 10 μΜ had no such effect. In summary, we have discovered a novel family CB2R agonists and demonstrated that some devoid of chemotactic active CB2R agonists can reduce monocyte recruitment in vivo while other chemoattractant CB2R agonists have no in vivo anti-inflammatory effect. We propose that non-chemotactic CB2R agonists represent a new class of anti-inflammatory drugs with a novel mode of action.

Amphibian alkaloids are attractive targets for synthesis due to their biological activity. An important class of amphibian alkaloids is the 2,5-disubstituted pyrrolidine-based family of compounds. There are many synthetic approaches for the preparation of the trans-2,5- disubstituted pyrrolidines, but methods for the construction of the cis-2,5-pyrrolidines are limited. Therefore, it was desired to develop an enantioselective approach for the preparation of cis-2,5-disubsituted pyrrolidines. (+)-Tropin-2-one derived from cocaine was used as starting material to exploit the inherent stereochemistry for construction of the cis-pyrrolidine ring. This permitted the unequivocal assignment of the absolute configuration of the target pyrrolidine. The structurally simple pyrrolidine alkaloid, 225H, was selected as a target to develop a general synthetic approach. The enantioselective synthesis of 225H was achieved in nine steps and good overall yield. The search for potent cannabinoid receptor partial agonist ligands as potential marijuana addiction therapeutic agents has led to an investigation of the synthesis of diaryl ether hybrid analogues of BAY 59-3074. A series of 2-(3-alkyl-5-hydroxyphenoxy)-6- (trifluoromethyl)benzonitriles, 3-(2-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)phenylalkanoates, and (3- (benzyloxy)phenoxy)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitriles were synthesized and evaluated in vitro for CB1 affinity. The olivetol diaryl ether analogue was the most potent ligand of the alkyl series, but the diaryl ester analogues exhibited modest affinity for CB1 receptors. The most potent compound of the series was the 2-(3-(benzyloxy)phenoxy)-6- (trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile.

Cannabinoid receptors (CBR) are the most abundant G-protein coupled receptors in the mammalian brain with the highest densities within the cerebellum (Herkenham et al., 1990). Cannabinoid manipulations have been reported to cause deficits in cerebellar-dependent learning (Kishimoto and Kano, 2006; Skosnik et al., 2007; Steinmetz and Freeman, 2010; 2013). Cannabinoid receptors-1 (CB1R) have been hypothesized to be important in the establishment of long-term depression within the cerebellar cortex (Levenes et al., 1998; Safo and Regehr, 2005). However, all investigations in vivo have used global manipulations and have not attempted to localize or characterize these receptors during cerebellar-dependent learning. Chapter 2 systematically examined localization within the cerebellar cortex of cannabinoid effects on eyeblink conditioning, a type of cerebellum-dependent learning. Local infusions into a specific portion of the cerebellar cortex, the eyeblink conditioning microzone, resulted in deficits in learning similar to systemic injections. Additionally, infusions of cannabinoids into the eyeblink conditioning microzone, and no other parts of the cerebellar cortex or deep nuclei, were responsible for the deficits. Finally, tetrode recordings were made in Purkinje cells while receiving either CBR agonist or vehicle injections prior to training. Fewer Purkinje cells exhibited learning-related decreases in activity when the rat was administered a CBR agonist as compared to when it was injected with the vehicle. The CBR administered Purkinje cells also showed earlier onsets and smaller amplitudes in their learning-related activity. Purkinje cells that show a learning-related increase in activity were not affected by cannabinoid administration. The impairment in Purkinje cell plasticity was not observed after the rats reached asymptotic levels of learning. These results indicate that CBR agonist administration disrupts the induction of plasticity within the cerebellar cortex and this may account for the behavioral deficit in eyeblink conditioning. Chapter 3 examined whether infusions of the CBR agonist into the cerebellar cortex impaired forebrain-dependent learning as well as forebrain-independent associative learning. Similar to subcutaneous injections, forebrain-dependent trace eyeblink conditioning was unimpaired, whereas forebrain independent delay eyeblink conditioning was impaired. These findings provide evidence that plasticity mechanisms that are modulated by cannabinoids do not play a significant role in trace eyeblink conditioning. Finally, in Chapter 4 the role of CBRs and endocannabinoids during memory consolidation were examined. CBR and endocannabinoid manipulations prior to training resulted in impaired eyeblink conditioning. However, a CBR agonist or a drug increasing endocannabinoid levels resulted in enhanced consolidation when administered 1 hour post-training. In contrast, a CBR antagonist or an endocannabinoid decreasing drug resulted in impairments 1 hour post-training. Thus, CBRs and endocannabinoids appear to be important in learning and consolidation of cerebellar-dependent learning.

PURPOSE: WIN55,212-2, a potent synthetic agonist of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2), reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E (ApoE) null mice. Although pharmacologic evidence suggests the anti-atherosclerotic effects of WIN55,212-2 are mediated CB2, this remains to be confirmed by genetic studies. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of WIN55,212-2 on development of atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor (Ldlr) null mice with and without homozygous deletion of the CB2 gene. METHODS: After 6 weeks on an atherogenic diet, groups of CB2 and CB2 Ldlr-null mice received a daily intraperitoneal injection of WIN55,212-2 or vehicle. After two weeks, plasma lipid levels and atherosclerosis in the aortic root were quantified. RESULTS: Plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels did not differ between CB2 and CB2 mice and WIN55,212-2 had no effect on total cholesterol levels in either genotype. However, triglyceride levels in both CB2 and CB2 mice were significantly lowered by WIN55,212-2. The size of aortic root lesions did not differ significantly between CB2 and CB2 mice with or without WIN55,212-2 treatment. However, WIN55,212-2 treatment significantly lowered lesional macrophage accumulation in CB2 mice, and lesional smooth muscle content in both CB2 and CB2 mice. Lesional apoptosis was also greater in CB2 mice compared to CB2mice, and only reduced by WIN55,212-2 in CB2 mice. Collagen content and elastin fiber fragmentation were unaffected by genotype or WIN55,212-2. CONCLUSIONS: WIN55,212-2 treatment does not alter lesion size in Ldlr null-mice, but does modify lesion cellularity CB2-dependent and CB2-independent mechanisms.

In non-pathological states the central nervous system maintains a degree of immunological privilege. When illness or injury occur, this privilege can be lost and the immune system drives pathology in the brain and spinal cord. More so, resident immune cells, the microglial, act as major effectors of this response. Cerebral ischemia, or stroke, is the fourth leading cause of death in developed nations. After the initial ischemia, the inflammatory response propagates further injury and cell death. Another affliction of the central nervous system, chronic pain and persistent use of the opioid analgesic, morphine, leads to tolerance and ineffectiveness of the drug. Currently, only one in three patients receive adequate pain relief from their pharmacological regiment. This loss of efficacy in morphine is also driven by an inflammatory response. Thus, a way to quell inflammation in both disease states could lead to better treatments for both disorders. The endogenous cannabinoid system has two known receptors, CB1 and CB2. Both of these receptors have been intimately linked to inflammation and the activation or antagonism of the receptors can impart desired outcomes in modulating the immune response. Primarily the CB1 receptor expression is on presynaptic terminals of neurons to modulate neuronal firing. The CB2 receptor's expression predominates on immunological cells including microglial. However, some degree of expression exists with reports of neuronal CB2 receptors and immunological CB1 receptors. This makes pharmacological therapies targeted at both receptors ideal candidates in treating not only stroke and but also preventing the induction of morphine tolerance. In the studies described here, we sought to investigate the role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in both stroke and as a way to prevent the induction of morphine tolerance. The results showed that CB1 -/- CB2 -/- receptor mice were able to maintain greater blood flow during cerebral ischemia. More so, CB1 antagonism in a permanent occlusion of cerebral vessels showed a protective effect independent of the serotonin receptor. Lastly, a CB2 agonist was able to limit the degree of tolerance that developed from chronic morphine therapy and also prevent hyperalgesia in addition to showing a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines. Acutely, this same agonist was found to antagonize the morphine receptor but this could be avoided if morphine was administered before the CB2 agonist. In brief, the studies at hand show that the endogenous cannabinoid system can attenuate inflammation in central nervous system injury and shows great promise as a future therapeutic for clinical use. / Physiology

EFFECTS OF CANNABINOID RECEPTOR INTERACTING PROTEIN (CRIP1a) ON CANNABINOID (CB1) RECEPTOR FUNCTION. By Tricia Hardt Smith, B.S., M.S. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Commonwealth University, 2009. Major Director: Dana E. Selley, Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology This dissertation examines modulation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor function by Cannabinoid Receptor Interacting Protein (CRIP1a), a novel protein that binds the C-terminus of CB1 receptors. In Human embryonic kidney cells expressing human CB1 receptors (hCB1-HEK) and hCB1-HEK cells stably co-expressing CRIP1a (hCB1-HEK-CRIP1a), quantitative immunoblotting revealed a CRIP1a/CB1 molar ratio of 5.4 and 0.37, respectively, with no difference in CB1 receptor expression. To test the hypothesis that CRIP1a modulates CB1 receptor signaling, G-protein and effector activity were examined with and without full, partial and inverse agonists. [35S]GTPgS binding, which measures G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated G-protein activation, showed that CRIP1a inhibited constitutive CB1 receptor activity, as indicated by the decreased effect of the inverse agonist SR141716A. CRIP1a also decreased CB1 receptor-mediated G-protein activation by high efficacy agonists, whereas moderate and low efficacy agonists were unaffected. In experiments varying Na+ concentration, CRIP1a decreased spontaneous G-protein activation at low Na+ concentrations, where spontaneous GPCR activity is highest. This effect was eliminated by pertussis toxin pre-treatment, indicating that CRIP1a only inhibits GPCR-mediated activity. To determine whether CRIP1a modulates receptor adaptation, hCB1-HEK (±CRIP1a) cells were pretreated with WIN or THC. Both ligands desensitized CB1 receptor-mediated G-protein activation, but desensitization was unaffected by CRIP1a. In contrast, CRIP1a attenuated downregulation of CB1 receptor binding sites by WIN, but not THC. Downstream, CRIP1a attenuated constitutive CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of cAMP, as indicated by elimination of SR141716A-stimulated cAMP, without affecting agonist-induced cAMP inhibition. Constitutive inhibition was not due to endocannabinoids because LC-ESI-MS-MS did not detect endocannabinoids in hCB1-HEK (±CRIP1a) cells. To determine whether effects of CRIP1a were conserved among cell types, Chinese Hamster Ovary cells expressing CB1 receptors were stably co-transfected with CRIP1a, and had a CRIP1a/CB1 receptor molar ratio of 15 and 1900 with and without CRIP1a over-expression, respectively. In this model, CRIP1a inhibited constitutive CB1 receptor-mediated G-protein activity, but activation by agonists was enhanced, suggesting CRIP1a effects were dependent on stoichiometry of CRIP1a/CB1 receptor or cell type. Overall, these results indicate that CRIP1a decreases constitutive CB1 receptor activity, modulates agonist efficacy, and inhibits CB1 receptor downregulation, in a ligand- and cellular environment-dependent manner.

Introduction: Cannabinoid compounds, both nonspecific as well as agonists selective for either cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) or cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2), have been shown to modulate the tumor microenvironment by inducing apoptosis in tumor cells in several model systems. The mechanism of this modulation remains only partially delineated, and activity induced via the CB1 and CB2 receptors may be distinct despite significant sequence homology and structural similarity of ligands. Methods: The CB2-selective agonist JWH-015 was used to investigate mechanisms downstream of CB2 activation in mouse and human breast cancer cell lines in vitro and in a murine mammary tumor model. Results: JWH-015 treatment significantly reduced primary tumor burden and metastasis of luciferase-tagged murine mammary carcinoma 4T1 cells in immunocompetent mice in vivo. Furthermore, JWH-015 reduced the viability of murine 4T1 and human MCF7 mammary carcinoma cells in vitro by inducing apoptosis. JWH-015-mediated reduction of breast cancer cell viability was not dependent on G alpha(i) signaling in vitro or modified by classical pharmacological blockade of CB1, GPR55, TRPV1, or TRPA1 receptors. JWH-015 effects were calcium dependent and induced changes in MAPK/ERK signaling. Conclusion: The results of this work characterize the actions of a CB2-selective agonist on breast cancer cells in a syngeneic murine model representing how a clinical presentation of cancer progression and metastasis may be significantly modulated by a G-protein-coupled receptor.