The use of copyrighted works is an essential tool for carrying out teaching activities. It is relevant for both teachers, who very often use them to support their instructional tasks, and students, who also make use of them to illustrate their learning activities. The mandatory authorisation of the copyrightholder may represent, in some cases, an exorbitant and unjustified demand (e. g. when the use is really inoffensive or responds to the exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms) or even an unenforceable requirement (either because there is no effective and sufficiently developed market for educational licences -notably on line-, or because is extremely difficult to control the actual utilisation of the work). The recognition of the private and public interests in the use of copyrighted works for educational purposes justifies the certain limitations to the copyrightholders' exclusive rights. This publication analyses the scope of the limitation of "illustration for teachin" incorporated in the Spanish Copyright Law by the Law 23/2006 and other complementary exceptions that may be invoked in educational activities. It reviews the legal framework established in the international treaties and in the Information Society Directive and also considers the laws other EU countries and beyond (notably US and Australia) some of them specifically targeting online education. The PhD thesis supports a flexible interpretation of the requirements foreseen in the Spanish Copyright law and de lege ferenda presents a series of policy options that could help to better conciliate public and private interests.

Prior to the year 2007, Eskom Distribution followed a method of load forecasting (now referred to as legacy method in this report) that was based on collecting customer applications, historical load trending, and relied on the planner’s knowledge of the area to a large extent. It was based in a conventional Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. On seeking to improve its load forecasting approach, the utility adopted a technique that was based on spatial forecasting. This new technique was called a geographical based load forecasting (GLF) technique which was performed by using a custom based tool, called PowerGLF. The aim of this research was to assess any improvements (or lack thereof) that were brought about by adopting the GLF method as compared to the legacy method that was used previously. The hypothesis to be tested was declared as: “The use of the GLF method that was introduced to Eskom Distribution Planning brings about the improvement on the planning process of infrastructure that is adequate, reliable and economic, when compared to the legacy method that was used before it.” To carry out this assessment, a case study method was followed. Real network studies that were compiled in 2006 and 2007 were used. These network studies were based on GLF method and the legacy method. The load forecasts from the case studies were evaluated on forecast accuracy, how they influenced the planning of adequate, reliable and economic (ARE) network infrastructure and their impact on the procurement and construction of the network infrastructure (which represent the actual utility expenditure on infrastructure). The statistical comparative analysis was done. The research results revealed that the legacy method was more accurate than the GLF method in both the case studies that were evaluated. However, regarding the ability of a load forecast method to support the planning process, the GLF method showed to be supporting the planning of adequate, reliable and economic infrastructure better than the legacy method. It was found that the forecast error for the GLF and legacy method do not affect the utility infrastructure procurement and construction. Based on the test results, the study reached a conclusion that the use of the GLF method that was introduced to Eskom Distribution Planning brings about the improvement in the planning process of infrastructure that is adequate, economic and reliable when compared to the legacy method that was used before it. The author wishes to express that the results of this study must not be taken as a generic conclusive finding regarding the evaluated load forecasting methods; they are applicable to the tested case studies. To get to a general conclusive result, more case studies would need to be carried out where clear and consistent evidence on performance of these load forecasting methods will be seen. The findings of this study can be used as part of a larger sample if such a larger population of case studies was to be evaluated. The methodology followed in this research can be repeated and followed when similar assessments are done in future.

This study aimed at exploring the school effectiveness characteristics of two high schools, one with high (School A) and one with low (School B) levels of placement ratio in &Ouml / SS for their graduates, to observe their characteristics as perceived by their stakeholders (students, teachers, parents, school administrative staff and managers). In this study, a comparative pre-structured case study method was employed. The study was conducted in two private high schools in the province of Ankara, Turkey. The participants were 10 students, 10 teachers, 10 parents, 2 non-academic staff and 3 administrators from School A, and 10 students, 10 teachers, 7 parents, 3 non-academic staff and 2 administrators from School B. A framework drawn by the researcher as a result of review of relevant literature was used to conceptualize the study and to guide the interview schedules to collect data. According to this framework, six general areas in effective school literature were explored. These areas were academic emphasis, organization and administration, school climate, home-school relations, teaching staff, and physical and financial resources. The data collected through semi-structured interviews were analyzed using content analysis technique. The findings revealed that two case schools had major differences almost in all areas explored. The only major similarity between two schools was in the leadership and leader qualities under organization and administration area. The effective school characteristics of the school with high levels of placement ratio in &Ouml / SS, in all six areas explored were added to the conceptual framework drawn at the beginning of the study.

Pas de résumé / Doctorat en droit / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

Raymond Saleilles (1855-1912) és considerat pels comparatistes com pare del dret comparat modern. De fet fou el màxim responsable de l'organització del primer congrés internacional de dret comparat a París el 1900. L'època marcada per la internacionalització dels intercanvis, la crisi del mètode jurídic francès i el repte de la codificació alemanya i suïssa motivà alguns juristes a buscar noves formes d'estudiar el dret. Saleilles defensava pel dret comparat un mètode, un objecte i un fi propis i autònoms diferents dels que fins ara tenien la dogmàtica jurídica o l'estudi de la legislació estrangera. El mètode tenia els seus fonaments en la sociologia i la història. L'objectiu del dret comparat havia de ser la construcció d'un ideal "droit commun de l'humanité civilisée". Aquest dret comú havia de ser construït no només per la doctrina sinó també per la jurisprudència i el legislador. / Raymond Saleilles (1855-1912) is considered by many comparatists as the father of modern comparative law. Saleilles had a great responsibility in the organization of the first International Congress on comparative Law in Paris in 1900. This event is still today considered as the foundation moment of modern comparative law.Saleilles' times were those of the internationalization of exchanges, of the crisis of the "Exegèse" Method and of the new challenging German and Swiss civil codification.Saleilles tried to build a new discipline, comparative law, with its own method, object and aim. This method had its basis on sociology and history and tried to break the national and scientifical fences of Jurisprudence.