One objective of the BCBS is to implement minimum supervisory capital standards in the banking sector. Basel I to Basel III attempted to maintain a minimum capital standard for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. Many loopholes were highlighted through years when political and economic disturbances occurred and caused volatility in the financial markets. This study analysed five major South African banks from 2002–2012 to determine the size of these disturbances on the regulatory capital levels. The empirical portion of this study comprised of statistical models to be applied to the quantitative observations of capital levels. These measurements served as the bases of comparison between the five banks. After the investigation it was evident that the capital levels of these five banks first decreased as the South African economy prevailed in a boom phase and banks were at ease. When the 2007–2009 financial crisis struck, the capital levels increased again in respect of the three risks. Global volatility surfaced as economic and political factors were introduced into the markets / MCom (Risk Management), North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, 2014

One objective of the BCBS is to implement minimum supervisory capital standards in the banking sector. Basel I to Basel III attempted to maintain a minimum capital standard for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. Many loopholes were highlighted through years when political and economic disturbances occurred and caused volatility in the financial markets. This study analysed five major South African banks from 2002–2012 to determine the size of these disturbances on the regulatory capital levels. The empirical portion of this study comprised of statistical models to be applied to the quantitative observations of capital levels. These measurements served as the bases of comparison between the five banks. After the investigation it was evident that the capital levels of these five banks first decreased as the South African economy prevailed in a boom phase and banks were at ease. When the 2007–2009 financial crisis struck, the capital levels increased again in respect of the three risks. Global volatility surfaced as economic and political factors were introduced into the markets / MCom (Risk Management), North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, 2014

Reserve Required System, a monetary policy manipulated by Taiwanese Government has been gradually reduced or even abandoned in global financial market, which eliminates the international competiveness of domestic banking industry. However, the government has no intention in implementing Zero Reserve Requirement. Given current domestic monetary policies as well as system of banking supervision, I propose "Risk-Based Deposit Reserves" for financial authorities implement. Current international usage sets an absolute value of reserve ratio, not in accordance with its operating risk. Therefore I designed a ¡§Five-Level Differential Deposit Reserve System¡¨ based on Capital Adequacy Ratio and Composite Risk Rating Score of the bank. Such innovation will help increase the quality of banks and eliminate unhealthy banks which will strengthen domestic banking industry in challenges of Basel ¢» and its competitiveness.

Abstract With the liberalization and globalization, the scope for banks is much more sophisticated in decade. Accompanied with Asian Financial Crisis, the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio of domestic financial institutions has increased significantly. Consequently, this research adopts 2SLS to estimate simultaneous equations and examines the impact of risk-based capital regulation on NPL ratio and operating performance. The empirical results are summarily as following: 1. There exists a negative relationship between capital adequacy ratio and NPL ratio, which means that the higher the capital adequacy ratio is, the lower the NPL loan will be. Therefore, adopting the capital regulation will be helpful to improve the balance-sheet structure. 2. With the change of capital adequacy ratio, ROE moves in the same direction; that is, there is a positive relationship between capital adequacy ratio and ROE. Usually, the high-profit companies have more cash flow to support the capital requirement. 3. Examining the effectiveness of ¡§First-Stage Financial Reform Policy¡¨, we find that only 12% and 26% of the banks are not qualified for capital adequacy ratio and NPL ratio, respectively.. Thus, the ¡§First-Stage Financial Reform Policy¡¨ has achieved the preliminary goal. 4. We adopt t-test to distinguish whether the difference between actual and standard figures is significantly large for those disqualified banks. It shows that the main factor might be because of the essential problem of bad asset-debt structure, and not the lack of time to adapt themselves to the new regulation.

Our country, the same type of deposit applies the same interest rate. The reserve ratio in the world has gradually been reduced even adjusted to zero. Because of the control policy increases in bank operating costs, and impact the efficiency of resource allocationa. The competent national authorities still see the control policy as the main monetary policy. Domestic banks under this system face a very high control costs. Presently our country is still unable to adopt "zero" reserve, so this study consider existing banking supervision system to develop a "Risk-Based Deposit System" for existing national reserve system.The concept of risk stratification derives from deposit insurance, using the capital adequacy ratio, banks integrated risk rating score and the financial leverage ratio. Each Bank based on their respective level of risk to employ different deposit reserve ratio. "Risk-Based Deposit System" can make the banking sector to spontaneously reduce their own business risk in order to meet the lower deposit reserve ratio of the risk criteria. Therefore, it will help banking sector to reduce regulatory burden, and assist banks in Taiwan to follow Basel III to strengthen its competitiveness and meet the world trend.

none

This diploma thesis provides a high-level overview of banking regulation under the general rules of the Basel agreements that are followed in almost every international bank globally. The introductory part of this paper is devoted to the fundamental purpose of regulation and explains the risks banks are exposed to. The following chapters outline the evolution of banking regulation as agreed by the Basel committee, explain the various capital adequacy frameworks, risk measurement methodologies and look into the proposed future developments in the regulatory area, including ex-post (Basel I, II) and ex-ante analysis of the practical impacts on banks. The final part of this diploma work is focused on actual real world application of the Basel II rules in a banking organization, precisely Barclays Capital, the investment banking arm of Barclays Plc. headquartered in London, UK and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

The following pages of my master thesis aim to acquaint the reader with the major changes brought about by Basel III banking regulation. This new regulatory framework was created in response to the financial crisis (beginning in 2007), which revealed some weaknesses in the original Basel II regulation, and its purpose is to prevent future similar situations in the financial market by increasing the stability and resilience of the banking sector. Impacts of Basel III are reflected primarily in increased demand for quality capital used by banks and maintaining sufficient liquidity. As shown by the results of the analysis, these factors have further effect on interest spread of banks and the real economy.

No description available.

Research issue: The transition from Basel II to Basel III becomes consuming for banks, financially. But Basel III should be profitably for financial market economy. Risks in the financial world is very complex. Is Basel III is sufficient to manage risk and future crises Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the application of Basel II and the transition to Basel III in Sweden with the banking system in focus. Method: The study has a qualitative research methodology for the collection of empirical data. The study is based on interviews with four large banks of Sweden (Swedbank, SEB, Nordea, Handelsbanken) and with Finansinspektionen. We also used previous studies, books and rapports. Conclusions: Basel has no direct connection to the profitability of the banks. The translation to Basel III was an obvious step for a more stable financial market. With Basel III it became more expensive for the banks; the more cost the less returns and hence led dividends for shareholders. But the banks will not bear the costs themselves, the costumers will get affected. Banks have begun to adapt to Basel III. There are requirements to save equity immediately not only in crisis. Which leads to the return is not likely to be lowered at bad times.