In 1976 Joan Kelly released her influential article “Did Women have a Renaissance?” Kelly argued that women did not enjoy any of the benefits of the period. Rather, she claimed, the lives of women were actually worse after the 1400s than they had been before. Since 1976, new primary documents authored by women have been discovered. Moreover, new access to relevant writings by authors like Francesco Barbaro, Pier Vergerio, Leonardo Bruni, Juan Luis Vives, and Erasmus make revisiting Kelly’s arguments possible. This thesis uses a sample of these texts to explore women’s experiences and create innovative avenues to explore in gender history. Towards those ends, it combines recent scholarship with primary documents to reveal an incongruence between the expectations placed on women and their self-identified lived experiences. It offers, thus, a more complicated world than that presented in Kelly’s paradigmatic study.

Lo studio intende rileggere criticamente le fonti contemporanee e appena successive alla stesura dell'Apocalypsis Nova, attribuita al beato Amedeo Menez de Sylva, inserendole nel più ampio dibattito sulla profezia e sulle attese apocalittiche della fine del XV secolo. / This study is a critically re-read of the contemporary sources of the Apocalypsis Nova, attributed to Blessed Amedeo Menez de Sylva. The sources are inserting in the broader debate on prophecy and apocalyptic expectations of the late 15th century.

No description available.