The original publication is available at http://www.samj.org.za / Background. Mental disorders are a major contributor to the burden of disease in all regions of the world. There are limited data on the epidemiology of major depressive disorder in South Africa. Methods. A nationally representative household survey was conducted between 2002 and 2004 using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) to establish a diagnosis of depression. The dataset analysed included 4 351 adult South Africans of all racial groups. Results. The prevalence of major depression was 9.7% for lifetime and 4.9% for the 12 months prior to the interview. The prevalence of depression was significantly higher among females than among males. The prevalence was also higher among those with a low level of education. Over 90% of all respondents with depression reported global role impairment. Conclusion. In comparison with data from other countries, South Africa has lower rates of depression than the USA but higher rates than Nigeria. The findings are broadly consistent with previous findings in South Africa. These findings are the first step in documenting a level of need for care in a context of significant under-funding of mental health services and research in South Africa. / Publishers' version

Previous studies have showed an association between emotional distress and decreased physical functioning in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH); however, none controlled for demographic and disease characteristics. This study investigates the independent association of depressive symptoms with physical functioning after controlling for both demographic and disease characteristics. Fifty-two patients, mean age 61 (SD = 14) years, undergoing cardiac catheterization, completed self-report questionnaires of depressive symptoms and physical functioning. Results showed that depressive symptoms (beta = -.28, p < .05) accounted for a statistically significant 8% of incremental variance in physical functioning over and above the variance explained by demographic and disease characteristics. The direction of effects cannot be determined because of the cross-sectional design. As such, the association of depressive symptoms with physical functioning in PH patients indicates the need for longitudinal research regarding the possible effect of depression on disease outcomes in this population.

No description available.

Background. There are inconclusive findings regarding whether danger and loss events differentially predict the onset of anxiety and depression. Method. A community sample of adolescents and young adults (n=2304, age 14–24 years at baseline) was prospectively followed up in up to four assessments over 10 years. Incident anxiety and depressive disorders were assessed at each wave using the DSM-IV/M-CIDI. Life events (including danger, loss and respectively mixed events) were assessed at baseline using the Munich Event List (MEL). Logistic regressions were used to reveal associations between event types at baseline and incident disorders at follow-up. Results. Loss events merely predicted incident ‘pure’ depression [odds ratio (OR) 2.4 per standard deviation, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–3.9, p<0.001] whereas danger events predicted incident ‘pure’ anxiety (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.6, p=0.023) and ‘pure’ depression (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7–3.5, p<0.001). Mixed events predicted incident ‘pure’ anxiety (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5–5.7, p=0.002), ‘pure’ depression (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6–3.4, p<0.001) and their co-morbidity (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8–7.0, p<0.001). Conclusions. Our results provide further evidence for differential effects of danger, loss and respectively mixed events on incident anxiety, depression and their co-morbidity. Since most loss events referred to death/separation from significant others, particularly interpersonal loss appears to be highly specific in predicting depression.

Hintergrund. Angst- und depressive Störungen treten sehr häufig auf. Die Komorbidität zwischen beiden Störungsgruppen ist hoch. Quer- und Längsschnittstudien legen nahe, dass vorausgehende Angststörungen das Risiko sekundärer Depression erhöhen, wobei wenig zur Rolle klinischer Charakteristika von Angststörungen in diesem Zusammenhang bekannt ist. Es liegen eine Fülle von Befunden zu Risikofaktoren für Angst- und depressive Störungen vor, die bei genauerer Betrachtung allerdings eine Reihe methodischer Limitationen und offener Forschungsfragen aufweisen (z.B. viele Querschnittserhebungen, klinische Stichproben, keine vergleichenden Analysen der Risikofaktoren von Angststörungen versus Depression). Eine reliable Bewertung der diagnostischen Spezifität vs. Unspezifität von Vulnerabilitäts- und Risikofaktoren von Angst- und depressiven Störungen mit den bislang vorliegenden Ergebnissen schwer möglich ist. Fragestellungen. Es wurden Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden hinsichtlich der Korrelate und Risikofaktoren von reinen Angst- versus reinen depressiven Störungen untersucht. Durch einen Vergleich reiner Angst- mit reinen depressiven Störungen sollte eine reliablere Einschätzung der Spezifität versus Unspezifität der untersuchten Vulnerabilitäts- und Risikofaktoren erfolgen. Der zweite Fokus lag in der Analyse der Rolle von primären Angststörungen und der mit ihnen assoziierten klinischen Merkmale bei der Entwicklung sekundärer Depressionen. Methoden. Die „Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology (EDSP)“- Studie ist eine prospektive, longitudinale Studie. Eine repräsentative Bevölkerungsstichprobe von ursprünglich 3021 Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen (zu Baseline 14-24 Jahre alt) wurde dreimal befragt (eine Baseline-Erhebung sowie zwei Folgebefragungen). Zusätzlich wurden die Eltern der Probanden, die am ersten Follow-Up teilgenommen hatten, in einem Elterninterview direkt interviewt. Von 2548 Probanden lagen diagnostische Informationen von der Basisbefragung und des Follow-Up-Zeitraumes vor. Psychische Störungen wurden mit Hilfe des M-CIDI nach DSM-IV Kriterien erfasst. Darüber hinaus wurden eine Vielzahl potenzieller Risikofaktoren (z.B. Behavioral Inhibition, kritische Lebensereignisse) erhoben. Ergebnisse. Die drei wichtigsten Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit waren: a)Es konnten gemeinsame, aber auch einige spezifische Risikofaktoren für Angststörungen versus depressive Störungen nachgewiesen werden. b)Die Angststörungen stellen eine heterogene Gruppe dar: Auch innerhalb der Gruppe der Angststörungen zeichnen sich spezifische Risikofaktoren für spezifische Angststörungen ab (d.h. es fanden sich Unterschiede zwischen Spezifischer und Sozialer Phobie). c)Es wurden starke Assoziationen zwischen Angststörungen sowie der mit ihnen assoziierten Merkmale (Beeinträchtigung, Komorbidität, Panikattacken) und der Entwicklung sekundärer depressiver Störungen gefunden. Im multiplen Modell, das alle klinischen Merkmale beinhaltete, stellte sich der Faktor schwere Beeinträchtigung als bedeutendster Prädiktor heraus. Diskussion und Schlussfolgerungen. Insgesamt befürworten die Befunde dieser Arbeit eher die sog. Splitters-Perspektive von zumindest teilweise unterschiedlichen Risikofaktoren für Angst- und depressive Störungen. Einer der potentesten Risikofaktoren für depressive Störungen scheinen vorausgehende Angststörungen zu sein, der Schweregrad der Beeinträchtigung durch die Angststörung spielt dabei eine entscheidende Rolle. Eine rechtzeitige, effektive Behandlung dieser Angststörungen könnte eine sehr erfolgversprechende Strategie in der Prävention depressiver Störungen sein. Der Beeinträchtigungsgrad durch die Angststörung kann dabei zur Identifizierung von sog. Hoch-Risiko-Personen genutzt werden. / Background. Anxiety disorders and depression are frequent mental disorders; comorbidity is high. Although cross-sectional and longitudinal studies suggest that anxiety disorders increase the risk of subsequent depression, little is known about the role of clinical characteristics of anxiety disorder in this association. Furthermore, there are a lot of studies investigating risk factors of anxiety disorders and depression. Most of these studies, however, have some substantial limitations (e.g., cross-sectional design, clinical samples, lack of analyses comparing risk factors of anxiety disorders versus depression) preventing a reliable assessment of the specificity of vulnerability and risk factors for anxiety disorders and depression. Aims. The first aim of the study was to examine common and specific correlates and risk factors of pure anxiety disorders versus pure depression. The second aim was to analyse the association between anxiety disorders and subsequent depression and the role of clinical characteristics of anxiety disorders in this associations. Methods. The data are from the Munich Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology (EDSP) study. The EDSP study is a 4-year prospective-longitudinal community study, which includes both baseline and follow-up data on 2548 adolescents and young adults 14 to 24 years of age at baseline. Parents of those probands participated at the first follow-up of the study were also interviewed. DSM-IV diagnoses were made using the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). A range of risk factors were assessed (e.g., behavioral inhibition, life events). Results. There were both common and specific risk factors of anxiety disorders and depression. Furthermore, specific risk factors for specific anxiety disorders could be identified (i.e. different risk factors of specific phobia versus social phobia were found). Anxiety disorders and their clinical characteristics (impairment, comorbidity, panic attacks) were significantly associated with the development of subsequent depression. In the final model, which included all clinical characteristics, severe impairment remained the only clinical feature that was an independent predictor of subsequent depression. Discussion and conclusions. The findings suggest that there are specific risk factors of anxiety disorders and depression. Anxiety disorders are a very powerful risk factor for subsequent depression whereas severe impairment seems to play a major role in this association. Effective treatment of anxiety disorders, specifically those associated with extreme disability, might be important for targeted primary prevention of depression. The degree of impairment of anxiety disorders could be used for the identification of individuals at highest risk for onset of depression.

Background: Whereas the role of externalizing disorders is relatively well established in predicting the onset of cannabis use (CU) or cannabis use disorder (CUD), the status of anxiety and mood disorders in predicting CU and CUD remains controversial. Objective: (1) To examine cross-sectional and prospective associations of CU and CUD with a range of mental disorders and whether anxiety and mood disorders are associated with CU/CUD after adjusting for externalizing disorders. Methods: N = 1395 community subjects aged 14–17 at baseline were followed-up at three waves prospectively over 10 years. Substance use, substance disorders and mental disorders were assessed using the DSM-IV/M-CIDI. Results: (1) The baseline prevalence rates where 19.3% at t0 for CU and 2.6% for CUD. Cumulative incidence rates at t3 were 54.3% for CU and 13.7% for CUD. (2) In cross-sectional and prospective analyses other substance use disorders, mood and anxiety disorders were associated with CU and CUD. (3) Associations of panic-anxiety with CU and of depressive and bipolar disorders with CU and CUD were significant after controlling for externalizing disorders. Conclusion: A range of psychopathological conditions, including depressive, bipolar and less consistently anxiety disorders as well as the degree of their comorbidity are significantly associated with incident CU and progression to CUD, even when controlling for externalising disorders. A better understanding of this complex interplay may result in better aetiological models and intervention strategies.