Spelling suggestions: "subject:"well cycle - 95regulation"" "subject:"well cycle - a.regulation""
11 |
G2 Phase Cell Cycle Regulation by E2F4 Following Genotoxic StressCrosby, Meredith Ellen 17 January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
12 |
Defining Mechanisms of Sensitivity and Resistance to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors to Develop Effective Thereaputic Strategies for the Treatment of Aggressive Diffuse Large B-Cell LymphomaHavas, Aaron Paul, Havas, Aaron Paul January 2016 (has links)
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The current standard of care is the combination of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP), but this only results in a 60% over-all 5-year survival rate, thus highlighting a need for new therapeutic approaches. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are novel therapeutics that is being clinically evaluated for combination therapy. Rational selection of companion therapeutics for HDACi is difficult due to their poorly understood, cell-type specific mechanisms of action. To understand these mechanisms better, we developed a pre-clinical model system of response to the HDACi belinostat. Using this model system, we identified two major responses. Resistance, consisting of a reversible G1 cell cycle arrest with little induction of apoptosis; or sensitivity, consisting of mitotic arrest and high levels of apoptosis. In this dissertation, we determine that the induction of G1 cell cycle arrest is due to the increased expression of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi) that bind to and inhibit the cyclin E/CDK2 complex thereby blocking the final repressive phosphorylation steps of Rb protein. Repression of transcriptional elongation blocked CDKi upregulation and prevented G1 cell cycle arrest in belinostat-resistant cells. Additionally, we identified that belinostat arrests sensitive cells prior to metaphase and belinostat-resistant cells slow-down in mitosis but complete the process prior to arresting in G1. The combination of belinostat with the microtubule-targeting agent, vincristine resulted in strong synergistic induction of apoptosis by targeting mitotic progression. Furthermore, this combination prevents polyploidy, a key mechanism of resistance to microtubule targeting agents. Finally, we utilized selective class one HDAC inhibitors to identify the individual contributions of HDACs in the eliciting the responses observed with belinostat treatment. HDAC1&2 inhibition recapitulated the belinostat-resistant phenotype of G1 cell cycle arrest with little apoptosis, in both belinostat-resistant and sensitive cell lines. HDAC3 inhibition resulted in the induction of DNA damage, increased S phase and the induction of apoptosis in belinostat-resistant cells. Belinostat-resistant cells did not have observable effects to HDAC3 inhibitor alone but when combined with vincristine had significantly increased G2/M population at early time points. This suggests that HDAC3 maintains roles in DNA replication and also in mitotic progression. HDAC3 inhibition combined with vincristine resulted in a significant increase in polyploidy, suggesting that HDAC3 might not regulate the expression of apoptotic regulating factors as belinostat does.
|
13 |
Purification and characterization of two members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase family: dual specificity phosphatase PVP and low molecular weight phosphatase WZBUnknown Date (has links)
by Paula A. Livingston. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2009. / Includes bibliography. / Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2009. Mode of access: World Wide Web. / Two protein tyrosine phosphatases, dual specificity phosphatase PVP and low molecular weight phosphatase WZB were purified and characterized. PVP was expressed as inclusion bodies and a suitable purification and refolding method was devised. Enzyme kinetics revealed that p-nitrophenylphosphate and (Sb(B-naphthyl phosphate were substrates with KM of 4.0mM and 8.1mM respectively. PVP showed no reactivity towards phosphoserine. Kinetic characterization of WZB showed that only pnitrophenylphosphate was a substrate with no affinity for Ç-naphthyl phosphate and phosphoserine. Optimal conditions for activity with PNPP were found at a pH of 5 with a KM of 1.1mM, kcat of 35.4s-1 and kcat/KM of 32.2s-1mM-1. Inhibition studies showed that phosphate, fluoride, and molybdate were competitive inhibitors with Ki of 3.2mM, 71.7mM, and 50.4(So(BM respectively and hydrogen peroxide abolished activity. Active site mutants of WZB Cys9Ser and Asp115Asn showed no activity.
|
14 |
An investigation of the role of PAK6 tumorigenesisUnknown Date (has links)
The function and role of PAK6, serine/threonone kinase, in cancer progressionhas not yet been clearly identified. Several studies reveal that PAK6 may participate in key changes contributing to cancer progression such as cell survival, cell motility, and invasiveness. Basedon the membrane localization of PAK6 in prostate and breast cancer cells,we speculated that PAK6 plays a rolein cancer progression cells by localizing on the membrane and modifying proteins linked to motility and proliferation. We isolated the raft domain of breast cancer cells expressing either wild type (WT), constitutively active (SN), or kinase dead PAK6 (KM) and found that PAK6 is a membrane associated kinase which translocates from the plasma membrane to the cytosol when activated. The downstream effects of PAK6 are unknown ; however, results from cell proliferation assays suggest a growth regulatory mechanism. / by JoAnn Roberts. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2012. / Includes bibliography. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / System requirements: Adobe Reader.
|
15 |
The role of cyclin dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) in the proliferation and differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells / Elaine B. Stead.Stead, Elaine January 2002 (has links)
Errata inserted inside back cover. / "August 2002" / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 146-174) / 177 leaves, [91 leaves of plates] : ill. (some col.) ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Molecular Biosciences, 2002
|
16 |
In vivo study on cell cycle and checkpoint regulation during mouse liver developmentChan, Kwok-kin, 陳國堅 January 2010 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Surgery / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
17 |
Characterization of checkpoint adaptation in human fibroblastic glioma cells and an analysis of protein phosphatase inhibitorsLanser, Brittany January 2012 (has links)
This thesis reports that checkpoint adaptation occurs in human brain cancer cells. M059K cells, after treatment with camptothecin (CPT), recruited γ-histone H2AX, phosphorylated Chk1 and arrested in the G2 phase. Strikingly, cells escaped the checkpoint, became rounded and entered mitosis as measured by phospho-histone H3 signals. Lamin A/C immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that 48% of the cells that survived checkpoint adaptation contained micronuclei. These data suggest that brain cancer cells undergo checkpoint adaptation and may have an altered genome. This thesis also explored if phosphatases participate in checkpoint adaptation. Human colon cancer cells were treated with CPT and the PP2A inhibitor cantharidin. Following treatment the cells became rounded and 65% were positive for phospho-histone H3 signals indicating that cantharidin caused cells to be in mitosis following CPT treatment. These data suggest that PP2A might have a role in checkpoint adaptation, or participate in a pathway that bypasses checkpoint adaptation. / xi, 114 leaves : ill. (some col.) ; 29 cm
|
18 |
Investigating Sex Specific Cell Cycle Regulation in Fetal Germ CellsCassy Spiller Unknown Date (has links)
During development, somatic cell cues direct sex-specific differentiation of germ cells that is characterised by two distinct cell cycle states. At 12.5 days post coitum (dpc) in a testis, XY germ cells stop proliferating and enter G1/G0 arrest. In the ovary, XX germ cells bypass G1/G0 arrest and instead enter the first phase of meiosis I from 13.5 dpc. Whilst it is hypothesised that errors in cell cycle control during development precede the formation of testicular germ cell tumours, the mechanism of cell cycle control at this time has not been thoroughly investigated. This project therefore sought to explore the mechanism of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest using several approaches. Although cell cycle regulation for somatic cells is well established, we know very little regarding germ cell control of this process. Therefore my first aim was to profile this machinery at the transcript level using a cell cycle cDNA array. Purified populations of germ cells were isolated both before and after sex differentiation and expression of 112 cell cycle related genes was assessed. From this study a comprehensive network governing apoptosis and calcium signalling that was common to both XX and XY germ cells was observed. Importantly, the retinoblastoma family and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21 was implicated in the regulation of G1/G0 arrest in XY germ cells. Lastly, XX germ cells displayed a down-regulation of genes involved in both G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle consistent with their progression past G1 phase. This study has provided a detailed analysis of cell cycle gene expression during fetal germ cell development and identified candidate factors for future investigation in order to understand cases of aberrant cell cycle control in these specialised cells. In order to investigate several candidate genes identified within the cell cycle array, I next sought to generate a germ cell-specific Cre recombinase mouse model for use in conditional knockout studies. As current Cre lines lack specificity or appropriate temporal expression, we used the germ cell-specific regions of the fragilis promoter to drive Cre expression during germ cell specification. Eleven founder lines were generated using this construct and four were analysed using a reporter line. Although we have not achieved germ cell expression from these lines to date, analysis continues in order to identify an invaluable new tool for germ cell research. Following the implication of the retinoblastoma family in XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest, I next investigated the role of RB in these cells using the Rb null mutant. RB is a known cell cycle suppressor that controls this process in many cell types and, subsequently, mice homozygous for the Rb deletion die in utero at 14.5 dpc. Using this model we analysed developing gonads from 14.5 – 16.5 dpc using ex vivo culture techniques. At 14.5 dpc when wild type germ cells have arrested, proliferating germ cells were detected in the absence of Rb using proliferation marker Ki67. This proliferation was accompanied by a slight increase in germ cell number at 14.5 dpc, however, two days later at 16.5 dpc germ cell numbers were slightly decreased in the Rb-/- testes. During this time we could also detect increased expression of other RB family members p107 and p130, suggesting that these factors may compensate for the loss of Rb in the germ line. This investigation has implicated RB in the regulation of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest and will form the basis for future work aimed at understanding the initiation of this cell cycle state. In addition to RB, a lesser-known transcription factor was also investigated in the initiation and maintenance of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest. The high mobility group box transcription factor 1 (HBP1) suppresses proliferation and promotes differentiation in various cell types and was recently identified within the XY germ cells at the appropriate time of sex differentiation. In my analysis two Hbp1 transcripts were identified within the XY germ cells that display different sub-cellular localisations in vitro. Next, Hbp1-LacZ reporter lines were generated to aid in understanding the germ cell-specific regulation of these transcripts and lastly, I analysed the genetrap mutation for Hbp1. Surprisingly, this model revealed no aberrations to germ cell-cell cycle control during development. In summary, I have performed the first comprehensive study of the cell cycle machinery utilised by germ cells as they undergo the first stages of sex differentiation. Using loss-of-function models I was able to implicate the cell cycle regulator RB specifically in XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest and, conversely, demonstrate that the transcription factor HBP1 is not required for this process.
|
19 |
Investigating Sex Specific Cell Cycle Regulation in Fetal Germ CellsCassy Spiller Unknown Date (has links)
During development, somatic cell cues direct sex-specific differentiation of germ cells that is characterised by two distinct cell cycle states. At 12.5 days post coitum (dpc) in a testis, XY germ cells stop proliferating and enter G1/G0 arrest. In the ovary, XX germ cells bypass G1/G0 arrest and instead enter the first phase of meiosis I from 13.5 dpc. Whilst it is hypothesised that errors in cell cycle control during development precede the formation of testicular germ cell tumours, the mechanism of cell cycle control at this time has not been thoroughly investigated. This project therefore sought to explore the mechanism of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest using several approaches. Although cell cycle regulation for somatic cells is well established, we know very little regarding germ cell control of this process. Therefore my first aim was to profile this machinery at the transcript level using a cell cycle cDNA array. Purified populations of germ cells were isolated both before and after sex differentiation and expression of 112 cell cycle related genes was assessed. From this study a comprehensive network governing apoptosis and calcium signalling that was common to both XX and XY germ cells was observed. Importantly, the retinoblastoma family and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21 was implicated in the regulation of G1/G0 arrest in XY germ cells. Lastly, XX germ cells displayed a down-regulation of genes involved in both G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle consistent with their progression past G1 phase. This study has provided a detailed analysis of cell cycle gene expression during fetal germ cell development and identified candidate factors for future investigation in order to understand cases of aberrant cell cycle control in these specialised cells. In order to investigate several candidate genes identified within the cell cycle array, I next sought to generate a germ cell-specific Cre recombinase mouse model for use in conditional knockout studies. As current Cre lines lack specificity or appropriate temporal expression, we used the germ cell-specific regions of the fragilis promoter to drive Cre expression during germ cell specification. Eleven founder lines were generated using this construct and four were analysed using a reporter line. Although we have not achieved germ cell expression from these lines to date, analysis continues in order to identify an invaluable new tool for germ cell research. Following the implication of the retinoblastoma family in XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest, I next investigated the role of RB in these cells using the Rb null mutant. RB is a known cell cycle suppressor that controls this process in many cell types and, subsequently, mice homozygous for the Rb deletion die in utero at 14.5 dpc. Using this model we analysed developing gonads from 14.5 – 16.5 dpc using ex vivo culture techniques. At 14.5 dpc when wild type germ cells have arrested, proliferating germ cells were detected in the absence of Rb using proliferation marker Ki67. This proliferation was accompanied by a slight increase in germ cell number at 14.5 dpc, however, two days later at 16.5 dpc germ cell numbers were slightly decreased in the Rb-/- testes. During this time we could also detect increased expression of other RB family members p107 and p130, suggesting that these factors may compensate for the loss of Rb in the germ line. This investigation has implicated RB in the regulation of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest and will form the basis for future work aimed at understanding the initiation of this cell cycle state. In addition to RB, a lesser-known transcription factor was also investigated in the initiation and maintenance of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest. The high mobility group box transcription factor 1 (HBP1) suppresses proliferation and promotes differentiation in various cell types and was recently identified within the XY germ cells at the appropriate time of sex differentiation. In my analysis two Hbp1 transcripts were identified within the XY germ cells that display different sub-cellular localisations in vitro. Next, Hbp1-LacZ reporter lines were generated to aid in understanding the germ cell-specific regulation of these transcripts and lastly, I analysed the genetrap mutation for Hbp1. Surprisingly, this model revealed no aberrations to germ cell-cell cycle control during development. In summary, I have performed the first comprehensive study of the cell cycle machinery utilised by germ cells as they undergo the first stages of sex differentiation. Using loss-of-function models I was able to implicate the cell cycle regulator RB specifically in XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest and, conversely, demonstrate that the transcription factor HBP1 is not required for this process.
|
20 |
Investigating Sex Specific Cell Cycle Regulation in Fetal Germ CellsCassy Spiller Unknown Date (has links)
During development, somatic cell cues direct sex-specific differentiation of germ cells that is characterised by two distinct cell cycle states. At 12.5 days post coitum (dpc) in a testis, XY germ cells stop proliferating and enter G1/G0 arrest. In the ovary, XX germ cells bypass G1/G0 arrest and instead enter the first phase of meiosis I from 13.5 dpc. Whilst it is hypothesised that errors in cell cycle control during development precede the formation of testicular germ cell tumours, the mechanism of cell cycle control at this time has not been thoroughly investigated. This project therefore sought to explore the mechanism of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest using several approaches. Although cell cycle regulation for somatic cells is well established, we know very little regarding germ cell control of this process. Therefore my first aim was to profile this machinery at the transcript level using a cell cycle cDNA array. Purified populations of germ cells were isolated both before and after sex differentiation and expression of 112 cell cycle related genes was assessed. From this study a comprehensive network governing apoptosis and calcium signalling that was common to both XX and XY germ cells was observed. Importantly, the retinoblastoma family and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21 was implicated in the regulation of G1/G0 arrest in XY germ cells. Lastly, XX germ cells displayed a down-regulation of genes involved in both G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle consistent with their progression past G1 phase. This study has provided a detailed analysis of cell cycle gene expression during fetal germ cell development and identified candidate factors for future investigation in order to understand cases of aberrant cell cycle control in these specialised cells. In order to investigate several candidate genes identified within the cell cycle array, I next sought to generate a germ cell-specific Cre recombinase mouse model for use in conditional knockout studies. As current Cre lines lack specificity or appropriate temporal expression, we used the germ cell-specific regions of the fragilis promoter to drive Cre expression during germ cell specification. Eleven founder lines were generated using this construct and four were analysed using a reporter line. Although we have not achieved germ cell expression from these lines to date, analysis continues in order to identify an invaluable new tool for germ cell research. Following the implication of the retinoblastoma family in XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest, I next investigated the role of RB in these cells using the Rb null mutant. RB is a known cell cycle suppressor that controls this process in many cell types and, subsequently, mice homozygous for the Rb deletion die in utero at 14.5 dpc. Using this model we analysed developing gonads from 14.5 – 16.5 dpc using ex vivo culture techniques. At 14.5 dpc when wild type germ cells have arrested, proliferating germ cells were detected in the absence of Rb using proliferation marker Ki67. This proliferation was accompanied by a slight increase in germ cell number at 14.5 dpc, however, two days later at 16.5 dpc germ cell numbers were slightly decreased in the Rb-/- testes. During this time we could also detect increased expression of other RB family members p107 and p130, suggesting that these factors may compensate for the loss of Rb in the germ line. This investigation has implicated RB in the regulation of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest and will form the basis for future work aimed at understanding the initiation of this cell cycle state. In addition to RB, a lesser-known transcription factor was also investigated in the initiation and maintenance of XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest. The high mobility group box transcription factor 1 (HBP1) suppresses proliferation and promotes differentiation in various cell types and was recently identified within the XY germ cells at the appropriate time of sex differentiation. In my analysis two Hbp1 transcripts were identified within the XY germ cells that display different sub-cellular localisations in vitro. Next, Hbp1-LacZ reporter lines were generated to aid in understanding the germ cell-specific regulation of these transcripts and lastly, I analysed the genetrap mutation for Hbp1. Surprisingly, this model revealed no aberrations to germ cell-cell cycle control during development. In summary, I have performed the first comprehensive study of the cell cycle machinery utilised by germ cells as they undergo the first stages of sex differentiation. Using loss-of-function models I was able to implicate the cell cycle regulator RB specifically in XY germ cell G1/G0 arrest and, conversely, demonstrate that the transcription factor HBP1 is not required for this process.
|
Page generated in 0.0783 seconds