Distal enhancer elements regulate the tissue-specific expression of their target genes via the establishment of physical interactions with the gene promoter. In mice, a cluster of five enhancers, jointly classified as a super-enhancer, specifically upregulate α-globin gene expression during erythroid differentiation. Aside from the Nprl3 gene, whose promoter is located inside this enhancer region, expression-levels of other genes within a short distance (&lt,50kb) of the enhancer region are not affected by the activation of the enhancer in erythroid cells, despite being located within the same sub-TAD in erythroid cells. The CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is implicated in the organisation of chromosome topology through the formation of interactions between its binding sites in an orientation-dependent manner. In this thesis, I demonstrate that CTCF functions in vivo as a boundary to maintain α-globin enhancer-promoter specificity in erythroid cells. The study of the local chromatin architecture by next-generation Capture-C reveals that α-globin enhancer and promoter interactions are constrained to a compartment of roughly 70kb. The unidirectional interaction profiles of the α-globin enhancers are delimited by the interactions between two genomic domains flanking the α-globin cluster. Further investigation shows that each of these domains contains several CTCF binding sites orientated in tandem, such that CTCF binding orientation between domains is convergent. Although CTCF binding across the α-globin locus is identical between mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and erythroid cells, interaction between these domains occurs only in erythroid cells suggesting it is dependent on the formation of tissue-specific α-globin enhancer-promoter interactions. By generating a series of mouse models, deleting CTCF binding sites at the α-globin enhancers singly and in combination, I show that the deletion of two CTCF binding sites directly flanking the enhancer cluster results in a shift in interactions between flanking domains, away from the enhancer region. This leads to an expansion of enhancer interactions to include two genes directly upstream of the α-globin enhancers: Rhbdf1 and Mpg. Despite the Rhbdf1 gene being subject to polycomb group protein-mediated gene repression in erythroid cells, ablation of CTCF binding results in increased interactions between both the Rhbdf1 and Mpg gene promoters and the α-globin enhancers and concurrent strong transcriptional upregulation of both genes. The Rhbdf1 gene promoter acquires the active histone mark H3K4me3, but doesn't lose Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) mark H3K27me3 or binding of its catalytic component Ezh2. Despite the presence of this repressive mark, robust levels of Rhbdf1 expression are detected at levels higher than those in ES cells where this gene is actively expressed under the influence of its own enhancer. I conclude that regulation of the direction of enhancer interactions by CTCF is required for the promoter specificity of enhancers and the maintenance of transcriptional states of nearby genes.

DNA methylation is essential for mammalian development and transcriptional repression of genes and retrotransposons during embryo development and in somatic cells. The patterns of DNA methylation are established by de novo DNA methyltransferases, which are regulated by developmental signalling and require access to chromatin. Besides DNA methyltransferases, other proteins have recently been implicated in DNA methylation, such as the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler LSH. The absence of LSH in mouse embryos leads to defects in DNA methylation and development. In relation to this, mutations in LSH have been found to cause Immunodeficiency-Centromeric instability-Facial anomalies (ICF) syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by centromeric instability and CpG hypomethylation of centromeric satellite repeats, and is most often caused by mutations in the catalytic domain of the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3B. LSH is essential for developmentally programmed de novo DNA methylation of large chromosomal domains including promoters of protein coding genes and repetitive sequences. Importantly, fibroblasts derived from chromatin remodeling ATPase LSH-null mouse embryos, which lack DNA methylation at transposons and specific gene promoters, are capable of re-establishing normal patterns of DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing of misregulated genes upon re-expression of LSH. The ATP hydrolysis by LSH is essential for its function in gene silencing and de novo DNA methylation. However, the molecular mechanisms of LSH-dependent gene silencing and de novo DNA methylation are yet unclear. Here we use an inducible system that enables controlled expression of LSH in Lsh-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) to follow chromatin dynamics, transcriptional silencing and establishment of de novo DNA methylation. This conditionally reversible Lsh knockout cellular system allowed us to study the order of events occurring immediately after LSH restoration in MEF cell lines in order to elucidate the molecular mechanism of LSH-dependent gene silencing. We have demonstrated that LSH upon its restoration localises to the promoters of LSH-dependent loci leading to a mild decrease in the occupancy of H3, which reinforces the previously shown role of LSH as a chromatin remodeler. Simultaneously, there is removal of acetyl groups from H3 tails when LSH is bound to these target regions, which might be facilitated by the interaction of HDACs with LSH. The removal of H3Ac marks is followed by deposition of H3K9me2 by G9a/GLP histone methylases at the same time point when misregulated genes are silenced. This suggests that LSH creates a suitable substrate for G9a/GLP promoting gene silencing. Surprisingly, transcriptional repression occurs without acquisition of DNA methylation at the promoters of these loci. This order of events implies that LSH plays a role as a chromatin remodeler leading to changes in chromatin structure and modifications that facilitate epigenetic gene silencing without DNA methylation in the initial period when LSH is restored in MEF cell lines. Furthermore, deposition of H3K9me2 by the G9a/GLP complex is critical for silencing of specific genes, but not for repetitive elements such as IAPs. The histone modification H3K27me3 seems to play a transitory role in the silencing of IAP retrotransposons in the absence of G9a/GLP activity. In conclusion, this work has demonstrated that changes in chromatin modifications leading to a transcriptionally repressive chromatin state can be established in somatic cells by the chromatin remodeler LSH without acquisition of DNA methylation. This suggests that the primary role of LSH is to promote changes in chromatin structure and modifications that lead to gene silencing and not DNA methylation, which most likely occurs as a consequence of transcriptional silencing.

ABSTRACT Chromatin insulators are required for proper temporal and spatial expression of genes in metazoans. Insulators are thought to play an important role in the regulation of gene expression through the formation of higher-order chromatin structures. One of the best characterized insulators is the Drosophila gypsy insulator, which is located in the gypsy retrovirus. Several proteins are required for gypsy insulator function, including Su(Hw), Mod(mdg4), and CP190. In addition to the gypsy insulator, these proteins are located throughout the genome at sites which are thought to correspond to endogenous insulators. Analysis of the distribution of insulator proteins across a region of chromosome 2R in Drosophila polytene chromosomes shows that Su(Hw) is found in three structures differentially associated with insulator proteins: bands, interbands and domains of coexpressed genes. Bands are formed by condensation of chromatin within genes containing one or more Su(Hw) binding sites, while Su(Hw) sites in interbands appear to form structures normally associated with open chromatin. Bands characterized by the lack of CP190 and BEAF-32 insulator proteins are formed by clusters of coexpressed genes, and these bands correlate with the distribution of specific chromatin marks. Conservation of the band interband pattern, as well as the distribution of insulator proteins in nurse cells, suggests that this organization may represent the basic organization of interphasic chromosomes. We also show that, in addition to the gypsy insulator, sequence analysis predicts the presence of Su(Hw) binding sites within a number of transposable elements. Su(Hw) binds to predicted sites within gtwin and jockey, which possesses enhancer-blocking activity. Su(Hw) affects the tissue-specific expression of transposable elements, although this effect is unrelated to the presence of Su(Hw) binding sites within the element or control of the elements via the piRNA pathway. Additionally, the effect of Su(Hw) on transposable element expression often differs from that of Mod(mdg4). Taken together, these results suggest that insulator proteins associate specifically with, and may help to define, various levels of chromatin organization on polytene chromosomes. Also, gypsy insulator proteins may influence the expression of transposable elements in a way that does not depend on Su(Hw) binding sites within the elements themselves.

Artificial insemination (AI) with sex-sorted bottlenose dolphin spermatozoa provides female calves for obtaining more cohesive social groups and optimum genetic management of captive populations. However, distance of animals to the sorting facility represents a limit to the procedure. Although one bottlenose dolphin calf has been born using spermatozoa from frozen-thawed, sorted and recryopreserved spermatozoa, critical evaluation of the steps involved in this process is required to maximize its efficiency for future AIs and expansion of the technology to other species. Two experiments were designed to determine the efficiency of the sorting process and the quality of frozen-thawed bottlenose dolphin spermatozoa during sorting and recryopreservation. In experiment 1, the effect of two washing media (with and without 4 percent egg yolk, v/v) following density gradient centrifugation (DGC) on sperm recovery rate and in vitro characteristics of cryopreserved spermatozoa was examined. In experiment 2, cryopreserved semen was used to compare the effects of two recryopreservation methods (conventional straw freezing and directional freezing) on in vitro sperm characteristics of control (non-sorted) and sorted spermatozoa. Egg yolk supplementation of the washing medium in experiment 1 did not influence (P > 0.05) the sperm recovery rate, however, sperm motility parameters and viability were improved (P < 0.05). For Experiment 2, motility parameters and viability were influenced by stage of sex-sorting process, sperm type (non-sorted and sorted) and freezing method (P < 0.05). After recryopreservation, sorted spermatozoa frozen with the directional freezing method maintained higher (P < 0.05) motility parameters over the 24 h incubation period compared to spermatozoa frozen using straws. Quality of sperm DNA of nonsorted spermatozoa, as assessed by the SCSA, remained unchanged throughout the process. However, a possible interaction between Hoechst 33342 and acridine orange was observed in sorted samples. After recryopreservation, viability of sorted spermatozoa was higher (P < 0.05) than that of non-sorted spermatozoa across all time points. The percentages of viable spermatozoa determined by light (eosin-nigrosin) and fluorescence microscopy (propidium iodide) techniques were correlated (R^2=0.79, P < 0.001). Collective results indicate that bottlenose dolphin spermatozoa undergoing cryopreservation, sorting and recryopreservation are of adequate quality for use in AI.

One of the fundamental questions in science is how chromatin transitions from actively transcribed euchromatin to silent heterochromatin, and what factors affect this transition. One area of my research has focused on understanding the differences in the chromatin structure of active and silent regions in the ribosomal DNA locus (rDNA), a heterochromatin region in S. cerevisiae. Secondly, I have focused on understanding a histone methyltransferase Set1, which is involved in both euchromatin and heterochromatin regions. To distinguish actively transcribed open regions of chromatin from silent and closed regions of chromatin, we have expressed a DNA methyltransferase M.CviPI in vivo to utilize its accessibility to GpC sites. We have used this technique to study changes in nucleosome positioning within the NTS2 region of the rDNA in two cases: as a result of a silencing defect caused by the loss of Sir2, a histone deacetylase involved in silencing at the rDNA, and as an indicator of active transcription by RNA Pol I. Using this technique, we observed differences between open and closed chromatin structure by changes in nucleosome positioning within NTS2. Additionally, we have observed the presence of bound factors within the 35S rRNA gene promoter that are unique to actively transcribed genes. The second area of my research focused on the protein methyltransferase Set1 that mono-, di-, and trimethylates lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) utilizing the methyl group from S-adenosyl methionine (SAM). Set1 is part of a multi protein complex called COMPASS (Complex associated with Set1), and is associated with both actively transcribed and silent regions. Thirty mutants of Set1 were made within the SET domain to learn more about the catalytic mechanism of Set1. The crystal structures of human SET domain proteins, as well as sequence alignments and a random mutagenesis of yeast Set1, were used to identify conserved amino acids in the SET domain of Set1. Mutants were analyzed for their effect on histone methylation in vivo, silencing of RNA Pol II transcription within the rDNA, suppression of ipl1-2, and COMPASS complex formation. Our results show that trimethylated H3K4 is required for silencing of RNA Pol II transcription at the rDNA. Overall, we have shown the importance of tyrosine residues in SET domain proteins. To summarize, my research has strived to understand chromatin structure and the factors that affect the transition between euchromatin and heterochromatin.

Regulation of gene expression is essential for many biological processes. Binding of transcription factors to DNA is a key regulatory step in the control of gene expression. It is commonly observed that DNA sequences with high affinity for transcription factors occur more frequently in the genome than the instances of genes bound or regulated by these factors. However, the mechanism by which transcription factors selectively identify and regulate these genes was unclear. I utilized the transcriptional control of the phosphate-responsive signaling pathway (PHO) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to address this problem.

When living cells are lysed in non-ionic detergents and 2M NaCl, structures are released that resemble nuclei, termed nucleoids. Nucleoids contain tenaciously attached DNA, RNA and protein. The nature of the interactions of these components is poorly understood. It is known that the DNA is attached to these structures in a looped configuration, and newly synthesised DNA is found closely associated with the attachment sites. Therefore, the speculation that these attachment sites have a functional signification other than for structural purposes has been seriously considered. To investigate these possibilities, the proteins were characterised for DNA binding activity, and the presence of any enzymatic activity. Some of the nucleoid proteins are derived from the cell surface, and specific phosphorylating and methylating activities were also detected. The significance of these findings remains to be determined. The study of the DNA-binding activity is hampered by the fact that these proteins are not readily solubilised away from the nucleic acids. However, DNA-binding proteins are present in nucleoids. No specificity for DNA sequences was demonstrable, using the protein blotting technique. In the course of these studies, a new technique was devised to enable sequence-binding proteins to be identified. Examination of the DNA close to thl attachment sites shows it to be enriched in transcriptionally active genes, and in a given population of cells, some genes are closer to the attachment sites than others. This supports the idea that genes are specifically arranged within the nucleus of any cell, and that this position is of functional significance. Direct examination of the most closely adherent DNA to these structures did not reveal any one DNA sequence that may mediate attachment.

In Drosophila there are two different chromosome-wide targeting systems, the dosage compensation system that equalizes the transcriptional output from X-linked genes between males and females, and the regulation of the 4th chromosome mediated by the POF protein.   The best studied of these two mechanisms is the dosage compensation system. To attain dosage compensation in Drosophila at least five different proteins, encoded by the male-specific lethal genes msl1, msl2, msl3, mle and mof, are required. These proteins together with two non-coding RNAs (roX1 and roX2) form a dosage compensation complex (MSL complex), which binds exclusively to the X chromosome in Drosophila males and up-regulates the transcription approximately two times.   In this thesis I show that roX1 and roX2 are most likely the only non-coding RNAs within the MSL complex. As expected, the roX transcripts were enriched within the MSL complex. Interestingly, one additional transcript was identified within the MSL complex. This transcript did not associate with the X chromosome and is therefore not believed to be involved in up-regulation of the X-linked genes. This transcript encodes for the rate limiting component in the MSL complex, the MSL2 protein. A model is proposed in which free, partial or complete, MSL complex feed-back regulates the amount of msl2 transcript, and thereby limits the MSL complex production.   The second chromosome-wide regulatory system in flies acts on an autosome, the heterochromatic 4th chromosome. This regulation is a balancing mechanism between at least two different proteins, the chromosome 4 specific protein painting of fourth (POF) and heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). POF binds to nascent RNAs transcribed from the 4th chromosome and HP1 target the same set of genes at the chromatin level. POF stimulates the transcribed genes, while HP1 represses them; together they create the most optimal condition for these genes. This type of balancing mechanism may be a more general way to fine-tune transcription at a chromosome-wide level and raises the question about autosomal gene regulation as a general mechanism.

No description available.

No description available.