This study investigates how the public forum cognition of citizen affect their intension to attend public forum given researching methods of Public Affairs Management Integrated Reference Framework (PAM) and Social Development Matrix(SDM). Based on PAM, we analysed the meaning of citizen governance and the role of citizen through real events, and discussed the cognition and psychological weights of our citizen to participate public forums. Through the analysis methods of literatures, this study summarized three factors that proposed by Ostrom(1990) - Institution, Commitment and Supervision, and then sequentially made the standard measurement divided into two levels by fair/unfair, high/low and valid/invalid. In this study, we focused on citizens who had participated in interactive management and chose Information Integration Theory (IIT) as our research method. Our research discussed that psychological weights of Institution, Commitment and Supervision, which defined three explanatory variables to estimate the public forum consciousness of citizens. By using SPSS and AVERAGE software, we computed the psychological weights of three factors and understood the attitudes of citizens toward public forum, furthermore, we compared the differences among the weights and offered suggestion and strategies of citizen governing in the future. The results are as following: 1. Compared to participants from traditional conservative society, our participants from highly developed multi-cultural society are more willing to attend public forums. 2. Participants of different backgrounds assess sequentially the importance of three factors by Supervision, Institution and Commitment. 3. Our results showed that the integrated information patterns(model) are all unequal weighted average pattern(model). 4. All three factors of our research are significant on dependent variable in main effects, two-factor interaction and three-factor interaction.

Seminario para optar al Grado de Licenciado en Ciencias Políticas y Gubernamentales Mención: Gestión Pública / Esta investigación se enmarca entre los estudios cualitativos y busca comparar los modos de participación ciudadana en base a dos casos de comunas en Chile: La Pintana y Las Condes en el período 2012-2017. El resultado de esta investigación señala que las principales diferencias entre ambas comunas se enmarcan en 5 dimensiones, frecuencia de los usos de los modos de participación ciudadana, los enfoques sobre la participación ciudadana que presenta cada una de estas comunas, la voluntad de los funcionarios hacia la participación ciudadana, el entorno organizacional que rodea al Municipio (organizaciones de la sociedad civil) y la capacidad de incidencia de los vecinos de estas comunas. / This works is a qualitative effort which general purpose is to compare the ways of citizen governance, based in two cases of comunas in Chile: La Pintana and Las Condes during 2012-2017. The results of this efforts points out that the most important differences between both cases are basically categorized in 5 dimensions, the frequency, the approach to the topic from the local government, bureaucrats willingness to citizen governance, the civil society organizations and the impact that citizens can have in public policy in this comunas.