Introduction and Rationale: Concussions account for the majority of traumatic brain injuries in children. Currently there more than 500,000 pediatric concussions per year and that number is likely low due to under-reporting (Rose, Weber, Collen,& Heyer, 2015). Most symptoms of concussion are easily recognized to the trained pediatric primary care provider. Yet, symptom management and recommendations for rest, exercise, specialty care referral, and return to normal activities can be challenging for many providers, due to the lack of evidence and lack of formal recommendations by any organization (Rose et al., 2015; Silverberg & Iverson, 2013). Purpose and Objective: The main purpose of this Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project is to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for pediatric primary care providers. The objective is to provide a CPG that offers clinical guidance when managing pediatric concussion patients in the primary care setting. This CPG will also provide clarity for pediatric primary care providers (PCP) when determining what options are available in treatment for pediatric concussions. Methods: The working framework of this project was The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) procedure for reporting clinical guidelines, in the form of key action statements, was used as the model for development of the CPG. Results: The CPG was appraised using the AGREE II instrument, which provides valid and reliable scores and data used in the evaluation of CPG's. Six domains were evaluated, and the CPG yielded scores above 80% for all categories. The overall standard deviation was 0, which indicts a very low level of discrepancy between users of the instrument. Conclusion: This DNP project addresses an evidence and primary care practice gap. With a large number of pediatric concussions, a consistent management approach will ensure a safe and therapeutic recovery. A CPG was developed and evaluated using the AGREE II instrument. The CPG was found to meet the standards for general recommended use in pediatric primary care.

Childhood obesity is a national problem in the United States and has known implications as a potential cause of chronic illnesses as the child transitions into adulthood. A primary care clinic in the southwestern United States had a high percentage of obese Hispanic children within its population; therefore, the nurses and the pediatrician needed an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) to manage Hispanic children with a body mass index greater than the 95th percentile for their age. The purpose of the project was to develop a culturally competent CPG to manage childhood obesity in this primary care practice. The social cognitive theory provided the framework to develop the CPG. The final project resulted in an evidence-based CPG that was validated by an expert physician panel. The implication of this project is that nurses and providers can provide culturally competent education to the parent and child to reduce obesity among the pediatric Hispanic population. This project may create positive social change by modifying unhealthy cultural practices and behaviors, preventing chronic diseases, and reducing health care costs for the children within the selected practice.

Recovering from a cardiac surgery procedure and the transition to home can be an overwhelming experience for patients and caregivers. A tertiary care hospital's cardiothoracic surgery department suspended a nurse-practitioner-coordinated transitional care program in the 1st quarter of 2016. Following this decision, the readmission rate increased from its previous rate of 15.6% in quarter 1 to 20% in quarter 3. The purpose of this scholarly project was to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG) that can bridge the gap in the transitional care process. The transitional care model informed the design of the project. A draft guideline was distributed to 5 stakeholders from the inpatient cardiac surgery care team for initial review. After initial review and revisions an edited version was then distributed to 5 additional stakeholders. Those stakeholders provided an assessment utilizing the AGREE II tool to assess the 6 domains of scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, application and editorial independence, and overall quality. Four domains indicated a high level of agreement (96%-100%) and 2 domains indicated a response of < 76% for domains related to rigor and organizational resources. The overall guideline assessment of the quality of the CPG received a score of 96%, with a recommendation to adopt the guideline. Advanced practice nurses will utilize this guideline to provide a systematic process in bridging gaps in care for the transition of the cardiac surgery patient population from hospital to home. Social change will be promoted through improved patient management by using evidence-based transitional care, decreased readmissions, and improved health outcomes for the cardiac surgical population.

Childhood bullying can lead to adverse physical and mental health outcomes for both the victim and the bully. Risk factors for bullying can be related to gender, race, sexual preference, and having any type of disability. A pediatric primary care clinic in a large, metropolitan area, the focus for this project, did not have an evidenced-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) for providers to facilitate the management of children who presented with reported bullying. The project, guided by the Tanner'€™s integrated model of clinical judgement, addressed the question whether a CPG would facilitate the early recognition and treatment of bullying in the pediatric clinical site. Using a literature search, a CPG was developed with evidence that included 6 recommendations ranging from clinical assessment and screening to advocacy. The CPG was then evaluated by 4 expert panelists using the AGREE II tool. Panelists included 2 pediatric medical doctors, 1 pediatric school nurse, and 1 mental health nurse practitioner. The panel evaluation results revealed a score of 81 out of a possible 100, where a score of 71 was the standard for acceptable results for the 6 recommendations. Results from the expert panel were used to modify the CPG, after which the guideline was presented to the panel for final approval. One final recommendation of the panel was to include a provision for referral and follow up for children identified with bullying. The finalized CPG was presented to the medical director of the pediatric clinic for implementation. The implications of the project for positive social change include decreased variations in clinical practice, early detection and intervention of bullying, improved effectiveness and quality of care, and decreased costly and preventable adverse events.

Transition of care refers to the movement of patients between health care settings; it occurs each time patients move between providers within the same setting or between settings based on the patient's acute or chronic health care needs. Care transition includes the efficient and accurate exchange of information needed to provide high-quality continuity of care. A rural community hospital in in the northeastern region of the United States has a skilled nursing facility and an acute care hospital on one campus. This project focused on the development of a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the hospital to improve communication during transitions of care. The Iowa model of evidence-based practice informed the development of the guideline. A project team developed the CPG. Five multidisciplinary experts reviewed the CPG using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE II) evaluative tool. Results for the 6 domains of the AGREE II tool showed experts' agreement greater than 90% with the guideline as developed. The creation of a CPG to improve communication during care transition could benefit nurses with improved clinical decision making and patients with improved outcomes. The CPG could impact social change by supporting the application of the principles of evidence-based nursing practice, which could result in improved care and patient outcomes.

ABSTRACT Introduction and Rationale: Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition, characterized by markedly pruritic eczematous lesions, that most often presents in childhood. The majority of children diagnosed with AD will have mild disease and will first present with symptoms to a primary care provider (PCP), however approximately 85% of pediatricians only provide limited initial care followed by a referral to dermatology (Eichenfield et al., 2015). While there are specialty care based treatment guidelines for childhood AD, there are no guidelines available that specifically address primary care management of childhood AD. Purpose and Objective: The primary purpose of this DNP project is to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) for pediatric PCPs. The secondary purpose is to develop a corresponding atopic dermatitis action plan (ADAP) to be used by children and parents. The objective is to equip PCPs to better manage children with AD in the primary care setting and to guide patients and parents in the importance of daily control measures and in the individualized treatment plan prescribed by the PCP. Methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) framework and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) serve as the theoretical frameworks for CPG and ADAP development. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) process for evidence based policy setting is used as a model for key action statement development. Results: Evaluation of the CPG was completed using the AGREE II tool, a reliable and validated tool for evaluating CPGs. Five of the six domains evaluated, yielded combined scores of at least 90%, with one domain a combined score of 63%. The overall standard deviation was 0.58, indicating an overall low level of user discrepancy Additions and revisions were made based on the results of the AGREE II evaluation scores with specific emphasis on the lowest scoring domain. Conclusion: This DNP Project identified the need for a CPG specific to pediatric primary care. A CPG with accompanying ADAP was developed and evaluated using the AGREE II tool. The CPG was found to meet the recommended standards and recommended for use in pediatric primary care.

Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes of death in the United States, contributing to rising health care costs and increased morbidity and mortality rates. Researchers demonstrated that aggressive heath measures involving ongoing diabetes self-management education are paramount in minimizing associated complications of diabetes. The management and prevention of diabetes is not standardized and providers within a health clinic in Illinois reported challenges in providing self-management education during scheduled patient appointments due to limited resources and time. The purpose of this DNP project was to develop a clinical practice guideline to be used by all providers within the health care clinic for the management of Type 2 diabetes. The goal of the developed guideline was to optimize the time providers spend with patients diagnosed with diabetes and improve the consistency and quality of education and care. The health promotion model provided a guide for the development of the practice guideline. The method and design of this DNP project involved extensive research, literature review, evidence grading, and development of an evidence-based practice guideline for Type 2 diabetes management. A selected team of 3 diabetes experts appraised the developed guideline using the AGREE II instrument, and guideline usability was evaluated by 3 nurse practitioners within the medical clinic using a 10-item questionnaire. Results of the appraisal confirmed the high quality, feasibility, and usability of the developed guideline for diabetes self-management education and support. Improving the delivery of care can bring about positive social change by improving health outcomes in individuals with Type 2 diabetes and reducing morbidity and mortality rates.

In a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital on the East Coast of the United States, behavioral outbursts result in 2 out of 10 veterans dismissed from a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) unit prior to completing the 6-week program. The purpose of this evidence-based quality improvement project was to create a clinical practice guideline (CPG) based on social cognitive theory (SCT) to provide new strategies for managing veterans with PTSD and to improve the confidence of the nurses in managing outbursts. The Star Model guided the project development with the Delphi method to achieve participant consensus, the AGREE II to assess the CPG quality, and the Generalized Self-Efficacy (GSE) scale to measure the change in participant knowledge and confidence. The literature was searched, compiled, assessed, and shared with 10 participants, registered nurses on the PTSD unit. Through the Delphi process, the participants achieved consensus (8/10) for the CPG, with two neutral participants. The GSE was administered pre- and post-test and analyzed using a paired t test to measure the mean differences of the GSE scores. The data was normally distributed to different scores to gauge the impact of the CPG development process on improving nursing knowledge and confidence was normally distributed [t(9) = -4.188, p < 0.05, &, t(9) = -2.714, p =0.003]. The data indicated a significant increase in participant knowledge about role of SCT, and confidence toward implementing the CPG into clinical practice. This project contributes to positive social change as nurses identified a clinical practice problem, transferred evidence about strategies from the literature into their clinical practice through a CPG, and implemented the CPG with the knowledge and confidence to impact patient care.

Ineffective pain management in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) increases patients' risk of adverse effects including decreased mobility, infection, chronic pain, depression, cardiopulmonary complications, increased length of stay, insomnia, fatigue, and overall decrease in quality of life. The PACU in a community hospital did not provide an evidence-based pain management guideline for nurses treating postoperative patients, resulting in nurses' concerns about providing pain management. The purpose of this project was to translate evidence on pain management into an evidence-based guideline for improved nursing practice in a PACU. Evidence was obtained from a detailed literature search using multiple databases and professional organizations' guidelines. Nursing practice guidelines were developed and evaluated by 3 expert panelists using the Agree II guidelines. The panelists selected included; Two anesthesiologists, one who is trained in pain management and is also a pharmacist. The third expert is a practicing nurse practitioner in an acute setting who is also a surgical first assist and the associate director of robotics. The panel endorsed the guidelines for advancement through the hospital's review committees. Implementation of the evidence-based pain management guideline in the PACU might provide nurses with tools to guide their interventions and improve patient outcomes. Social changes resulting from the use of evidence-based pain management guidelines include decreased time to opiate administration, decreased adverse effects, improved assessment of pain, and an increase in the number of patients who receive proper pain management.

Managing heart failure patients in the outpatient setting can pose a challenge for nurses and health care staff due to the need to educate patients on self-care skills and management of disease. Several factors, including health literacy and numeracy, need to be considered when developing an education program for heart failure patients to promote self-care management. The purpose of this project was to provide nursing staff with a clinical practice guideline (CPG) that incorporated health and numeracy literacy assessment into an individualized education program. The Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice (EBP) model, the situation-specific theory of heart failure (HF) self-care, and Wagner's chronic care model guided the development and implementation of this project. The practice-focused question for this project asked whether evidence informs a CPG intended to assess health literacy and numeracy assessment and promote an enhanced individualized education intervention in an outpatient HF population. A literature review using 20 articles from 2006-2018 was completed. Five articles were selected to review levels of evidence, and three articles were chosen to support the development of the CPG. The CPG was reviewed, refined, and validated by an expert panel of HF nurses and physicians. The CPG might support a positive social change in the practice setting by improving the tools for nurses to assess health literacy in the HF patient population and provide individualized education to influence self-care interventions.