Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-03-12T15:13:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoPauloOckeDeFreitas_DISSERT.pdf: 1214376 bytes, checksum: 0ed23f23ec672b0e19cc290f912f1e9a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-03-15T14:56:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoPauloOckeDeFreitas_DISSERT.pdf: 1214376 bytes, checksum: 0ed23f23ec672b0e19cc290f912f1e9a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-15T14:56:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoPauloOckeDeFreitas_DISSERT.pdf: 1214376 bytes, checksum: 0ed23f23ec672b0e19cc290f912f1e9a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-08 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / O objetivo da presente Disserta??o de Mestrado ? analisar o presidencialismo tendo em vista a promo??o de estabilidade ou de instabilidade no processo decis?rio ou na implementa??o da agenda pol?tica. A discuss?o em torno das pesquisas desenvolvidas sobre o presidencialismo de coaliz?o e dos principais argumentos concernentes a esse tema ? confrontada com os progressos sociais e econ?micos verificados ap?s a promulga??o da Constitui??o de 1988. Esses relevantes avan?os sociais e econ?micos s?o uma express?o do contrato social da redemocratiza??o, cujo termo inicial foi estabelecido pela Constitui??o de 1988 e incrementado, com maior ou menor ?nfase, desde ent?o, pelos governos, com base nas regras do conjunto das institui??es sociais, pol?ticas e econ?micas. Os avan?os alcan?ados no contexto do presidencialismo de coaliz?o n?o ocorreram sem que barreiras de natureza ideol?gica, legal e pol?tica tivessem que ser superadas. Entre tais obst?culos destacam-se as pr?ticas patrimonialistas, de longa tradi??o no Brasil. O patrimonialismo ? um conceito que mant?m a sua for?a, validade e efic?cia operacional e, por isso, pode ser contemporaneamente confrontado com o potencial de governabilidade sob o presidencialismo de coaliz?o. Disso decorre que as institui??es pol?ticas e econ?micas podem ser analisadas sob a perspectiva do patrimonialismo como ponto de partida para a determina??o do grau de inclus?o social que essas mesmas institui??es s?o capazes de promover. Esta pesquisa adota a perspectiva do desenho institucional do presidencialismo de coaliz?o, notadamente do processo decis?rio e n?o apenas a do seu arcabou?o formal e legal e confronta a mec?nica do presidencialismo de coaliz?o com o processo de impeachment da presidente Dilma Rousseff. N?o ? poss?vel afirmar que o presidencialismo de coaliz?o degrade a democracia e que contribua para a depreda??o da cidadania por parte dos agentes p?blicos e privados. O presidencialismo de coaliz?o promove o compartilhamento de poder entre o Executivo, o Legislativo, os demais ?rg?os pol?ticos e a sociedade civil organizada, admite a atua??o mediadora do Poder Judici?rio, viabiliza mecanismos para evitar o arb?trio do Executivo e ? dotado de mecanismos capazes de gerar condi??es para o incremento do contrato social da redemocratiza??o e para o aprimoramento das institui??es pol?ticas e econ?micas inclusivas. / The purpose of this Dissertation is to analyze coalitional presidentialism in view of to promoting stability or instability in the decision-making process or in the implementation of the political agenda. The discussion around the research on coalitional presidentialism and the main arguments concerning this issue is confronted with the social and economic progress made after the promulgation of the Constitution of 1988. These important social and economic advances are an expression of the social contract of redemocratization, whose initial term was established by the 1988 Constitution and increased, with greater or less emphasis, by governments, based on the rules of the set of social, political and economic institutions. The advances achieved in the context of coalitional presidentialism did not occur without ideological, legal and political barriers having to be overcome. Among these obstacles stand out patrimonialist practices, with a long tradition in Brazil. Patrimonialism is a concept that maintains its strength, validity and operational effectiveness and, therefore, can be contemporaneously confronted with the potential for governance under the coalitional presidentialism. From this it follows that political and economic institutions can be analyzed from the perspective of patrimonialism as a starting point for determining the degree of social inclusion that these same institutions can promote. This research considers the institutional design perspective of coalitional presidentialism, notably the decision-making process and not only its formal and legal framework, and confronts the mechanics of coalitional presidentialism with the impeachment process of President Dilma Rousseff. The governance category is instrumentalized to analyze how the Executive, the Legislative and the parties are constituted as decisive political actors in the process of forming the coalition and exerting influence in the political arena. It is not possible to say that coalitional presidentialism degrades democracy and contributes to the depredation of citizenship by public and private actors. Coalitional presidentialism promotes the sharing of power between the Executive, the Legislative, other political bodies and organized civil society, admits the mediating role of the Judiciary, makes possible mechanisms to avoid the dominance of the Executive and is endowed with mechanisms capable of generating conditions for the increase of the contract social of redemocratization and for the improvement of inclusive political and economic institutions.