Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-10-04T18:28:51Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Alexsandro Sousa Brito.pdf: 3094346 bytes, checksum: 0f9f853f957ec57ce4331ad9d6437cdd (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-04T18:28:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Alexsandro Sousa Brito.pdf: 3094346 bytes, checksum: 0f9f853f957ec57ce4331ad9d6437cdd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-20 / CAPES / FAPEMA - Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento. Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico do Maranh?o / Public consortium are known for their ability to bring together local government and partnerships around a common problem that would be difficult to solve by the single action of a single entity. It was local government consortium experience analyzed, in our study, talk about Consortium of Production and Supply (CINPRA) it is from S?o Lu?s-MA and suggests parameters for analysis of the implementation of public consortium. It proposes, from the construction of these parameters, the identification of consortium not as instruments of policy but also as an arrangement of policy making, or democratic structuring of public policy. Parameters are indicative of the capacity of these arrangements to produce shared public policies, as the institutional design of the consortium may or may not favor the democratic structuring of these actions. In this sense, the analysis made here inserts the discussion of public consortium in the analysis of public policies, more specifically in the analysis of policy implementation. Thus, it was tried to understand the classic models of implementation of public policies and to propose a strategy of analysis of implementation that balance and equilibrium the democratic-participative aspect in the process of construction of the consortium. A brief historiography of the object of research is also made, analysis of some other national and international experiences is also made, looking for common elements to the different experiences recorded in the specific literature. It also analyzes the legal and institutional aspects arising from the promulgation of the regulatory legal framework of the consortium. CINPRA's analysis showed up the inability to institutionalize as a local for democratic structuring of policy produce together due to the inability to formulate a problem that will be, in fact, common and needed for a cooperation strategy. This research we have undertaken, verified that the supply problem, as posed by CINPRA, was not an issue capable of capturing the public interest of the local government level, as well as of the society itself, failing to constitute a public problem, which, in part, may explain the low capability of the consortium to bring the necessary attention to producing public policy between local government and partnerships. Therefore, the unusual problem was not enough to achieve a consistent agreement around the membership. / Os cons?rcios p?blicos s?o conhecidos pela capacidade de arregimentar entidades p?blicas e privadas em torno de um problema comum, que, dificilmente lograria solu??o pela a??o isolada de um ?nico ente. Analisa-se a experi?ncia de consorciamento intermunicipal a partir do caso do Cons?rcio de Produ??o e Abastecimento de S?o Lu?s ? MA (CINPRA) e sugere par?metros para an?lise de implementa??o de cons?rcios p?blicos. Prop?e, a partir da constru??o desses par?metros, a identifica??o dos cons?rcios n?o apenas como instrumentos de pol?tica mas tamb?m como uma pol?tica de produ??o de pol?ticas, ou como uma pol?tica de estrutura??o democr?tica de pol?tica p?blicas. Os par?metros s?o indicadores da capacidade desses arranjos em produzir pol?ticas p?blicas compartilhadas, ? medida que o desenho institucional dos cons?rcios pode favorecer ou n?o a estrutura??o democr?tica dessas a??es. Nesse sentido, a an?lise feita aqui insere a discuss?o dos cons?rcios p?blicos na an?lise de pol?ticas p?blicas, mais especificamente na an?lise de implementa??o de pol?ticas. Assim, buscou-se compreender os modelos cl?ssicos de implementa??o de pol?ticas p?blicas e propor uma estrat?gia de an?lise de implementa??o que sopesasse o aspecto democr?tico-participativo no processo de constru??o dos cons?rcios. Elabora-se ainda uma r?pida historiografia do objeto de investiga??o e faz-se, tamb?m, uma an?lise de algumas outras experi?ncias nacionais e internacionais, buscando elementos comuns ?s diversas experi?ncias registradas na literatura espec?fica. Analisa-se ainda os aspectos jur?dicos e institucionais decorrentes da promulga??o do marco legal regulat?rio dos cons?rcios. Um dos principais resultados alcan?ados na an?lise do CINPRA ? de que a incapacidade de se institucionalizar como um espa?o de estrutura??o democr?tica de coprodu??o de pol?ticas, passa, em princ?pio, pela inabilidade na formula??o de um problema que, de fato, fosse comum e impusesse a necessidade imperiosa de uma estrat?gia de coopera??o. Pela pesquisa que empreendemos, verificamos que o problema do abastecimento, como colocado pelo CINPRA, n?o foi uma quest?o capaz de capitanear o interesse p?blico dos munic?pios, tampouco da pr?pria sociedade, n?o conseguindo se constituir num problema p?blico, o que, em parte pode explicar a baixa capacidade do cons?rcio em arregimentar a aten??o necess?ria para uma pr?tica consorciada de produ??o de pol?tica p?blica. Logo, o problema ?(in)comum? n?o foi suficiente para lograr um pacto consistente em torno da agremia??o.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T13:53:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexBFMN_DISSERT.pdf: 2231149 bytes, checksum: c09ca7ac40bf0bd19e07f774c2033225 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-31 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / With the disorganized decentralization occurred in Brazil after the 1988 Constitution, municipalities have risen to the level of federal entities. This phenomenon became known as "municipalism" also brought some negative effects such as low capacity financial, economic and political of these entities. In the face of this reality , the municipalities sought in models of collaborative features to address public policy issues ultrarregionais, one of these models are the Public Consortia. Characterized as the organization of all federal entities that aim to solve public policy implementation alone that they could not, or spend great resources for such. This reality of the municipalities have an aggravating factor when looking at the situation in Metropolitan Regions (MRs). This is because the RMs has a historical process of formation that does not encourage cooperation, since that were created top-down during the military regime. Furthermore, the metropolitan municipalities have significant power asymmetries, localist vision, rigidity earmarked revenues, different scenarios conurbation, difficulty standardization of concepts and others that contribute to the vision of low cooperation of these metropolitan areas. Thus, the problem of this work is in the presence of collaborative arrangements, such as the Public Consortia in metropolitan areas, which are seen as areas of low cooperation. To elucidate this research was used for analysis the cases of CONDIAM/PB and Cons?rcio Grande Recife/PE, because they are apparently antagonistic, but with some points of similarity. The cases has as foundation the Theory of Common Resources, which provides the possibility of collective action through the initiative of individuals. This theory has as its methodology for analyzing the picture IAD Framework, which proposes its analysis based on three axes: external variables, the arena of action and results. The nature of the method of this research was classified as exploratory and descriptive. For the stage of date analysis, was used the method of document analysis and content, Further than of separation of the cases according to theur especificities. At the end of the study, noted that the CONDIAM/PB was a strategy of municipal government of Joao Pessoa to attract funds from the Federal Government for the purpose of to build a landfill, and over the years the ideology of cooperation was left aside, the prevailing view localist municipalities. In the case of Cons?rcio Grande Recife/PE, members act with some degree of cooperation, especially the collaborative aspect of the region, however, still prevails with greater strength the power of the state of Pernambuco in the decisions and paths of the consortium. Thus, was conclude that the Public Consortia analyzed are an experience of collaborative arrangement, from the initiative of members, as the theory of common resources says, but has not actually signed as a practice of collective action to overcome the dilemmas faced by metropolitan areas / Com a descentraliza??o ocorrida no Brasil ap?s a Constitui??o de 1988, os munic?pios se elevaram ao patamar de entes federados. Esse fen?meno, que ficou conhecido por municipalismo , tamb?m trouxe alguns efeitos perversos como a baixa capacidade financeira, econ?mica e pol?tica desses entes. Diante dessa realidade os munic?pios buscaram em modelos de car?ter colaborativo para solucionar problemas de pol?ticas p?blicas ultrarregionais, um desses modelos s?o os Cons?rcios P?blicos. Caracterizados como a organiza??o entre entes federados que visem ? solu??o implementa??o de pol?ticas p?blicas que sozinhos eles n?o conseguiriam, ou despenderiam grandes recursos para tal. Essa realidade dos munic?pios tem um agravante quando se observa a situa??o nas Regi?es Metropolitanas (RMs). Isso porque as RMs possuem um hist?rico processo de forma??o que n?o incentiva a coopera??o, j? que foram criadas de cima para baixo durante o regime militar. Al?m disso, os munic?pios metropolitanos t?m significativas assimetrias de poder, vis?o localista, rigidez de receitas vinculadas, diferentes cen?rios de conurba??o, dificuldade de padroniza??o dos conceitos, dentre outros que contribuem para a vis?o de baixa coopera??o dessas ?reas metropolitanas. Assim, a problem?tica desse trabalho est? na presen?a de arranjos colaborativos, como os Cons?rcios P?blicos, em Regi?es Metropolitanas, que s?o vistas como ?reas de baixa coopera??o. Para elucidar essa pesquisa, utilizou-se para an?lises os casos do CONDIAM/PB e Cons?rcio Grande Recife/PE, por serem aparentemente antag?nicos, mas com alguns pontos de semelhan?a. Os casos t?m como fundamenta??o a Teoria dos Recursos Comuns, que estabelece a possibilidade de a??o coletiva atrav?s da iniciativa dos indiv?duos. Essa teoria tem como metodologia de an?lise o quadro IAD Framework, que prop?e sua an?lise a partir de tr?s eixos: vari?veis externas, arena de a??o e resultados alcan?ados. A natureza do m?todo dessa pesquisa foi classificada como explorat?ria e descritiva. Para a etapa de an?lise dos dados, utilizou-se o m?todo de an?lise documental e de conte?do, al?m da separa??o dos casos de acordo com suas especificidades. Ao fim da pesquisa, observou-se que o CONDIAM/PB foi uma estrat?gia do Governo Municipal de Jo?o Pessoa para atrair recursos junto ao Governo Federal com o prop?sito de construir um aterro sanit?rio, e com o passar dos anos a ideologia de coopera??o foi deixada de lado, prevalecendo a vis?o localista dos munic?pios. No caso do Cons?rcio Grande Recife/PE, os membros atuam com certo grau de coopera??o, sobretudo pelo aspecto colaborativo da regi?o, entretanto, ainda prevalece com maior for?a o poder do Estado de Pernambuco nas decis?es e nos caminhos do cons?rcio. Assim, conclui-se que, os Cons?rcios P?blicos analisados s?o uma experi?ncia de arranjo colaborativo, a partir da iniciativa dos membros, como diz a teoria dos recursos comuns, mas ainda n?o se firmaram efetivamente como uma pr?tica de a??o coletiva que supere os dilemas enfrentados pelas Regi?es Metropolitanas

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 KelsianeML_DISSERT.pdf: 2087250 bytes, checksum: d8baece5d547f708496d6c44107ea5f8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-11-18 / Taking as a starting point the Classic Federalism and theory of the development this Work intend to present some ideas linked about cooperation between federal entities and intergovernmental relations with the main focus the regulation by the Public Consortia aimed at administrative efficiency as a Constitutional Principle of Activity Administrative, against the current provisions of the Federal Constituition of 1988, and infraconstitutional legislation in order to provoke debate and criticism about the principle of cooperation adopted as a paradigm and the capabilities that the state has and what it is, in fact, an efficient management public. It is in the growth of the state, and not a decrease as a minimal state, which aims to discuss its role in promoting the collective interests, and it is therefore essential, as an institution able to intervene on citizens in the search for socially relevant results. Study Federalism and Development on the premise of public consortia and administrative efficiency requires study the course of history as the formation of the Brazilian State, in particular the fact that he is in joint effort between federal agencies - federal, state and municipal - in order to better review the relations established in this plan, in what concerns directly on the issue of division of powers, especially the common or competitors and the subject of the highest relevance for the implementation of an effective federal pact. Finally, the objective of this Work is not only particularize the institute of public consortia, it is intended to demonstrate the deviousness of the concept of efficiency and the division of powers of federal agencies and the constitutional contribution of the institute as a program that should be put in a tone of debate, adequacy of the practice and the law itself / Tendo como ponto de partida o Federalismo Cl?ssico e a Teoria do Desenvolvimento, este Trabalho pretende apresentar algumas ideias vinculadas acerca da coopera??o entre os entes federativos e suas rela??es intergovernamentais tendo como foco principal a regula??o por meio dos Cons?rcios P?blicos visando a Efici?ncia Administrativa como Princ?pio Constitucional da Atividade Administrativa, face ao disposto na atual Constitui??o Federal de 1988, e na Legisla??o Infraconstitucional no intuito de provocar debates e cr?ticas a respeito do princ?pio da coopera??o adotado como paradigma e das capacidades que o Estado possui e do que seja, de fato, uma eficiente gest?o p?blica. ? no crescimento do Estado, e n?o em sua diminui??o enquanto Estado m?nimo, que visa discutir o seu papel na promo??o dos interesses coletivos, sendo, pois indispens?vel, enquanto institui??o apta a intervir sobre os cidad?os na busca de resultados socialmente relevantes. Estudar o Federalismo e o Desenvolvimento na premissa dos cons?rcios p?blicos e da efici?ncia administrativa pressup?e estudar o percurso hist?rico de como foi a forma??o do Estado Brasileiro, em especial o fato de que ele se constitui em uni?o de esfor?os entre entes federados Uni?o, Estados e Munic?pios - no intuito de melhor rever as rela??es estabelecidas nesse plano, o que toca diretamente sobre o tema da reparti??o de compet?ncias, em especial as comuns ou concorrentes, sendo tema da mais alta relev?ncia para a implementa??o de um efetivo pacto federativo. Enfim, o objetivo deste Trabalho n?o ? apenas particularizar o instituto dos cons?rcios p?blicos, pretende-se demonstrar a sinuosidade da no??o de efici?ncia e a reparti??o de compet?ncias dos entes federativos e o aporte constitucional do instituto como programa que deveria ser posto, em tom de debate, de adequa??o da parte pr?tica e da pr?pria lei

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-04-01T19:19:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 WagnerLuizAlvesDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 7206458 bytes, checksum: 4db11258f6d8ec7eb29bea48116b52ff (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-04-06T20:27:28Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 WagnerLuizAlvesDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 7206458 bytes, checksum: 4db11258f6d8ec7eb29bea48116b52ff (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-06T20:27:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WagnerLuizAlvesDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 7206458 bytes, checksum: 4db11258f6d8ec7eb29bea48116b52ff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-26 / A problem?tica dos res?duos s?lidos que envolve a gest?o, o gerenciamento e a destina??o desses ? uma quest?o que permeia todas as esferas da sociedade, o qual denota implica??es ambientais que contribuem para o debate da crise ambiental em curso. Nessa perspectiva, esse estudo tem por objetivo investigar e conhecer o papel que os cons?rcios, em especial o Cons?rcio P?blico Regional de Res?duos S?lidos do Serid?/RN, t?m na gest?o dos res?duos, com o prop?sito de observar suas fortalezas e debilidades, com o intuito de concluir se estes s?o uma solu??o adequada para a problem?tica dos res?duos s?lidos. Ao estudarmos uma regi?o que est? passando por um processo de organiza??o institucional pautada nos res?duos s?lidos, o foco transformou-se em um ponto de investiga??o acad?mica interessante. Se tratando de uma pesquisa qualitativa, foram realizadas leituras de autores pertinentes ao objeto e dos seguintes marcos legais, a saber: a Pol?tica Nacional de Saneamento B?sico (Lei n? 11.445/2007), a Pol?tica Nacional de Res?duos S?lidos (Lei n? 12.305/2010) e a Lei de Cons?rcios P?blicos (Lei n? 11.107/2005). A regi?o consorciada possui cerca de 290.000 habitantes, sendo geradas 40.000 toneladas de res?duos ao ano. Quanto ? destina??o final dos res?duos, todos os munic?pios da regi?o depositam seus res?duos a c?u aberto, ou seja, em lix?es. Na an?lise sobre o Cons?rcio do Serid?, foi identificado um rol de quest?es que est?o dificultando a sua implementa??o. As demandas passam, principalmente, pela esfera pol?tica, mas tamb?m por aspectos financeiros, t?cnicos e log?sticos. Espera-se que, com a efetiva??o do Cons?rcio atrav?s da constru??o das suas estruturas de apoio (Esta??es de transbordo e Aterro Sanit?rio), um novo modelo de gest?o dos res?duos s?lidos seja implantado. / The problem of solid waste that involves the management, the management and the allocation of these is an issue that permeates all spheres of society, which denotes environmental implications that contribute to the discussion of the environmental crisis in progress. From this perspective, this study aims to investigate and understand the role that consortia, especially the Regional Public Waste Consortium Solid Serid?/RN have waste management, in order to observe their strengths and weaknesses in order to conclude whether they are an appropriate solution to the problem of solid waste. In studying a region that is undergoing a process of institutional organization guided in the solid waste, the focus turned into an interesting academic research point. Since this is a qualitative research, readings were taken of relevant authors to the object and the following legal frameworks, namely: the National Basic Sanitation Policy (Law n? 11.445/2007), the National Policy on Solid Waste (Law n? 12.305/2010 ) and the Law on Public Consortia (Law n? 11.107/2005). The consortium region has about 290.000 inhabitants, generated 40.000 tons of waste a year. As for the final disposal of waste, all municipalities in the region deposit their waste in the open, or in garbage dumps. In the analysis of the Consortium Serid?, a list of issues that are hindering their implementation has been identified. The demands come mainly from the political sphere, but also financial, technical and logistical. It is expected that with the realization of the Consortium by building its supporting structures (overfill Station and Landfill), a new model of solid waste management is implemented.