Homologous genetic recombination, because of its fundamental roles in the maintenance of genome stability and evolution, is an essential cellular function common to all organisms. This process also plays important roles in the repair of damaged DNA molecules, generation of genetic diversity and proper segregation of chromosomes. The genetic exchange is a highly orchestrated process that entails a plethora of control mechanisms and a large number of proteins, of which RecA and SSB are two proteins that have been chosen for further investigation(s) in the present study. In addition, we have also investigated the interaction between SSB and UvrD1, which plays an important role in DNA repair pathways, especially nucleotide excision repair (NER) and mismatch repair as well as DNA replication and recombination. Chapter 1 reviews the literature regarding various aspects of homologous recombination, with an emphasis on the biochemical and the biophysical aspects of RecA and SSB proteins. In addition, it provides an overview of the study of DNA repair and recombination in mycobacteria. RecA protein is ubiquitous and well conserved among bacterial species. Many archaeal species possess two RecA homologues (RadA and RadB) and eukarya possess multiple homologues of RecA including, Rad51, Rad51B, Rad51C, Rad51D, DMC1, XRCC2, or XRCC3. RecA or its homologues function as polymers, consisting of hundreds of monomers that cooperatively polymerize on single-stranded DNA to form a nucleoprotein filament. E. coli RecA protein participates in Trans Lesion Synthesis (TLS) of DNA and forms the minimal mutasome in association with DNA polymerase V (UmuD’2C). The fundamental mechanism underlying HR, i.e. DNA strand exchange, is one of the most fascinating examples of molecular recognition and exchange between biological macromolecules. Since the isolation of E. coli recA gene and the subsequent purification of its gene product and also from other organisms, RecA protein has been studied extensively for more than three decades. E. coli RecA protein has pivotal roles in DNA recombination and repair, and binding to DNA in the presence of ATP, is a fundamental property of RecA protein resulting in the formation of a nucleoprotein filament. This is the slow step of the HR process, and is considerably faster on ssDNA than on duplex DNA. Binding of RecA to dsDNA is slower at physiological pH, is accelerated at acidic pH, and the lag in binding at the higher pH values is due to slow nucleation. The ATP and the DNA binding functions of RecA display allosteric interaction such that ATP- binding leads to an increase in affinity to ssDNA-binding and vice-versa. X-ray structures of E. coli RecA complexed with nucleotide cofactors have implicated a highly conserved Gln196 in Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA in the coupling of ATP and the DNA binding domains. The carboxyamide group of Gln196 makes an H-bond with the γ-phosphate group of ATP and the side chain of this residue is observed to move by approximately 2Å towards the ATP, relative to the other residues involved in ATP binding. In addition, a highly conserved Arg198 has also been postulated to interact with the γ-phosphate group of bound ATP and position it for a nucleophilic attack by a conserved residue-Glu96 leading to ATP hydrolyses. To elucidate the role of Gln196 and Arg198 in the allosteric modulation of RecA functions, we generated MsRecA variant proteins, where in Gln196 was substituted with alanine, asparagine or glutamate; Arg198 was mutated to a lysine. The biochemical characterization of MsRecA and its variant proteins with the objective of defining the allosteric interaction between the ATP- and the DNA-binding sites has been described with in Chapter 2. We observed that while the mutant MsRecA proteins were proficient in ATP-binding they were deficient in ATP hydrolyses. We assayed for the ability of these proteins to bind ssDNA using either nitrocellulose filter binding or Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). While we did not detect any ssDNA-binding by the mutant MsRecA proteins in the filter binding assay, we observed only ten-fold reduction in the affinity for ssDNA as compared to wild type MsRecA protein in MsRecAQ196A, Q196N and R198K in the SPR assay. MsRecA Q196E did not show any binding to ssDNA, in both nitrocellulose filter-binding as well as SPR assays. We assayed for the ability of the mutant RecA proteins for their ability to promote DNA-pairing as well as DNA strand exchange. While we observed limited pairing promoted by the mutant proteins relative to the wild-type MsRecA, we observed a complete abrogation of strand exchange in the case of mutant proteins. In addition, we assayed for the co-protease function of MsRecA, by monitoring the cleavage of MtLexA. We observed that only the wild-type MsRecA protein was able to cleave MtLexA, while none of the mutant RecA proteins were able to do so. In order to understand the differences observed between the wild -type and the mutant MsRecA proteins, we analyzed the conformational state of MsRecA and its variant proteins by circular dichroism spectroscopy upon ATP-binding. We observed that while MsRecA and MsRecAQ196N displayed a reduction in the absorbance at 220 nm upon ATP binding, we did not observe any such structural transitions in the other mutant MsRecA proteins that we tested. Based on our observations and the crystal structure of E. coli RecA bound to ssDNA, in Chapter 2, we propose a dual role for the Gln196 and Arg198 in modulating RecA activities. In the presynaptic filament Gln196 and Arg198 sense the presence of the nucleotide in the nucleotide binding pocket and initiate a series of conformation changes that culminate in the transition to an active RecA nucleoprotein filament. In the active RecA nucleoprotein filament these residues are repositioned such that they now form a part of the protomer-protomer interface. As such they perform two vital functions; they stabilize the protomer-protomer interface by participating in the formation of hydrogen bonds that span the interface as well transmit the wave of ATP hydrolysis across the interface leading to a coordinated hydrolyses of ATP essential for the heteroduplex extension phase of strand exchange reaction. The members of the super family of single stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB) play an important role in all aspects of DNA metabolism including DNA replication, repair, transcription and recombination. Prokaryotic SSBs bind ssDNA with high affinity and generally with positive cooperativity. Several lines of evidence suggest that prokaryotic SSBs are modularly organized into three distinct domains: the N-terminal DNA binding domain and acidic C-terminal domain are linked by a flexible spacer. Studies from our laboratory have revealed that M. smegmatis SSB plays a concerted role in recombination-like activities promoted by the cognate RecA. The C- terminal of SSB is known to be involved in its ability to interact with other proteins. We have previously reported that the C-terminal domain of M. smegmatis SSB, which is not essential for interaction with DNA, is the site for the binding of cognate RecA. The data in Chapter 3 describes the characterization of the SSB C-terminus with the objective of delineating the elements responsible for mediating protein-protein interaction, as well as to define the mechanism by which SSB is able to modulate the activities of RecA. To map the RecA interaction domain of SSB we created deletion mutants in MsSSB lacking 5, 10, 15 or 20 residues from the C-terminal. The truncated SSB proteins were expressed with a His- tag at the N- terminus and purified to homogeneity using a Ni-NTA affinity matrix. We observed unlike MsSSB, MsSSB∆C5 and MsSSB∆C10, MsSSB∆C15 and MsSSB∆C20 were unable to support three-strand exchange catalyzed by MsRecA. Based on the observation that interaction with SSB is essential for MsRecA to catalyze the strand Exchange reaction, we postulate that the RecA interacting domain of SSB is situated between the 15th and the 20th residue from the C-terminal. Further, the C-terminal of MsSSB modulates the transitions between DNA binding modes. Unlike the case with EcSSB where deletion of the last 8 residues from the C-terminal stabilizes the (SSB)35 mode of ssDNA binding, we observe that in case of MsSSB the deletion of C-terminal seems to destabilize the (SSB)35. In addition, the transition from the low density binding mode to a high density mode involves the formation of several intermediates when the C-terminal residues are deleted. With the objective of understanding the functions to the C-terminal of SSB independent of its DNA-binding domain in modulating RecA functions, we employed a peptide corresponding to the 35 residues from the C-terminal of the MsSSB. We observed that the C-terminal region alone is capable of interacting with RecA. In addition we also observed that the C-terminal domain of SSB stimulates RecA functions independent of its DNA binding domain. To address the question, whether the stimulatory effect of the C-terminal domain of SSB in the absence of its DNA-binding domain is restricted to RecA or is a generalized phenomenon associated with all SSB interacting proteins; we tested the effect of C-terminal domain of SSB on UvrD which is known to interact with SSB. UvrD participates in several pathways of DNA metabolism, which include the nucleotide excision repair (NER) and mismatch repair pathway, replication and recombination. Genetic evidence suggests that UvrD and SSB interact in vivo. We tested the effect of mycobacterial SSB on M. tuberculosis UvrD1 (MtUvrD1) functions in vitro. We observe that MtUvrd1 physically interacts with SSB. Further, presence of SSB has an inhibitory effect on the helicase activity of MtUvrD1 and that this effect is dependent on the C-terminal region as the deletion of residues from the C-terminal of SSB abrogates the inhibitory effect of SSB. However, unlike RecA, the C-terminal region of SSB alone had no effect on the helicase activity of UvrD1. We also observed that MsSSB has opposing effects on the ATPase activity of MtUvrD1. In the presence of low concentrations of SSB the ATPase activity is enhanced, while we observed an inhibition when the concentration of MsSSB is high. The precise mechanistic details of how SSB is able to act as an accessory protein to RecA, in context of homologous recombination and stimulates its biochemical activities have been a subject of debate. Whereas research from some groups has shown that the stimulatory effect SSB is mediated through its ability to melt DNA secondary structure, thereby allowing RecA to overcome the kinetic barrier imposed by the presence of secondary structure in ssDNA, others postulate that SSB plays a direct role in the stabilization of RecA nucleoprotein filament and prevents its dissociation. Chapter 3 discusses the experimental evidence in favor of the aforesaid models and based on the results of our experiments; we propose that the accessory functions of SSB may be mediated by a mechanism that involves elements of both models. While interaction with SSB can bring about a conformational change in RecA that is reflected in the enhanced levels of strand exchange and co-protease activity, the helix destabilizing function of SSB is essential during heteroduplex extension and to sequester the displaced strand such that it does not participate in any further pairing reactions. The novel finding that we present in Chapter 3 is that the interaction of SSB C-terminal alone has a stimulatory effect upon RecA activities. Furthermore, we observed that M. tuberculosis UvrD1 is a weak interaction partner of SSB. The physical and functional interactions between MsSSB with RecA on the one hand, and MsSSB and UvrD1 on the other highlight different types of cross-talk between the components of HR and DNA repair pathways. In contrast to the results of earlier studies, our results indicate that protein-protein interactions alone between SSB and RecA may modulate the RecA mediated processes of presynapsis, homologous pairing and strand exchange between homologous DNA molecules as well as modulate its co-protease activity. In addition, our studies indicate that a direct protein-protein interaction is responsible for the modulation of UvrD1 activities by SSB.

Homologous recombination (HR) is a highly conserved cellular process involved in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity and generation of genetic diversity. Biochemical and genetic studies have suggested that HR is crucial for repair of damaged DNA arising from various endogenous or exogenous assaults on the genome of any organism. Further, HR is vital to repair fatal DNA damage during DNA replication. An instructive example of cross-talk between the processes of DNA recombination and replication can be construed in the processing of replication/recombination/repair intermediates. The impediment(s) to the progression of DNA replication fork is one of the underlying causes for increased genome instability and consequently this might compromise the survival of organism. Various processes manifest at stalled replication forks before they can be rendered competent for the replication-restart. One of the mechanisms of replication-restart involves replication fork reversal (RFR), which envisage unwinding of the blocked forks with simultaneous annealing of the parental and daughter strands o generate a Holliday junction intermediate adjacent to DNA double strand end. Genetic evidence shows that in E. coli dnaEts mutant, holD mutant and in helicase defective rep mutant, RFR is catalyzed by RuvAB complex. Classically, HJ intermediates are generated during the terminal stages of the HR pathway. In E. coli, branch migration and resolution of HJ intermediates is promoted by RuvA, RuvB and RuvC proteins, which participate at the late stages of HR. Structural, biochemical and mutational analysis suggest that E. coli RuvA binds Holliday junction DNA with high affinity and specificity. RuvB, a member of the AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) family, is recruited to the RuvA-Holliday junction complex and functions as a motor protein. Together, RuvA and RuvB catalyze ATP dependent branch migration of HJ. The resolution of HJ is catalyzed by the RuvC endonuclease, which introduces coordinated cuts at two symmetrical sites across the junction. RuvAB complex, the Holliday junction branch migration apparatus, is ubiquitous in bacteria. Genetic, biochemical and structural studies have not only established the in vivo role of E. coli RuvAB, in context of HR pathway, but have also provided valuable insights into the mechanism of HJ processing by RuvAB complex. However, the paucity of extensive studies examining the biochemical properties of each member of the RuvABC protein complex restricts models in deciphering the functions of the individual components of this tripartite protein complex. Our current understanding of the biochemical function of E. coli RuvA is within the context of its interacting cellular partner, RuvB. Consequently, the inherent activities of RuvA in the context of DNA repair and HR are poorly understood. Moreover, it remains to be ascertained if RuvABC protein complex, its different sub-complexes, or the individual subunits can function differently in the processing of HJ intermediates generated during DNA repair and HR. The information from these studies would be helpful in understanding the mechanistic details of HR pathway in mycobacteria. Additionally, a number of important questions regarding the molecular basis of RuvAB catalyzed fork reversal remain unanswered. Therefore, exploration of biochemical details of the RuvAB mediated RFR would provide mechanistic insights into the dynamics of fork reversal process. Moreover, analysis of RuvAB catalyzed RFR might be helpful in validating the different assumptions of the RFR model that has been proposed on the basis of genetic analysis of certain E. coli replication mutants. Another interesting question that remains to be answered is, how under in vivo conditions, RuvABC protein complex or its individual subunits are regulated to function differently in the context of HR and DNA repair? Mycobacterium tuberculosis is an important intracellular pathogen which is likely to experience substantial DNA damage inside the host and thus may require an efficient DNA recombination and repair machinery for its survival. Our knowledge about the mechanistic aspects of genetic exchange in mycobacteria is rather limited. Therefore, understanding of the processes catalyzed by the components of HR pathway may help in molecular genetic analysis of mycobacteria. Sequence analysis of M. tuberculosis genome, followed by various comparative genomic studies, has revealed the presence of putative homologs of E. coli rec genes but it is not known whether these gene products are able to catalyze the reactions similar to their E. coli counterparts. In M. tuberculosis, the genes encoding for the enzymatic machinery required for branch migration and resolution of HJ intermediates are present. The ruvA, ruvB and ruvC genes form an operon, and are probably translationally coupled. Further, these ruv genes are DNA damage inducible. The transcript level of ruvC is regulated by both RecA dependent and independent mechanisms whereas ruvA and ruvB are induced only through RecA dependent SOS response. During M. tuberculosis infection of host cells, expression of ruvA and ruvB genes is upregulated. We therefore surmise that their gene product might be required for DNA replication, recombination or repair, and would be physiologically relevant under in vivo conditions. However, the details of reactions involved in the processing of HR intermediates and rescue of stalled replication forks in M. tuberculosis remains unknown. In the initial part of this study, we have investigated the function of M. tuberculosis RuvA protein using Holliday junctions containing either homologous or heterologous core. In the later part, we have explored the ability of M. tuberculosis RuvA and RuvB proteins to catalyze in vitro replication fork reversal. M. tuberculosis ruvA gene was isolated by PCR amplification and cloned in an expression vector to generate the pMTRA construct. Genetic complementation assays, using the pMTRA construct transformed into E. coli ΔruvA mutant, indicated that M. tuberculosis ruvA is functional in E. coli and suggested that it can substitute for E. coli RuvA in conferring resistance to MMS and survival following UV irradiation. Having established the functionality of M.tuberculosis ruvA, a method was developed for heterologous over-expression and purification of M. tuberculosis RuvA protein (MtRuvA). MtRuvA was purified to homogeneity and the identity of purified protein was verified using western blot analysis using the anti-MtRuvA antibodies. Purified MtRuvA was free of any contaminating endo- or exo-nuclease activity. Biochemical functions of MtRuvA were defined by performing detailed investigations of DNA-binding and Holliday junction processing activities. Substrate specificity of purified MtRuvA was examined,through DNA binding assays, by using oligonucleotide substrates mimicking differentintermediates involved in the pathway of recombinational DNA repair. Purified M. tuberculosis RuvA exhibited high affinity for HJ substrate but also formed stable complex with replication fork and flap substrate. DNase I footprinting of MtRuvA-homologous Holliday junction complex confirmed that MtRuvA bound at the junction center. The DNase I protection conferred by MtRuvA, on homologous HJ, was two-fold symmetric; the continuous footprint was 10 bp longon one pair of symmetrical arms and 7 bp on the opposite pair of arms. In parallel, DNase footprinting of MtRuvA-heterologous Holliday junction complex generated a footprint that encompassed 16 nucleotide residues on each strand of the Holliday junction. Different crystallographic studies have envisaged an important role for RuvA in base pair rearrangement atthe center of the junction. Also, in crystal structure of tetramer of EcRuvA-HJ complex twobases at the junction center were unpaired. To explore if RuvA binding leads to helical distortionof Holliday junction, MtRuvA-HJ complexes were subjected to chemical probing with KMnO4.In case of heterologous HJ, binding of MtRuvA resulted in appearance of sensitive T residues at the junction crossover. By contrast, binding of MtRuvA to homologous HJ rendered the T residues at the junction center and within the homologous core sensitive to oxidation by KMnO4.Taken together, these observations suggested that binding of MtRuvA distorts two base pairs at the junction crossover in heterologous HJ, whereas in case of homologous HJ base pairs distortion extends into the arms of the junction. These observations with KMnO4 probing were independently validated, in real time, by using sensitive to 2-aminopurine fluorescence spectroscopy measurements of MtRuvA-HJ complexes. To follow structural distortions upon interaction with MtRuvA, HJ variants carrying 2-AP substitution were generated for both homologous and heterologous HJ substrate. In each junction species, the 2-AP residue was uniquely present either at the junction center, adjacent to the center or away from the center. Incase of heterologous HJ, binding of MtRuvA resulted in increase of fluorescence emission of2-AP residues located at the junction crossover but not those of 2-AP residues that were present1-2 base pairs away from the junction center. Binding of MtRuvA to homologous HJ resulted in increase of fluorescence emission of 2-AP residues located at the junction crossover. Further, increase in fluorescence emission was also observed for 2-AP residues present within the homologous core or adjacent to the homologous core in a pair of symmetrically related arms. Thus, 2-AP fluorescence results suggested that binding of MtRuvA to homologous HJ causes base pair distortion within and adjacent to the homologous core whereas in case of heterologous HJ the base pair distortion is restricted to the junction center. Together, these results suggest thatMtRuvA causes two distinct types of base pair distortions between homologous and heterologous HJ substrates. To explore the relationship between binding of MtRuvA and alterations in global structure of the junction DNA, we employed the established technique of comparative gel electrophoresis. Analysis of data from comparative gel electrophoresis revealed that MtRuvA, upon binding to the Holliday junctions, converts the stacked-X structure of HJ to square-planar form and stabilizes the same for loading of RuvB rings and subsequent branch migration by RuvAB complex. Our results underline the possible existence of distinct pathways for RuvA function, which presumably depend on the structure and the nature of the DNA repair or HR intermediates. In summary, our results show that binding of MtRuvA to the HJ induced changes in the local conformation of junction, which might augment RuvB catalyzed branch migration. An unexpected finding is the observation that MtRuvA causes two distinct types of structural distortions, depending on whether the Holliday junction contains homologous or heterologous core. These observations support models wherein RuvA facilitates, in a manner independent of RuvB, base pair rearrangements at the crossover point of both homologous and heterologous Holliday junctions. Although the genetic basis of ruvA ruvB catalyzed RFR in E. coli has been understood in some detail but less is known about the genetic and molecular mechanism of fork reversal in mycobacteria or other organisms. Specifically, to examine if the E. coli paradigm can be generalized to other RuvAB orthologs, we explored the RFR activity of M. tuberculosis RuvAB using a series of oligonucleotides and plasmid-based substrates that mimic stalled replication fork intermediates. This approach might be useful in genetic analysis of factors involved in processing of stalled forks in M. tuberculosis wherein technical difficulties associated with the isolation and characterization of appropriate mutants have limited our understanding of DNA metabolism. Importantly, we have asked the questions as to how the structure at fork junction, extent of reversal and presence of sequence heterology might determine the outcome of RuvAB mediated RFR. The results from this study will be helpful in consolidating the proposed in vivo role for RuvAB complex in fork reversal. The open reading frame corresponding to M. tuberculosis ruvB gene was PCR amplified and cloned in an expression vector to generate the pMTRB construct. Genetic complementation assays were performed to assess the functionality of M. tuberculosis ruvB in E. coli ΔruvB mutant. The data from these assays suggested that M. tuberculosis ruvB is active in E. coli and it is able to make functional contacts with E. coli RuvA. Moreover, the efficient alleviation of MMS toxicity in E. coli ΔruvB mutant suggested that M. tuberculosis ruvB might have a role in relieving replication stress generated under specific in vivo conditions. For biochemical analysis, M. tuberculosis RuvB protein (MtRuvB) was over-expressed in a heterologous system and purified to homogeneity. The identity of purified MtRuvB was verified using western blot analysis using the anti-MtRuvB antibodies. Purified MtRuvB was free of any contaminating endo- or exo- nuclease activity. The DNA-binding properties of MtRuvB were analyzed, in conjunction with its cognate RuvA, by using different substrates that are most likely to occur as intermediates during the processes of DNA replication and/or recombination. MtRuvAB bound HJ, three-way junction and heterologous replication fork with high affinity but with relatively weaker affinity to flap and flayed duplex substrates. MtRuvB displayed very weak affinity for linear duplex and failed to bind linear single-stranded DNA. The high affinity of MtRuvB for HJ substrate, in presence of its cognate RuvA, is indicative of direct and functional interaction between RuvA and RuvB. To further test this idea, the catalytic activity of MtRuvB was assayed in the in vitro HJ branch migration assay. In this assay,MtRuvB, in association with its cognate RuvA, promoted efficient branch migration of homologous HJ over heterologous HJ. To decipher the role of MtRuvAB in processing of stalled replication fork we performed in vitro replication fork reversal (RFR) assay using both oligonucleotide and plasmid based model replication fork substrates. Initially, binding of MtRuvAB to different homologous fork (HomFork) substrates was analyzed using the electrophoretic mobility shift assays. MtRuvAB exhibited similar binding affinity towards different HomFork substrates bearing different spatial orientation of nascent leading and lagging strands. To gain insight into the role of MtRuvAB in processing of replication forks, in vitro RFR reactions were carried out using an array of synthetic homologous fork substrates. In all these reactions, MtRuvAB catalyzed efficient fork reversal leading to generation of both parental duplex and daughter duplex. In the kinetics of fork reversal reaction, for all the fork substrates,the accumulation of daughter duplex increased with time whereas the increase in parental or nascent strand DNA was negligible. Taken together, our results suggest that MtRuvAB can efficiently catalyze in vitro replication fork reversal reaction to generate a Holliday junction intermediate thus implicating that RuvAB mediated fork reversal involves concerted unwinding and annealing of nascent leading and lagging strands. Equally important, we demonstrate the reversal of forks carrying hemi-replicated DNA, thus indicating that MtRuvAB mediated fork reversal is independent of symmetry at the fork junction. For understanding the role of RuvAB mediated processing of stalled forks at chromosome level, the fork reversal assays were performed using plasmid derived model “RF” substrate. Fork reversal was monitored by restriction enzyme digestion mediated release of 5’ end labeled fragments of specific size from the fourth arm extruded at the branch point of fork junction. In these reactions MtRuvAB complex was proficient at generating the reversed arm de novo from the RF substrate. Further, MtRuvAB complex catalyzed extensive fork reversal as analyzed by release of linear duplex of2.9 kb from a JM substrate. Use of non hydrolysable analogs of ATP and analysis of restriction digestion mediated release of duplex fragments from the reversed arm suggested that MtRuvAB catalyzed RFR reaction is ATP hydrolysis dependent progressive and processive reaction. MtRuvAB complex catalyzed fork reversal on plasmid substrate that had been linearized thus indicating that MtRuvAB mediated RFR is uncoupled from DNA supercoils in the substrate. Notably, MtRuvAB promoted reversal of forks in a substrate containing short stretch of heterologous sequences, indicating that sequence heterology failed to impede fork reversal activity of MtRuvAB complex. These results are discussed in the context of recognition and processing of varied types of replication fork structures by RuvAB enzyme complex.

Tuberculosis, caused by the infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis remained as a major global health challenge with one third of world population being infected by this pathogen. M. tuberculosis can persist for decades in infected individuals in the latent state as an asymptomatic disease and can emerge to cause active disease at a later stage. Thus, pathways and the mechanisms that are involved in the maintenance of genome integrity appear to be important for M. tuberculosis survival, persistence and pathogenesis. Helicases are ubiquitous enzymes known to play a key role in DNA replication, repair and recombination. However, role of helicases in providing selective advantage for M. tuberculosis survival and genome maintenance is obscure. Therefore, understanding the role of various helicases could provide insights into the M. tuberculosis survival, persistence and pathogenesis in humans. This information could be useful in considering helicases as a novel therapeutic target as well as developing effective vaccines. The research focus of my thesis has been to understand the role of helicases in safeguarding the M. tuberculosis genome from various genotoxic stresses. The major focus of the current study has been addressed towards understanding the role of M. tuberculosis RecG (MtRecG) helicase in recombinational repair and in remodeling stalled replication forks. This study highlights the importance of RecG helicase in the maintenance of genome integrity via DNA repair, recombination and in remodeling the stalled replication forks in M. tuberculosis. The thesis has been divided into following sections as follows: Chapter I: General introduction that describes the causes and consequences of replication stress and DNA repair pathways in M. tuberculosis The genome is susceptible to various types of damage induced by exogenous as well as endogenous DNA damaging agents. Unrepaired or misrepaired DNA lesions can lead to gross chromosomal rearrangements and ultimately cell death. Thus, organisms have evolved with efficient DNA damage response machinery to cope up with deleterious effects of genotoxic agents. Accurate transmission of genetic information requires error-free duplication of chromosomal DNA during every round of cell division. Defects associated with replication are considered as a major source of genome instability in all organisms. Normal DNA replication is hampered when the fork encounters road blocks that have the potential to stall or collapse a replication fork. The types of lesions that potentially block replication fork include lesions on the template DNA, various secondary structures, R-loops, or DNA bound proteins. To understand the DNA damage induced replication stress and the role of fork remodeling enzymes in the repair of stalled replication forks and its restart, chapter I of the thesis has been distributed into multiple sections as follows: Briefly, initial portion of the chapter describes overall replication process in prokaryotes highlighting the importance of coordinated replisome assembly and disassembly during initiation and termination. Later section discusses about various types of exogenous and endogenous DNA damages leading to replication fork stalling. Subsequent section of chapter I provide detailed description and mechanism of various repair pathways cell operates to repair such damages. Chapter I further summarizes causes of stalled replication forks majorly including template lesions, natural impediments like DNA secondary structures and DNA-protein cross links. Subsequent section discusses various pathways of replication restart that include essential role of primosomal proteins in reloading replisome machinery at stalled replication forks. Subsequent section of chapter I provide a comprehensive description of replication fork reversal (RFR) and mechanism of replication restart. RFR involves unwinding of blocked forks via simultaneous unwinding and annealing of parental and daughter strands to generate Holliday junction (HJ) intermediate. Genetic and biochemical studies highlighted the importance of RecG, RuvAB and RecA proteins in driving RFR reaction in E. coli. Hence, in the subsequent chapter, the functional role of RecG, RuvAB and RecA in replication-recombination processes has been discussed. Last section of the chapter devotes completely to M. tuberculosis, its genome dynamics and the various pathways of mycobacterial DNA repair. M. tuberculosis experiences substantial DNA damage inside host macrophages owing to the acidic environment, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) which are sufficient enough to cause replication stress. To gain insights into the role of M. tuberculosis RecG helicase in DNA repair, recombination and in remodeling the stalled replication forks the following objectives were laid for my PhD thesis: 1 To understand the functional role of M. tuberculosis RecG (MtRecG) in DNA repair and recombination. 2 To investigate the distinct role(s) of MtRecG, MtRuvAB and MtRecA in remodeling the stalled replication forks. Chapter II: Evidence for the role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG helicase in DNA repair and recombination In order to survive and replicate in a variety of stressful conditions during its life cycle, M. tuberculosis must possess mechanisms to safeguard the integrity of the genome. Although DNA repair and recombination related genes are thought to play key roles in the repair of damaged DNA in all organisms, so far only a few of them have been functionally characterized in the tubercle bacillus. Helicases are one such ubiquitous enzyme involved in all DNA metabolic transaction pathways for maintenance of genome stability. To understand the role of M. tuberculosis RecG (MtRecG) helicase in recombination and repair, we carried out functional and biochemical studies. In our study, we show that M. tuberculosis RecG expression was induced in response to different genotoxic agents. Strikingly, expression of M. tuberculosis RecG in Escherichia coli ∆recG mutant strain provided protection against MMC, MMS and UV-induced cell death. Purified M. tuberculosis RecG exhibited higher binding affinity for the Holliday junction (HJ) as compared to a number of canonical recombinational DNA repair intermediates. Notably, although MtRecG binds at the core of the mobile and immobile HJs, and with higher binding affinity for the immobile junction, branch migration and resolution was evident only in the case of the mobile junction. Furthermore, immobile HJs stimulate MtRecG ATPase activity less efficiently as compared to the mobile HJs. In addition to HJ substrates, MtRecG exhibited binding affinity for a variety of branched DNA structures including three-way junctions, replication forks, flap structures, forked duplex and a D-loop structures, but demonstrated strong unwinding activity on replication fork and flap DNA structures. Altogether, these results support that MtRecG plays an important role in processes related to DNA metabolism under normal as well as in stress conditions. Chapter III: Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG but not RuvAB or RecA is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: Implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria Aberrant DNA replication, defects in the protection and restart of stalled replication forks are a major cause of genome instability in all organisms. Replication fork reversal is emerging as an evolutionarily conserved physiological response for restart of stalled forks. Escherichia coli RecG, RuvAB and RecA proteins have been shown to reverse the model replication fork structures in vitro. However, the pathways and the mechanisms by which Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow growing human pathogen responds to different types of replication stress and DNA damage is unclear. In our study, we show that M. tuberculosis RecG rescues E. coli ∆recG cells from replicative stress. The purified M. tuberculosis RecG (MtRecG) and RuvAB (MtRuvAB) proteins catalyze fork reversal of model replication fork structures with and without leading strand ssDNA gap. Interestingly, SSB suppresses the MtRecG and MtRuvAB mediated fork reversal with substrates that contain lagging strand gap. Notably, our comparative studies with fork structures containing template damage and template switching mechanism of lesion bypass reveal that MtRecG but not MtRuvAB or MtRecA is proficient in driving the fork reversal. Finally, unlike MtRuvAB, we find that MtRecG drives efficient reversal of forks when fork structures are tightly bound by protein. These results provide direct evidence and valuable insights into the underlying mechanism of MtRecG catalyzed replication fork remodeling and restart pathways in vivo.

L'ADN mitochondrial des plantes est dynamique et son expression est complexe. Par la voie naturelle d'import d'ARN de transfert codés par le noyau, nous avons adressé dans les mitochondries d'Arabidopsis l'ARN orf77 caractéristique de la S-CMS du maïs et nous avons analysé les effets sur le transcriptome mitochondrial. Celui-ci s'est avéré strictement régulé durant le développement et fortement tamponné aux stades précoces. L'adressage mitochondrial de l'orf77 a aussi promu un cross-talk avec le noyau. D'autre part, la réplication et la réparation de l'ADN dans les mitochondries de plante impliquent une recombinaison active contrôlée par des facteurs codés par le noyau. Nous avons identifié l'exonucléase 5'-3' potentiellement responsable de la résection des extrémités de l'ADN dans la réparation par recombinaison des cassures double-brin. Nos résultats ouvrent des perspectives pour la génération de diversité génétique mitochondriale et la création de lignées CMS d'intérêt agronomique. / The mitochondrial DNA of plants is dynamic and its expression is complex. Using a strategy based on the natural import of nuclear-encoded transfer RNAs from the cytosol, we targeted to mitochondria in Arabidopsis thaliana the orf77 RNA characteristic for S-CMS in maize and we analyzed the effects on the transcriptome. The results showed that the mitochondrial transcriptome is tighly regulated during plant development and is strongly buffered at early stages. Mitochondrial targeting of orf77 also triggered a cross-talk with the nucleus. On the other hand, DNA replication and repair in plant mitochondria involve active recombination controled by nuclear-encoded factors. We identified a new member of this set of factors, the 5'-3' exonuclease potentially responsible for the resection of DNA ends in recombination-mediated repair of double-strand breaks. As a whole, the results open prospects for generating mitochondrial genetic diversity and creating CMS lines with agronomical interest.

La réparation des cassures double brin (CDB) de l'ADN par recombinaison est essentielle au maintien de l'intégrité du génome de tous les être vivants. Ce processus doit cependant être finement régulé puisque la recombinaison peut générer des mutations ou des réarrangements chromosomiques, parfois extrêmement délétères pour la cellule. Les CDB peuvent être réparées par deux mécanismes : la recombinaison non homologue (ou jonction des extrémités d'ADN) ou la recombinaison homologue (impliquant une homologie de séquence entre les molécules recombinantes). Dans les cellules somatiques, les deux voies principales de recombinaison homologue (RH) sont la voie Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) dépendante de la recombinase RAD51 et la voie Single Strand Annealing (SSA) indépendante de RAD51. Nos résultats ont d'abord mis en évidence un rôle inattendu de XRCC2, RAD51B et RAD51D - trois paralogues de RAD51 - dans la voie SSA. Nous avons confirmé que la fonction de la protéine XRCC2 dans la voie SSA ne dépend pas de RAD51, ce qui démontre que certains paralogues de RAD51 ont acquis des fonctions indépendantes de la recombinase. La différence de sévérité des phénotypes des mutants individuels ainsi que les analyses d'épistasie menées sur le double et le triple mutant suggèrent des fonctions individuelles de ces protéines au cours du SSA. Nous proposons qu'elles facilitent l'étape d'hybridation des deux séquences complémentaires situées de part et d'autre de la cassure, bien que ceci reste à confirmer par des études in vitro. L'étude des fonctions de l'hétérodimère XPF-ERCC1 - un complexe impliqué dans le clivage des extrémités d'ADN non homologues au cours des voies de RH - a révélé un rôle inhibiteur de ce complexe sur la voie SDSA. Cette action est dépendante de son activité endonucléasique et serait liée au clivage des longues extrémités 3' sortantes réalisant l'invasion d'un duplex d'ADN homologue, l'étape initiale de la voie SDSA. Notre étude a de plus confirmé que le rôle du complexe dépend de la longueur des extrémités non homologues chez Arabidopsis, comme chez les mammifères et la levure. Bien que le complexe XPF-ERCC1 soit essentiel au clivage des longues extrémités d'ADN non homologue, il n'est pas requis à l'élimination des courtes extrémités au cours de la RH. / The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) by recombination is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity of all living organisms. However, recombination must be finely regulated as it can generate mutations or chromosomal rearrangements, sometimes extremely deleterious to the cell. DSB can be repaired by two classes of recombination mechanism: non-homologous recombination (or DNA End Joining) or homologous recombination (implicating DNA sequence homology between the recombining molecules). In somatic cells, the two main pathways of homologous recombination (HR) are RAD51-dependent Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) and RAD51-independent Single Strand Annealing (SSA). Our results have demonstrated an unexpected role of XRCC2, RAD51B and RAD51D - three RAD51 paralogues – in the SSA pathway. We confirmed that the function of XRCC2 in SSA does not depend upon RAD51, thus demonstrating that some RAD51 paralogues have acquired RAD51 recombinase-independent functions. The different severities of individual mutant phenotypes and epistasis analyses carried out on the double and triple mutants suggest individual functions of these proteins in SSA recombination. We propose that they facilitate hybridization of the two complementary sequences located on both sides of the break, although this remains to be confirmed by in vitro experiments. Study of the roles of XPF-ERCC1 - a complex involved in the cleavage of non-homologous DNA ends during HR - revealed an inhibitory role of this complex on the SDSA pathway. This is dependent on its endonuclease activity and is probably due to the cleavage of long 3' ends performing the homologous DNA duplex invasion, the initial step of the SDSA pathway. Our analyses also confirmed that the role of the complex depends on the length of the nonhomologous ends, as seen in mammals and yeasts. Although XPF-ERCC1 is essential for the cleavage of long nonhomologous DNA ends, it is not required for the elimination of short ends during HR.