Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-03-12T15:13:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoPauloOckeDeFreitas_DISSERT.pdf: 1214376 bytes, checksum: 0ed23f23ec672b0e19cc290f912f1e9a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-03-15T14:56:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoPauloOckeDeFreitas_DISSERT.pdf: 1214376 bytes, checksum: 0ed23f23ec672b0e19cc290f912f1e9a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-15T14:56:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoPauloOckeDeFreitas_DISSERT.pdf: 1214376 bytes, checksum: 0ed23f23ec672b0e19cc290f912f1e9a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-08 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / O objetivo da presente Disserta??o de Mestrado ? analisar o presidencialismo tendo em vista a promo??o de estabilidade ou de instabilidade no processo decis?rio ou na implementa??o da agenda pol?tica. A discuss?o em torno das pesquisas desenvolvidas sobre o presidencialismo de coaliz?o e dos principais argumentos concernentes a esse tema ? confrontada com os progressos sociais e econ?micos verificados ap?s a promulga??o da Constitui??o de 1988. Esses relevantes avan?os sociais e econ?micos s?o uma express?o do contrato social da redemocratiza??o, cujo termo inicial foi estabelecido pela Constitui??o de 1988 e incrementado, com maior ou menor ?nfase, desde ent?o, pelos governos, com base nas regras do conjunto das institui??es sociais, pol?ticas e econ?micas. Os avan?os alcan?ados no contexto do presidencialismo de coaliz?o n?o ocorreram sem que barreiras de natureza ideol?gica, legal e pol?tica tivessem que ser superadas. Entre tais obst?culos destacam-se as pr?ticas patrimonialistas, de longa tradi??o no Brasil. O patrimonialismo ? um conceito que mant?m a sua for?a, validade e efic?cia operacional e, por isso, pode ser contemporaneamente confrontado com o potencial de governabilidade sob o presidencialismo de coaliz?o. Disso decorre que as institui??es pol?ticas e econ?micas podem ser analisadas sob a perspectiva do patrimonialismo como ponto de partida para a determina??o do grau de inclus?o social que essas mesmas institui??es s?o capazes de promover. Esta pesquisa adota a perspectiva do desenho institucional do presidencialismo de coaliz?o, notadamente do processo decis?rio e n?o apenas a do seu arcabou?o formal e legal e confronta a mec?nica do presidencialismo de coaliz?o com o processo de impeachment da presidente Dilma Rousseff. N?o ? poss?vel afirmar que o presidencialismo de coaliz?o degrade a democracia e que contribua para a depreda??o da cidadania por parte dos agentes p?blicos e privados. O presidencialismo de coaliz?o promove o compartilhamento de poder entre o Executivo, o Legislativo, os demais ?rg?os pol?ticos e a sociedade civil organizada, admite a atua??o mediadora do Poder Judici?rio, viabiliza mecanismos para evitar o arb?trio do Executivo e ? dotado de mecanismos capazes de gerar condi??es para o incremento do contrato social da redemocratiza??o e para o aprimoramento das institui??es pol?ticas e econ?micas inclusivas. / The purpose of this Dissertation is to analyze coalitional presidentialism in view of to promoting stability or instability in the decision-making process or in the implementation of the political agenda. The discussion around the research on coalitional presidentialism and the main arguments concerning this issue is confronted with the social and economic progress made after the promulgation of the Constitution of 1988. These important social and economic advances are an expression of the social contract of redemocratization, whose initial term was established by the 1988 Constitution and increased, with greater or less emphasis, by governments, based on the rules of the set of social, political and economic institutions. The advances achieved in the context of coalitional presidentialism did not occur without ideological, legal and political barriers having to be overcome. Among these obstacles stand out patrimonialist practices, with a long tradition in Brazil. Patrimonialism is a concept that maintains its strength, validity and operational effectiveness and, therefore, can be contemporaneously confronted with the potential for governance under the coalitional presidentialism. From this it follows that political and economic institutions can be analyzed from the perspective of patrimonialism as a starting point for determining the degree of social inclusion that these same institutions can promote. This research considers the institutional design perspective of coalitional presidentialism, notably the decision-making process and not only its formal and legal framework, and confronts the mechanics of coalitional presidentialism with the impeachment process of President Dilma Rousseff. The governance category is instrumentalized to analyze how the Executive, the Legislative and the parties are constituted as decisive political actors in the process of forming the coalition and exerting influence in the political arena. It is not possible to say that coalitional presidentialism degrades democracy and contributes to the depredation of citizenship by public and private actors. Coalitional presidentialism promotes the sharing of power between the Executive, the Legislative, other political bodies and organized civil society, admits the mediating role of the Judiciary, makes possible mechanisms to avoid the dominance of the Executive and is endowed with mechanisms capable of generating conditions for the increase of the contract social of redemocratization and for the improvement of inclusive political and economic institutions.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T13:51:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoMRN_DISSERT.pdf: 3197339 bytes, checksum: 8679305ed89e4c7f00dd0dbd6382c8b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-07-18 / Public policies have been studied in the various fields of humanities and social sciences, from different theoretical and technical aspects. However, there is still a lack of studies that incorporate the dimension that encompasses the political action and its interference in such actions, also recognizing the importance of the institutional setting of the Brazilian presidential model in implementing these policies. This fragmented and multiparty system has led to power heterogeneous sets of political parties. Thus, the ministerial offices, more than assisting the President?s government project, manage particularized agendas, which are party biased and have the influence of interest groups in hegemonic themes addressed by government agencies. When these agendas operate in sectoral and specialized policies, the friction level is apparently low. However, when this occurs in intersectoral actions, such as in regional development, there is evidence of strong signs of competition among government agencies, which in theory, should operate in an integrated manner. Although this is not a specific feature of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva?s government- the period to be studied- there was similar behavior in Fernando Henrique Cardoso?s presidency, one realizes that the expansion of coalition on behalf of governance is increasingly interfering in the outcome of intersectoral public policies, due to these multiple arguments in action. In order to understand these processes, this study focused on the Sustainable and Integrated Development Programme for Differentiated Meso-Regions (PROMESO), part of the National Policy for Regional Development (NPRD). The program provides interface with various government agencies and their public policies in a clear intersectoral design. The research sought to identify and analyze the relationships between government agencies and their programs with interest groups, whether political parties or other segments of civil society, highlighting the logic of favoritism, which poses in second place the integration of actions in the intersectoral policies. Therefore, besides the theoretical debate that incorporates several categories of political science, public administration, public policy, geography and economics, the study focused on secondary sources, using different government agencies databases in order to raise information. It was observed that the interference of partisan politics has been disastrous for some public policies. Thus, the research confirms that cooperative character is fragile within government agencies, often limited to official documents, and that there is indeed, a striking feature of competition, especially when it comes to transversalized policies / As pol?ticas p?blicas t?m sido estudadas em diversas ?reas das ci?ncias humanas e sociais, a partir de diferentes aspectos te?ricos e t?cnicos. No entanto, ainda h? car?ncia de estudos que incorporem a dimens?o do exerc?cio da pol?tica e suas interfer?ncias em tais a??es, reconhecendo inclusive a import?ncia da arquitetura institucional do modelo presidencialista brasileiro na implementa??o dessas pol?ticas. Esse sistema multipartid?rio e fragmentado tem levado ao poder conjuntos heterog?neos de partidos pol?ticos. Dessa forma, os gabinetes ministeriais, mais do que auxiliarem o projeto de governo do presidente da Rep?blica, passam a operar agendas particularizadas, que possuem marcas partid?rias e influ?ncia de grupos de interesse hegem?nicos nos temas tratados pelas ag?ncias governamentais. Quando estas agendas operam em pol?ticas setoriais e especializadas, o n?vel de atrito aparentemente ? baixo. Por?m, quando isto ocorre em a??es intersetoriais, a exemplo do desenvolvimento regional, evidenciam-se fortes tra?os de competi??o entre ag?ncias governamentais, que em tese deveriam operar de forma integrada. Embora este n?o seja um tra?o especifico do governo de Luiz In?cio Lula da Silva o per?odo que ser? estudado , encontrando-se comportamentos similares na presid?ncia de Fernando Henrique Cardoso, percebe-se que a amplia??o da coaliz?o em nome da governabilidade vem interferindo cada vez mais no resultado das pol?ticas p?blicas intersetoriais, em virtude destas m?ltiplas l?gicas que se manifestam. Para se entender estes processos, elegeu-se como foco do estudo o Programa de Desenvolvimento Integrado e Sustent?vel de Mesorregi?es Diferenciadas (PROMESO), parte da Pol?tica Nacional de Desenvolvimento Regional (PNDR). O programa estabelece interfaces com diversas ag?ncias governamentais e suas pol?ticas p?blicas em um claro desenho intersetorial. A pesquisa buscou identificar e analisar as rela??es das ag?ncias governamentais e seus programas com grupos de interesse, fossem eles partidos pol?ticos ou outros segmentos da sociedade civil, evidenciando as l?gicas de favorecimento, que secundarizam a integra??o de a??es nas pol?ticas intersetoriais. Para tanto, al?m do debate te?rico que incorpora categorias diversas da ci?ncia pol?tica, da administra??o p?blica, das pol?ticas p?blicas, da geografia e da economia, o estudo debru?ou-se sobre fontes secund?rias, utilizando bases de dados das diferentes ag?ncias governamentais, com a finalidade de levantar informa??es. Evidenciou-se que a interfer?ncia da pol?tica partid?ria tem sido um aspecto nefasto para algumas pol?ticas p?blicas. Assim, a pesquisa confirma que ? t?nue o car?ter cooperativo no ?mbito das ag?ncias governamentais, muitas vezes limitado aos documentos oficiais, e que de fato h? um tra?o marcante de competi??o, sobretudo quando se fala em pol?ticas transversalizadas