Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-11-01T22:16:10Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JairoJoseDosSantosJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 922115 bytes, checksum: 6c026846783e4a641b3768333bb46c44 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-11-13T20:51:01Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JairoJoseDosSantosJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 922115 bytes, checksum: 6c026846783e4a641b3768333bb46c44 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-13T20:51:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JairoJoseDosSantosJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 922115 bytes, checksum: 6c026846783e4a641b3768333bb46c44 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-05-26 / O fen?meno bullying constitui-se como uma forma de agress?o interpessoal que j? h? algum tempo se tornou bastante reconhecida, debatida e problematizada por diversos estudiosos ou pelos meios de comunica??o, devido principalmente ? explos?o global de massacres escolares, cuja autoria, na maioria das vezes, est? atribu?da a ex-alunos que outrora foram v?timas desta forma de intimida??o. Na tentativa de compreender e apontar solu??es para esta quest?o, diversos estudos e pesquisas acad?micas emergiram primordialmente na d?cada de 1980, tentando desde ent?o estabelecer contornos precisos em torno da defini??o desta forma de agress?o. A maioria destas interpreta??es e estudos se filia ao paradigma interpretativo proposto na d?cada de 1980 pelo pesquisador sueco Dan Olweus (1978), pioneiro mundial e principal refer?ncia nos estudos sobre o tema bullying. O presente trabalho de disserta??o problematiza este enfoque tradicional supracitado e debate sobre a necessidade de se romper com este monop?lio interpretativo produzido, permitindo assim que outros saberes cient?ficos possam adentrar na discuss?o deste tema e produzir novas maneiras de compreens?o sobre o assunto. Desta forma, constitui-se como objetivo geral desta pesquisa problematizar criticamente o discurso hegem?nico que celebra a quest?o do bullying e que anuncia suas ?verdades? como se fossem as ?nicas poss?veis e necess?rias a serem aceitas. Al?m disto, ? miss?o deste estudo apresentar um contraponto sociol?gico de intepreta??o que ofere?a uma nova perspectiva de compreens?o do assunto, agora sob o enfoque de tem?ticas espec?ficas, tais como a de g?nero; a da produ??o do discurso; e a da ideologia na cultura. Para tanto, esta pesquisa recorre metodologicamente ? teoria construcionista cr?tica e seu conjunto de postulados que apontam a constru??o social da realidade humana a partir da ideologia e da cultura, de modo que esta mesma realidade pode ser oportunamente desconstru?da pela mesma a??o humana. Contando com entrevistas junto a v?timas de bullying e com uma revis?o de literatura comparativa entre as ideias de autores provenientes do enfoque tradicional e aqueles que comungam do pensamento construcionista cr?tico, esta disserta??o almeja abrir espa?o para que, na posteridade, ?reas de conhecimento cient?fico distintas do paradigma tradicional de interpreta??o do fen?meno possam se inserir nos debates e problematiza??es acerca da quest?o e consequentemente produzir novos olhares que pluralizem o entendimento desta forma de intimida??o. / The bullying phenomenon constitutes a form of interpersonal aggression that for some time has become well-known, debated and problematized by several scholars or the media, mainly due to the global explosion of school massacres, whose authorship, for the most part, is attributed to former students who were once victims of this form of intimidation. In an attempt to understand and point solutions to this question, several studies and academic research emerged primarily in the 1980s, trying to establish precise contours around the definition of this form of aggression. Most of these interpretations and studies are based on the interpretive paradigm proposed in the 1980s by the Swedish researcher Dan Olweus (1978), a world pioneer and main reference in studies on the subject of bullying. This dissertation deals with this traditional approach and discusses the need to break with this interpretive monopoly produced, thus allowing other scientific knowledge to enter into the discussion of this topic and to produce new ways of understanding about the subject. Thus, it is a general objective of this research to critically problematize the hegemonic discourse that celebrates the issue of bullying and that announces its "truths" as if they were the only ones possible and necessary to be accepted. In addition, it is the mission of this research to present a sociological counterpoint of interpretation that offers a new perspective of understanding the subject, now under the focus of specific themes, such as gender, discourse and ideology production in culture. To do so, this research methodologically refers to the critical constructionist theory and its set of postulates that point to the social construction of human reality from ideology and culture, so that this reality can be timely deconstructed by the same human action. Counting on interviews with victims of bullying and a comparative literature review between the ideas of authors coming from the traditional approach and from those who share critical constructional thinking, this dissertation aims to open space so that, in posterity, areas of scientific knowledge distinct from the paradigm Traditional interpretation of the phenomenon can be inserted in the debates and problematizations about the issue and, consequently, produce new looks that pluralize the understanding of this form of intimidation.