Yes / This chapter evaluates the consistency of the United Kingdom (UK) regulatory framework on shale gas with Commission Recommendation 2014/70/EU on minimum principles for the exploration and production of unconventional oil and gas. In the absence of European-wide legislation, European Union (EU) Member States have the right to determine the conditions for exploiting their unconventional energy sources. However, due to the environmental and human health risks associated with hydraulic fracturing, the EU has expressed its interest in ensuring adequate protection of the environment and to creating clear and transparent common standards for the benefit of operators, investors and the public while promoting the interests of those Member States which are currently exploring unconventional energy. It can be argued that the UK regime has been designed to address the environmental risks arising from hydraulic fracturing operations and as such it sets a high environmental threshold for operations. In fact, the UK legislation appears to be more comprehensive than in many other jurisdictions commercially exploiting shale gas, and therefore it has a potential to inform the content of any future harmonising measures on the exploration and extraction of such resources at the EU level.

Revisorernas oberoende har under de senaste två decennierna varit ett mycket kontroversiellt ämne till följd av de skandaler som inträffade i USA i början av millenniet. Den välkända Enronskandalen väckte mycket uppmärksamhet vilket resulterade i att många intressenter har blivit skeptiska mot revisorns oberoende och tappade förtroendet för revisorerna. Det är nämligen mycket viktigt för revisionsbranschen att inge förtroende för sitt arbete, om allmänheten ska kunna förlita sig på den information som framgår av revisionsberättelsen. I syfte att säkerställa revisorns oberoende gentemot sina klienter infördes analysmodellen i Sverige den första januari 2002. Modellen bygger på att en revisor, inför varje granskningsuppdrag, ska pröva om det föreligger sådana omständigheter som kan rubba dennes oberoende. Under samma år antogs även EU-rekommendationen 2002/590/EG i syfte att behandla frågor avseende oberoende problematiken inom EU. Rekommendationen 2002/590/EG föreslår revisorsrotation, d.v.s. att påskrivande revisorer ska bytas ut efter två genomförda mandatperioder på sammanlagt sju år. Syftet med uppsatsen är att bilda en djupgående uppfattning om revisorn oberoende och huruvida rotationsregler kan främja oberoendet samt under vilka förutsättningar de kan tillämpas. För att besvara studiens forskningsfrågor tillämpades kvalitativa semistrukturerade intervjuer med fem revisorer från region syd i Sverige. Resultaten visar att en revisor ska agera med objektivitet, självständighet och opartiskhet i syfte att bevara sin oberoende ställning. Studien påvisar att rotationsregler tillämpas främst i de klientföretagen av allmänt intresse. / The independence of auditors has been a very controversial topic for the past two decades because of the scandals that occurred in the United States at the beginning of the millennium. The Enron scandal attracted a lot of attention, which resulted in many stakeholders becoming skeptical of the auditor's independence and losing confidence in them. It is important for the auditing industry to instill confidence in their work, so that the public can rely on the information that appears in the audit report. In order to ensure the auditor's independence, the so-called “analysmodellen” was introduced in Sweden on the first of January 2002. The model is based on an auditor, prior to each audit assignment, examining whether there are circumstances that could upset his independence. During the same year, Commission Recommendation 2002/590/EC was also adopted to address issues relating to the issue of independence within the EU. The recommendation proposes auditor rotation, i.e. endorsing auditors to be replaced after two completed terms of office of a total of seven years. The purpose of this thesis is to form an in-depth view of the auditor's independence, whether rotation rules can promote independence and the conditions under which it can be applied. To answer the research questions, qualitative semi-structured interviews were applied with five auditors in the Southern Region of Sweden. The results show that an auditor must act objectively and impartially in order to maintain his independence. The rotation rules are mainly applied in the companies of public interest.