Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Background: Stimulated Raman spectroscopy (SRS) is a nondestructive tool for biochemical characterization of tissues. The aims were: 1) To evaluate the ability of SRS and Spontaneous Raman spectroscopy (SpRS) to differentiate among sound, demineralized and remineralized bovine enamel by phosphate and carbonate ratio (P/C-Ratio); and 2) To determine the correlation between the outcomes of transverse microradiography (TMR: Integrated mineral loss (ΔZ) and lesion depth) and P/C-Ratio. Material and Methods: Thirty, 5×5×2-mm ground and polished bovine enamel blocks were prepared. The surface was divided into 3 equal areas. Each area was chemically demineralized (demin) by Carbopol demineralized solution for 0 (Sound-Demin), 24 (24h-Demin), and 48h (48h-Demin), respectively. Then, specimens were sectioned for TMR analysis, and the remaining one part of each specimen was remineralized (remin) for 15days using a pH-cycling model (Sound-Remin, 24hD-Remin=24h-Demin and remineralization, 48hD-Remin = 48h-Demin and remineralization). Demin and remin groups were scanned to obtain P/C-Ratio by SpRS and SRS. SRS was further scanned from 0 (surface) up to 100 µm into the dentine at 10-µm intervals. Remineralized specimens were sectioned for TMR analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare between TMR and SpRS/SRS. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to correlate among TMR, SpRS, and SRS. A 5-percent significance level was used for each test. Results: As demin time increased, both ΔZ and lesion depth were increased. After remineralization, both values were decreased. There were significant differences between demine and remin groups and between demin times. For SpRS, Sound-Demin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 24h-Demin and 48h-Demin (p ≤ 0.001). The 24h-Demin had significantly larger values than 48h-Demin (p = 0.048). Sound-Remin had larger P/C-Ratio than 24hD-Remin (p = 0.316) and 48hD-Remin (p = 0.015). 24hD-Remin was larger than 48hD-Remin (p = 0.269). 24hD-Remin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 24h-Demin (p ≤ 0.001). 48hD-Remin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 48h-Demin (p ≤ 0.001). For SRS, at surface (0 µm), for demin group, Sound-Demin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 24h-Demin (p = 0.020) and 48h-Demin (p = 0.032). 24h-Demin had larger value than 48h-Demin; but no significant difference (p = 0.117). Among remin groups, Sound-Remin was not statistical significance different for 24hD-Remin (p = 0.172) and 48hD-Remin (p = 0.134). However, 24hD-Remin was smaller; but not statistical significance different from 48hD-Remin (p = 0.688). At deeper levels (10 µm to 100µm), it was found that 1) After demineralization, Sound-Demin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 24h-Demin and 48h-Demin at 0 µm to 20 µm, and 80 µm to 100µm; Sound-Demin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 48h-Demin; and no statistical significance differences were found among Sound-Demin and 24h-Demin, 24h-Demin and 48h-Demin. 2) After remineralization, no statistical significance differences were found among Sound-Remin, 24hD-Remin, and 48hD-Remin. 3) Sound-Demin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than Sound-Remin at 0 µm ,10 µm, 20 µm; and no statistical significance differences were found at levels deeper than 30 µm. 4) No statistical significance differences were found between 24h-Demin and 24hD-Remin from 0 µm to 70µm; and 24hD-Remin had significantly larger P/C-Ratio than 24h-Demin from 80 µm to 100 µm. 5) No statistical significance differences were found between 48h-Demin and 48hD-Remin. For correlation, moderate correlation was found between SpRS demineralized/remineralized groups and ΔZ, and between SpRS demineralized groups and lesion depth. Conclusion: SpRS and SRS have the potential to quantify demineralization through calculation of the phosphate and carbonate ratio. In addition, SpRS can detect the change of remineralization. A nondestructive caries detection approach using SpRS and SRS would be beneficial in clinical practice.

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of five different displays on the diagnosis of artificial caries-like lesions on restored and unrestored tooth surfaces. Materials & Methods: 60 extracted human teeth (30 premolars and 30 molars) were selected. All molars had class II cavities prepared and restored. Half of the premolars and molars were randomly selected and a 7mm² area was exposed to a demineralizing solution for 120 days. Phantoms with four teeth (two premolars and two molars) were created. Periapical radiographs were obtained on RVG 6100 digital sensor (Kodak Dental Systems, New York, USA). The images were evaluated under subdued lighting on five viewing displays (Barco MDNC-3321, NEC Wide, Apple iPad Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro 4 and Dell flat panel monitor) by three observers using a five-point rating scale. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), accuracy (Ac) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and their areas under the curves (AUC) were calculated and compared by Analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey test. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were accomplished after a three month interval observational.. The observer agreement was evaluated with the Cohen’s kappa test. Results: Even though the tablets slightly improved accuracy over the medical monitors, there was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy or AUC among the five monitors when the same tooth group was considered (p< 0.05) with the exception of the iPad Pro which had a specificity p-value of 0.014 when comparing the two materials within the iPad Pro. Conclusion: There is no perceivable disadvantage to utilizing a higher resolution tablet viewing platform for plane images. No advantage to the medical grade monitors over the tablets or the consumer monitor. Both tablets improved detection accuracy on the unrestored premolars. However further evaluation especially in a clinical lighting setting is warranted to evaluate a displays impact on observer performance within common clinical practice lighting parameters.

No description available.

A cárie dentária continua sendo um grande desafio para os Cirurgiões-Dentistas pela dificuldade de diagnóstico, sobretudo em superfícies proximais. Muitos equipamentos se destinam a facilitar o exame do paciente, tendo como principal objetivo o diagnóstico de cáries incipientes. Dentre os exames mais utilizados está a radiografia interproximal associada ao exame clínico. O Sistema Internacional de Avaliação e Detecção de Cáries (ICDAS) vem sendo bem aceito tanto para o uso clínico como para pesquisas in vitro e in vivo, apresentando ótimos resultados. Além da técnica interproximal, a tomografia cone beam (CBCT) vem entrando no cotidiano da Odontologia, mas pouco se sabe sobre o seu desempenho para avaliação de cáries iniciais em superfícies proximais. A microtomografia (CT) é um novo método de avaliação destinado a pequenos espécimes e se assemelha a uma versão em miniatura da tomografia axial computadorizada, gerando imagens na ordem de micrômetros. Este método vem sendo utilização em pesquisas para se avaliar tecidos mineralizados, devido à sua habilidade de aferir com precisão o coeficiente de atenuação linear. O método padrão ouro que define com maior precisão os estágios da cárie é o histológico. Contudo, para sua avaliação é necessário destruir os espécimes. Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar o desempenho do método ICDAS, de radiografias digitais pela técnica interproximal, da CBCT e da CT para lesões precoces de cárie, com relação à histologia. Houve correlação entre os dados obtidos com o sistema ICDAS para superfícies proximais e as imagens da CT, no que diz respeito à classificação quanto à profundidade das lesões. A CT tem correlação positiva com a histologia tanto na classificação das lesões como na profundidade, contudo esta relação poderia ser maior se uma melhor resolução fosse conseguida. As radiografias digitais pela técnica interproximal tiveram o melhor desempenho com relação à CT e à histologia, sendo este desempenho muito semelhante ao método clínico ICDAS. A CBCT obteve o pior desempenho, contudo ainda assim houve correlação positiva com a histologia e com a CT. A associação do método clínico ICDAS e as radiografias interproximais digitais tiveram o melhor desempenho com relação à histologia. A grande vantagem da microtomografia quando comparada a outros métodos de avaliação da doença cárie, é a manutenção da integridade dos espécimes, a informação tridimensional e isotrópica, possibilitando o uso dos espécimes em outro momento, sem a perda de eventuais características presentes nos mesmos. / Dental caries is still a great challenge to dentists, manly in proximal surfaces due to its difficult diagnosis. Many types of equipment have been designed to minimize this problem, specially aiming early caries detection. Among all, one of the most used by clinicians is the interproximal radiograph. The International Caries Assessment System (ICDAS) is a clinical evaluation method that is well accepted and used having a good performance not only for in vivo but also for in vitro studies. Cone beam CT (CBCT) is also being assessed in the overall Dentistry, but its performance on early caries detection has not extensively being evaluated. Microtomography (CT) is a new assessment method which is addressed to small specimens and is similar to a miniature version of axial computed tomography, producing images with micrometrical definition. CT is being assessed in dental research to evaluate mineral content of hard tissues, due to its ability to measure precisely the linear attenuation coefficient. The gold standard method to measure early caries lesions is histological method. However, to perform it, its necessary to cut the specimen. This study had the aim to evaluate the ICDAS, digital X-rays with the interproximal technique, CBCT and CT performance for early caries lesions, when compared to histology. ICDAS for proximal surfaces and CT had a positive correlation through the lesions depth. CT had a positive correlation with histology when analyzing lesions depth and the classification relating to the severity of the lesion, although this relation could be better if a better resolution could be achieved. Digital bite-wing radiographs had the best performance among all exams when comparing to CT and histology, similar to what we notice with the ICDAS results. CBCT had the worst results when comparing to CT and histology, but it was still considered a good relation. The best performance was achieved with the association of ICDAS and digital bite-wing radiographs when comparing to histology. The great advantage of CT when compared to other validating methods to evaluate dental caries is that it doesnt destroy the specimens, it gives tridimensional and isotropic information, making possible to use the specimens again, without losing inner properties.

A cárie dentária continua sendo um grande desafio para os Cirurgiões-Dentistas pela dificuldade de diagnóstico, sobretudo em superfícies proximais. Muitos equipamentos se destinam a facilitar o exame do paciente, tendo como principal objetivo o diagnóstico de cáries incipientes. Dentre os exames mais utilizados está a radiografia interproximal associada ao exame clínico. O Sistema Internacional de Avaliação e Detecção de Cáries (ICDAS) vem sendo bem aceito tanto para o uso clínico como para pesquisas in vitro e in vivo, apresentando ótimos resultados. Além da técnica interproximal, a tomografia cone beam (CBCT) vem entrando no cotidiano da Odontologia, mas pouco se sabe sobre o seu desempenho para avaliação de cáries iniciais em superfícies proximais. A microtomografia (CT) é um novo método de avaliação destinado a pequenos espécimes e se assemelha a uma versão em miniatura da tomografia axial computadorizada, gerando imagens na ordem de micrômetros. Este método vem sendo utilização em pesquisas para se avaliar tecidos mineralizados, devido à sua habilidade de aferir com precisão o coeficiente de atenuação linear. O método padrão ouro que define com maior precisão os estágios da cárie é o histológico. Contudo, para sua avaliação é necessário destruir os espécimes. Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar o desempenho do método ICDAS, de radiografias digitais pela técnica interproximal, da CBCT e da CT para lesões precoces de cárie, com relação à histologia. Houve correlação entre os dados obtidos com o sistema ICDAS para superfícies proximais e as imagens da CT, no que diz respeito à classificação quanto à profundidade das lesões. A CT tem correlação positiva com a histologia tanto na classificação das lesões como na profundidade, contudo esta relação poderia ser maior se uma melhor resolução fosse conseguida. As radiografias digitais pela técnica interproximal tiveram o melhor desempenho com relação à CT e à histologia, sendo este desempenho muito semelhante ao método clínico ICDAS. A CBCT obteve o pior desempenho, contudo ainda assim houve correlação positiva com a histologia e com a CT. A associação do método clínico ICDAS e as radiografias interproximais digitais tiveram o melhor desempenho com relação à histologia. A grande vantagem da microtomografia quando comparada a outros métodos de avaliação da doença cárie, é a manutenção da integridade dos espécimes, a informação tridimensional e isotrópica, possibilitando o uso dos espécimes em outro momento, sem a perda de eventuais características presentes nos mesmos. / Dental caries is still a great challenge to dentists, manly in proximal surfaces due to its difficult diagnosis. Many types of equipment have been designed to minimize this problem, specially aiming early caries detection. Among all, one of the most used by clinicians is the interproximal radiograph. The International Caries Assessment System (ICDAS) is a clinical evaluation method that is well accepted and used having a good performance not only for in vivo but also for in vitro studies. Cone beam CT (CBCT) is also being assessed in the overall Dentistry, but its performance on early caries detection has not extensively being evaluated. Microtomography (CT) is a new assessment method which is addressed to small specimens and is similar to a miniature version of axial computed tomography, producing images with micrometrical definition. CT is being assessed in dental research to evaluate mineral content of hard tissues, due to its ability to measure precisely the linear attenuation coefficient. The gold standard method to measure early caries lesions is histological method. However, to perform it, its necessary to cut the specimen. This study had the aim to evaluate the ICDAS, digital X-rays with the interproximal technique, CBCT and CT performance for early caries lesions, when compared to histology. ICDAS for proximal surfaces and CT had a positive correlation through the lesions depth. CT had a positive correlation with histology when analyzing lesions depth and the classification relating to the severity of the lesion, although this relation could be better if a better resolution could be achieved. Digital bite-wing radiographs had the best performance among all exams when comparing to CT and histology, similar to what we notice with the ICDAS results. CBCT had the worst results when comparing to CT and histology, but it was still considered a good relation. The best performance was achieved with the association of ICDAS and digital bite-wing radiographs when comparing to histology. The great advantage of CT when compared to other validating methods to evaluate dental caries is that it doesnt destroy the specimens, it gives tridimensional and isotropic information, making possible to use the specimens again, without losing inner properties.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Objective: The objectives of this in-vitro study were: 1) to evaluate the ability of Near-Infrared Digital Imaging Transillumination (NIDIT) to detect non-cavitated approximal caries lesions; and 2) to compare the performance among NIDIT, Digital Radiography (DR), Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic Trans-Illumination (DIFOTI) and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Methods: Thirty human extracted premolars were selected. The approximal surface status ranged from sound to surfaces with non-cavitated caries lesions into the outer one-third of the dentin. Lesion depth was determined by micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) and used as a gold standard. Teeth were mounted in a custom-made device to simulate approximal contact. ICDAS, DR, DIFOTI and NIDIT examinations were performed and repeated by three trained and calibrated examiners. Sensitivity, specificity, area under ROC curve (Az), inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of each method, and correlation among the methods were determined. Results: ICCs for intra-/inter-examiner agreement were almost perfect for DIFOTI (0.85/0.83), substantial for ICDAS (0.79/0.72) and NIDIT (0.69/0.64), and moderate for DR (0.52/0.48). Sensitivity/specificity for DIFOTI, ICDAS, DR, and NIDIT were 0.91/0.69, 0.89/0.83, 0.50/0.64, and 0.68/0.93, respectively. Az of DR (0.61) was significantly lower than that of DIFOTI (0.91, p = 0.002) and ICDAS (0.90, p = 0.005), but was not significantly different from NIDIT (0.81, p = 0.052). DIFOTI, ICDAS, and NIDIT were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.13). Spearman correlation coefficients for DIFOTI (0.79, p < 0.001), ICDAS (0.74, p < 0.001), and NIDIT (0.65, p < 0.001) demonstrated a moderate association with μ-CT, while that of DR suggested no association (0.19, p = 0.289). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, NIDIT system demonstrated a potential for early approximal caries detection. ICDAS, DIFOTI, and NIDIT were superior to DR in terms of validity and reliability.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Indiana University School of Dentistry Master Degree Thesis. / Detection of caries at an early stage is unequivocally essential for early preventive intervention. Longitudinal assessment of caries lesions, especially under the opaque preventive sealant, would be of utmost importance to the dental community. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this two-part in-vitro study is to evaluate the performance of multiple detection methods: The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS); two quantitative light-induced fluorescence systems QLF; Inspektor™ Pro and QLF-D Biluminator™2 (Inspektor Research Systems B.V.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands); and photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence (PTR/LUM) of The Canary System® (Quantum Dental Technologies; Toronto, Canada). All these are to be evaluated on their detection of caries on posterior human permanent teeth for 1) of primary occlusal lesions, and 2) under the sealant of primary occlusal lesions. METHODS: One hundred and twenty (N = 120) human posterior permanent teeth, selected in compliance with IU-IRB “Institutional Review Board” standards, with non-cavitated occlusal lesions ICDAS (scores 0 to 4) were divided into two equal groups. The second group (N = 60) received an opaque resin dental sealant (Delton® Light-Curing Pit and Fissure Sealant Opaque, Dentsply, York, PA). All lesions were assessed with each detection method twice in a random order except for ICDAS, which was not used following the placement of the sealant. Histological validation was used to compare methods in regard to sensitivity, specificity, % correct, and the area under receiver- operating characteristic curve (AUC). Intra-examiner repeatability and inter-examiner agreement were measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: 1) Of primary occlusal lesions, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were respectively: 0.82, 0.86 and 0.87 (ICDAS); 0.89, 0.60 and 0.90 (Inspektor Pro); 0.96, 0.57 and 0.94 (QLF-D Biluminator 2); and 0.85, 0.43 and 0.79 (The Canary System). Intra-examiner repeatability and inter-examiner agreement were respectively: 0.81 to 0.87: 0.72 (ICDAS); 0.49 to 0.97: 0.73 (Inspektor Pro); 0.96 to 0.99: 0.96 (QLF-D Biluminator 2); and 0.33 to 0.63: 0.48 (The Canary System). 2) Of primary occlusal lesions under the opaque dental sealants, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were respectively: 0.99, 0.03 and 0.67 (Inspektor Pro); 1.00, 0.00 and 0.70 (QLF-D Biluminator 2); and 0.54, 0.50 and 0.58 (The Canary System). Intra-examiner repeatability and inter-examiner agreement were respectively: 0.24 to 0.37: 0.29 (Inspektor Pro); 0.80 to 0.84: 0.74 (QLF-D Biluminator 2); and 0.22 to 0.47: 0.01 (The Canary System). CONCLUSION: Limited to these in-vitro conditions, 1) ICDAS remains the method of choice for detection of early caries lesion due to its adequately high accuracy and repeatability. QLF systems demonstrate potential in longitudinal monitoring due to an almost perfect repeatability of QLF-D Biluminator 2. The Canary System performance and repeatability were not acceptable as a valid method of early caries detection. 2) None of the methods demonstrated acceptable ability in detecting of occlusal caries under the opaque sealant. However, QLF-D Biluminator 2, with limitation to these in-vitro conditions and Delton opaque sealant, demonstrated a fair accuracy AUC (0.70) in detecting of caries under sealants at an experimental threshold of 12.5% ΔF.