Spelling suggestions: "subject:"credit pronaf B"" "subject:"credit coronaf B""
1 |
Institui??es, agricultura familiar e cr?dito rural: avalia??o de resultados do Pronaf B nos territ?rios rurais do Rio Grande do NorteHolanda, Gilderlanio Alves 30 March 2010 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:34:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
HolandaGA_DISSERT.pdf: 4497929 bytes, checksum: eedce2b2b6ca0bd1adad00d5a32f2d36 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-03-30 / Cooperativa dos Trabalhadores Aut?nomos / Broadly anchored on Institutionalist literature this dissertation seeks to answer: Why rural credit granted to farming families in Rio Grande do Norte, Pronaf group B, has shown positive results in some territories while in others the same results are insatisfactory? Considering formal rules are the same, then why such results are so distinguished? This research supports the fact that these results are a direct consequence of the quality of institutions defined as longstanding social rules established and built in social interactions. For institutions one understands; organizational structures, formal and non-formal rules, social trust, thinking behaviors and its evolution as well as routines. Using Pronaf Rural Credit as a background this study measures and compares results obtained in the rural areas of Serid?, Sert?o do Apodi, Mato Grande, Ass?-Mossor?, Trairi, Potengi and Alto Oeste. The dimensions of measurement considered were: economics, social and guarantee of transparency. The study considers a sample of 402 Group B farming families. It also elaborates a socio-economic profile of these families in the considered areas and underlines the main causes for defaulted loans, difficulties to improve family income and results of access to Pronaf B credit line, as well as it proposes solutions to surpass obstacles to improve the efficiency of this credit line / A partir de ampla revis?o da literatura institucionalista, o trabalho procura responder as perguntas de pesquisa: Por que o cr?dito rural Pronaf grupo B apresenta bons resultados junto aos agricultores familiares em alguns territ?rios rurais do Rio Grande do Norte e em outros n?o? As regras formais s?o iguais, ent?o por que os resultados s?o diferentes? A pesquisa sustenta que esses resultados derivam da qualidade das institui??es, definidas como sistemas duradouros de regras sociais estabelecidas e embutidas que estruturam as intera??es sociais. Estruturas organizacionais, regras formais e informais, confian?a social, h?bitos de pensamento e sua evolu??o, rotinas s?o todas institui??o. Tendo como pano de fundo o cr?dito rural Pronaf, a disserta??o avalia e compara os resultados do Pronaf B nos territ?rios rurais Serid?, Sert?o do Apodi, Mato Grande, Ass?-Mossor?, Trair?, Potengi e Alto Oeste, atrav?s de indicadores referentes ?s dimens?es - econ?mica, garantia de transpar?ncia e social -, elaboradas a partir de uma amostra de 402 agricultores familiares do grupo B. Por sua vez, tra?a o perfil socioecon?mico desses agricultores no conjunto desses territ?rios rurais. Al?m disso, o estudo aponta as principais causas da inadimpl?ncia, dificuldades para melhorar a renda e resultados do acesso ao cr?dito. Finalmente, com base na an?lise do cr?dito Pronaf B, a pesquisa apresenta propostas para superar obst?culos para melhorar a efici?ncia dessa linha de cr?dito
|
Page generated in 0.0436 seconds