<p><font face="Times New Roman"> <p align="left">This study examines the legal and policy objectives of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) with specific reference to international standards and the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). The study sets out the history and development of the TBT Agreement and the relationship between the TBT Agreement and selected WTO Agreements. The study also explores the application and interpretation of the TBT Agreement under the WTO dispute settlement system. More importantly, the study addresses the legal, policy and practical implications of the TBT Agreement for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in Africa. A central argument put forward in this study is that, albeit international standards have been recognised as an important tool for LDCs in Africa to gain access to foreign markets, there is no significant &lsquo / political will&rsquo / and commitment from the key players in standardisation work, that is, the national governments, the private sector and the ISO. At the same time, some developed and developing countries tend to use their influence and involvement in the activities of the ISO as a means of promoting the use and adoption of their homegrown standards. The study proposes, among others, that a more participatory approach which encompasses representatives from consumer groups, the private sector and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) from these LDCs in Africa, should be adopted.</p> </font></p>

Thesis (MBA)--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / Although Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are not a new phenomenon, they have gained international prominence since 2005 due to their rapid and much publicised growth, as well as government ownership. The objective of this study is to investigate SWFs from the perspective of developing countries and to compare the developing country experience of SWF investment with that of the developed economies of the West. The question that this research report aims to address is whether SWF investment behaviour is more aggressive in developing economies than in advanced economies by being more likely to invest in sensitive sectors of, and to take significant stakes in companies within these sectors in, developing economies? Before this analysis is made, a comprehensive literature study is done consisting of two parts. The first provides an overview of the reasons behind the rise of SWFs and the West‘s discomfort with the phenomenon, focussing on the emergence of state capitalism as a competing socio-political model to free-market democracy. The second part of the literature review gives a broad overview of what constitutes a SWF, its main characteristics and what concerns about SWFs have transpired to date. The researcher uses a narrow definition to differentiate SWFs from other sovereign investor classes, and defines a SWF as a fund: i) owned directly by a sovereign government; ii) managed independently of other state financial institutions; iii) that does not have predominant explicit pension obligations; iv) that invests in a diverse set of financial asset classes in pursuit of commercial returns; and, v) that has made a significant proportion of its publicly-reported investments internationally. The concerns raised in the literature about SWFs as well as the response from the international community and individual recipient countries to these concerns are discussed. In particular, the researcher focuses on the fears expressed by recipient countries that SWFs may invest for non-commercial reasons. To answer the questions raised about SWFs, the researcher assesses the behaviours displayed by these funds by means of an analysis of the transnational transaction data contained in the SWF Institute‘s SWF Transaction Database for the period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2009. The research results show that SWFs do not appear to target sensitive industries in developing economies more than they would in advanced economies, but it appears that they are willing to gain greater influence and control of the running of the organisations in which they invest if those organisations are based in the developing world.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Mississippi State University. Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work. / Title from title screen. Includes bibliographical references.

Magister Legum - LLM / This study examines the legal and policy objectives of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) with specific reference to international standards and the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). The study sets out the history and development of the TBT Agreement and the relationship between the TBT Agreement and selected WTO Agreements. The study also explores the application and interpretation of the TBT Agreement under the WTO dispute settlement system. More importantly, the study addresses the legal, policy and practical implications of the TBT Agreement for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in Africa. A central argument put forward in this study is that, albeit international standards have been recognised as an important tool for LDCs in Africa to gain access to foreign markets, there is no significant ‘political will’ and commitment from the key players in standardisation work, that is, the national governments, the private sector and the ISO. At the same time, some developed and developing countries tend to use their influence and involvement in the activities of the ISO as a means of promoting the use and adoption of their homegrown standards. The study proposes, among others, that a more participatory approach which encompasses representatives from consumer groups, the private sector and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) from these LDCs in Africa, should be adopted

The ever-changing industrial processes which are becoming more globalised as well as the merging of markets in different economies, led to an increased focus on the health and safety of workers in the industries and the mining sector over the past decades. Occupational exposure limits (OELs) have been used for more than half a century as a risk management tool for the prevention of work-related illnesses which may arise from the exposure to a wide variety of hazardous chemical substances in the working environment. Aim: The aim of this study is to analyse comparatively occupational exposure limits (OELs) of hazardous chemical substances from selected groups contained in the Hazardous Chemical Substance Regulations (HCSR) and the Mine Health and Safety Regulations (MHSR) with those of selected developed countries and organisations. Method: The two lists of OELs from South Africa – HCSR and MHSR – were compared with 11 different developed countries and/or organisations namely: Canada (British Colombia), United Kingdom (Health and Safety Executive, HSE), Australia (National Occupational Health and Safety Commission, NOHSC), New Zealand (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment), Japan (Japan Society for Occupational Health, JSOH), Finland (Ministry of Social Affairs and Health), Germany (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft-DFG), Sweden (Swedish Work Environment Authority) and United States of America (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, ACGIH, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH). The selection of these countries and organisations was done on the basis of their dominance in the literature as well as the availability of the lists containing OELs. The OELs from each country and/or organisation, depending on the nature and characteristics of the said element and/or compound, were categorised into one of four groups, namely: pesticides, metals, dusts and fibres. The geometric means of each country and/or organisation were calculated from the ratios of each list by using the HCSR and MHSR as the denominator respectively. Results: It became evident that South Africa performed poorly when compared to other countries and/or organisations, indicated in this study. OSHA overall had the highest set OELs, in five out of the six comparisons that could be made, thus being less stringent than South Africa’s. Countries and organisations such as Sweden, Japan and Finland have the lowest overall set OELs for the different groups respectively. Conclusion: South African OELs legislated by both the HCSR and MHSR, are overall higher (less stringent) when compared to those of developed countries and/or organisations. The less stringent nature of South African OELs may be attributed to infrequent rate at which they are updated. The failure to incorporate recent scientific knowledge into OELs may impact on the health of workers. South Africa should follow international best practice and increase the frequency at which OELs are updated. Recommendations: The effectiveness of having two sets of OELs within a country; each applicable to its own industry should be investigated. Attention with regards to the groups lacking attention, i.e. fibres and pesticides should be given priority when revised. Although the other groups should not be disregarded. Duplicate OELs identified in the HCSR should be removed. To prevent duplicate OELs from being established it would be prudent to utilise CAS numbers when referring to substances in addition to their common and chemical names, thus this supports the recommendations made in an earlier study. / MSc (Occupational Hygiene), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

The ever-changing industrial processes which are becoming more globalised as well as the merging of markets in different economies, led to an increased focus on the health and safety of workers in the industries and the mining sector over the past decades. Occupational exposure limits (OELs) have been used for more than half a century as a risk management tool for the prevention of work-related illnesses which may arise from the exposure to a wide variety of hazardous chemical substances in the working environment. Aim: The aim of this study is to analyse comparatively occupational exposure limits (OELs) of hazardous chemical substances from selected groups contained in the Hazardous Chemical Substance Regulations (HCSR) and the Mine Health and Safety Regulations (MHSR) with those of selected developed countries and organisations. Method: The two lists of OELs from South Africa – HCSR and MHSR – were compared with 11 different developed countries and/or organisations namely: Canada (British Colombia), United Kingdom (Health and Safety Executive, HSE), Australia (National Occupational Health and Safety Commission, NOHSC), New Zealand (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment), Japan (Japan Society for Occupational Health, JSOH), Finland (Ministry of Social Affairs and Health), Germany (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft-DFG), Sweden (Swedish Work Environment Authority) and United States of America (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, ACGIH, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH). The selection of these countries and organisations was done on the basis of their dominance in the literature as well as the availability of the lists containing OELs. The OELs from each country and/or organisation, depending on the nature and characteristics of the said element and/or compound, were categorised into one of four groups, namely: pesticides, metals, dusts and fibres. The geometric means of each country and/or organisation were calculated from the ratios of each list by using the HCSR and MHSR as the denominator respectively. Results: It became evident that South Africa performed poorly when compared to other countries and/or organisations, indicated in this study. OSHA overall had the highest set OELs, in five out of the six comparisons that could be made, thus being less stringent than South Africa’s. Countries and organisations such as Sweden, Japan and Finland have the lowest overall set OELs for the different groups respectively. Conclusion: South African OELs legislated by both the HCSR and MHSR, are overall higher (less stringent) when compared to those of developed countries and/or organisations. The less stringent nature of South African OELs may be attributed to infrequent rate at which they are updated. The failure to incorporate recent scientific knowledge into OELs may impact on the health of workers. South Africa should follow international best practice and increase the frequency at which OELs are updated. Recommendations: The effectiveness of having two sets of OELs within a country; each applicable to its own industry should be investigated. Attention with regards to the groups lacking attention, i.e. fibres and pesticides should be given priority when revised. Although the other groups should not be disregarded. Duplicate OELs identified in the HCSR should be removed. To prevent duplicate OELs from being established it would be prudent to utilise CAS numbers when referring to substances in addition to their common and chemical names, thus this supports the recommendations made in an earlier study. / MSc (Occupational Hygiene), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

This paper uses the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data of approximately 200,000 surveys conducted on industry experts and general population to examine factors that have a significant impact on high growth Total Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA), with a focus on developed countries with GDP per capita of USD 20,000 or above. The results suggest that expert opinion has a significant positive correlation with high growth TEA in developed countries, while only the public sentiment has a meaningful relationship with high growth TEA in developing countries. Among the specific categories of the survey, access to funding and government regulations and support had the largest impact.

<p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>The desire for development in less privileged countries like Uganda has created the need for the privileged countries like Sweden to embark on external knowledge transfer through different projects, as one of the objectives to achieve development. However, some factors tend to limit the success of this external knowledge transfer process.<strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this research is to find out the factors that lead to the barriers and limitations of knowledge transfer in development projects. Since there are differences in objectives between nonprofit and profit making projects, the research is also aimed at highlighting the extent to which the affecting factors hinder the achievement of objectives and goals. <strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative methods were used in this research. Telephone interviews were conducted after sending questionnaires to four respondents from different organizations that were actively involved in the projects. In order to have balanced results, two respondents each from Uganda and Sweden were interviewed. Trustworthiness and ethical issues were put into consideration while conducting the interviews, in a bid to create a desirable atmosphere for conducting the study.<strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Result: </strong>External knowledge transfer is affected by factors like culture, individual factors, and knowledge management factors. Apart from the mentioned factors, research found that instead of organizational factors that would affect profit making projects to a greater extent, factors like the political will, ownership and local needs are the ones that affect development projects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The factors that affect the external knowledge transfer process are to a greater extent human, and are controllable. In development projects, the recipient country should identify the needs that would initiate the external knowledge transfer process. Most of the affecting factors would be controlled through building of relationships and strong ties, local ownership, and political considerations. All this put into consideration, external knowledge transfer between developed and developing countries stand a high chance to succeed.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>

When tourism is growing fast it is important to develop it in a sustainable way which benefits the communities involved as much as possible. Homestay tourism can benefit local communities such as mass tourism has been widely criticized for failing to do. Homestay has shown to be successful as a tool for building sustainable tourism and contributing to locals involved in other countries. The concept has given hosts an opportunity to gain from their local resources. This gives the resources importance thereby locals preserve them. Although, there is a lack of studies on how the homestay concept can contribute to sustainable tourism development and how the concept is implemented in the Philippines. The aim with the research is to explore impacts of the homestay concept in sustainable tourism development through following perspectives: assess the social and economic impacts of having a homestay, identify motivational factors behind local peoples' decisions to put up a homestay, explore further ways of developing homestays in a developing country with focus on the central part of The Philippines. In the research, several challanges for implementing the homestay concept in a sustainable way have been identified and given suggestions on. The biggest challenge identified is that hosts do not have the skills and knowledge for the purpose of the homestay concept. The study argue that this challenge could be overcome by host-training to a large extent. This host-training should preferably be facilitated by the government, which in the Philippines has internal challenges such as reversed hierarchy and low commitment to overcome before being able to facilitate the homestays for a more sustainable tourism development.

This work focuses on globalization, more closely on the economic aspects of this process. Small countries, especially developing ones are in the spotlight, as they face unique challenges that have been addressed by the international community for decades at least. The success rate of the intervention is very questionable and leaves room for improvement, which may be a platform to elevate millions out of poverty, solve crippling problems, provide access to technology and improve the global economic system. The uniting hypothesis is that that small developing nations are functioning in a hostile environment when it comes to trade, intellectual property protection and debt, which makes it extremely difficult for them to globalize competitively. Economic history, trade and technology are the main filters of this research. Conventional economic theory like market fundamentalism, and international trade theories will be discussed. A holistic literature review, will try to depict the many sides of the argument. The data used will be from the World Competitiveness Report, World Bank's World Development Indicators, other World Bank data, apropriatiate statistical offices. A case study is implemented to conclude the thesis and in this case to evaluate the hypothesis as only partly true, since small...