acase@tulane.edu

Le silencing transcriptionnel limite la transcription des gènes et des éléments transposables dont l’expression pourrait être délétère à la cellule. Il dépend d’une diversité de modifications de la chromatine comme la méthylation ADN ou les marques répressives des histones. De façon à mieux comprendre les mécanismes moléculaires à l’origine du silencing transcriptionnel, nous avons mené une approche de génétique directe à l’aide d’un transgène soumis au silencing dans la plante modèle Arabidopsis thaliana. Cette stratégie nous a permis d'isoler à la fois des mutants déficients pour le maintien du silencing transcriptionnel et des mutations qui empêchent la réactivation transcriptionnelle des éléments transposables en réponse à un stress thermique. Nous avons caractérisé les défauts provoqués par ces mutations en combinant des approches de biologie moléculaire, de cytologie et de génomique.Nous montrons ainsi que MED14, la sous-unité centrale du complexe Mediator, et UVH6, composant du complexe TFIIH, sont requis pour la transcription de l'hétérochromatine en stress thermique. MED14 stimule aussi la transcription de l'hétérochromatine en l'absence de stress, mais ne semble fonctionner qu'en présence de la méthylation ADN. En plus de cette fonction originale, nous identifions un nouveau rôle de MED14 dans le maintien de la méthylation ADN, possiblement via la voie de méthylation ADN dirigée par les petits ARN.Par ailleurs, nos résultats nous ont permis d’identifier le rôle des protéines MAIN et MAIL1, qui définissent une voie de silencing transcriptionnelle indépendante des voies connues jusqu'alors. De façon intéressante, MAIN et MAIL1 possèdent un domaine protéique partagé avec les éléments transposables, qui aurait successivement été capturé par les éléments transposables et leur hôte au cours de l’histoire évolutive des plantes à fleurs.Enfin, en isolant une nouvelle mutation du gène POL2A, nous confirmons le rôle de l’ADN polymérase epsilon dans le silencing transcriptionnel et caractérisons les propriétés chromatiniennes qui dépendent de POL2A. Nous montrons que les défauts de silencing des mutants pol2a corrèlent avec une désorganisation importante de l’hétérochromatine sans diminution drastique des marques qui y sont associées. Au contraire, nous détectons une hyperméthylation ADN prononcée dans le mutant, et explorons différentes hypothèses pour expliquer ce phénotype particulier. Nos données suggèrent que plusieurs mécanismes moléculaires sont à l’origine des défauts des mutants pol2a. Elles confirment le rôle prépondérant de la chromométhylase CMT3 dans la régulation de la méthylation ADN, et suggèrent qu’un stress réplicatif pourrait causer une hyperméthylation de l’ADN.Dans l’ensemble, ces travaux de thèse proposent des pistes de travail dont l’exploration pourrait permettre d’expliquer les effets des déficiences réplicatives dans le maintien du silencing transcriptionnel et de l’homéostasie de la méthylation ADN. Ils suggèrent en outre que MED14 a une fonction dédiée à la transcription de l’hétérochromatine qui pourrait stimuler le maintien de la méthylation ADN. / Transcriptional gene silencing hinders deleterious transcription of some genes and transposable elements. Silencing is maintained by numerous chromatin modifications such as DNA methylation and repressive histone marks. To better understand the molecular mechanisms of silencing, we conducted a forward genetic screen using a transgene reporter system targeted by transcriptional gene silencing in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We isolated a first type of mutants with diminished maintenance of silencing and a second category that displayed deficient release of transgene silencing upon heat stress. We then combined molecular, cytological and genomic methods to characterize the defects associated with these mutations.First, we show that the Mediator subunit MED14 and the TFIIH complex subunit UVH6 are required for heat-stress-induced release of silencing. We further show that MED14, but not UVH6, promotes transcriptional activation of transposable elements in mutant contexts where silencing is defective. Importantly, MED14 is only required when DNA methylation is not affected, suggesting that MED14 has a specialized function to promote transcription of heterochromatin. Furthermore, we show that MED14 promote DNA methylation at targets regulated by RNA-directed DNA methylation.Characterizing mutants from the first category, we unveil the contribution of the MAIN and MAIL1 proteins into transcriptional gene silencing, and show that they likely act through a pathway independent of known silencing factors. Interestingly, MAIN and MAIL1 bear a protein domain that is shared with transposable elements, and that has been captured by transposable elements and genes throughout the evolutionary history of flower plants.Additionally, we confirm the involvement of the DNA polymerase epsilon in transcriptional gene silencing by isolating a new mutation of the POL2A gene among mutants of the first category. We characterize the effects of the pol2a mutation on several heterochromatin properties, and show that the pol2a mutant retains high levels of heterochromatin marks despite having highly disorganized heterochromatin. We actually detect a strong elevation of DNA methylation in the pol2a mutant and explore different hypothesis to explain this unusual phenotype. We show that increased expression of the CMT3 chromomethylase is a likely cause, but that additional molecular mechanisms are probably involved. Further exploration suggests that constitutive replicative stress occurring in pol2a mutants could be an additional cause of DNA hypermethylation.To summarize, this work provide putative causes for DNA hypermethylation and silencing defects in a situation of replicative deficiency. Further investigation will be required to identify the molecular components involved in the mechanism. Our data further suggest that MED14 has a function dedicated to heterochromatin transcription that could promote DNA methylation maintenance.

Each cell division, the nuclear DNA must be replicated efficiently and with high accuracy to avoid mutations which can have an effect on cell function. There are three replicative DNA polymerases essential for the synthesis of DNA during replication in eukaryotic cells. DNA polymerase α (Pol α) synthesize short primers required for DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) and DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) to carry out the bulk synthesis. The role of Pol δ and Pol ε at the replication fork has been unclear. The aim of this thesis was to examine what role Pol ε has at the replication fork, compare the biochemical properties of Pol δ and Pol ε, and to study the function of the second largest and essential subunit of Pol ε, Dpb2. To identify where Pol ε replicates DNA in vivo, a strategy was taken where the active site of Pol ε was altered to create a mutator polymerase leaving a unique error-signature. A series of mutant pol ε proteins were purified and analyzed for enzyme activity and fidelity of DNA synthesis. Two mutants, M644F and M644G, exhibited an increased mutation rate and close to normal polymerase activity. One of these, the M644G gave rise to a specific increase of mismatch mutations resulting from T-dTMP mis-pairing during DNA synthesis in vitro. The M644G mutant was introduced in yeast strains carrying a reporter gene, URA3, on either side of an origin in different orientations. Mutations which inactivated the URA3 gene in the M644G mutant strains were analyzed. A strand specific signature was found demonstrating that Pol ε participates in the synthesis of the leading strand. Pol δ and Pol ε are both stimulated by the processivity clamp, PCNA, in in vitro replication assays. To clarify any differences they were challenged side by side in biochemical assays. Pol ε was found to require that single-stranded template (ssDNA) was entirely coated with RPA, whereas Pol δ was much less sensitive to uncoated ssDNA. The processivity of Pol δ was stimulated to a much higher degree by PCNA than of Pol ε. In presence of PCNA the processivity of Pol δ and Pol ε was comparable. In contrast, Pol ε was approximately four times slower than Pol δ when replicating a single-primed circular template in the presence of all accessory proteins and an excess of polymerase. The biochemical characterization of the system suggests that Pol ε and Pol δ are loaded onto the PCNA-primer-ternary complex by separate mechanisms. A model is proposed where the loading of Pol ε onto the leading strand is independent of the PCNA interaction motif which is required by enzymes acting on the lagging strand. The essential gene DPB2 encodes for the second largest subunit of Pol ε. We carried out a genetic screen in S.cerevisiae and isolated a lethal mutant allele of dpb2 (dpb2-200). When over-expressed together with the remaining three subunits of Polε, Pol2, Dpb3 and Dpb4, the dpb2-201 did not copurify. The biochemical property of Pol2/Dpb3/Dpb4 complex was compared with wild-type four-subunit Pol ε (Pol2/Dpb2/Dpb3/Dpb4) and a Pol2/Dpb2 complex in replication assays. The absence of Dpb2 in the complex did not significantly affect the specific activity or the processivity, but gave a slightly reduced efficiency in holoenzyme assays when compared to wild-type four-subunit Pol ε. We propose that Dpb2 is not essential for the enzyme activity of Pol ε.

In eukaryotes there are three DNA polymerases which are essential for the replication of chromosomal DNA: DNA polymerase alpha (Pol alpha), DNA polymerase delta (Pol delta) and DNA polymerase epsilon (Pol epsilon). In vitro studies of viral DNA replication showed that Pol alpha and Pol delta are sufficient for DNA replication on both leading and lagging DNA strands, thus leaving the function of Pol epsilon unknown. The low abundance and the reported protease sensitivity of Pol epsilon were holding back biochemical studies of the enzyme. The aim of this study was to characterize the structural and functional properties of eukaryotic Pol epsilon. We first developed a protocol for over-expression and purification of Pol epsilon from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pol epsilon consists of four subunits: Pol2 (catalytic subunit), Dpb2, Dpb3 and Dpb4. This four-subunit complex was purified to homogeneity by conventional chromatography and the subunit stoichiometry of purified Pol epsilon was estimated from colloidal coomassie-stained gels to be 1:1:1:1. The quaternary structure was determined by sedimentation velocity and gel filtration experiments. Molecular mass (371 kDa) was calculated from the experimentally determined Stokes radius (74.5 Å) and sedimentation coefficient (11.9 S) and was in good agreement with a theoretical molecular mass calculated for a heterotetramer (379 kDa). Analytical sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation experiments supported the proposed heterotetrameric structure of Pol epsilon. By cryo-electron microscopy and single-particle image analysis we determined the structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol epsilon to 20-Å resolution. The four-subunit complex was found to consist of a globular domain, comprising the Pol2 subunit, flexibly connected to an elongated domain, including Dpb2, Dpb3 and Dpb4 subunits. We found that Pol epsilon requires a minimal length of 40 base pairs of primer-template duplex to be processive. This length corresponds to the dimensions of the elongated domain. To characterize the fidelity by which Pol epsilon synthesizes DNA, we purified wild type and exonuclease-deficient Pol epsilon. Wild type Pol epsilon synthesizes DNA with a very high accuracy. Analysis of the exonuclease-deficient Pol epsilon showed that Pol epsilon proofreads more than 90% of the errors made by its polymerase activity. Exonuclease-deficient Pol epsilon was shown to have a specific spectrum of errors not seen in other DNA polymerases: a high proportion of transversions resulting from T-dTTP, T-dCTP and C-dTTP mispairs. This unique error specificity and amino acid sequence alignment suggest that the structure of the polymerase active site of Pol epsilon differs from those of other members of B family DNA polymerases. With recombinant proteins and circular single-stranded DNA templates, we partially reconstituted DNA replication in vitro, in which we challenged Pol epsilon and Pol delta in side-by-side comparisons regarding functional assays for polymerase activity and processivity, as well as physical interactions with nucleic acids and PCNA. We found that Pol epsilon activity and “on-DNA” PCNA interactions are dependent on RPA-coated template DNA. By the surface plasmon resonance technique, we showed that Pol epsilon has a high affinity for DNA and low affinity for immobilized PCNA. By contrast, Pol delta was found to have low affinity for DNA and high affinity for PCNA. We suggest that a possible function of RPA is to regulate down the DNA synthesis through Pol epsilon, and that the mechanism by which Pol epsilon and Pol delta load onto the template is different due to different properties of the interaction with DNA and PCNA.

To transfer the information in the genome from mother cell to daughter cell, the DNA replication must be carried out only once and with very high fidelity prior to every cell division. In yeast there are several different DNA polymerases involved in DNA replication and/or DNA repair. The two replicative DNA polymerases, DNA polymerase delta (Pol delta) and DNA polymerase epsilon (Pol epsilon), which both include a proofreading 3´→5´exonuclease activity, can replicate and proofread the genome with a very high degree of accuracy. The aim of this thesis was to gain a better understanding of how the enigmatic DNA polymerase epsilon participates in DNA transactions. To investigate whether Pol epsilon or Pol delta is responsible for the synthesis of DNA on the lagging strand, the processing and assembly of Okazaki fragments was studied. Pol delta was found to have a unique property called “idling” which, together with the flap-endonuclease (FEN1), maintained a ligatable nick for DNA ligase I. In contrast, Pol epsilon was found to lack the ability to “idle” and interact functionally with FEN-1, indicating that Pol epsilon is not involved in processing Okazaki fragments. Together with previous genetic studies, it was concluded that Pol delta is the preferred lagging strand polymerase, leaving Pol epsilon to carry out some other function. The structure of Pol epsilon was determined by cryo-electron microscopy, to a resolution of ~20 Å. Pol epsilon is composed of a globular “head” domain consisting of the large catalytic subunit Pol2p, and a “tail” domain, consisting of the small subunits Dpb2p, Dpb3p, and Dpb4p. The two separable domains were found to be connected by a flexible hinge. Interestingly, the high intrinsic processivity of Pol epsilon depends on the interaction between the tail domain and double-stranded DNA. As a replicative DNA polymerase, Pol epsilon encounters different lesions in DNA. It was shown that Pol epsilon can perform translesion synthesis (TLS) through a model abasic site in the absence of external processivity clamps under single-hit conditions. The lesion bypass was dependent of the sequence on the template and also on a proper interaction of the “tail”domain with the primer-template. Yeast cells treated with a DNA damaging agent and devoid of all TLS polymerases showed improved survival rates in the presence of elevated levels of dNTPs. These genetic results suggested that replicative polymerases may be engaged in the bypass of some DNA lesions. In vitro, Pol epsilon was found to bypass 8-OxoG at elevated dNTP levels. Together, the in vitro and in vivo results suggest that the replicative polymerases may be engaged in bypass of less bulky DNA lesions at elevated dNTP levels. In conclusion, the low-resolution structure presented represents the first structural characterization of a eukaryotic multi-subunit DNA polymerase. The replicative DNA polymerase Pol epsilon can perform translesion synthesis due to an interaction between the tail domain and double-stranded DNA. Pol epsilon may also bypass less bulky DNA lesions when there are elevated dNTP concentrations in vivo.

Mismatch repair corrects errors made during DNA replication and inactive mismatch repair is associated with Lynch Syndrome and sporadic cancer. Genome replication in eukaryotes is accompanied by chromatin formation. The first step in chromatin establishment is nucleosome assembly, that starts with histone tetramer deposition. It is not clear how three important cellular processes: genome replication, mismatch repair and nucleosome assembly are coordinated. Here we analyzed human mismatch repair in the presence of histone deposition in a reconstituted system. We showed that mismatch repair factor inhibits nucleosome assembly on the DNA region with the replicative error. Such a mechanism is important, since in this way DNA with errors remains accessible for mismatch repair system to perform the repair. The DNA synthesis step in mismatch repair is performed by DNA polymerase. Eukaryotes possess two major replicative DNA Polymerases: DNA Polymerase delta and DNA Polymerase epsilon. DNA polymerase delta is involved in mismatch repair. However, it was unknown whether DNA polymerase epsilon can also work in mismatch repair. Here we analyzed human mismatch repair with DNA Polymerase delta and DNA Polymerase epsilon in the environment of histone deposition. Our results indicated that repair activity with both polymerases was activated by histone deposition. Here it was first shown that human DNA Polymerase epsilon performs DNA synthesis during mismatch repair in vitro. Importantly, recent studies have revealed association of Polymerase epsilon mutations with cancer. Since our data showed activity of DNA Polymerase epsilon in mismatch repair, a possible tumor development mechanism may involve inactivation of mismatch repair due to Polymerase epsilon mutations. Overall, our study expanded the understanding of the mechanism of human mismatch repair in the chromatin environment.

Chez les plantes, les méristèmes ont la capacité de se diviser tout au long de la vie de la plante, qui peut dépasser 1000 ans pour certaines espèces. De plus, la lignée germinale n'est pas définie dès l'embryogenèse mais provient des cellules méristématiques et s’individualise relativement tard au cours du développement. Il est donc crucial que le cycle cellulaire soit finement régulé afin d'éviter une accumulation de mutations au cours de la croissance végétative et de la reproduction. Chez tous les eucaryotes, les protéines CDT1 sont impliquées dans l’initiation de la réplication de l'ADN en permettant la formation du complexe de pré-réplication et l'ouverture de la fourche de réplication avant le recrutement des ADN polymérases. Leur activité est strictement régulée afin que chaque partie du génome soit répliquée une fois et une seule au cours de la phase S. Le génome d’Arabidopsis thaliana code pour deux protéines homologues du facteur d’initiation de la réplication CDT1 (CDC10 Target1) : AtCDT1a et AtCDT1b. La sur-expression de CDT1a stimule la réplication de l’ADN et, chez Arabidopsis, cette protéine aurait une double fonction dans la régulation du cycle cellulaire et dans la division des plastes. Nous avons étudié ici les fonctions respectives de AtCDT1a et AtCDT1b. En utilisant des approches génétiques, nous avons montré que ces deux protéines jouent des rôles partiellement redondants pour maintenir l’intégrité du génome et permettre le développement des gamétophytes. De plus, en réalisant une approche de TAP (Tandem Affinity Purification), nous avons montré qu’elles interagissent avec l’ADN polymérase ε, une ADN polymérase réplicative, ouvrant de nouvelles perspectives de recherche concernant le rôle des protéines CDT1de plantes lors de la réplication de l'ADN. En parallèle, nous avons essayé d'élucider les spécificités de CDT1a et plus précisément de son extension N-terminale qui est absente de CDT1b. Nous avons constaté que ce domaine de CDT1a est requis pour son interaction avec l'ADN pol ε, et que les mutants cdt1a complémentés par une version tronquée de la protéine présentent une croissance considérablement réduite, un arrêt prématuré du méristème racinaire, et un stress de l'ADN constitutif, ce qui suggère que l’interaction CDT1a/pol ε est indispensable à la progression normale de la phase S. L’ensemble de nos résultats ont révélé de nouvelles fonctions pour les homologues de CDT1 de plantes. Une question importante sera de déterminer si celles-ci sont caractéristiques du cycle cellulaire chez les plantes, ou si nous avons identifié de nouveaux mécanismes qui sont conservés chez tous les eucaryotes. / In plants, meristems retain the ability to divide throughout the life cycle of plants, which can last for over 1000 years in some species. Furthermore, the germline is not laid down early during embryogenesis but originates from the meristematic cells relatively late during development. Thus, accurate cell cycle regulation is of utmost importance to avoid the accumulation of mutations during vegetative growth and reproduction. In all eukaryotes, CDT1 proteins are involved in the onset of DNA replication by allowing the formation of the pre-replication complex and subsequent opening of the replication fork. Their activity is strictly regulated to ensure faithful duplication of the genome during S-phase. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome encodes two homologs of the replication licensing factor CDT1 (CDC10 Target 1): AtCDT1a and AtCDT1b. Overexpression of CDT1a stimulates DNA replication, and this protein would have a function both in cell cycle regulation and plastid division.Here, we have investigated the respective roles of Arabidopsis CDT1a and CDT1b. Using genetic approaches, we have shown that the two proteins function partially redundantly to maintain genome integrity and allow gametophyte development. In addition, using Tandem Affinity Purification, we have shown that they interact with DNA pol ε, a replicative DNA polymerase, opening further research prospects regarding the role of plant CDT1 proteins during DNA replication. In parallel, we have tried to elucidate the specificities of CDT1a and more precisely of its N-terminal extension that is absent from CDT1b. We have found that this domain of CDT1a is required for its interaction with DNA pol ε, and that cdt1a mutants complemented with a truncated version of the protein show drastically reduced growth, premature meristem arrest, and constitutive DNA stress, suggesting that the CDT1a/pol ε interaction is indispensible to the normal progression of S-phase. Together, our results have unraveled new functions for plant CDT1 homologues, and one important aspect of future research will be to determine whether these are features of the plant cell cycle, or if we have identified new mechanisms that are conserved in all eukaryotes.