Univ., Diss.--Bremen, 2003.

Hamburger Univ. für Wirtschaft und Politik, Diss.--Hamburg, 2004.

Hamburg, Hamburger Universiẗat für Wirtschaft und Politik, Diss., 2004.

This overview can be summarized as a systematic literature study regarding deliberately arranged teaching about democracy and civic in social education. There is immersive research about deliberation since the 1990´s around deliberative democracy and in which way this model can be used in a classroom with the purpose of forming students into good citizens. The results of this kind of research have been contentious for example some types of researches points towards that some school programs have more advantages in a classroom deliberation than others. Other methods  have  shown  that  deliberative  dialogues  in  the  classroom  is  beneficial  for  developing  broader knowledge among the students. Therefore,  this study will be focused on gathering and categorizing different  types of studies regarding deliberative education amongst students. There has also been an emphasis on showing how this research defines the concept of deliberative education. This  overview  categorizes  studies  with  an  emphasis  on  classroom  climate,  studies  that  focus  on  the teacher’s role as well as studies that focus on the student. The research will show what view the teachers and students have about deliberative education. Such as what positive images and experiences are there and what problems can be found with deliberative education. What effects does deliberative education have on knowledge, values and involvement and is the view unambiguous or is it contradictory. This paper enriches further studies by show holes in the research. Society is in constant change and there are new demands on the knowledge mediation. By compiling results and conclusions this overview can show holes in the research or at least give inspiration to further studies. Since the deliberative dialogues requires different opinions and perspective it can be seen as a method among others to include students to share each other's differences. This can be seen as important especially in regards of future classrooms with a larger variation of people from different backgrounds, both ethnically, culturally, and religiously.

No description available.

The aim of this thesis is to explore the under-studied area of deliberative democratic politics at the local level, while adding to the literature on deliberative theory itself. Empirical research was conducted through the qualitative tools of participant observation in Project Lyttelton’s Energy Matters Workshop and in-depth interviews with Project Lyttelton members, workshop participants and local government representatives. A comparative analysis was also undertaken between two locally focussed initiatives looking at citizen engagement and democracy in relation to climate change. The findings of this research suggest that Project Lyttelton’s Energy Matters Workshop answers the call for a deliberative approach through its use of the key institutional features of deliberative democratic processes. The research findings also show that local deliberative initiatives may not be about reaching consensus or agreement in relation to a particular issue such as climate change. Rather, they may be focused on building up a network of citizens that discuss new ideas, build awareness, invigorate public engagement, highlight shared interests and motivate new initiatives. However, the research data also draws attention to compelling, and as yet unanswered questions, about just what conditions are needed for local deliberation to affect public policy and climate change decision-making, how deliberative practices could be integrated within government structures themselves, how the current political framework (and context) could act as a spur to those at the local level, and how local participation and deliberation could have a voice in the largely international climate change arena. This research adds to the scholarship on deliberative theory by examining what deliberation looks like at the local level, while providing further empirical research for deliberative theory itself.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2009. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 122-134).

Konstanz, Univ., Diplomarb., 2003.

Deliberative democracy and conflict management models have been given increasing attention for their potential consistency and similarities, which is useful knowledge given the opened possibilities of interdisciplinary work. I argue that this debate ought to be broadened to include how conflict transformation and a pragmatic strand of deliberative democracy are aligned with regard to orientation to conflict. First, I offer an account of why conflict transformation’s key values should be seen as valuable for democratic theory to emulate. Second, I show how a pragmatic strand of deliberative democracy is consistent and similar with respect to those key values. Together, these build a framework which offers the ability for practitioners and theorists to pursue interdisciplinary work between two particular strands of deliberative democracy and conflict management which to date have not been given adequate attention.

The focus of this thesis is mainly to investigate the external political process from consensus conference and the correlation between consensus conference and political policy aimed at understanding the external effect of the conference. This thesis also studies the influence of public conference on both the administrative body and city council and the operations of public policy. A case study putting its emphasis on the public conference in installing a harbor cable car system bears a sense of unique significance in the very first consensus conference on municipal agenda in Taiwan. It is found that a consensus conference is perhaps more suitable for local administration to solve municipal issues than for the central government to solve national agenda. Thus, local government should step up its efforts to promote the valuable channel of citizen participation via public conference in an attempt to raise the consciousness of citizenship. The purpose of this article is also to get in-depth knowledge of the correlation between the consensus conference and public policy via comparison and analyses of social theories and publications and to interview dedicated personnel with both the administrative agency and city council for further discussions, which could, in the end, serve as a probable option to solve controversial issues once the deliberative democracy is chosen. The opinions collected via on-site interviews with dedicated administrative agencies (e.g. Bureau of Urban development & Bureau of Human Resources Development) and Kaohsiung city council have been used to analyze and verify the political clout of the consensus onference outside the regular decision-making process, which might become a valuable lesson learned for both the central and local authorities in the future.