Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:34:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FabioHVR_DISSERT.pdf: 1736315 bytes, checksum: 4dc3a2eac30fed1c52fec8dc075fa7d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-12-11 / Analyzes the development experience in the Territories of Mato Grande and Sert?o do Apodi in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, evaluating the actions of the National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture, specifically the line of infrastructure (PRONAF-INFRA), and the National Program for Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT) in these territories. Summarizes the various rural development approaches and takes the theoretical assumptions of territorial development, the concept of constructed territory and market-plan territory, further the cycle model to analyze public policies selected these experiences. Thus, we propose to test the hypothesis that most of the actions implemented would lead to the formation of market-plan territories, in other words, perceived only as a platform for the presentation of projects. The literature and documents, combined with case studies, interviews and direct observation of the meetings of committees, showed that, despite two boards are under the same laws, rules and formal regulations, have clear differences when considering the theory and concepts that were used as reference. The Apodi s territory is closer to a constructed space thus the search for a broader agenda, more autonomous and more appropriate to the reality experienced by local actors. On other hand the Territory of Mato Grande had the characteristics of a market-plan territory more present. As the result, the territory of Sert?o do Apodi accesses not only as part of a greater number of policies and funding sources, ensuring a greater and more diverse investment volume than the territory of Mato Grande. Despite these differences, studies have shown that territorial boards surveyed are still far from becoming the main forum for managing the development from conception planning socially constructed. Showed, finally, that territorial development strategy is relevant, but requires a long walk and a deep and continuous learning process to be successfully implemented in rural areas of Northeast Brazil / Analisa a experi?ncia de desenvolvimento nos Territ?rios do Mato Grande e Sert?o do Apodi, no estado do Rio Grande do Norte, e avalia as a??es do Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar Linha Infraestrutura (PRONAF-INFRA) e Programa Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustent?vel dos Territ?rios Rurais (PRONAT) nesses territ?rios. Apresenta uma s?ntese das diversas abordagens desenvolvimento rural e toma os pressupostos te?ricos do desenvolvimento territorial, o conceito de territ?rio constru?do e territ?rio mercadejado, e o modelo do ciclo de pol?ticas p?blicas para analisar as experi?ncias selecionadas. Deste modo, prop?e testar a hip?tese de que a maior parte das a??es implementadas levariam ? constitui??o de territ?rios mercadejados, ou seja, percebidos apenas como plataformas para apresenta??o de projetos. As pesquisas bibliogr?fica e documental, combinadas com estudos de caso, entrevistas e observa??o direta das reuni?es dos colegiados, evidenciaram que, apesar dos dois colegiados estarem regidos pelas mesmas legisla??es, normas e regulamentos formais, possuem claras diferen?as quando se considera os pressupostos te?ricos e os conceitos que foram tomados como refer?ncia. O Territ?rio do Apodi est? mais pr?ximo de um espa?o constru?do e da busca de uma agenda mais ampla, mais aut?noma e mais adequada a realidade vivenciada pelos atores locais, do que o Territ?rio do Mato Grande, onde as caracter?sticas de um territ?rio mercadejado est?o mais presentes. Como consequ?ncia o Sert?o do Apodi n?o s? acessa como integra um maior n?mero de pol?ticas e de fontes de financiamento, garantindo um maior e mais diversificado volume de investimento do que o Mato Grande. Apesar dessas diferen?as, os estudos realizados mostraram que os colegiados territoriais pesquisados ainda est?o longe de se transformarem em f?runs privilegiados que gerem o desenvolvimento a partir da concep??o do territ?rio constru?do socialmente. Mostraram, finalmente, que estrat?gia de desenvolvimento territorial ? relevante, mas requer uma longa caminhada e um profundo e cont?nuo processo de aprendizagem para ser implementada com sucesso nos territ?rios rurais do Nordeste brasileiro

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:34:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 HolandaGA_DISSERT.pdf: 4497929 bytes, checksum: eedce2b2b6ca0bd1adad00d5a32f2d36 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-03-30 / Cooperativa dos Trabalhadores Aut?nomos / Broadly anchored on Institutionalist literature this dissertation seeks to answer: Why rural credit granted to farming families in Rio Grande do Norte, Pronaf group B, has shown positive results in some territories while in others the same results are insatisfactory? Considering formal rules are the same, then why such results are so distinguished? This research supports the fact that these results are a direct consequence of the quality of institutions defined as longstanding social rules established and built in social interactions. For institutions one understands; organizational structures, formal and non-formal rules, social trust, thinking behaviors and its evolution as well as routines. Using Pronaf Rural Credit as a background this study measures and compares results obtained in the rural areas of Serid?, Sert?o do Apodi, Mato Grande, Ass?-Mossor?, Trairi, Potengi and Alto Oeste. The dimensions of measurement considered were: economics, social and guarantee of transparency. The study considers a sample of 402 Group B farming families. It also elaborates a socio-economic profile of these families in the considered areas and underlines the main causes for defaulted loans, difficulties to improve family income and results of access to Pronaf B credit line, as well as it proposes solutions to surpass obstacles to improve the efficiency of this credit line / A partir de ampla revis?o da literatura institucionalista, o trabalho procura responder as perguntas de pesquisa: Por que o cr?dito rural Pronaf grupo B apresenta bons resultados junto aos agricultores familiares em alguns territ?rios rurais do Rio Grande do Norte e em outros n?o? As regras formais s?o iguais, ent?o por que os resultados s?o diferentes? A pesquisa sustenta que esses resultados derivam da qualidade das institui??es, definidas como sistemas duradouros de regras sociais estabelecidas e embutidas que estruturam as intera??es sociais. Estruturas organizacionais, regras formais e informais, confian?a social, h?bitos de pensamento e sua evolu??o, rotinas s?o todas institui??o. Tendo como pano de fundo o cr?dito rural Pronaf, a disserta??o avalia e compara os resultados do Pronaf B nos territ?rios rurais Serid?, Sert?o do Apodi, Mato Grande, Ass?-Mossor?, Trair?, Potengi e Alto Oeste, atrav?s de indicadores referentes ?s dimens?es - econ?mica, garantia de transpar?ncia e social -, elaboradas a partir de uma amostra de 402 agricultores familiares do grupo B. Por sua vez, tra?a o perfil socioecon?mico desses agricultores no conjunto desses territ?rios rurais. Al?m disso, o estudo aponta as principais causas da inadimpl?ncia, dificuldades para melhorar a renda e resultados do acesso ao cr?dito. Finalmente, com base na an?lise do cr?dito Pronaf B, a pesquisa apresenta propostas para superar obst?culos para melhorar a efici?ncia dessa linha de cr?dito

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:13:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2009 - Ana Leticia Espolador Leitao.pdf: 5300508 bytes, checksum: 1102659f663ded52882d4f9e9657002e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-11-05 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / Although rights for the family farmers had been inserted in the 1988 Federal Constitution, what did contribute to the formulation of a public politics at this segment it was also the demand by the civilian society, through workers syndicates movements, small rural producers, joining the Agriculture Workers National Confederation (Contag), among other social movements. Adding to this, studies were performed jointly by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and by the National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (Incra) aiming at the making of a program that would benefit the family farming segment. The National Programme for the Strengthening of the Family Farming (Pronaf) presented itself as the first public policy nationally consolidated with such purpose. As a public politic in the making, one of its credit line, the one for infrastructure and services, does alter its range, going from municipal to territorial, entitled as National Programme for Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (Proinf). This range expansion has as one of its axioms the participation of the family farmers in the decisions processes. To better verify this change, it was elected the study of the case of the Capara? Territory in the state of Esp?rito Santo, where there had been conflict and attempt to the social concertation, above all the family farmers who were not previously Proinf participants. / N?o obstante os direitos para os agricultores familiares inseridos na Constitui??o Federal de 1988, o que propiciou a formula??o de uma pol?tica p?blica destinada para esse segmento foi tamb?m a reivindica??o da sociedade civil, por meio de movimentos sindicais de trabalhadores, pequenos produtores rurais, reunindo a Confedera??o Nacional dos Trabalhadores na Agricultura (Contag), entre outros movimentos sociais. Ademais, estudos foram realizados conjuntamente pela Organiza??o das Na??es Unidas para a Agricultura e a Alimenta??o (FAO) e pelo Instituto Nacional de Coloniza??o e Reforma Agr?ria (Incra) visando ? elabora??o de um programa que beneficiasse o segmento da agricultura familiar. O Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (Pronaf) se apresenta como a primeira pol?tica p?blica consolidada nacionalmente, com esse prop?sito. Como pol?tica p?blica em constru??o, uma de suas linhas de cr?dito, a de infraestrutura e servi?os, altera sua escala, passando de municipal para territorial, nomeando-se Programa Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustent?vel de Territ?rios Rurais (Proinf). Um dos preceitos dessa amplia??o de escala ? a participa??o de agricultores familiares na tomada de decis?es. Para melhor verificar essa mudan?a, foi escolhido o estudo de caso do Territ?rio Capara?, no Esp?rito Santo, onde houve conflito e busca pela concerta??o, envolvendo os atores sociais, sobretudo os agricultores familiares, que anteriormente n?o eram protagonistas do Proinf.