Background: Neck pain is a major public health with great effects on both the individual and society. Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common form of neck pain with neurological symptoms. Physical therapy is often the first treatment but there is paucity in literature reviews investigating the effects of physical therapy. Objective: To assess the effects of physical therapy for cervical radiculopathy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro and Web of Science. A total of 12 RCT articles were included in the study. The articles were reviewed based on the aims of the study and the PEDro scale. Results: Eight studies of moderate quality and four high quality. Most studies used the same outcome measures. Most common interventions were traction and manual therapy. Outcomes were varied with some reporting positive effects and others no change. Treatment periods, number of sessions and follow-up varied. In most cases, the positive results wore off at follow-up and differences between groups less pronounced. Conclusions: The quality of RCTs investigating cervical radiculopathy is variable. There is limited evidence suggesting that physical therapy treatment can have a measurable and significant long-term effect on cervical radiculopathy. / Bakgrund: Nacksmärta är ett allvarligt folkhälsoproblem med stor effekt på både den enskilde och samhället. Cervikal radikulopati är en relativt vanlig form av nacksmärta med neurologiska symtom. Fysioterapi är ofta den första behandlingen för detta tillstånd men det är brist på litteraturstudier som undersöker fysioterapins effekter. Syfte: Att undersöka effekterna av fysioterapi för cervikal radikulopati. Metod: Litteratursökningar gjordes i PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro och Web of Science. Totalt inkluderades 12 RCT artiklar i studien. Artiklarna granskades utifrån studiens frågeställningar samt PEDro kvalitetsgranskningsmall. Resultat: Åtta studier var av måttlig kvalitet och fyra hög kvalitet. De flesta studier använde samma utfallsmått och alla uppmätte smärta, funktionshinder och funktion. De två vanligaste behandlingarna var traktion och manuell terapi. Resultaten av insatserna varierade då vissa rapporterade positiva effekter och andra ingen förändring. Behandlingsperioder, antal sessioner samt uppföljning varierade. I de flesta fall, så avtog de positiva resultaten vid uppföljning och skillnaden mellan grupperna blev mindre uppenbara. Konklusion: Denna litteraturöversikt påvisade att kvaliteten på de RCT studier som undersöker cervikal radikulopati varierar. Resultaten visar att det finns begränsad evidens som tyder på att fysioterapi kan ha en mätbar och betydande inverkan på cervikal radikulopati i längden.

ABSTRACT Whiplash associated disorders (WAD) is one of the most debated musculoskeletal conditions. Sensory disturbances including hypersensitive responses to mechanical, thermal and electrical stimulation have been consistently shown to be a feature of both the acute and chronic stages of the whiplash condition. More importantly, such dysfunctions have also been found to be associated with higher risk of poor functional recovery. It is apparent that better understanding of the sensory disturbances in WAD is needed in order to elucidate mechanisms underlying the pain and disability of this recalcitrant condition and to facilitate the development of more effective management strategies. Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) combining sensory detection and pain threshold measures is proving to be a valuable tool to advance the classification and illuminating the underlying mechanisms of an array of musculoskeletal pain disorders but such protocol has never been undertaken in a WAD cohort. In order to fill this gap in knowledge, the series of studies in the thesis aimed to utilize comprehensive QST to investigate the presence of somatosensory dysfunction in chronic WAD and to compare the somatosensory profile of WAD to cervical radiculopathy and idiopathic (non-traumatic) neck pain. Once a better understanding of the potential underlying mechanisms in chronic WAD was established, the research then focused on documenting the presence of such somatosensory disturbances soon after whiplash injury and its temporal development over a 6 months period. The results have provided a number of significant insights into some of the potential underlying mechanisms of the somatosensory dysfunction in WAD as well as other neck pain conditions of different aetiology. It is clear that generalised sensory hypoaesthesia coexisted with sensory hypersensitivity in chronic WAD and a combination of pain and detection measures best discriminated patients with WAD and controls. Similar sensory presentation was also found in patients with cervical radiculopathy but not in idiopathic neck pain patients. This finding indicates that different mechanisms underlie various musculoskeletal conditions with disordered central processes contributing to a greater degree in some conditions. Patients with whiplash and those with cervical radiculopthy may share similar underlying pain mechanisms involving the central nervous system and the discrepant findings in the idiopathic neck pain group may be due to the magnitude of nociceptive input required to induce/maintain altered central adaptive changes. Another important observation from the studies was that sensory hypoaesthesia was present in the majority of patients with whiplash injury in the acute stage. However, it persisted only in individuals who initially reported higher levels of pain and disability levels and sign of hypersensitivity. It was this group of individuals who predominantly developed persistent symptoms at six months post injury. The longitudinal findings indicate that such sensory impairments can be identified very early on and treatment interventions directed at these sensory disturbances (both sensory hypersensitivity and hypoaesthesia) should aim to reduce the nociceptive input and this may improve recovery post whiplash injury. The findings in this thesis demonstrated the clear association between sensory hypersensitivity and other sensory disturbances and their potential influence on recovery. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the whiplash condition highlighted the importance of the early identification of “low-risk and “high-risk” patients in order to assist the clinicians to make clinical decisions on the best management approach. It cannot be overemphasised that the early assessment of whiplash injured patients should aim to identify features associated with poor recovery and a better classification system will be an important step. Implications for assessment and management of whiplash are vital in the acute stage of injury and may well go some way toward preventing the transition to chronicity, particularly in those with a more complex clinical presentation involving somatosensory disturbances. Further research directions have also been identified in order to improvement management of this complex clinical condition.

Submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Durban University of Technology in partial compliance with the requirements for a Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Department of Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. / Background: Neck pain is an extremely common condition and the treatment of neck pain forms an integral part of chiropractic practice. The optimal treatment of neck pain is provided when practitioners incorporate available evidence, experience, and knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of the patient into their treatment regimes. Current evidence suggests that a combination of manual therapy, specifically manipulation and/or mobilization, and rehabilitation may offer the optimum treatment for mechanical neck pain. However, numerous factors other than available evidence, experience and clinical presentation may influence treatment choices made by practitioners. Through the assessment of practice patterns, one may asses if the optimal treatment for a neck pain is being provided by practitioners and assess if factors specific to a practitioner may influence the treatment of neck pain. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the chiropractic treatment and management of mechanical neck pain, to compare this to evidence based recommendations for the conservative treatment of mechanical neck pain and to assess if factors other than the available evidence may influence the treatment of mechanical neck pain. Method: A quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive survey compiled using available literature and validated by means of a focus group and pilot testing, was administered to chiropractors practicing in KwaZulu-Natal. Upon completion of the questionnaire, the data was coded into an Excel spread sheet and imported into IBM SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis. This research protocol was approved by the Durban University of Technology Institutional Research Ethics Committee (REC 82/13) and the study took place from March to July 2014. Results: Ninety-six practitioners responded to the study which is a response rate of greater than 70%. Practitioners favoured the use of spinal manipulation, auxiliary therapeutic techniques (specifically those which were manual in nature), rehabilitation, and numerous forms of education. Specific variations in treatment pattern existed when comparing various patient presentations indicating that practitioner based factors impacted on treatment choices made by practitioners. The most significant findings included the increased utilisation of auxiliary therapeutic techniques by female practitioners, the increased utilisation of traction by practitioners identifying with the straight philosophy of chiropractic. Other significant findings included the increased utilisation of cervical collars by practitioners of increased age and experience and the increased utilisation of auxiliary therapeutic techniques by practitioners who did not attend health related conferences at least once every second year or did not attend short courses or subscribe to journals or magazines since qualification. Conclusions: This study indicates that treatment for mechanical neck pain offered by chiropractors in KwaZulu-Natal is in line with current evidence based recommendations for the treatment of mechanical neck pain, with practitioners commonly using modalities which were recommended, whilst rarely using modalities which were not recommended. The use of rehabilitation was, however, slightly lower than expected. Patient presentation and practitioner based factors were found to influence the treatment of mechanical neck pain; however, as a whole these variations were small with the majority of practitioners favouring the use of modalities which were recommended within the literature. Future studies should address the gap in the literature regarding the conservative treatment of cervical radiculopathy. / M

Submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Durban University of Technology in partial compliance with the requirements for a Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Department of Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. / Background: Neck pain is an extremely common condition and the treatment of neck pain forms an integral part of chiropractic practice. The optimal treatment of neck pain is provided when practitioners incorporate available evidence, experience, and knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of the patient into their treatment regimes. Current evidence suggests that a combination of manual therapy, specifically manipulation and/or mobilization, and rehabilitation may offer the optimum treatment for mechanical neck pain. However, numerous factors other than available evidence, experience and clinical presentation may influence treatment choices made by practitioners. Through the assessment of practice patterns, one may asses if the optimal treatment for a neck pain is being provided by practitioners and assess if factors specific to a practitioner may influence the treatment of neck pain. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the chiropractic treatment and management of mechanical neck pain, to compare this to evidence based recommendations for the conservative treatment of mechanical neck pain and to assess if factors other than the available evidence may influence the treatment of mechanical neck pain. Method: A quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive survey compiled using available literature and validated by means of a focus group and pilot testing, was administered to chiropractors practicing in KwaZulu-Natal. Upon completion of the questionnaire, the data was coded into an Excel spread sheet and imported into IBM SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis. This research protocol was approved by the Durban University of Technology Institutional Research Ethics Committee (REC 82/13) and the study took place from March to July 2014. Results: Ninety-six practitioners responded to the study which is a response rate of greater than 70%. Practitioners favoured the use of spinal manipulation, auxiliary therapeutic techniques (specifically those which were manual in nature), rehabilitation, and numerous forms of education. Specific variations in treatment pattern existed when comparing various patient presentations indicating that practitioner based factors impacted on treatment choices made by practitioners. The most significant findings included the increased utilisation of auxiliary therapeutic techniques by female practitioners, the increased utilisation of traction by practitioners identifying with the straight philosophy of chiropractic. Other significant findings included the increased utilisation of cervical collars by practitioners of increased age and experience and the increased utilisation of auxiliary therapeutic techniques by practitioners who did not attend health related conferences at least once every second year or did not attend short courses or subscribe to journals or magazines since qualification. Conclusions: This study indicates that treatment for mechanical neck pain offered by chiropractors in KwaZulu-Natal is in line with current evidence based recommendations for the treatment of mechanical neck pain, with practitioners commonly using modalities which were recommended, whilst rarely using modalities which were not recommended. The use of rehabilitation was, however, slightly lower than expected. Patient presentation and practitioner based factors were found to influence the treatment of mechanical neck pain; however, as a whole these variations were small with the majority of practitioners favouring the use of modalities which were recommended within the literature. Future studies should address the gap in the literature regarding the conservative treatment of cervical radiculopathy. / M

Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T12:23:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ValeriaRibeiroNogueiraBarbosa.pdf: 2894050 bytes, checksum: 2496af522e31ec83452db4d278903717 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003-09-29 / Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) represents the most common entrapment neuropathy, better defined and more studied in the human being. The diagnosis is commonly presumed in patients with painful syndrome in the upper limbs, whose symptoms aggravate at night. The gold-standard for the diagnosis is the occurring of alterations in the sensitive and muscled conduction of the median nerve. Despite the CTS being well clinically characterized, when it is typical, a lot of painful factors in the upper limbs are not caused by CTS, and these patients neuralgic exam may vary from normal to serious alterations. This paper has as objectives: 1. To evaluate the profile of the painful symptoms that may presumably occur in patients with idiopatic CTS or without CTS; 2. to evaluate the profile of the neuralgic exam in patients with idiopatic CTS. Between April and December of 2002, 35 patients with idiopatic CTS (34 women and one man) with diagnosis confirmed by the clinical and electrophysiological exam were examined. They were paired according to their age and sex with 35 citzens of the general population (34 women and one man, aged between 34 and 72, average 51, +/- 9,7 years old). The frequency of paintful syndromes distribution in the two groups studied was analysed by the square test. The age average in both groups of patients was compared by the t-Student test. There was not statistical difference concerning the ages. In the group with CTS the complaints of pain were prevalent in the neck (45,7%), Phalen`s test (68,5%), and fist compression (74,3%) are common, being the last two ones prevalent ( α = 0,05). The severity of the CTS was evaluated by the eletrophysiological exam. Most of the CTS cases are of light degree and occur bilaterally. Just seven patients have unilateral CTS. Concluding: 1- One must cogitate the CTS diagnosis in every case of pain of obscure origin in the lower limbs, being the location either proximal or distal; 2- Just one of patients with CTS had, clearly, signs of cervical radicular injury. One cannot establish etiological relation between these two conditions. What is told about the existence of double-crush syndrome as a nosological entity; 3- In the neurogical exam, the alteration in the sensibility to pain was the most observed sign. The discriminatitive sensibility test seems not to have value to support the CTS diagnosis; 4- the Phalen and the carpal compression tests are more useful to the CTS diagnosis than the Tinel sign, for they are more prevalent. / A Síndrome do Túnel do Carpo (STC) representa a neuropatia compressiva mais comum, melhor definida e mais estudada no ser humano. O diagnóstico é comumente presumido em pacientes com síndrome dolorosa nos membros superiores, cujos sintomas se agravam à noite. O padrão-ouro para o diagnóstico é a ocorrência de alterações na condução sensitiva e motora do nervo mediano. Apesar da STC ser bem caracterizada clinicamente, quando é típica, muitos quadros dolorosos nos membros superiores não são causados por STC, e o exame neurológico desses pacientes pode variar de normal a alterações graves. Este trabalho tem como objetivos: 1- avaliar o perfil dos sintomas dolorosos que presumivelmente possam ocorrer em pacientes com STC idiopático e sem STC; 2- avaliar o perfil do exame neurológico em pacientes com STC idiopático. Entre abril e dezembro de 2002, 35 pacientes com STC idiopático (34 mulheres e um homem, idades entre 34 e 72 anos, média 51, + 9,8 anos) com diagnóstico confirmado pelo exame clínico e eletrofisiológico foram examinados. Eles foram pareados por idade e sexo com 35 sujeitos da população geral (34 mulheres e um homem, idades entre 34 e 72 anos, média 51, + 9,7 anos). A freqüência de distribuição de síndromes dolorosas nos dois grupos estudados foi analisada pelo teste do qui-quadrado. A média de idade dos dois grupos de pacientes foi comparada pelo teste t de Student. Não houve diferença estatística quanto às idades. No grupo com STC as queixas de dor são prevalentes no pescoço (42,8%), membros superiores (36,8%) e mãos (82,8%). Nos sujeitos sem STC a localização do quadro doloroso predomina na cabeça (11,4%), região axial do corpo (37,1%) e membros inferiores (22,8%), (α = 0,05). Entre os sujeitos com STC, 85,7% apresentam queixas de parestesias nos membros superiores e 74,2% destes apenas nas mãos. Os chamados testes provocativos: sinal de Tinel (45,7%), teste de Phalen (68,5%) e compressão do punho (74,3%) são comuns, sendo os dois últimos prevalentes (α = 0,05). A gravidade da STC foi avaliada pelo exame eletrofisiológico. A maioria dos casos de STC são de grau leve e ocorrem bilateralmente. Apenas sete pacientes têm STC unilateral. Em conclusão: 1 - Deve-se cogitar o diagnóstico de STC em todos os casos de dor de origem obscura nos membros superiores, seja de localização proximal ou distal; 2 - apenas uma das pacientes com STC teve, claramente, sinais de lesão radicular cervical. Não se pôde estabelecer relação etiológica entre as duas condições. O que fala contra a existência de síndrome da dupla compressão como uma entidade nosológica; 3 no exame neurológico, a alteração da sensibilidade à dor foi o sinal mais observado. O teste da sensibilidade discriminativa parece não ter valor para suportar o diagnóstico de STC; 4 os testes de Phalen e da compressão carpal são mais úteis para o diagnóstico de STC do que o sinal de Tinel, pois são mais prevalentes.

Cette étude a été subventionnée par le Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQ-S, grant # 21230 – 2) / Les infiltrations foraminales cervicales sont associées à un risque de complications neurologiques majeures. Cette étude compare l’efficacité des infiltrations facettaires, plus sécuritaires, à celle des infiltrations foraminales dans le traitement de la cervico-brachialgie secondaire à une spondylose et/ou à une hernie discale, à 4 semaines post traitement. Cinquante-six sujets ont été randomisés pour recevoir une infiltration foraminale (15 hommes, 13 femmes ; âge moyen 52 ans) ou facettaire (8 hommes, 20 femmes ; âge moyen 44 ans). L’issue principale était l’intensité de la douleur mesurée sur une échelle visuelle analogique (0 – 100). Les issues secondaires étaient le Neck Disability Index et le Medication Quantitative Scale. Suivant les analyses en intention-de-traiter et en intention-du-protocole, pour un score de douleur initial moyen, une réduction significative de l’intensité de la douleur a été observée avec les infiltrations facettaires [45.3% (95%CI: 21.4; 69.2) et 37.0% (95%CI: 9.2; 64.7)] contrairement aux infiltrations foraminales [9.8% (95%CI: +11.5; 31.2) et 17.8% (95%CI: +6.6; 42.2)]. Les infiltrations facettaires ont procuré une amélioration cliniquement (mais non statistiquement) significative du Neck Disability Index [24.3% (95%CI: +2.9; 51.5) et 20.7% (95%CI: +6.2; 47.6),], contrairement aux infiltrations foraminales [9.6% (95%CI: +15.2; 34.4) et 12.8% (95%CI: +11.2; 36.7)]. Les infiltrations facettaires étaient au moins aussi efficaces que les infiltrations foraminales pour un score initial de douleur ≤ 60, alors que l’analyse de non infériorité n’était pas concluante pour un score initial ≥ 80, de même que pour le Neck Disability Index. Les infiltrations n’ont pas été associées à une réduction du score de Medication Quantitative Scale. Les infiltrations facettaires sont efficaces dans le traitement de la névralgie cervico-brachiale et représentent une alternative valable et plus sécuritaire aux infiltrations foraminales. / Transforaminal corticosteroid injections can be performed in the management of cervical radiculopathy but carry the risk of catastrophic complications. This study compares the efficacy of transforaminal and facet corticosteroid injections at 4 weeks post treatment. We randomly assigned 56 subjects to receive CT-guided transforaminal (15 men, 13 women; mean age 52 years; range 28 – 72 years) or facet (8 men, 20 women; mean 44 years; range 26 – 60 years) injections. The primary outcome was pain severity rated on a visual analog scale (0-100). Secondary outcome measures were the Neck Disability Index and the Medication Quantitative Scale. In the intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses, for a mean baseline score, facet injections demonstrated a significant pain score reduction of 45.3% (95%CI: 21.4; 69.2) and 37.0% (95%CI: 9.2; 64.7), while transforaminal injections showed nonsignificant pain score reduction of 9.8% (95%CI: +11.5; 31.2) and 17.8% (95%CI: +6.6; 42.2). While facet injections demonstrated an improvement in Neck Disability Index score of [24.3% (95%CI: +2.9; 51.5); 20.7% (95%CI: +6.2; 47.6),] as opposed to transforaminal injections [9.6% (95%CI: +15.2; 34.4); 12.8% (95%CI: +11.2; 36.7)], the results did not reach statistical significance. Noninferiority of facet to transforaminal injections was demonstrated for baseline pain score ≤ 60, while noninferiority analysis was inconclusive for baseline pain score ≥ 80 and for the Neck Disability Index score. Neither intervention showed a significant medication intake score reduction over time. Facet injections are effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and represent a valid and safer alternative to transforaminal injections.